EASYPLUS MINI SELF MONITORING GLUCOSE TEST SYSTEM, MODELS R1 AND R2
K070053 · Eps Bio Technology Corp. · NBW · Dec 3, 2007 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K070053
Device Name
EASYPLUS MINI SELF MONITORING GLUCOSE TEST SYSTEM, MODELS R1 AND R2
Applicant
Eps Bio Technology Corp.
Product Code
NBW · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 3, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The EasyPlus mini Self Monitoring Blood Glucose Test System is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
Device Story
System consists of meter, disposable glucose oxidase test strips, code card, check strip, and control solutions. User inserts test strip into meter; applies capillary whole blood sample (fingertip or forearm) to strip. Device uses electrochemical biosensor (amperometry) to measure current generated by glucose oxidation; calculates glucose concentration. Result displayed on meter screen in 5 seconds. Used by diabetics for self-monitoring or healthcare professionals in clinical settings. Provides quantitative glucose data to aid diabetes management decisions. Alternate site testing (forearm) restricted to steady-state glucose conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical testing evaluated accuracy for both finger stick and alternate site testing. Bench testing included evaluation of interferences, sensitivity, linearity, reportable range, altitude effects, stability, precision, and reproducibility. Results support substantial equivalence.
Technological Characteristics
System includes meter, test strips, auto lancet, check strip, code card, and control solutions. Quantitative measurement of glucose in capillary whole blood. In vitro diagnostic use. Class II device under 21 CFR 862.1345.
Indications for Use
Indicated for professional healthcare personnel or diabetics at home to measure glucose concentration in fresh capillary whole blood from fingertips or forearm to aid diabetes management. Not intended for neonate blood samples.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
Roche Accu-Chek Advantage System (k032552)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k070053
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Whole blood glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, electrochemical biosensor
E. Applicant:
EPS Bio Technology Corp.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
EasyPlus mini Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System (Model R2)
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.1345, Glucose test system
21 CFR § 862.1660, Quality control materials (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II – glucose assay
Class I, reserved – control materials
3. Product code:
NBW - System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over the Counter
CGA - Glucose Oxidase, Glucose
JJX - single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed)
4. Panel:
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The EasyPlus mini Self Monitoring Blood Glucose Monitoring System is intended for in vitro diagnostic use (outside of body). It is indicated to be used by professional healthcare personnel or diabetics at home to measure glucose concentration for aiding diabetes management. The glucose concentration is measured with quantitative capillary whole
{1}
blood from the fingertip, and forearm by using Easy Plus mini Monitoring Blood Glucose Monitoring System. The device is not intended for testing neonate blood samples.
## EasyPlus mini Meter
The EasyPlus mini Meter is intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. EasyPlus mini Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the EasyPlus mini Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). It is indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
## The EasyPlus mini Test Strips
The EasyPlus mini Blood Glucose Test Strips, are intended for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood samples drawn from the fingertips or forearm. EasyPlus mini Blood Glucose Test Strips must be used with the EasyPlus mini Blood Glucose Meter. Testing is done outside the body (In Vitro diagnostic use). They are indicated for use at home (over the counter [OTC]) by persons with diabetes, or in clinical settings by healthcare professionals, as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
## The EasyPlus Normal/High Control Solution
For use with the EasyPlus mini meter and EasyPlus mini Blood Glucose Test Strips as a quality control check to verify the accuracy of blood glucose test results.
## 3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Alternate site testing (AST) (forearm) can only be used during steady-state blood glucose conditions. AST (forearm) should only be performed under the following conditions:
- Testing before a meal
- In a fasting state
- Two hours or more after a meal
- Two hours or more after insulin dosing
- Two hours after physical activity
The device is not intended for testing neonate blood samples nor is the device intended for testing critically ill patients. The labeling includes the following limitations in which the device should not be used for patients: undergoing oxygen therapy, severely dehydrated, severely hypotensive (low blood pressure), in shock and in hypoglycemic-hyperosmolar sate (with and without ketosis).
## 4. Special instrument requirements:
Easy Plus mini Self Monitoring Blood Glucose Monitoring System (Model R2)
## I. Device Description:
The Easy Plus mini Self Monitoring Blood Glucose System consists of the meter, blood glucose test strips, code card, check strip, control solutions (normal and high), lancing device and lancets.
