DIAGNOSTIC HYBRIDS' D3 DFA HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS IDENTIFICATION AND TYPING KIT, MODEL 01-090000
K070265 · Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. · GQN · Oct 24, 2007 · Microbiology
Device Facts
Record ID
K070265
Device Name
DIAGNOSTIC HYBRIDS' D3 DFA HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS IDENTIFICATION AND TYPING KIT, MODEL 01-090000
Applicant
Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc.
Product Code
GQN · Microbiology
Decision Date
Oct 24, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3305
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc. D3 DFA Herpes Simplex Virus Identification and Typing Kit is intended for use in the qualitative detection and typing of human herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) in cell cultures by immunofluorescence using fluoresceinated monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Negative results do not rule out an infection and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment or other management decisions. Performance using direct specimen testing has not been evaluated.
Device Story
Kit uses direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing to identify HSV-1 and HSV-2 in cell cultures; input consists of cell culture monolayers inoculated with clinical specimens (vesicular fluid, swabs, or lesions). Reagents contain fluorescein-labeled murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) targeting HSV-1 glycoproteins (gG1) and HSV-2 recombinant glycoprotein C. Procedure involves fixing monolayers in acetone, applying DFA reagents, washing, and mounting. Clinicians use a fluorescence microscope (FITC filter, 490nm excitation/520nm emission) to visualize results; infected cells exhibit bright apple-green fluorescence against a dull red Evan’s Blue counter-stained background. Output is qualitative identification/typing of HSV. Used in clinical laboratories to confirm viral presence following culture amplification; aids in management decisions for patients with suspected HSV infection.
Clinical Evidence
Performance evaluated via method comparison study of 398 prospectively collected clinical specimens across three laboratory sites. Compared against a currently marketed HSV identification kit. Overall PPA for HSV-1 was 98.6% (92.7-100% CI) and for HSV-2 was 100% (95.3-100% CI). Overall NPA for HSV-1 was 100% (98.9-100% CI) and for HSV-2 was 99.7% (98.3-100% CI). Analytical specificity testing confirmed no cross-reactivity with 59 virus strains, 17 host cell types, 27 bacterial cultures, yeast, or protozoa.
Technological Characteristics
In vitro diagnostic kit containing fluorescein-labeled murine monoclonal antibodies (HSV-1 and HSV-2 specific), Evan's Blue counterstain, PBS, and mounting fluid. Employs direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) principle. Requires fluorescence microscope (100-400X magnification). Reagents contain 0.1% sodium azide as preservative. Non-automated, manual staining procedure.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection and typing of HSV-1 and HSV-2 in cell cultures via immunofluorescence. For use in patients suspected of HSV infection (e.g., oral-facial, genital, eye, cutaneous lesions). Not for direct specimen testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Herpes simplex virus serological assays are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in various serological tests to identify antibodies to herpes simplex virus in serum. Additionally, some of the assays consist of herpes simplex virus antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent assays) used to identify herpes simplex virus directly from clinical specimens or tissue culture isolates derived from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of diseases caused by herpes simplex viruses and provides epidemiological information on these diseases. Herpes simplex viral infections range from common and mild lesions of the skin and mucous membranes to a severe form of encephalitis (inflammation of the brain). Neonatal herpes virus infections range from a mild infection to a severe generalized disease with a fatal outcome.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is classified as class II (special controls). The special control for the device is FDA's revised guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 Serological Assays.” For availability of the guidance revised document, see § 866.1(e).
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number: K070265
B. Purpose for Submission: Premarket notification 510(k)
C. Measurand: Herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2)
D. Type of Test: Cell culture confirmation, by immunofluorescence using fluoresceinated monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).
E. Applicant: Diagnostic Hybrids, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Proprietary Name: D³ DFA Herpes Simplex Virus Identification and Typing Kit
Common Name: Fluorescent antibody test for ID and typing HSV-1 and HSV-2 from cell culture
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section: 866.3305 Herpes simplex virus serological reagents
2. Classification: Class II
3. Product code: GQN [Antigens, CF (including CF control), herpesvirus hominis, 1, 2]
4. Panel: Microbiology (83)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s): The Diagnostic Hybrids D³ DFA Herpes Simplex Virus Identification and Typing Kit is intended for use in the qualitative detection and typing of human herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) in cell cultures by immunofluorescence using fluoresceinated monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Negative results do not preclude an infection and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment or other management decisions.
