The EasyRA clinical analyzer is designed for clinical laboratory use, making direct quantitative measurements of Na+ (sodium), K+ (potassium), Cl- (chloride), Li+ (lithium) and Glucose (Trinder method) in human serum samples. Additionally, other various chemistry assays may be adaptable to the analyzer depending on the reagent used to induce a photometric reaction. Sodium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment diseases involving electrolyte imbalance. Potassium measurements monitor electrolyte balance and in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels. Chloride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma. Lithium measurements are used to assure that the proper drug dosage is administered in the treatment of patients with mental disturbances, such as manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder).
Device Story
EasyRA is a random-access clinical chemistry analyzer for clinical laboratories; processes human serum samples. Inputs: serum samples; reagents. Operation: utilizes photometric (up to 6 wavelengths) and ion-selective electrode (ISE) technologies. Photometric module performs endpoint/rate reactions; ISE module measures voltage changes (Nernst equation) for electrolyte activity. RFID chips on reagent vessels store test parameters (wavelength, reaction time, volumes) to ensure correct method execution. Throughput: 150 tests/hour. Output: quantitative analyte concentrations. Healthcare providers use results for diagnosis and treatment of metabolic/electrolyte disorders and drug monitoring. Benefits: automated, intuitive interface; high-throughput clinical testing.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; substantial equivalence based on bench testing and performance characteristics of the clinical chemistry analyzer.
Technological Characteristics
Random-access analyzer; 24 photometric test positions + 4 ISE positions. Photometric sensing via 6-wavelength photometer; potentiometric sensing via ion-selective electrodes. Connectivity: LIS integration, barcode scanning. Reagent management: RFID-tagged vessels. Throughput: 150 tests/hour. Software: Hazard analysis and development processes reviewed. Calibration: Photometric (blanks/kinetic/endpoint) and ISE (Nernst equation/2-point).
Indications for Use
Indicated for clinical laboratory use to measure Na, K, Cl, Li, and Glucose in human serum. Used for diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte imbalances, metabolic disorders, carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes, hypoglycemia, pancreatic islet cell carcinoma), and monitoring lithium dosage for mental disturbances (bipolar disorder).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1 of 13
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k070057
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Glucose, Sodium, Potassium, Chloride and Lithium
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative photometric and ion-selective electrode
E. Applicant:
Medica Corp.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
EasyRA Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21CFR862.1345 - Glucose test system
21CFR862.1665 - Sodium test system
21CFR862.1600 - Potassium test system
21CFR862.1170 - Chloride test system
21CFR862.3560 - Lithium test system
21CFR862.1150 - Calibrator
21CFR862.2160 - Discrete photometric chemistry analyzer for clinical use
21CFR862.1660 – Quality control material
2. Classification:
Class 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 1, and 1, respectively
3. Product code:
CGA- Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
JGS - Electrode, Ion Specific, Sodium
CEM - Electrode, Ion Specific, Potassium
CGZ - Electrode, Ion-Specific, Chloride
JIH - Flame Photometry, Lithium
JIT - Calibrator, secondary
JJE - Analyzer, Chemistry (Photometric, Discrete), for clinical use
JJY - Multi-analyte controls
{1}
4. Panel:
Chemistry (75), toxicology (91)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indication(s) for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The EasyRA clinical analyzer is designed for clinical laboratory use, making direct quantitative measurements of Na+ (sodium), K+ (potassium), Cl- (chloride), Li+ (lithium) and Glucose (Trinder method) in human serum samples. Additionally, other various chemistry assays may be adaptable to the analyzer depending on the reagent used to induce a photometric reaction.
Sodium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment diseases involving electrolyte imbalance.
Potassium measurements monitor electrolyte balance and in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels.
Chloride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders.
Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Lithium measurements are used to assure that the proper drug dosage is administered in the treatment of patients with mental disturbances, such as manic-depressive illness (bipolar disorder).
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Prescription use
4. Special instrument requirements:
EasyRA Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
I. Device Description:
The EasyRA (EZRA) is a random-access clinical chemistry analyzer with positions for 24 photometric tests on-board as well as 4 additional tests performed by ion-selective electrode technology. The EZRA accommodates up to 24 samples and processes these using 72 disposable optical cuvettes. Typical test throughput is 150 tests per hour. These may include photometric and potentiometric tests. The user interface software has been designed to make operation as simple and intuitive as possible.
2 of 13
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Diagnostic Chemicals Limited, Glucose (Trinder) assay
Medica Corporation, EasyElectroLyte Na+, K+, Li+ Analyzer
Medica Corporation, EasyElectroLyte Na+, K+, Cl- Analyzer
Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., COBAS MIRA Chemistry System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k875211, k002407, k000926, and k920402, respectively
