K063852 · Home Access Health Corp. · JKA · Nov 9, 2007 · Clinical Chemistry
Device Facts
Record ID
K063852
Device Name
ACCESSA CHOLESTEROL PANEL
Applicant
Home Access Health Corp.
Product Code
JKA · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Nov 9, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1675
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The accessa Cholesterol Panel is intended for in vitro, quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides and calculated LDL-Cholesterol in dried micro-serum samples ("Cholesterol Panel"). Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis and various liver and renal diseases. The Cholesterol Panel is not intended for use on neonates. LDL-Cholesterol cannot be determined where the triglycerides value is greater than 400 mg/dL.
Device Story
System facilitates home-based capillary blood collection for lipid panel analysis. Patient performs fingerstick, collects ~100 microliters of blood into a collection/transportation cassette, and mails sample to a certified clinical laboratory. Laboratory elutes dried sample into serum; analyzes using Roche Cobas Mira Plus chemical analyzer with FDA-cleared reagents. Proprietary algorithm processes results; healthcare provider reviews output to inform clinical decisions regarding lipid disorders. Benefits include convenient, remote access to diagnostic lipid testing without immediate venipuncture.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study (March-May 2006) compared self-collected and professionally-collected capillary samples against venipuncture serum samples. Results demonstrated substantial equivalence to venous serum for Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and calculated LDL-Cholesterol using the proprietary algorithm.
Indicated for quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and calculated LDL-Cholesterol in dried micro-serum samples for patients (excluding neonates) to diagnose/treat lipid/lipoprotein metabolism disorders, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and liver/renal diseases. Contraindicated for neonates and patients with triglycerides > 400 mg/dL for LDL calculation.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A blood specimen collection device is a device intended for medical purposes to collect and to handle blood specimens and to separate serum from nonserum (cellular) components prior to further testing. This generic type device may include blood collection tubes, vials, systems, serum separators, blood collection trays, or vacuum sample tubes.
Predicate Devices
Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile by BIOSAFE Laboratories, Inc. (k012221)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k063852
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, Triglycerides, calculated LDL-cholesterol
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, enzymatic
E. Applicant:
Home Access Health Corp.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
accessa Cholesterol Panel (Capillary blood self-collection and transportation system for Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, and Calculated LDL-Cholesterol)
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21CFR 862.1675 (Blood specimen collection devices)
21CFR 862.1175 (Total Cholesterol)
21CFR 862.1475 (HDL Cholesterol)
21CFR 862.1705 (Triglycerides)
2. Classification:
Class II
{1}
3. Product code:
JKA, CHH, LBS, JGY
4. Panel:
75 (Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indication for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The accessa Cholesterol Panel is intended for in vitro, quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides and calculated LDL-Cholesterol in dried micro-serum samples ("Cholesterol Panel"). Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis and various liver and renal diseases. The Cholesterol Panel is not intended for use on neonates. LDL-Cholesterol cannot be determined where the triglycerides value is greater than 400 mg/dL.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use and over-the-counter use; The labeling said "Do NOT use if you have any blood clotting disorder (hemophilia), or are taking prescription medications that thin your blood unless otherwise directed by your doctor."
4. Special instrument requirements:
Roche Cobas Mira Plus analyzer in the clinical laboratory located at Home Access Health Corporation.
I. Device Description:
The accessa Cholesterol Panel incorporates the use of two separately regulated products, the Home Access Micro Serum Specimen (MSS) Collection Kit and the Home Access Health Corporation (HAHC) Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Lipid profile test methods.
The accessa Cholesterol Panel kit is comprised of the following:
- Blood collection/transportation cassette
{2}
- Sample Return Pouch with Desiccant
- 2 Safety lancets
- Gauze pad
- Adhesive bandage
- Instructions for use
- Brochure: “Things you need to know to keep your heart healthy”
- Prepaid US Mail return mailer
- Informed Consent Form
The testing services are done in the clinical laboratory located at Home Access Health Corporation using the Roche Cobas Mira Plus chemical analyzer. Once the dried serum sample is received in the laboratory, it is eluted with a diluent into a diluted serum sample and is assayed using the following predicate reagents. The lipid profile results will be calculated automatically by the analyzer.
- Amresco Cholesterol reagent
- Wako L-Type HDL-Cholesterol reagent
- Roche Triglycerides reagent
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile by BIOSAFE Laboratories, Inc.