Performance using direct specimen testing has not been evaluated.
2. Indication(s) for use: Same as Intended Use.
{1}
3. Special conditions for use statement(s): For prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements: This device requires the use of a fluorescence microscope to read device stained cultures. One should use with the correct filter combination for FITC (excitation peak = 490 nm, emission peak = 520nm).
I. Device Description:
The HSV-1 MAbs were developed using HSV-1(f) cell lysate as immunogen – one has been determined to be directed against HSV-1 glycoprotein C1, the antigen to the other is undetermined. The HSV-2 MAbs were developed using a HSV-2 recombinant glycoprotein G immunogen.
1. HSV-1 DFA Reagent – One dropper bottle containing a blend of two fluorescein labeled murine monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV-1 specific glycoproteins. The HSV-1 MAbs were developed using HSV-1(f) cell lysate as immunogen – one MAb has been determined to be directed against HSV-1 glycoprotein G1 (gG1), the antigen to the other is undetermined. The buffered, stabilized, aqueous solution contains Evan’s Blue as a counter-stain and 0.1% sodium azide as preservative.
2. HSV-2 DFA Reagent – One dropper bottle containing a blend of two fluorescein labeled murine monoclonal antibodies directed against HSV-2 specific glycoproteins. The HSV-2 MAbs were developed using a HSV-2 recombinant glycoprotein C immunogen. The buffered, stabilized, aqueous solution contains Evan’s Blue as a counter-stain and 0.1% sodium azide as preservative.
3. HSV-1/HSV-2 Antigen Control Slides - Individually packaged control slides containing wells with cell culture derived positive and negative control cells. Each slide consists of four wells containing acetone fixed cells; two wells of uninfected cells and one well each of HSV-1 infected cells and HSV-2 infected cells. Each slide is intended to be stained only one time.
4. PBS Concentrate - A 40X concentrate consisting of 4% sodium azide in phosphate buffered saline (after dilution to 1X in water, the concentration of sodium azide in the solution is 0.1%).
5. Mounting Fluid - An aqueous, buffered, stabilized solution of glycerol and 0.1% sodium azide.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): Pathodx® Herpes Typing Kit
2. Predicate K number(s): K904167
Page 2 of 10
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For the qualitative detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) types HSV-1 or HSV-2 in cell cultures by immunofluorescence using fluoresceinated monoclonal antibodies. Negative results do not preclude an infection and should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment or other management decisions. Performance using direct specimen testing has not been evaluated. | Remel PathoDx Herpes Typing Kit is an immunofluorescence test designed for the detection and typing of herpes simplex virus types I and II (HSV-1 and HSV-11) in direct clinical specimens and following growth in tissue culture. Culture confirmation slides and shell vial assays may undergo detection and typing with a bivalent staining procedure. |
| Basic principle | Direct Fluorescent Antibody (DFA) test - Immunofluorescence using fluoresceinated MAbs. | DFA (Direct Fluorescent Antibody) test - Immunofluorescence using fluoresceinated MAbs. |
| Antibody | A blend of two fluorescein labeled murine monoclonal antibodies against HSV-1 and two against HSV-1. Specific glycoproteins with were developed using HSV-1(f) cell lysate as immunogen – one MAb has been determined to be directed against HSV-1 glycoprotein C1; the antigen to the other is undetermined. The HSV-2 MAbs were developed using two fluorescein labeled murine HSV-2 recombinant glycoprotein G immunogens. | The HSV-I antibody is a blend of two monoclonal antibodies which react with polypeptides having 85K and 142K dalton molecular weights. The HSV-II typing reagent contains two monoclonal antibodies, one that recognizes a 79K dalton polypeptide and the other a 41K dalton polypeptide molecule. |
| Instrumentation (required but not provided) | Fluorescence microscope with the correct filter combination for FITC (excitation peak = 490 nm, emission peak = 520 nm). | Fluorescence microscope with the correct filter combination for FITC (excitation peak = 490 nm, emission peak = 520 nm). |
| Sample type | Specimens of vesicular fluid; swabbed areas or lesions contained in transport medium | Specimens of vesicular fluid; swabbed areas or lesions contained in transport medium. |
{3}
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Procedural | Immunofluorescence testing following amplification in cell culture only. | Results are considered presumptive for identification of HSV from direct patient specimens using fluoresceinated monoclonal antibodies. All direct clinical specimens which are negative or have inadequate numbers of cells must be re-evaluated by cell culture. |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable): N/A
L. Test Principle: A suspected specimen is inoculated into tube culture, shell vials or multi-well plates coated containing a monolayer of cells known to be sensitive to HSV. When infected with HSV, a characteristic deterioration of cells, termed cytopathic effect (CPE), can be observed. Tube culture can take several days before CPE is evident. However, the rate of isolation may be enhanced including a decreased time for identification and typing of inoculated specimens by centrifugation in shell vials or multi-well plates. Monolayers are fixed in acetone with a slide(s) prepared from tube culture scrapings or from shell vials or multi-well plates.
