CLEVER CHEK TD-4209 BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM, MODEL TD-4209, TD-4222, TD-4225
Applicant
Taidoc Technology Corporation
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Oct 26, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Clever Chek TD-4209/ Clever Chek TD-4222/ Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood glucose monitoring system is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus. The alternative site testing in the Clever Chek TD-4209/ Clever Chek TD-4222/ Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood glucose monitoring system can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions. Professionals may use the Clever Chek TD-4209/ Clever Chek TD-4222 Blood/ Clever Chek TD-4225 glucose monitoring system to test neonatal blood from the heel, but may not be used in screening for neonatal hypoqlycemia.
Device Story
System consists of blood glucose meter, test strips, control solutions, and lancet device. User inserts test strip into meter; applies capillary whole blood sample to strip chamber. Glucose oxidase enzyme on strip reacts with glucose; generates electrical current proportional to glucose concentration. Meter measures current via amperometry; displays quantitative glucose result. Used by patients at home or healthcare professionals in clinical settings. Results aid in monitoring diabetes control programs. System includes 'check & code' strip for meter verification. Alternative site testing (palm, forearm, upper-arm, calf, thigh) permitted only during steady-state conditions. Neonatal testing performed by professionals using heel-stick samples.
Clinical Evidence
Performance evaluated in laboratory and clinical settings by healthcare professionals and lay users. Studies demonstrated system performance meets intended use requirements. No specific sensitivity/specificity metrics provided in summary.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical meter with dry reagent biosensor test strips. Quantitative measurement based on current proportional to glucose concentration. Supports capillary and neonatal blood samples. Standalone device.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative glucose measurement in fresh capillary whole blood (finger/alternative sites) and neonatal heel blood. For use by people with diabetes mellitus (home) and healthcare professionals (clinical settings) to monitor diabetes control. Alternative site testing restricted to steady-state glucose conditions. Not for diabetes diagnosis/screening or neonatal hypoglycemia screening.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Accu-Chek Aviva Blood Glucose Test System (k060620)
Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System (k062235)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k071493
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Measurand:
Whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative amperometric assay
E. Applicant:
TaiDoc Technology Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Clever Chek TD-4209, Clever Chek TD-4222, Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose Test System
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
NBW - System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over the Counter
CGA - Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
4. Panel:
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus.
{1}
The alternative site testing in the Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions.
Professionals may use the Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System to test neonatal blood from the heel, but may not be used in screening for neonatal hypoglycemia.
## 3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For over-the-counter (OTC) use
The alternative site testing in the Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions.
Alternative site testing (AST) should ONLY be used in the following intervals:
- In a pre-meal or fasting state (more than 2 hours since the last meal)
- Two hours or more after taking insulin
- Two hours or more after exercise
Warnings in the labeling include the following statements:
- Inaccurate results may occur in severely hypotensive individuals or patients in shock
- Inaccurate low results may occur for individuals experiencing a hyperglycemic-hyperosmolar state, with or without ketosis
- Critically ill patients should not be tested with glucose meters
## 4. Special instrument requirements:
Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Meters
## I. Device Description:
The Clever Chek TD-4209, Clever Chek TD-4222 and Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems each consist of four main products: the blood glucose meter, test strips (including the "check & code" strip), control solutions (2 levels of Taidoc control solution – cleared under k012430), and the lancet device (cleared under k833344). These products have been designed and tested to work together as a system to produce accurate blood glucose test results. The sponsor recommends that only Taidoc test strips and control solutions specified in the manual be used with the blood glucose meters. The performance of the test strips is verified by the control solutions. The check & code strip verifies the status of the meter.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
### 1. Predicate device name(s):
Accu-Chek Aviva Blood Glucose Test System; Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
{2}
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): k060620; k062235
3. Comparison with predicate:
Similarities
| Item | Device | Predicate (Accu-chek Aviva) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Intended Use | Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for use in the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood from the finger and the following alternative sites: the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf and the thigh. It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or screening for diabetes mellitus. The alternative site testing in the Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System can be used only during steady-state blood glucose conditions. Professionals may use the Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System to test neonatal blood from the heel, but may not be used in screening for neonatal hypoglycemia. | The ACCU-CHEK Aviva Test Strips are used with the ACCU-CHEK Aviva meter. The ACCU-CHEK Aviva test system is designed to quantitatively measure the concentration of glucose for monitoring glucose in the home or in health care facilities. Testing sites include traditional fingertip site along with palm, forearm, upper arm, thigh, and calf. Professionals may use the test strips to test capillary, venous, arterial, and neonatal blood; home use is limited to capillary whole blood testing. |
| Detection method | Amperometry | Amperometry |
| Test Strip calibration | Code strip | Code key |
Differences
| Item | Device | Predicate (Accu-chek Aviva) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test range | 20 – 600 mg/dL | 10 – 600 mg/dL |
| Enzyme | Glucose oxidase | Glucose dehydrogenase |
| Sample volume (μl) | 0.7 μl | 0.6 μl |
| Storage condition | 39.2°F-104°F/4°C-40°C Below 85% RH | 36°F-90°F/2°C-32°C |
| Coding | Code strip | Code strip |
| Reaction time | 7 | 5 |
| Hematocrit | 20-60% | 20-70% |
{3}
The sponsor also compared the Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System cleared under k062235. The sponsor claims that the only difference is the test strip, TD-4306 in the new device to TD-4302 cleared under k062235.