Predicate Test Methods for venous whole blood:
- Total Cholesterol: Amresco Cholesterol Reagent Assay
- HDL Cholesterol: Wako L-Type HDL-Cholesterol Reagent Assay
- Triglycerides: Roche Triglycerides Assay
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k012221, k832780, k801834, k801298, respectively
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities and Differences Between Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile (predicate) and accessa Cholesterol Panel (candidate) | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile (Predicate-k012221) | accessa Cholesterol Panel (Candidate) |
| Indications for use | The Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile Blood Collection and Transport System is intended for over-the-counter distribution, for the self-collection and transportation | The accessa Cholesterol Panel is intended for in vitro, quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, |
{3}
| Similarities and Differences Between Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile (predicate) and accessa Cholesterol Panel (candidate) | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Safe At Home Cholesterol Profile (Predicate-k012221) | accessa Cholesterol Panel (Candidate) |
| | of dried capillary blood for in vitro diagnostic quantitative determination of Total Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides and Calculated LDL-Cholesterol in dried blood spots. This kit is not intended for use on neonates. LDL cannot be determined where the triglycerides value is greater than 400 mg/dL | Triglycerides and calculated LDL-Cholesterol in dried micro-serum samples (“Cholesterol Panel”). Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis and various liver and renal diseases. The Cholesterol Panel is not intended for use on neonates. LDL-Cholesterol cannot be determined where the triglycerides value is greater than 400 mg/dL. |
| Location of collection | Home | Same |
| Location of analysis | Laboratory | Same |
| Distribution | Over-the-counter | Same, plus prescription use |
| Analysis | Mail in to laboratory | Same |
| Report | Mailed to user | Same |
| LDL | Calculated | Same |
| Fasting required | Yes | Same |
| Similarities and Differences for Cholesterol | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate | Candidate |
| | Amresco Cholesterol Reagent (Predicate-k832780) | accessa Cholesterol Panel (Candidate) |
| Intended Use | In vitro quantitative determination of total cholesterol in serum | Same |
| Clinical Chemistry Analyzer | Roche Cobas Mira Plus analyzer | Same |
| Linearity | Up to 500 mg/dL | 82-500 mg/dL |
| Specimen Collection/Collection Device | Venipuncture blood sample from fasted individuals, collected in vacutainer containing 4 to 10 mL blood. | Dried micro serum capillary blood specimens from fasted individuals, self-collected into a glass fiber strip. Volume of capillary blood required is less than 0.1 mL. |
| Specimen stability | Samples are stable for up to 7 days at room temperature and up to 6 months at -20°C. | Samples stable up to 21 days at room temperature. |
| Reported values for analytes | Unchanged from the analyzer | Calculated using data from the analyzer. |
{4}
| Similarities and Differences for HDL Cholesterol | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate | Candidate |
| | Wako L-type HDL-C Reagent (Predicate-k801834) | accessa Cholesterol Panel (Candidate) |
| Intended Use | In vitro quantitative determination of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) in serum | Same |
| Clinical Chemistry Analyzer | Roche Cobas Mira Plus analyzer | Same |
| Linearity | Up to 180 mg/dL | 23-151 mg/dL |
| Specimen Collection/Collection Device | Venipuncture blood sample from fasted individuals, collected in vacutainer containing 4 to 10 mL blood. | Dried micro serum capillary blood specimens from fasted individuals, self-collected into a glass fiber strip. Volume of capillary blood required is less than 0.1 mL. |
| Specimen stability | Samples are stable for up to 4 days at 4-6 °C. | Samples stable up to 21 days at room temperature. |
| Reported values for analytes | From the analyzer | Calculated using data from the analyzer. |
| Similarities and Differences for Triglycerides | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Predicate | Candidate |
| | Roche Triglycerides Reagent (Predicate-k801298) | accessa Cholesterol Panel (Candidate) |
| Intended Use | In vitro quantitative determination of triglycerides in serum | Same |
| Clinical Chemistry Analyzer | Roche Cobas Mira Plus analyzer | Same |
| Linearity | Up to 900 mg/dL | 16-900 mg/dL |
| Specimen Collection/Collection Device | Venipuncture blood sample from fasted individuals, collected in vacutainer containing 4 to 10 mL blood. | Dried micro serum capillary blood specimens from fasted individuals, self-collected into a glass fiber strip. Volume of capillary blood required is less than 0.1 mL. |
| Specimen stability | Samples are stable for 5 to 7 days when stored in the refrigerator and up to 3 months at -20°C. | Samples stable up to 21 days at room temperature. |
| Reported values for analytes | From the analyzer | Calculated using data from the analyzer. |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