2
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Roche Accu-Chek Advantage System
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k032552
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Detection Method | Amperometry | Same |
| Temperature Range | 10-40°C | Same |
| Sample Type | Fresh Capillary Whole Blood | Same |
| Power | 1.5V AAA Batteries | Same |
| Sample Site | Fingertip and forearm | Fingertip |
| Memory | 480 tests | 100 tests |
| Test Time | 5 seconds | 40 seconds |
| Hematocrit Range | 30-55% | 20-65% |
| Humidity | ≤90% | ≤85% |
| Measuring Range | 20-600 mg/dL | 10-600 mg/dL |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. CLSI EP5-A, Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices
2. CLSI EP6-P, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods; Proposed Guideline
3. CLSI EP7-P, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Proposed Guideline
4. ISO 15197:2003, In Vitro Diagnostic Test Systems – Requirements for Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Self Managing Diabetes Mellitus
5. IEC 60601-1-2, Medical Electrical Equipment – Part 1: General Requirement for Safety; Electromagnetic Compatibility – requirements and Tests
6. IEC 61010-1, Safety Requirements for Electrical Equipment for Measurement, Control, and Laboratory Use – Part 1: General Requirements
7. IEC 60601-2-101, Safety Requirements for Electrical Equipment for Measurement, Control, and Laboratory Use – Part 2-101: Particular Requirements for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Equipment
8. IEC 60068-2-64, Environmental Testing- Part 2: Test Methods- Test Fh: Vibration, Broad-band Random (Digital Control) and Guidance
9. IEC 61326 (2002-02) – (for reference), Electrical Equipment for Measurement Control, and Laboratory Use – EMC Requirements
10. ISO 14971:2000, Medical Devices – Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices
11. ISO 15223:2000, Medical Devices – Symbols to be used with Medical Device Labels, Labeling, and Information to be Supplied
12. EN 376:2002, Information Supplied by the Manufacturer with In Vitro Diagnostic
{3}
Reagents for Self Testing
13. ISO 10993-1, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing
14. EN 13640:2002 Stability Testing of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents
15. ISO 15223:2000, Medical Devices – Symbols to be Used with Medical Device Labels
## L. Test Principle:
The EasyPlus mini Self Monitoring Blood Glucose System employs a disposable dry reagent strip technology based on the glucose oxidase method for glucose determination. Each test strip features an electrode containing the enzyme glucose oxidase (Aspergillus niger). A blood sample is applied to the blood collection area at the tip of the strip and is automatically drawn into the reaction zone, where the glucose oxidase catalyzes the oxidation of glucose to produce gluconic acid. During the reaction, a mediator transfers electrons to the electrode surface and generates a current. The amount of the current is proportional to the amount of glucose present in the blood sample. The glucose concentration is displayed on the meter screen after 5 seconds.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The sponsor evaluated within-day precision of the device using whole blood samples spiked with six different glucose concentrations, two test strip lots, and 10 different meters. Ten replicate glucose measurements were tested for each concentration in one day. The results are summarized in the table below.
| Summary of results for within-day Precision / mg/dL | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Range | YSI 2300 Mean | Number | Mean | SD | CV% |
| 20-50 | 32 | 200 | 42 | 1.9 | 4.6 |
| 51-110 | 79 | 200 | 81 | 3.6 | 4.4 |
| 111-150 | 124 | 200 | 122 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| 151-250 | 204 | 200 | 202 | 6.2 | 3.0 |
| 251-400 | 350 | 200 | 345 | 9.1 | 2.6 |
| 401-600 | 574 | 200 | 574 | 16.2 | 2.8 |
Day-to-day precision was evaluated using three glucose controls with low, normal, and high concentration levels over a ten-day period using ten meters and two test strip lots. Each control was tested twice, once in the morning and once in the afternoon. The results are summarized in the table below.
{4}
| Control | Number | Mean (mg/dL) | SD (mg/dL) | CV% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Low | 400 | 38 | 3.1 | 8.3 |
| Normal | 400 | 111 | 3.8 | 3.5 |
| High | 400 | 354 | 13.3 | 3.8 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The measuring range of the device is $20 - 600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . Testing was performed using whole blood supplemented with B-D-glucose to provide samples at seven different blood glucose levels ranging from 15 to $628\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . The linearity study measured spiked whole blood samples with the device using three test strip lots and the YSI 2300 analyzer. A total of 660 tests $(220\times 3$ lots) were performed on 5 meters. A regression analysis showed linearity of the EasyPlus mini with a correlation coefficient $(r^2)$ of 0.994 and with a regression equation $y = 0.9997X - 1.554$ .
# c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The control solutions are prepared at two target concentrations by gravimetric addition of glucose to an aqueous matrix. The glucose concentration of the control solutions are verified with the YSI reference method. The glucose concentrations of the control solutions are traceable to NIST SRM 917b8.
Shelf life studies show the unopened test strips have a 19 month life-span and 3 months shelf-life once a vial of strips is opened. Unopened controls have a 19 month shelf life and are stable for 3 months after first use.
# d. Detection limit:
The lower end of the measuring range is $20\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . See the linearity study above.