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Glucose | | Diagnostic Chemicals Limited on the COBAS MIRA |
| Intended use | Quantitative determination of glucose in serum | Quantitative determination of glucose in serum |
| Method | Photometric-end point reaction using the Trinder glucose oxidase method | Photometric-end point reaction using the Trinder glucose oxidase method |
| Formulation | | |
| pH (buffered) | 7.40 units | 7.25 units |
| 4-aminoantipyrine | 0.30 mM/L | 0.25 mM/L |
| phenol | 10 mM/L | 20.0 mM/L |
| glucose oxidase | >10,000 U/L | >40,000 U/L |
| peroxidase (horseradish) | >700 U/L | >2,000 U/L |
| Sample Volume | 3μl | 3μl |
| Analysis time | 10.4 minutes for 1st result | 5.4 minutes for 1st result |
| ISE Assays | | |
| Intended use | Quantitative determination of Na,K,Cl and Li in serum | Quantitative determination of Na,K,Cl and Li in serum, plasma, whole blood and urine (urine not applicable for Li) |
3 of 13
{3}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Method | Ion Selective Electrode | Ion Selective Electrode |
| Sample Volume | 70μl | 55μl |
| Analysis time | 35 seconds | 35 seconds |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI - Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices - EP05-A2
CLSI - Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods - EP06-A
CLSI - Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry - EP07-A2
CLSI - Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples - EP09-A2
L. Test Principle:
Photometric Chemistries
The analyzer utilizes up to 6 wavelengths in conjunction with reagents, which are mixed with samples by the EZRA to perform up to 24 tests including Glucose-Trinder (Glu-T). The analyzer is adaptable to test methods based on rate and endpoint monitoring using monochromatic or bi-chromatic measurements. The photometer measures the light of a selected wavelength passing through optical cuvettes in which reagents react with a sample. This amount of light is then compared with that which occurred when on-board calibration standards were previously run to produce final results. Values for the parameters used with each test measurement, including wavelength, time of reaction and liquid volumes are stored on an RFID chip which is mounted on each reagent vessel. This insures that the correct photometric method is used by the EZRA with each reagent.
Potentiometric Chemistries
Additional tests, including Na, K, Cl, and Li are measured using ion-selective electrodes using the exact same technology with the EasyElectroLytes predicate devices cleared by the FDA under k002407 (for Cl-) and k000926 (for Na+, K+, Li+). The Ion Selective Electrode (ISE) technology measures changes in voltages (potentiometric measurement) which are a function of Na, K, Cl or Li ion activity in the sample. These changes are then compared with those obtained during a single point calibration to produce the final results.
Glucose-Trinder Reagent
The glucose oxidase in the reagent oxidizes the glucose in a serum sample to gluconic acid and releases hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). The H₂O₂ generates a quinoneimine dye, the absorbance of which at 520nm is directly proportional to the amount of glucose in the serum sample. Medica's Glu-T reagent is packaged in a 40ml bottle
4 of 13
{4}
(wedge) that fits the reagent tray of the EZRA. The shelf-life of the Glu-T reagent in the wedge has been established to be 36 months. The wedge label includes an RFID chip that has pre-programmed information about the reagent, which is automatically uploaded to the computer for the analysis to commence. The above reaction principle is the same with the one used by the "Diagnostic Chemicals Limited" (DCL) dye, cleared by the FDA under K875211, and utilized routinely with the Cobas-Mira predicate device.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
##### Glucose
Within run imprecision: Twenty replicates of each of three levels of commercial human serum based QC material were tested 5 replicates per day over 4 days.
| QC Level | Within Run SD | Within Run CV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| mg/dL | Mg/dL | % |
| 272 | 1.94 | 0.71% |
| 109 | 0.87 | 0.79% |
| 60 | 1.00 | 1.69% |
Total Imprecision: Duplicate measurements of each of three levels of QC material were tested over 20 days.
| QC Level | Total SD | Total CV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| mg/dL | mg/dL | % |
| 263.93 | 4.39 | 1.66% |
| 105.86 | 1.62 | 1.53% |
| 60.43 | 1.30 | 2.16% |
### ISE chemistries
Within Run Imprecision was evaluated on the EZRA Chemistry Analyzer using two levels of human-based QC material (A, B) in five replicates per day over 5 days.
| | Level Mean | | Within Run SD | | CV | CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | A mmol/L | B mmol/L | A mmol/L | B mmol/L | A % | B % |
| Na | 144.56 | 161.78 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.42% | 0.44% |
| K | 4.18 | 6.19 | 0.035 | 0.06 | 0.84% | 0.97% |
| Li | 0.97 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00% | 0.52% |
| Cl | 99.41 | 117.35 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.55% | 0.41% |
{5}
Total Imprecision was evaluated on the EZRA Chemistry analyzer using two levels of human-based QC material (A,B) in duplicate, twice a day (am and pm) over 20 days.
| | Mean | | Total SD | | Total CV | Total CV |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | A mmol/L | B mmol/L | A mmol/L | B mmol/L | A % | B % |
| Na | 143.50 | 159.98 | 2.02 | 1.51 | 1.41% | 0.95% |
| K | 4.15 | 6.10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.41% | 1.00% |
| Li | 0.95 | 1.90 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 1.48% | 1.29% |
| Cl | 99.0 | 117.1 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 1.01% | 0.87% |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The Glucose assay is linear from 25 to $375\mathrm{mg / dL}$