The D³ DFA HSV-1 or HSV-2 Reagents are added to separate monolayers. After incubating, the stained cells are washed and, covered with a supplied Mounting Fluid. The fixed monolayers are examined using a fluorescence microscope. The HSV-1 and HSV-2 DFA reagents contain Evan’s Blue as a counter-stain. HSV-1 or HSV-2 infected cells will both stain with a characteristic bright apple-green fluorescence distinguished from the counter-stained uninfected cells by a dull red fluorescence.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
2. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility: Not applicable.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range: Not applicable.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): Not applicable.
d. Detection limit: This testing is not considered necessary during premarket notification process because performance testing has been done using a comparative device in amplified cell culture (cell culture is not part of the review process for this device).
e. Analytical specificity:
{4}
i. Analytical specificity was evaluated by staining cultures infected with a number of ATCC reference HSV-1 and HSV-2 strains and found to react with all of them. The D³ HSV-1 and HSV-2 DFA reagents were tested for cross-reactivity against a wide variety of other microorganisms and cells. No cross-reactivity was observed for 59 virus strains (cultured and processed for staining) or for 17 host culture cell types. Conditions for cross-reactivity testing were achieved by using the D³ HSV-1 or HSV-2 DFA Reagent along with relatively high titers of microorganisms. The DFA Reagents were prepared at 1.5X the concentration that is provided in the kit.
1. Depending on the particular virus, 500 to 715 TCID₅₀ viruses were inoculated into multi-well plate cultures and incubated for 24 hours, processed and stained with the 1.5X DFAs according to the procedure detailed in the product insert. Stained cells were examined at 200x magnification. Cell cultures were stained as confluent monolayers. Bacteria and yeast were cultured, processed as suspensions, then spotted on microscope slides (at CFUs ranging from 6.4×10⁴ to 2.93×10⁷/well in a 10 μL dot, depending on the bacterium), then stained with the 1.5X DFAs according to the procedure in the product insert.
2. Twenty-seven (27) bacterial cultures, one yeast and one protozoan culture were stained and examined for cross-reactivity, including Staphylococcus aureus, a protein-A-producing bacterium. Staining of S. aureus appeared as small points of fluorescence while all other cultures were negative. [Protein A will specifically bind to the Fc portions of conjugated antibodies. Such binding can be distinguished from viral antigen binding on the basis of morphology, i.e., S. aureus-bound fluorescence appears as small (~1 micron diameter), bright dots.]