# e. Analytical specificity:
Common interferences were evaluated by spiking venous blood with glucose to three concentrations (approximately 50, 250 and $500\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ). Each of these glucose concentrations was then spiked with the interfering compound at two concentrations to make the interference samples. Control samples were each spiked with the solvents used to make the interfering samples. The substances and concentrations of the interferents are recommended in CLSI EP7. The sponsor's acceptance criterion for the interference test was a bias $\leq 15\mathrm{mg / dL}$ when glucose concentration $\leq 75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and bias of $\leq 15\%$ when glucose concentration $>75\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . Interference from dopamine and L-dopa was observed when the recommended concentration of these drugs was reached in the blood. Interference was also observed in higher than therapeutic dosages of acetaminophen, gentisic acid, and methyldopa.
No interference effects were observed from the common interfering compounds shown below.
{5}
| Interfering Substance | Test Concentration mg/dL |
| --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 8 |
| Ascorbic Acid | 2.5 |
| Dopamine | 2 |
| Gentisic Acid | 6 |
| Triglycerides | 3000 |
| Bilirubin | 1.2 |
| Cholesterol | 500 |
| L-Dopa | 2 |
| Methyldopa | 2 |
| Uric Acid | 13 |
The sponsor evaluated the effect of hematocrit levels on whole blood samples spiked with six hematocrit levels (approximately $20\%$ , $30\%$ , $40\%$ , $50\%$ , $55\%$ and $60\%$ ) for glucose values (4 levels) distributed within the measuring range (approximately $26 - 510 \, \mathrm{mg/dL}$ ) of the device. Each sample was run $n = 10$ and the percent bias was calculated compared to the $40\%$ hematocrit samples. Results are summarized in the table below. The claim for the device was for use with samples having hematocrit concentrations ranging from $30\%$ to $55\%$ . The results of the hematocrit study are summarized in the table below:
| Strip Lot Number | Hematocrit % | YSI level 1 (mg/dL) | YSI Level 2 (mg/dL) | YSI Level 3 (mg/dL) | YSI Level 4 (mg/dL) | Slope | Intercept | r2 | % Bias |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 012072901 | 20 | 28.8 | 138.5 | 281 | 509 | 1.162 | 9.6 | .998 | 25.74 |
| 012072901 | 30 | 28.8 | 134 | 281 | 512 | 1.21 | -2/66 | 1.000 | 11.63 |
| 012072901 | 40 | 27.1 | 134 | 286 | 514 | 1.000 | 0.00 | 1.000 | |
| 012072901 | 50 | 25.3 | 136 | 281 | 517.5 | 0.888 | 0.11 | 0.999 | -12.76 |
| 012072901 | 55 | 28.0 | 137 | 289 | 512 | .0853 | 7.84 | 0.998 | -13.95 |
| 012072901 | 60 | 25.2 | 137.5 | 290 | 516 | 0.792 | 0.82 | 0.997 | -23.94 |
| 012072701 | 20 | 28.8 | 138.5 | 281 | 509 | 1.154 | 12.04 | 0.997 | 30.58 |
| 012072701 | 30 | 28.8 | 134 | 281 | 512 | 1.108 | 0.93 | 0.999 | 12.64 |
| 012072701 | 40 | 27.1 | 134 | 286 | 514 | 1.000 | 0.00 | 1.000 | |
| 012072701 | 50 | 25.3 | 136 | 281 | 517.5 | 0.865 | 3.43 | 0.999 | -12.95 |
| 012072701 | 55 | 28.0 | 137 | 289 | 512 | 0.848 | 7.06 | 0.998 | -14.62 |
| 012072701 | 60 | 25.2 | 137.5 | 290 | 516 | 0.779 | 0.68 | 0.997 | -27.65 |
An altitude study was performed with venous whole blood adjusted to nine different glucose concentrations ranging from approximately 26 to $568\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . One aliquot of each sample was tested on the ground at 160 feet above sea level and the other was tested at 10,000 feet. The result of each sample tested at 10,000 feet was within $\pm 15\%$ of the YSI value. This demonstrates that the meter may be used up to an altitude of 10,000 feet above sea level.
{6}
Temperature and humidity studies were performed and showed that the meter can be used at temperatures from 50°F to 104°F and at relative humidity ranging from 38% to 93%.
