K070012 · Kyung Won Medical Co., Ltd. · GXP · Dec 27, 2007 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K070012
Device Name
POLYBONE
Applicant
Kyung Won Medical Co., Ltd.
Product Code
GXP · Neurology
Decision Date
Dec 27, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 882.5300
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
PolyBone is a self-setting, calcium phosphate cement intended for use in the repair of neurosurgical burr holes, contiguous craniotomy cuts and other cranial defects as well as in the augmentation or restoration of bony contour in the craniofacial skeleton.
Device Story
PolyBone is a self-setting calcium phosphate cement used for cranial defect repair and craniofacial bony contour restoration. It consists of a powder and liquid component; when mixed, it forms a paste that hardens in situ. The device is intended for use by neurosurgeons in a clinical setting. It functions as a bone void filler; it is designed for use in cancellous bone. The device provides a structural scaffold for bone repair. Biocompatibility was verified via ISO 10993-1:2003 testing, including cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, and systemic toxicity assessments.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Biocompatibility testing performed per ISO 10993-1:2003 (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, intracutaneous reactivity, systemic toxicity, subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity, and implantation). Bench testing compared doughing time, setting time, working time, pH, compressive strength, and dissolution rate against the predicate.
Technological Characteristics
Self-setting calcium phosphate cement. Components: beta-tricalcium phosphate, monocalcium monobasic, calcium sulfate hemihydrate, and polyphosphate. Supplied as powder and liquid. Compressive strength: 22.7 MPa. Meets ISO 7490:2000 Type 2 criteria (min 2.6 MPa). Biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1:2003.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring repair of neurosurgical burr holes, contiguous craniotomy cuts, other cranial defects, or augmentation/restoration of bony contour in the craniofacial skeleton.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Methyl methacrylate for cranioplasty (skull repair) is a self-curing acrylic that a surgeon uses to repair a skull defect in a patient. At the time of surgery, the surgeon initiates polymerization of the material and forms it into a plate or other appropriate shape to repair the defect.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K070012
DEC & T 2007
Kyungwon Medical
Suite 601 World Meridian Venture Center, 60-24 Gasan-dong, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Korea 153-801
# 510(k) Summary
Date: Date: Date: Date: Date:
- 1. Company making the submission:
| | Submitter |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name | Kyungwon Medical Co., Ltd. |
| Address | Suite 601 World Meridian Venture Center, 60-24<br>Gasan-dong, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Korea 153-801 |
| Phone | +82 2 2113-8693~8 |
| Fax | +82 2 2113-8699 |
| Contact | Ph.D. Hwang, In Soo |
| Internet | http://www.kyungwonmedinet.co.kr |
### 2. Device :
Trade Name - PolyBone Common Name - Artificial bone substitute Classification Name - Methyl methacrylate for cranioplasty
- 3. Predicate Device: BoneSource® HAC Rapid Setting Cement, Methyl methacrylate for cranioplasty, Stryker Instruments, K043334.
- 4. Description :
PolyBone consists of beta-tricalcium phosphate, monocalcium monobasic, calcium sulfate hemihydrate and polyphosphate. PolyBone is indicated for use as cranioplasty cement.
- 5. Indication for use :
PolyBone is a self-setting, calcium phosphate cement intended for use in the repair of neurosurgical burr holes, contiguous craniotomy cuts and other cranial defects as well as in the augmentation or restoration of bony contour in the craniofacial skeleton.
- 6. Review :
Polybone has the similar technological characteristics to the predicate device; components, indication for use, chemical and performance properties.
Components Similarities Both products are supplied with Powder and Liquid.
Indication for Use Similarities
510k Summary Page # 1 of 2
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### Suite 601 World Meridian Venture Center, 60-24 Gasan-dong, IX Kyungwon Medical Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Korea 153-801
Both products have the same indication for use.
Chemical Similarities
Both products are made up from Calcium phosphate family.
### Performance Properties Similarities
The properties of both devices have the equivalence in the doughing time, setting time, working time and pH. The different points are compressive strength and dissolution rate. The compressive strength force of predicate is 60 MPa and of Polybone is 22.7MPa. The predicate device is used in the cortical bone and Polybone is in cancellous bone. Minimum 2.6 MPa is the acceptance criteria for Type 2 in ISO 7490:2000 Dental gypsum-bonded casting investments. In the dissolution rate Polybone has more rapid rate than the predicate.
### Biocompatibility
The biocompatibility of Polybone has been performed by ISO 10993-1:2003; cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, intracutaneous reactivity, systemic toxicity, subchronic toxicity, genotoxicity and implantation. The testing results show Polybone to be biologically safe.
Therefore, we believe that Polybone is substantially equivalent to predicated device according to the above information in terms of component, indication for use, chemical and performance priorities.
## 7. Conclusions :
Based on the information provided in this premarket notification Kyungwon Medical Co., Ltd. concludes that PolyBone is safe and effective and substantially equivalent to predicate devices as described herein.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The seal features a stylized eagle-like symbol on the right. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the symbol.
Public Health Service
DEC 2 7 2007
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Kodent, Inc. % Steve Chang, Ph.D. President 13340E Firestone Boulevard Suite J Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
> K070012 Trade/Device Name: PolyBone® Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.5300 Regulation Name: Methyl methacrylate for cranioplasty Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GXP Dated: November 6, 2007 Received: November 13, 2007
Dear Dr. Chang:
Re:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Steve Chang, Ph.D.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding postmarket surveillance, please contact CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometric's (OSB's) Division of Postmarket Surveillance at (240) 276-3474. For questions regarding the reporting of device adverse events (Medical Device Reporting (MDR)), please contact the Division of Surveillance Systems at (240) 276-3464. You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or the Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark M. Millman
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Submission
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known)
070012
Device Name: PolyBone
Indications for Use:
PolyBone is a self-setting, calcium phosphate cement intended for use in the repair of neurosurgical burr holes, contiguous craniotomy cuts and other cranial defiect as well as in the augmentation or restoration of bony contour in the craniofacial skeleton.
Prescription Use (21CFR801 Subpart D) AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use-(21CFR801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off
Division of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number k070012
Indication for use Page # 1
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.