Page 5 of 10
{5}
Results from previously described cross-reactivity testing for microbiological organisms are listed below:
| Virus Strains Tested for Cross Reactivity with D³ HSV DFA Reagent | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Organism | Strain or Type | Inoculum (TCID50) | Organism | Strain or Type | Inoculum (TCID50) |
| Adenovirus | Type 1 | 715 | Influenza B | Hong Kong | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 3 | 715 | Influenza B | Maryland | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 5 | 715 | Influenza B | Mass | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 6 | 715 | Influenza B | Taiwan | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 7 | 715 | Influenza B | GL | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 8 | 715 | Influenza B | JH-001 isolate | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 10 | 715 | Influenza B | Russia | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 13 | 715 | RSV | Long | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 14 | 715 | RSV | Wash | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 18 | 715 | RSV | 9320 | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 31 | 715 | Parainfluenza 1 | C-35 | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 40 | 715 | Parainfluenza 2 | Greer | 715 |
| Adenovirus | Type 41 | 715 | Parainfluenza 3 | C 243 | 715 |
| Influenza A | Aichi | 715 | Parainfluenza 4a | M-25 | 715 |
| Influenza A | Mal | 715 | Parainfluenza 4b | CH19503 | 715 |
| Influenza A | Hong Kong | 715 | CMV | Towne | 700 |
| Influenza A | Denver | 715 | CMV | Davis | 700 |
| Influenza A | Port Chalmers | 715 | CMV | AD169 | 700 |
| Influenza A | Victoria | 715 | VZV | Webster | 500 |
| Influenza A | New Jersey | 715 | VZV | Allen | 500 |
| Influenza A | PR | 715 | Epstein-Barr | Commercially available slides stained.¹ | |
| Influenza A | WS | 715 | Rubeola | | |
| | | | Mumps | | |
| Echovirus | Types 4, 6, 9, 11, 30, 34 | Commercially available slides stained.¹ | HPV | Types 6, 11 | Commercially available slides stained.¹ |
| Coxsackievirus | Types B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B6 | Commercially available slides stained.¹ | | | |
| Cell Lines Tested for Cross Reactivity with D³ HSV DFA Reagent | |
| --- | --- |
| A-549 | NCI-H292 |
| BGMK | pCMK |
| HEp-2 | pRhMK |
| LLC-MK2 | RhMK II |
| MDCK | pRK |
| MRC-5 | RD |
| MRHF | R-Mix |
| Mv1Lu | Vero & WI-38 |
| Microorganisms Tested for Cross Reactivity with D³ HSV DFA Reagent | |
| --- | --- |
| BACTERIA | CFU TESTED |
| Acinetobacter calcoaceticus | 9.7 x 10⁵ |
| Bordetella bronchiseptica | 1.7 x 10⁵ |
| Bordetella pertussis | 4.6 x 10⁶ |
¹ Test material is from commercially available prepared slides. Each positive well contains approximately 10 to 50% reactive cells.
Page 6 of 10
{6}
| Corynebacterium diphtheriae | 2.5 x 10^6 |
| --- | --- |
| Escherichia coli | 2.6 x 10^5 |
| Gardnerella vaginalis | 5.0 x 10^5 |
| Haemophilis influenzae type A | 9.3 x 10^5 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 6.4 x 10^6 |
| Legionella pneumophila | 6.5 x 10^4 |
| Moraxella cartarrhalis | 6.4 x 10^4 |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | 1.3 x 10^6 |
| Proteus mirabilis | 2.1 x 10^6 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 1.0 x 10^7 |
| Salmonella enteriditis | 2.5 x 10^6 |
| Salmonella typhimurium | 1.7 x 10^6 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 1.0 x 10^7 |
| Streptococcus agalactiae | 9.6 x 10^6 |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | 8.0 x 10^5 |
| Streptococcus pyogenes | 2.9 x 10^7 |
| Acholeplasma laidlawi | ~6 x 10^7 |
| Mycoplasma hominis | ~6 x 10^4 |
| Mycoplasma orale | ~6 x 10^4 |
| Mycoplasma pneumoniae | ~6 x 10^4 |
| Mycoplasma salivarium | ~6 x 10^7 |
| Ureaplasma uralyticum | ~6 x 10^4 |
| Chlamydophila pneumoniae | Commercially available slides stained. 1 |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | Commercially available slides stained. 1 |
| YEAST | |
| Candida glabrata | 8.7 x 10^6 |
| PROTOZOAN | |
| Trichomonas vaginalis | [Commercially available slides stained.] |
f. Assay cut-off: Not-applicable.
3. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device: This study included four hundred and one (401) prospectively collected specimens submitted for Herpes simplex culture. Each specimen was evaluated by the Diagnostic Hybrids D³ DFA Herpes Simplex Virus Identification and Typing Kit (“D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit”) and compared to a currently marketed HSV identification kit (“Comparison Device”). A combination of fresh (154) and frozen (247) specimens were tested. Three specimens from site 3 were not evaluated due to bacterial contamination of the monolayers, leaving 398 for analysis. These studies were conducted at two external laboratory sites located in the mid-west United States and one in-house virology laboratory.
Percent Agreement between the D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit and the Comparison Devices was calculated and tabulated for all the tested specimens,
Page 7 of 10
{7}
and is presented below. The term, “95% CI” refers to 95% Confidence Intervals, which were calculated according to Exact method (Clopper, C. and S. Pearson, Biometrika 26:404-413, 1934).