A sample volume study was performed with venous whole blood adjusted to two glucose concentrations (approximately 150 mg/dL and 375 mg/dL) and verified on the YSI analyzer. The tests were performed on five test strip lots. One aliquot of each sample was tested using seven different sample volumes (0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.5 uL.) The sponsor's acceptance criterion was that value of each sample tested on the EasyPlus mini should be within +/- 10% of the YSI value. The studies showed that test can be performed with a sample volume of 0.6 uL.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The sponsor demonstrated that the EasyPlus mini Blood Glucose Monitoring System intended for use with fingerstick samples is equivalent to the YSI 2300 Analyzer. 179 diabetics performed the test on the device at three clinics. A healthcare professional then performed the test on the EasyPlus mini and the YSI 2300. The glucose values for these samples ranged from 50.6 - 448 mg/dL. In order to fully cover the measuring range, 20 samples were spiked with glucose or allowed to glycolyze. The approximate percent distribution of 199 samples ranging from 21 to 600 mg/dL were as follows: 20-50 mg/dL - 5%; 51-80 mg/dL - 6%; 81-120 mg/dL - 22%; 121-200 mg/dL - 35%; 201-300 mg/dL - 21%; 301-400 - 5.5%; and 401-600 mg/dL - 5.5%. Based on data analysis, device met the minimum system accuracy requirement established according to the ISO 15197 guidelines, which is 95% of the individual glucose results falling within ±15 mg/dL of the results of the reference procedure at glucose concentrations <75 mg/dL and within ±20% at glucose concentrations ≥75 mg/dL. These results are summarized in the table below.
Accuracy results for glucose concentration <75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 mg/dL | Within ±10 mg/dL | Within ±15 mg/dL |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3/14 (21%) | 11/14 (78%) | 14/14 (100%) |
Accuracy results for glucose concentration ≥75 mg/dL
| Within ± 5 % | Within ± 10 % | Within ± 15 % | Within ± 20% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 69/185 (37%) | 127/185 (69%) | 166/185 (90%) | 183/185 (98%) |
Method comparison studies were performed using alternate site testing (AST) samples compared to professional fingerstick samples. The studies were performed
{7}
using professional and participant AST samples taken from the forearm. A total of 118 samples were tested at three sites. Regression analysis of the values generated shown below indicated correlation between the finger and the forearm.
| Comparison | Number | Range (mg/dL) | Slope and y-intercept | r² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Forearm vs. finger | 118 | 34 – 600 | y=0.986 +5.684 | 0.991 |
The sponsor conducted a consumer study at a fourth site with 70 patients to evaluate the accuracy of glucose measurement between the lay-user and the healthcare professionals.
The lay users followed the package insert instructions intended for use in the U.S. They collected blood from the fingertip and forearm and performed the glucose test on the EasyPlus mini. The range of glucose values for these samples was 74 - 247 mg/dL. A healthcare professional then performed the test on the EasyPlus mini and the YSI 2300. Regression analysis of the values generated shown below indicated that lay users could obtain glucose results similar to results obtained by healthcare professionals.
| Comparison | Number | Range (mg/dL) | Slope and y-intercept | r² |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Finger (patient vs. YSI) | 70 | 74-247 | y=0.979 +1.53 | 0.922 |
| Finger (professional vs. YSI) | 70 | 74-247 | y=1.004 -0.65 | 0.934 |
| Forearm vs. Finger | 70 | 74-247 | y=1.007 +2.86 | 0.922 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
See 2a. above.
4. Clinical cut-off:
{8}
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The labeling includes a reference for expected values from the literature as follows: Expected blood glucose levels for people without diabetes (American Diabetes Association, Standards of Medical Care for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Care, 25(2002), p. S37.)
| Time Range | (mg/dL) |
| --- | --- |
| before breakfast | 70-105 |
| before lunch or dinner | 70-110 |
| one hour after meals | less than 160 |
| two hours after meals | less than 120 |
| between 2 and 4 AM | greater than 70 |
N. Instrument Name:
EasyPlus mini Self Monitoring Blood Glucose Meter
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Each test strip is single use and must be replaced with a new strip for each additional reading.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types:
Yes ☑ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
There is no sample identification function with this device. Samples are applied directly to the test strip as they are collected.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
This device is intended to be used with capillary whole blood from the fingertip and forearm. Since the whole blood sample is applied directly to the test strip, there are no special handling or storage issues.
5. Calibration:
The meter automatically detects the code number when a test strip is inserted. The labeling instructs the user to match the code number the meter displays to the code
9
{9}
number on the test vial. If the numbers do not match, or if no number appears, the user is instructed to try another test strip. If this fails the user is instructed to try a new vial of strips and to call customer service if this also fails.
6. **Quality Control:**
Glucose control solutions at two different concentrations should be run with this device. They are included in the device. When a test strip is inserted into the meter, the control mode can be activated. This prevents control results from being stored in the internal memory as a patient sample. An acceptable range for each control level is printed on the test strip vial label. The user is referred to the troubleshooting section of the owner's manual if control results fall outside these ranges.
P. **Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:**
Q. **Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. **Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
10
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.