NOVA STATSENSOR CREATININE HOSPITAL METER, CONTROL SOLUTIONS,LINEARITY SOLUTIONS, AND TEST STRIPS
K070068 · Nova Biomedical Corp. · CGL · May 7, 2007 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K070068
Device Name
NOVA STATSENSOR CREATININE HOSPITAL METER, CONTROL SOLUTIONS,LINEARITY SOLUTIONS, AND TEST STRIPS
Applicant
Nova Biomedical Corp.
Product Code
CGL · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
May 7, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1225
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter is intended for in vitro diagnostic use by health care professionals and for Point-Of-Care usage for the quantitative measurement of creatinine in capillary, venous, and arterial whole blood. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases and in monitoring renal dialysis. Not for use in neonates. Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips are intended for use only with the StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter for quantitative tests. The Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter is intended to quantitatively measure creatinine in whole blood. The Creatinine Meter is factory calibrated to provide plasma equivalent results to laboratory methods. Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips are for testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use only). Nova StatSensor Creatinine Control Solutions are intended for use with the Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter and Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood creatinine test results. There are three levels of controls, (Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3). These solutions will be offered for sale separately from the meter. Nova StatSensor Creatinine Linearity Kit solutions are used to check the linearity of the Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter System. There are five levels of Linearity Solutions, (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5).
Device Story
Point-of-care diagnostic system for quantitative creatinine measurement in whole blood; utilizes electrochemical test strips; operated by healthcare professionals in clinical settings. Device processes blood samples to provide plasma-equivalent creatinine results; aids clinicians in diagnosing renal disease and monitoring dialysis. System includes meter, test strips, quality control solutions, and linearity kits for accuracy verification. Provides rapid results to inform immediate clinical decision-making regarding renal function.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document; substantial equivalence determination based on 510(k) regulatory review.
Technological Characteristics
Electrochemical biosensor; uses test strips containing creatinine amidohydrolase, creatine amidinohydrolase, and sarcosine oxidase. Handheld form factor; 3.7V rechargeable lithium battery. Factory calibrated; no calibration code required. Connectivity via charging/data upload station. Operating range: 15°C-40°C, 20%-80% humidity. Measuring range: 0.3-12.5 mg/dL.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of creatinine in capillary, venous, and arterial whole blood by healthcare professionals in point-of-care settings to aid in diagnosis/treatment of renal disease and monitoring dialysis. Contraindicated for use in neonates.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A creatinine test system is a device intended to measure creatinine levels in plasma and urine. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k070068
B. Purpose for Submission:
Notification of intent to manufacture and market a new device
C. Measurand:
Creatinine
D. Type of Test:
Colorimetric quantitative determination of Creatinine
E. Applicant:
Nova Biomedical Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Proprietary name – Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter, Nova StatSensor Creatinine Quality Control Levels 1,2,3, Nova StatSensor Creatinine Linearity Solutions Levels 1,2,3,4,5
Established name – Creatinine Test System, Quality Control Material
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1225 Creatinine Test System
21 CFR 862.1660 Quality Control Material
2. Classification:
Class II (reagent)
Class I, reserved (control material)
{1}
3. Product code:
CGL, JJX
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for Use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter is intended for in vitro diagnostic use by health care professionals and for Point-Of-Care usage for the quantitative measurement of creatinine in capillary, venous, and arterial whole blood. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases and in monitoring renal dialysis. Not for use in neonates.
Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips are intended for use only with the StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter for quantitative tests. The Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter is intended to quantitatively measure creatinine in whole blood. The Creatinine Meter is factory calibrated to provide plasma equivalent results to laboratory methods. Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips are for testing outside the body (in vitro diagnostic use only).
Nova StatSensor Creatinine Control Solutions are intended for use with the Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter and Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood creatinine test results. There are three levels of controls, (Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3). These solutions will be offered for sale separately from the meter.