## Results from Testing of All Specimens:
Total results - D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit and comparison device using various culture methodologies.
| | HSV-1
Comparison Device | | | HSV-2
Comparison Device | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | + | - | | + | - |
| D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit | + | 73 | 0 | + | 76 | 1 |
| | - | 1 | 324 | - | 0 | 321 |
| Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) = Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) = | 95% CI | | | 95% CI | | |
| | 73/74
98.6% | 92.7% - 100% | | 76/76
100% | 95.3% - 100% | |
| | 324/324
100% | 98.9% - 100% | | 321/322
99.7% | 98.3% -100% | |
## Results from Individual Study Sites:
i. **Study Site 1**: A total of 107 specimens (4 fresh and 103 frozen) were tested using the D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit. An aliquot from each specimen was inoculated into MRC-5 and A549 tubes, one tube for each HSV type. The inoculated cells were incubated at 35° to 37°C and examined daily for CPE for seven days. Tube cultures exhibiting no CPE after seven days of incubation were scraped and cell spots made on multi-well slides. The cell spots were fixed with acetone and in accordance with the respective product insert (subject and predicate devices). All calculations for confidence intervals were done according to the Exact Method. The results of comparison testing are summarized below (Table 6).
| | Table 6a - HSV-1
Comparison Device | | | Table 6b - HSV-2
Comparison Device | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | + | - | | + | - |
| D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit | + | 35 | 0 | + | 28 | 0 |
| | - | 0 | 72 | - | 0 | 79 |
| PPA = | 95% CI | | | 95% CI | | |
| | 35/35
100% | 90.0% - 100% | | 28/28
100% | 87.7% - 100% | |
| NPA = | 72/72
100% | 95.0% - 100% | | 79/79
100% | 95.4% - 100% | |
{8}
ii. Study Site 2: A total of 150 fresh specimens were cultured for HSV. Briefly, an aliquot from each specimen was inoculated into MRC-5 tubes, one tube for each HSV type. The inoculated cells were incubated at 35° to 37°C and examined daily for CPE. Tube cultures exhibiting CPE were scraped and cell spots made on multi-well slides according to the D³ DFA HSV ID & Typing Kit and Comparison Device product insert procedures. Tube cultures exhibiting no CPE at 7-days were also scraped and cell spots made to confirm the absence of HSV. All 150 specimens were tested for the presence of HSV. All calculations for confidence intervals were done according to the Exact Method. The results of this testing site are summarized below (Table 7).
| Table 7a - HSV-1
Comparison Device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | + | - | |
| + | 21 | 0 | |
| - | 1 | 128 | |
| | 95% CI | | |
| 21/22
95.5% | 77.2% - 99.9% | | |
| 128/128
100% | 97.2% - 100% | | |
| Table 7b - HSV-2
Comparison Device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | + | - | |
| + | 25 | 1 | |
| - | 0 | 124 | |
| | 95% CI | | |
| 25/25
100% | 86.3% - 100% | | |
| 124/125
99.2% | 95.6% - 100% | | |
iii. Study Site 3: The study was conducted at a Diagnostic Hybrids in-house virology laboratory. A total of 141 frozen specimens provided by an independent laboratory were processed. An aliquot from each specimen was inoculated into duplicate wells of DHI H&V-Mix™ multi-well plates. The inoculated cells were centrifuged, incubated up to 24-hours then stained in accordance with the respective product insert. All calculations for confidence intervals were done according to the Exact Method. The results of this testing are summarized below (Table 8).
| Table 8a - HSV-1
Comparison Device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | + | - | |
| + | 17 | 0 | |
| - | 0 | 124 | |
| | 95% CI | | |
| 17/17
100% | 80.5% - 100% | | |
| 124/124
100% | 97.1% - 100% | | |
| Table 8b - HSV-2
Comparison Device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | + | - | |
| + | 23 | 0 | |
| - | 0 | 118 | |
| | 95% CI | | |
| 23/23
100% | 85.2% - 100% | | |
| 118/118
100% | 96.9% - 100% | | |
b. Matrix comparison: Not applicable
4. Clinical studies: Testing was performed with clinically collected specimens
{9}
submitted to the four different laboratories for HSV testing. Results were compared with a legally marketed HSV device(s).
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data: Not applicable.
5. Clinical cut-off: Not applicable.
6. Expected values/Reference range: Not applicable.
N. Proposed Labeling: The labeling is considered adequate and satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10 for safety and effectiveness and substantial equivalence to a legally marketed device.
O. Conclusion: The submitted information in this premarket notification is considered complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Page 10 of 10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.