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI EP5-A2: Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods: Second Edition
- CLSI EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline
- CLSI EP9-A: Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline
- ISO 15197: In vitro diagnostic test systems - Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus
- ISO 14971: Medical Devices – Application of risk management to medical devices
## L. Test Principle:
Once a whole blood sample is applied to the sample chamber of the test strip, the process of glucose measurement commences. Glucose measurement is based on electrical potential caused by the reaction of glucose with the reagents contained on the strip’s electrodes. The glucose in the sample is oxidized by the enzyme glucose oxidase, producing gluconic acid. The electrical current resulting from this enzymatic reaction is measured and converted to glucose concentration by the meter. The magnitude of the current is proportional to the concentration of glucose in the sample.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor evaluated within-day precision of the device using whole blood samples spiked with five different glucose concentrations, three different reagent lots, and 10 different TD-4209 glucose meters. Each combination of multivariate factors was evaluated using 10 measurements. Day-to-day precision was evaluated using three glucose control solutions with concentration levels, low, normal, and high. The day-to-day precision was evaluated over a ten-day period using three different reagent lots and ten TD-4224 glucose meters. The summary of test results is presented below.
{4}
5
Repeatability (within-day precision)
| Sample level (mg/dL) | No. of Assay | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 30-50 | 100 | 41.8 | 2.03 | 4.85 |
| 51-110 | 100 | 91.1 | 2.76 | 3.03 |
| 111-150 | 100 | 143.0 | 3.53 | 2.47 |
| 151-250 | 100 | 239.6 | 6.65 | 2.77 |
| 251-400 | 100 | 364.6 | 6.48 | 1.78 |
Reproducibility (day-to-day precision)
| Control Samples | No. of Assays | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low | 100 | 75.9 | 3.35 | 4.41 |
| Medium | 100 | 127.9 | 5.59 | 4.37 |
| High | 100 | 315.1 | 11.93 | 3.79 |
The test strip TD-4306 provided in the new device is also intended to measure blood glucose levels in neonates, which is a high risk population. To cover the neonate glucose range, with-in day precision using whole blood samples was evaluated for glucose levels at the lower range from 20 to 100 mg/dL prepared with dextrose to obtain five different glucose concentrations. Tests were done for three different reagent lots, and 10 different TD-4209 glucose meters. Results are summarized in the table below. The sponsor's acceptance criterion is CV less than 5%, however, at glucose level 20-25 mg/dL, the CV is 9.63%.
| Sample level (mg/dL) | No. of Assays | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 20-25 | 100 | 27.6 | 2.65 | 9.63 |
| 30-40 | 100 | 41.8 | 2.03 | 4.85 |
| 50-60 | 100 | 56.7 | 2.74 | 4.83 |
| 70-80 | 100 | 81.4 | 2.95 | 3.62 |
| 90-100 | 100 | 91.1 | 2.76 | 3.03 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The sponsor used nine spiked whole blood samples in the range (20-600 mg/dL) as reference values and compared with the values generated from YSI-2300 analyzer. A regression analysis showed linearity of Clever Chek TD-4209, Clever Chek TD-4222, and Clever Chek TD-4225 blood glucose monitoring systems with correlation coefficients (R²) of 0.998, 0.999, and 0.999, and with regression equations y = 0.96X + 6.5, y = 0.97X + 4.32, and y = 0.96X + 7.754, respectively.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): The sponsor states that formulation for the control solution does not change from the predicate device previously cleared under k012430. However, the
{5}
sponsor provided data to confirm the stability of both strips and control solutions for 90-day period recommended in the package insert. The sponsor included the protocols for strip calibration procedure in the labeling. The sponsor also provided the traceability and value assignment procedure for control solutions used in this device. The sponsor conducted studies to evaluate the in-use stability of the TD-4209 glucose monitoring system at the assigned temperature range of $50^{\circ}\mathrm{F} - 104^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ ( $10^{\circ}\mathrm{C} - 40^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ ). Using control solutions at low, medium and high concentration tested at $50^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ and $104^{\circ}\mathrm{F}$ compared with room temperature, results showed $<2\%$ CV for all glucose concentrations and met the acceptability criterion ( $<5\%$ CV).