Nova StatSensor Creatinine Linearity Kit solutions are used to check the linearity of the Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter System. There are five levels of Linearity Solutions, (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For in vitro diagnostic prescription use
Not for use in neonates
The device is intended for use in point-of-care settings and the appropriate studies were
{2}
performed.
4. Special instrument requirements:
The Nova StatSensor Creatinine meter uses Nova StatSensor Creatinine Test Strips
I. Device Description:
The Nova StatSensor Creatinine meter consists of a hand held Creatinine Hospital meter, a charging station, StatSensor Creatinine Strips, 3 Levels of Quality Control and 5 Levels of Linearity Solutions. The Nova StatSensor Creatinine meter is factory calibrated.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
i-Stat Creatinine Test, Beckman Synchron LX-20, Beckman Synchron LXi 725I, Bayer ADVIA 1650, Dade Dimension RXL
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k973292, k965240, k023049, k990346, k043546
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Characteristic | Proposed Nova StatSensor | Predicate Beckman Synchron LX-20 | Predicate Beckman Synchron LXi 725I | Predicate Bayer ADVIA 1650 | Predicate Dade Dimension RXL | Predicate i-Stat with Creatine Cartridge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| K Number | New | k965240 | k023049 | k990346 | k043546 | k973292 |
| Measuring Range | 0.3-12.0 mg/dL | 0.3-25 mg/dL | 0.3-25 mg/dL | 0.2 - 37.0 mg/dL | 0.2 - 30.0 mg/dL | 0.2-20 mg/dL |
| Operating Principle | Electrochemical biosensor test strip | Random access processing analyzer using a colorimetric, kinetic rate reaction | Random access processing analyzer using a colorimetric, kinetic rate reaction | Automated analyzer, UV rate reaction | Discrete chemistry analyzer measuring kinetic rate reaction. | Electrochemical biosensor cartridge |
| Intended Use | The Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter System is intended for in vitro diagnostic use by health care professionals for the quantitative measurement of creatinine in capillary, venous, and arterial whole blood. It is | In-Vitro diagnostic use by health care professionals for the quantitative measurement of creatinine in serum | In-Vitro diagnostic use by health care professionals for the quantitative measurement of creatinine in serum | To measure the creatinine levels in serum and urine. | In-Vitro diagnostic assay for the quantization of creatinine in human serum | For the quantitative determination of Creatinine in whole blood |
{3}
| Characteristic | Proposed Nova StatSensor | Predicate Beckman Synchron LX-20 | Predicate Beckman Synchron LXi 725I | Predicate Bayer ADVIA 1650 | Predicate Dade Dimension RXL | Predicate i-Stat with Creatine Cartridge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | indicated for use in a clinical setting by healthcare professionals as an aid to monitor kidney function. | | | | | |
| Sample type | Whole blood | Serum | Serum | Serum | Serum | Whole Blood |
| Sample size | 1.2 μL | 20 μL | 20 μL | 2 μL of a 1:5 diluted solution | 3 μL diluted serum | 65 μL |
| Sample application | Test strip capillary draw | Automatic sample aspiration from sample cups | Automatic sample aspiration from sample cups | Sample Tray 84 samples, positive sample identification | Auto - sampling from vacationer type tubes or sample cups | Test cartridge syringe or capillary fill tube |
| Handheld meter? | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| Meter Calibration | Automatic, no Calibration Code | automatic, at least every 5 days | automatic, at least every 5 days | Automatic 2-point liquid calibration | Automatic | Automatic calibration with each cartridge |
| Data storage | 1200 | Unlimited using DL2000 data manager | Unlimited | 70,000 patient samples | Unlimited, based on available hard disk storage space | 5,000 test results |