The linearity of ISE assays are as follows:
Sodium 110 to $200\mathrm{mmol / L}$
Potassium 1.0 to $10.0\mathrm{mmol / L}$
Chloride 50 to $150\mathrm{mmol / L}$
Lithium $0.2 - 3.5\mathrm{mmol / L}$


{6}


c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The Glu-T calibrator is provided by and is traceable to a commercially available secondary calibrator. The calibrator material was value-assigned using a primary glucose aqueous standard. Twenty replicates of the lyophilized human serum based calibrator to be assigned were tested interspersed with samples of the primary standard used for the calibration. The resulting calibrator assigned value was tested by:
- Evaluating linearity using NIST-traceable standards
- Evaluating CAP results
- Evaluating method comparison results in-house vs. the predicate device.
All data obtained supported the validity of the value assignment. The shelf life of this material was established by the manufacturer for 3 years.
ISE calibrator is manufactured at Medica and was 510(k) cleared for use as calibrator in Electrolyte Analyzers per k000926 and k002407. Medica will repackage the original solutions to fit the EZRA and re-label as "ISE Module Reagent Pack." Medica identifies each manufacturing lot using a unique lot numbering system that identifies materials, methods, date and personnel used. The aqueous calibrator material in the reagent pack is tested at Medica prior to release to ensure compliance with Medica's specifications. Each analyte in the calibrant material is tested on pre-qualified analyzers against secondary primary standard solutions prepared gravimetrically.
The current claim for shelf life of these reagents has been established to be 24 months via an accelerated shelf life study, and supported by a real time study.
The shelf life of this material is 3 years from date of manufacture as established by the original manufacturer. Medica will use the same expiration date on the Medica label.
7 of 13
{7}
8 of 13
# Quality Control
The quality control materials to be used with the EZRA analyzer are manufactured by and traceable to a commercially available control material. At Medica, the mean values for each lot are established using Medica's Calibrator "EasyCal", and the EasyRA chemistry analyzer. The ranges are then adjusted around the new mean values.
## d. Detection limit:
The lower limit of detection (LOD) of the Glucose assay is 0.34 mg/dL. The functional sensitivity (the lowest concentration that can be measured with 20% CV) is 1.3 mg/dL.
See linearity study above for ISE methods.
## e. Analytical specificity:
### Glucose
No significant interference was found with levels up to 300 mg/dL of hemoglobin. No significant interference was found with levels up to 5 mg/dL of bilirubin. No significant interference was found with levels up to 5 mg/dL of Ascorbic Acid. Ascorbic Acid above 5 mg/dL produces a negative bias in glucose levels. There is a significant interference to lipemia (Intralipid) at 200 mg/dL. Intralipid produces a positive bias in glucose values.
### ISE
There was no interference with sodium, potassium, lithium and chloride sensors by bilirubin up to 20 mg/dL. There was no interference with sodium, chloride and lithium sensors to hemoglobin at 500 mg/dL. There was no interference with sodium, potassium and chloride sensors by Intralipid up to 2000 mg/dL. There appeared to be a small dose-related effect on the lithium sensor results that may be inherent in the Intralipid formulation. Despite this trend, there was no interference up to 800 mg/dL Intralipid.
To test for drug-related interferences, serum was spiked with a potentially interfering substance to the test concentration shown in the following tables.
The interference was calculated using the difference between the medians of the spiked and unspiked samples.
There was no interference with sodium, potassium, lithium and chloride sensors by the following chemicals at the corresponding levels:
{8}
| Chemical | Level tested (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| Imipramine | 0.1 |
| Procainamide | 10 |
| Nortyptylene | 0.15 |
| Hydroytyramine | 40 |
| Chloropromazine | 5 |
| Erythromycin | 5 |
| Ethosuximide | 20 |
| Acetaminophen | 20 |
| Ampicillin | 5 |
| Potassium thiocyanate | 20 |
| Salicylic acid | 20 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 50 |
| Ibufrofen | 40 |
The following results are for substances found to significantly interfere with one or more sensors.
| Chemical | Level tested (mg/dL) | Effect |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Valproic acid | 50 | Decreases Sodium by 5.7 mM |
| Benzalkonium Chloride | 8 | Increases Sodium by 14 mM and Potassium by 1mM |
f. Assay cut-off: Not Applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The following lists the data obtained in a comparison of the Medica Glucose Trinder reagent on the Medica EZRA Chemistry Analyzer (y) to the performance of a similar Glucose reagent (x) on the Roche COBAS MIRA Analyzer. Values ranged from 45 to 373 mg/dL. The data shown below are the results for single results obtained on the Medica EZRA Chemistry Analyzers vs. the average of 2 replicate values obtained on the Roche COBAS MIRA Analyzer.
Number of Samples 43
Slope 0.997
Y Intercept -1.06
Correlation Coefficient 0.998
{9}