# d. Detection limit:
The sponsor has not conducted studies to determine the limit of detection (LOD), however, as supported by linearity studies, the sponsor has established the measuring range of $20 - 600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ for the Clever Chek TD-4209, Clever Chek TD-4222, and Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.
# e. Analytical specificity:
The sponsor tested the following exogenous and endogenous substances for interference. Two glucose levels (75-85 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL) were tested. Interferents and the levels tested were, Acetaminophen (0-20 mg/dL), Ascorbic acid (0-3 mg/dL), Dopamine (0-12.25 mg/dL), Uric acid (0-20 mg/dL), Triglycerides (0-2000 mg/dL), and Bilirubin (0-20 mg/dL). Based on acceptance criterion of a mean glucose difference of $\pm 10\%$ of the glucose values obtained in the absence of interfering substances, the following conclusions were drawn with regard to interfering substances.
| Substance | Test Concentration (mg/dL) | No Interference (mg/dL) | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Low Glucose level (75-85) | High Glucose level (300) |
| Acetaminophen | 20 | 5 | 5 |
| Ascorbic Acid | 3 | 3* | 3* |
| Dopamine | 13 | 2 | 2 |
| Methyl-Dopa | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.75 |
| Bilirubin | 20 | 15 | 15 |
| Uric acid | 20 | 10 | 15 |
| Triglycerides | 2000 | 2000* | 2000* |
* No interference up to test concentration
The sponsor evaluated the effect of hematocrit levels $20 - 70\%$ on whole blood samples spiked with six hematocrit levels for glucose values (7 levels) distributed within the measuring range $(23 - 486\mathrm{mg / dL})$ of the device. The values generated were compared with the glucose values from YSI-2300 analyzer. The regression analysis for each hematocrit level is summarized in the table below. Based on the regression analysis and also the sponsor's
{6}
acceptability criterion of $\pm 15\mathrm{mg/dL}$ deviation for glucose concentrations of $<75\mathrm{mg/dL}$ and $\pm 20\%$ deviation for glucose concentration of $\geq 75\mathrm{mg/dL}$, the sponsor claimed results generated by the device is comparable to the values of YSI-2300 instrument at hematocrit levels between $20-60\%$.
| Hematocrit % | Slope and Y-intercept | R |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20 | y= 1.029x+6.912 | 0.999 |
| 30 | y= 1.013x+2.789 | 0.995 |
| 38 | y= 0.979x+0.500 | 0.998 |
| 45 | y= 1.050x-4.723 | 0.999 |
| 60 | y= 0.861x+6.369 | 0.999 |
| 70 | y= 0.775x+6.943 | 0.999 |
To determine the impact of hematocrit levels on neonates, the sponsor used 100 neonate samples with hematocrit level varied from 38 to $68\%$. Analysis was done using TD-4306 strip (with Clever Chek TD-4222) and the values were compared with the values generated using YSI-2300 glucose analyzer. Results met the sponsors acceptance criteria of $95\%$ of the individual difference is within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg/dL}$ when glucose concentration less than $75\mathrm{mg/dL}$ and is within $\pm 20\%$ when glucose concentration $\geq 75\mathrm{mg/dL}$.
An altitude study was performed with whole blood samples from 20 volunteers (glucose range: 68-157 mg/dL) and 3 control solutions at low, medium and high concentrations. All the controls met the sponsors acceptability criterion of CV<5% for the control solutions measured at sea level and at an altitude of 10,744 feet. The data submitted support use of the device up to 10,744 feet.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The sponsor demonstrated that the Clever Chek TD-4209/TD-4222/TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System for finger stick is equivalent to a standard reference method (YSI-2300). Samples from 156 volunteers with glucose concentrations distributed over the range of $21 - 568\mathrm{mg/dL}$ were evaluated at three different laboratory sites. Percent distribution of the samples corresponding to the glucose concentration ranged as follows: $20 - 50\mathrm{mg/dL} - 10\%$; $51 - 110\mathrm{mg/dL} - 32\%$; $111 - 150\mathrm{mg/dL} - 32\%$; $151 - 250\mathrm{mg/dL} - 10\%$; $251 - 400\mathrm{mg/dL} - 10\%$; and $401 - 600\mathrm{mg/dL} - 6\%$. To obtain the blood glucose concentrations less than 40 and more than $400\mathrm{mg/dL}$, a pooled capillary whole blood specimen was spiked with the desired glucose levels. Based on data analysis, device met the minimum system accuracy requirement established according to the ISO 15197 guidelines, which is $95\%$ of the
{7}
individual difference is within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ when glucose concentration less than $75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and is within $\pm 20\%$ when glucose concentration $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . In comparison with YSI-2300, all three laboratory sites showed regression correlation $(\mathbb{R}^2)$ values ranging between 0.981-0.992. Results for all three sites combined and for each Clever Chek TD-4209/TD-4222/TD-4225 meter using strip TD-4306 are given below.