| Test Time | 30 seconds | 25 seconds | 25 seconds | 20 seconds | 20 seconds | 120 seconds |
| Weight | 8.8 oz. | 1,620 pounds | 2,701 pounds | 1,178 pounds | 800 pounds | 18.34 oz |
| Bar code scanner | YES | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Power source | Rechargeable 3.7 V Lithium battery | 115 or 220 V outlet | 115 or 220 V outlet | 100-240 Volt Main | 110-130 V outlet | 2 9-volt batteries |
| Accessories: | Charging/Data Upload Station Base Unit | Data manager | Data manager, automated sample rack system | Data management system | N/A | N/A |
| Controls: | Liquid, 3 levels | 2 levels | 2 levels | 3 levels | 3 levels | Liquid 3 levels |
| Linearity Solutions | Liquid, 5 levels | 5 levels | 5 levels | 5 levels | 5 levels | Liquid 5 levels |
| Test Strip/Cartridge Active reagent: | Creatinine amidohydroliase, creatine amindinohydrolase and sarcosine oxidase | Jaffe rate method (kinetic alkaline picrate) | Jaffe rate method (kinetic alkaline picrate) | Enzymatic UV reaction/alkaline picrate reagent | Alkaline picrate, colorimetry, creatinine | Creatinine amidohydroliase, creatine amindinohydrolase and sarcosine oxidase |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
EP5-A2 Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods
EP6-A Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical
{4}
Approach; Approved Guideline Evaluation of Matrix Effects
EP7-P Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
EP9-A Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples
# L. Test Principle:
Colorimetric
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision evaluations were performed based upon CLSI EP5-A2. Day to Day precision was evaluated using two meters and two lots of test strips at the sponsor's site. Samples were run in duplicate. Control levels 1, 2 and 3 were used. Testing was performed for 20 days.
| Strip Lot | Control Level | Range mg/dL | Mean | CV% | N | Duration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 6080301 | L1 | 0.8-1.5 | 1.06 | 8.39 | 80 | 20 days |
| | L2 | 1.7-2.5 | 2.09 | 5.80 | 80 | 20 days |
| | L3 | 4.0-7.0 | 6.14 | 3.35 | 80 | 20 days |
| 6080401 | L1 | 0.8-1.5 | 1.08 | 8.68 | 80 | 20 days |
| | L2 | 1.7-2.5 | 2.09 | 5.87 | 80 | 20 days |
| | L3 | 4.0-7.0 | 6.11 | 3.59 | 80 | 20 days |
# Within Run Precision
Two meters and three lots of strips were used. Three levels of controls were tested in replicates of 20 using each strip lot (the controls were prepared separately for each lot tested). Additionally three blood samples were prepared with target creatinine concentrations of 0.3-1.5, 2.5-4.5, and $6.0 - 12.0\mathrm{mg / dL}$
Within Run Precision Pooled
| Blood Samples | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Strip Lot | Blood Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | Ref Value (mg/dL) | %CV | N |
| 6072601 | 0.3-1.5 | 0.98 | 0.9 | 8.73 | 20 |
| | 2.5-4.5 | 2.43 | 2.6 | 2.95 | 20 |
| | 6.0-12.0 | 6.95 | 6.6 | 4.42 | 20 |
| | | | | | |
| 6072701 | 0.3-1.5 | 1.11 | 1.0 | 8.03 | 20 |
| | 2.5-4.5 | 3.94 | 4.1 | 3.52 | 20 |
{5}
| | 6.0-12.0 | 10.64 | 9.9 | 5.16 | 20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | |
| 6072702 | 0.3-1.5 | 0.99 | 0.9 | 9.48 | 20 |
| | 2.5-4.5 | 3.53 | 3.6 | 4.77 | 20 |
| | 6.0-12.0 | 10.23 | 10.0 | 5.91 | 20 |
| Control Samples | | | | | |
| Strip Lot | Control Level (mg/dL) | Mean (mg/dL) | SD | %CV | N |
| 6072601 | L1 (0.8-1.5) | 1.12 | 0.06 | 5.27 | 20 |
| | L2 (1.7-2.5) | 2.14 | 0.05 | 2.29 | 20 |
| | L3 (4.0-7.0) | 6.16 | 0.30 | 4.84 | 20 |
| | | | | | |
| 6072701 | L1 (0.8-1.5) | 1.13 | 0.08 | 6.99 | 20 |
| | L2 (1.7-2.5) | 3.94 | 0.14 | 3.52 | 20 |
| | L3 (4.0-7.0) | 6.20 | 0.36 | 5.83 | 20 |
| | | | | | |
| 6072702 | L1 (0.8-1.5) | 1.10 | 0.06 | 5.52 | 20 |
| | L2 (1.7-2.5) | 2.16 | 0.05 | 2.33 | 20 |
| | L3 (4.0-7.0) | 6.25 | 0.31 | 4.91 | 20 |
Precision protocol was performed on venous whole blood samples based upon CLSI EP5-A2 at three Point of Care sites by typical Point of Care staff. There was no significant difference in precision at the various sites.