The performance of the Medica Na/K/Cl/Li ISE module (y) on an EZRA Chemistry Analyzer was compared with the performance of the Na/K/Li Medica ISE module (x) in a Medica EasyElectrolytes analyzer. The following table lists the data obtained in the comparison. Values for x and for y ranged from 126.1 to 190.5 mmol/L for sodium, 2.66 to 8.93 mmol/L for potassium, 0.24 to 3.34 mmol/L for lithium and 59 to 153 mmol/L for chloride.
Sodium:
Number of Samples 40
Slope 1.01
Y Intercept -1.97
Correlation Coefficient 0.9974

Potassium:
Number of Samples 42
Slope 1.01
Y Intercept -0.07
Correlation Coefficient 0.9989
10 of 13
{10}

# Chloride:
Number of Samples 41
Slope 0.991
Y Intercept 1.01
Correlation Coefficient 0.9954

# Lithium:
Number of Samples 40
Slope 0.98
Y Intercept 0.02
Correlation Coefficient 0.9995
{11}

b. Matrix comparison: Not Applicable (serum only)
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not Applicable
b. Clinical specificity: Not Applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not Applicable
4. Clinical cut-off: Not Applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range: Reference ranges are provided in the labeling from literature as follows:
Glucose 70 - 105 mg/dL
Sodium 136.0 - 146.0 mmol/L
Potassium 3.5 - 5.1 mmol/L
Chloride 98 - 106 mmol/L
Lithium* 0.6 - 1.2 mmol/L
*Therapeutic Range
Tietz NW. Clinical Guide to Laboratory Tests 3rd ed. WB Saunders and Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1995: p268.
Statland, B. Clinical Decision Levels for Lab Tests, 2nd ed., Oradell, NJ, Medical Economics Books, p. 22 - 209; 1987
Tietz, N.W. Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry, 5th ed., Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders and Co., p. 961 - 1027 (2001)
{12}
13 of 13
N. Instrument Name:
EasyRA Clinical Chemistry Analyzer
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Random access routine and stat mode
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☐ X or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
Barcode capability with LIS connectivity
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Direct tube sampling or sample cup
5. Calibration:
Photometric calculations are made on sample blanks, reagent blanks, bi-chromatic endpoints, rate or enzyme reactions, and kinetic reactions. ISE calculations use the Nernst equation determined by the voltage difference resulting from a 2 point calibration.
6. Quality Control:
The instrument has a quality control program.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The “Performance Characteristics” Section above:
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.