Clever Chek TD-4209/TD-4222/TD-4225 meters vs. YSI-2300 reference method
| Total (N=156) | TD-4209 vs. YSI-2300 | TD-4222 vs. YSI-2300 | TD-4225 vs. YSI-2300 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| slope | 0.964 | 0.997 | 0.984 |
| y=intercept | 2.104 | 2.528 | 2.994 |
| R square | 0.990 | 0.987 | 0.989 |
To demonstrate the accuracy of the device for glucose monitoring in neonates by healthcare professionals, the sponsor conducted an accuracy study using 100neonatal whole blood samples drawn from the heel. The age of the newborns was from 1-90 days (60% is less than 7 days) and hematocrit level varied from 38 to 68%. Analysis was done using TD-4306 strip (with Clever Chek TD-4222) and the values were compared with the values generated using YSI-2300 glucose analyzer and the Accu-chek Aviva glucose meter. Data was presented in compliance with ISO 15197 standard and Error Grid Analysis. Results generated given below meets the ISO 15197 acceptance criteria of 95% (68/71) of the individual difference is within $\pm 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ when glucose concentration less than $75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and is within $\pm 20\%$ when glucose concentration $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . Regression analysis conducted against YSI-2300 values generated equation $y = 0.8902x + 6.8212$ with correlation coefficient of 0.9378 ( $n = 100$ ).
Difference distribution for glucose concentration $< 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Difference within ±5mg/dL | 40% | 19/48 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Difference within ±10mg/dL | 90% | 43/48 |
| Difference within ±15mg/dL | 98% | 47/48 |
Difference distribution for glucose concentration $\geq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$
| Difference within ±5 % | 15% | 8/52 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Difference within ±10 % | 60% | 31/52 |
| Difference within ±15 % | 87% | 45/52 |
| Difference within ±20 % | 96% | 50/52 |
The sponsor conducted a consumer study to evaluate the accuracy of glucose measurement between the lay-user and the healthcare professionals. Using
{8}
129 volunteer samples (Glucose range: 41 – 420 mg/dL) at three distribution sites, they showed the device meets their acceptability criteria as well as ISO-15197 criteria with 95% of individual differences within ±15 mg/dL deviation for glucose concentration of <75 mg/dL and ±20% deviation for glucose concentration of ≥75 mg/dL.
The sponsor conducted the alternative site testing (AST) using the palm, the forearm, the upper arm, the calf, and the thigh in comparison to data obtained using finger. A total of 129 samples were tested at three sites. The results generated demonstrated the device meets the sponsor’s acceptance criteria (95% of individual differences fell within ±15 mg/dL deviation for glucose concentration of <75 mg/dL and ±20% deviation for glucose concentration of ≥75 mg/dL) as well as the ISO-15197 acceptance criteria for accuracy. Regression analysis of the values generated also shown below indicated correlation between the finger and the alternative sites.
| Comparison | N | Range (mg/dL) | Slope and Y-intercept | R² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Palm vs. finger | 100 | 42-329 | Y= 1.022x-2.524 | 0.983 |
| Forearm vs. finger | 100 | 45-311 | Y=0.982x+2.891 | 0.983 |
| Upper arm vs. finger | 100 | 45-311 | Y=0.980x+1.550 | 0.979 |
| Calf vs. finger | 100 | 42-329 | Y=0.993x+0.389 | 0.979 |
| Thigh vs. finger | 100 | 45-326 | Y=0.972x+4.344 | 0.979 |
b. Matrix comparison:
See above: Method comparison with predicate device
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not Applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
Not Applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not Applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor included the following Expected Values for normal glucose levels in their strip labeling:
| Status | Plasma glucose range for people without diabetes (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Before meals | 70-110 |
| 2 hours after meals | <120 |
{9}
Source: American Diabetic Association Clinical Practice Recommendations 2003
## N. Instrument Name:
Clever Chek TD-4209/Clever Chek TD-4222/Clever Chek TD-4225 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
## O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for additional readings.
2. Software:
FDA reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types in k041107. See k041107 for more information.
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the finger, the palm, the forearm, the upper-arm, the calf, and the thigh only. For neonates, healthcare professionals may use this device for glucose testing from whole blood from the heel. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip, there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
A code strip is provided with each batch of test strips to calibrate the meter for that batch. No further calibrations are required of the user.
6. Quality Control:
Glucose control solutions at two different concentrations to be run with this device are included in the device. When a test strip is inserted into the meter, the control mode can be activated. This prevents control results from being stored in the internal memory. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. The user is referred to the troubleshooting section of the owner’s manual if control results fall outside these ranges.
## P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
## Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
## R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.