Within-run Precision Summary for Point of Care Site Studies
| Mean SD %CV | Site 1 | | | Site 2 | | | Site 3 | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Target Range (mg/dL) | | | Target Range (mg/dL) | | | Target Range (mg/dL) | | |
| | 0.5 - 1.5 | 3.0-5.0 | 8.0-12.0 | 0.5 - 1.5 | 3.0-5.0 | 8.0-12.0 | 0.5 - 1.5 | 3.0-5.0 | 8.0-12.0 |
| | 0.84 | 4.42 | 11.42 | 0.88 | 4.10 | 11.38 | 0.84 | 4.53 | 8.15 |
| | 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.85 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.60 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.26 |
| | 9.73 | 7.72 | 7.43 | 10.41 | 4.26 | 5.24 | 5.86 | 2.77 | 3.25 |
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The Nova StatSensor Creatinine meter measuring range is 0.3 – 12.5 mg/dL. Linearity protocol was based upon CLSI EP6-A. Venous blood samples were prepared by spiking blood with 5 different concentrations of creatinine and 3 levels of hematocrit. 5 replicates were performed on 2 meters for each level. A total of 30 samples were run at each creatinine concentration. Y=1.0068x-0.0398. r²=0.9927, n=450. Results of the study support the claimed linearity range.
## c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The values of the Nova StatSensor Creatinine controls and linearity solutions are
{6}
traceable to the NIST SRM967 Creatinine. Acceptance criteria between the NIST Creatinine standard and Nova controls are $\pm 5\%$ (L1), $\pm 4\%$ (L2), $\pm 3\%$ (L3). Expected control range values are L1 $0.8 - 1.5\mathrm{mg / dL}$, L2 $1.7 - 2.5\mathrm{mg / dL}$, and L3 $4.0 - 7.0\mathrm{mg / dL}$. The nominal concentrations of the Nova Linearity solutions are Level 1: 0.30-0.80mg/dL, Level 2: 0.80-1.50mg/dL, Level 3: 1.70-2.50mg/dL, Level 4: 4.00-7.00mg/dL, Level 5: 7.00-12.00mg/dL.
Opened Bottle Stability: The sponsor recommends that the Linearity/Control Solutions once opened be stored at $2 - 8^{0}\mathrm{C}$ and are stable for up to 5 weeks at $25^{0}\mathrm{C}$. Stability at $25^{0}\mathrm{C}$ was demonstrated by real time studies. All analytes satisfied the sponsor's acceptance criteria of $\pm 15\%$ for L1 and $\pm 10\%$ for all other levels deviation from analyte concentration at day 0.
Closed Bottle Stability (Shelf Life): The sponsor's shelf life stability claim is two years from date of manufacture. All analytes were tested at 5, 25, 40 and $50^{\mathrm{0}}\mathrm{C}$ for 9 weeks to predict two year stability when stored at $2 - 8^{\mathrm{0}}\mathrm{C}$. The percent loss is determined in comparison to Day Zero values and the product is considered stable when the loss reported is $\leq 15\%$. All analytes satisfied the sponsor's acceptance criteria verifying the closed bottle stability claim. Real time studies are ongoing.
d. Detection limit:
The detection limit for the Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter was performed following Nova Biomedical Co.'s protocol which was prepared in accordance with CLSI EP17-A. Limitation of Blank (LoB) was determined to be $0.055\mathrm{g / dL}$. Limit of Detection (LoD) was determined to be $0.124\mathrm{mg / dL}$.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were performed based upon CLSI EP7-P. Several Compounds were studied to determine if their presence affected the reporting of creatinine in whole blood. Three whole blood samples were prepared with target ranges of 0.5-1.5, 2.0-4.0 and $6.0 - 10.0\mathrm{mg / dL}$. The compounds were added in 4 different concentrations, 3 samples were run for each concentration. The sponsor defined interference as $\leq 15\%$ for target ranges of $0.3 - 1.5\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and $\leq 10\%$ for target ranges $>1.5\mathrm{mg / dL}$. The following compounds produced no interference at the spiked concentrations $(\mathrm{mg / dL})$ - Acetaminophen (10), Ascorbic Acid (3.5), Bilirubin (15), Cholesterol (1000), Creatine (4), L-Dopa (0.3), Dopamine (10), Glucose (500), Heparin (120 U/dL), Maltose (100), Triglyceride (1000), Uric Acid (20) or Hemoglobin (up to $2.6\mathrm{g / dL}$).
Hematocrit studies were performed to determine the affect of varying levels of hematocrit on creatinine results determined by the Nova StatSensor. Blood samples were spiked with 3 different levels of hematocrit (28, 43 and $59\%$) and 5 different creatinine concentrations $(0.3 - 1.5, 1.5 - 3.0, 3.0 - 6.0, 6.0 - 9.0, 9.0 - 12.0 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{dL})$.
{7}
The sponsor defined non-interference as ≤15% for target ranges of 0.3-1.5 mg/dL and ≤10% for target ranges >1.5 mg/dL. Device performance at hematocrit concentrations of 30 – 60% was determined to be acceptable.
Humidity and temperature testing was performed using whole blood with 3 creatinine target concentrations. Meters were placed in environmental chambers with varying humidity and temperature to determine the affects on the Nova StatSensor Creatinine meter. The sponsor defined non-interference as ≤15% for target ranges of 0.3-1.5 mg/dL and ≤10% for target ranges >1.5 mg/dL. The meter met these criteria for the temperature range of 15°C to 40°C and humidity range of 20% to 80%.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparisons were performed at 5 external Point of Care sites by typical Point of Care staff untrained in the use of the device. Samples of venous, arterial and capillary whole blood were collected at each site were compared against the predicate devices. Samples were endogenous and were compared across the measuring range as indicated below (results are pooled for arterial, venous and capillary results). There was no significant difference in results at the various sites.
Y=0.9873x+0.0241
r²=0.9858
n=947
range=0.30-12.9 mg/dL
b. Matrix comparison:
The Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter is designed for measurement of creatinine in whole blood only. A comparison of whole blood samples from different sources (Venous, Arterial and capillary) was performed against serum during method comparison.
Samples were compared against the predicate devices on whole venous, arterial and capillary blood. Samples were endogenous and were compared across the measuring range as indicated below. These samples are the same samples used for method comparison study described above.
Venous Blood
y=0.9896x+0.0244
r²=0.9783
Arterial Blood
y=0.9792x+0.0787
r²=0.9946
Capillary Blood
y=0.9851x+0.0031
r²=0.9829
{8}
n=722
n=76
n=149
range=0.30-10.8 mg/dL range 0.57-12.0 mg/dL range 0.40-12.9 mg/dL
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Normal Creatinine value is less than 1.2mg/dL
The sponsor referenced: Burtis, Carl A and Ashwood, Edward. Ed, 1999 Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry
N. Instrument Name:
Nova StatSensor Creatinine Hospital Meter, Test Strips, Controls and Linearity Solutions
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Single sample test strip assay
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
{9}
Whole Blood (arterial, venous, capillary)
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Samples are typically obtained by fingerstick but whole blood from arterial or venous sources may be used
5. Calibration:
Calibration is performed with each lot of test strips no calibration code is necessary.
6. Quality Control:
Quality control should be performed every 24 hours on at least two levels of controls.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
Not Applicable
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.