1. CLSI EP5-A, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices; Approved Guideline.
2. CLSI EP6-A, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Analytical Methods; Proposed Guideline.
3. CLSI EP7-A, Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Proposed Guideline
4. CLSI EP9-A2, Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline Second edition
5. CLSI EP17-A, Protocols for Demonstration, Verification, and Evaluation of Limits of
{5}
Detection and Quantitation: Approve Guideline-2004
6. FDA guidance document, Guidance for 510(k)s on Cholesterol Tests for Clinical Laboratory, Physicians' Office Laboratory and Home Use-1995
7. American Society for Testing and Materials methodology for accelerated aging of medical devices (ASTM F1980)
8. The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), NIH, May 2001
## L. Test Principle:
The lay user follows the directions to self-collect a capillary blood sample (approximately 100 micro liters), package and mail the sample to the Home Access Health Corporation. Once the dried sample is received in the laboratory, it is eluted into a usable serum sample. Once eluted, the sample can be assayed as a diluted serum sample using FDA-cleared reagents. All testing is done using the Roche Cobas Mira Plus analyzer for total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides. The LDL-cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
Cholesterol was certified by the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network (CRMLN) as meeting the National Cholesterol Program's (NCEP) performance criteria for accuracy and precision.
### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
A precision study was performed based on the CLSI EP5-A guideline and NCEP guidelines for accuracy. Two volunteers were chosen as a sample source as their lipoprotein levels were closed to "high" and "low" medical decision levels. Their blood was drawn and spotted onto the 240 blood collection cassettes (micro serum samples, MSS). These MSS samples are allowed to dry, then eluted, and measured on the Roche Cobas Mira analyzer for total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and Triglycerides. All samples were tested twice a day in duplicate for 20 days (N=80). The precision results are shown below:
| Analyte | Concentration | MSS Within run | | MSS Total | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean [ng/dL] | SD [ng/dL] | CV [%] | SD [ng/dL] | CV [%] |
| CHO | 206 | 4.75 | 2.31 | 6.18 | 3.00 |
| CHO | 240 | 5.69 | 2.37 | 6.55 | 2.73 |
| HDL | 40 | 1.26 | 3.15 | 1.57 | 3.92 |
| HDL | 73 | 1.55 | 2.13 | 2.49 | 3.41 |
| TG | 150 | 5.37 | 3.58 | 7.2 | 4.80 |
| TG | 305 | 8.97 | 2.94 | 13.39 | 4.39 |
{6}
For accuracy based on the NCEP guideline's allowable precision, bias, and total % error, the results of the micro serum samples (MSS) are shown in the table below:
| Analyte | Expected value | MSS Total CV% | MSS Bias % | MSS Total Error% | NCEP total Error% |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cholesterol | 206 | 3.00 | -1.12 | 7.36 | <8.9 |
| Cholesterol | 240 | 2.73 | -1.3 | 6.65 | <8.9 |
| HDL Cholesterol | 40 | 3.92 | -2.89 | 10.63 | <12.8 |
| HDL Cholesterol | 73 | 3.41 | -0.46 | 7.15 | <12.8 |
| Triglycerides | 150 | 4.80 | 3.2 | 12.26 | <14.8 |
| Triglycerides | 305 | 4.39 | -1.47 | 9.94 | <14.8 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
A linearity study was performed to validate a linear range of lipid profile testing in micro serum samples (MSS) according to the CLSI EP6-A guideline. Lipid profile testing includes testing of three analytes: Total Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, and Triglycerides. A pair of blood specimens was chosen for each analyte based on high and low levels of each lipoprotein. These specimens were then mixed in different proportions and spotted onto blood collection /transportation cassettes (MSS samples). These MSS samples were then eluted and measured, and their MSS results calculated and compared to the expected plasma values (blood drawn by venipuncture). A total of 11 sets of MSS with different levels were tested in replicates of 4. MSS values were plotted against the expected values and an appropriate line fitted by standard linear regression yielded the following:
For Total Cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9648 + 11.26, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9943$ , sample ranges tested was 82-564 mg/dL.
For HDL Cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.987 + 1.088, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9982$ , sample ranges tested was 10-151 mg/dL.
For Triglyceride: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9860 - 1.03, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9986$ , sample ranges tested was 16-1015 mg/dL.
The sponsor chose the following as their device's linearity ranges: 82-500 mg/dL for total cholesterol, 23-151 mg/dL for HDL-cholesterol and 16-900 mg/dL for Triglycerides.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Home Access Health Corp. has documented traceability to the NCEP's recommended accuracy base for Total Cholesterol by performing a direct comparison with a
{7}
Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network laboratory using fresh human specimens which cover the NCEP medical decision points.
Shelf-life of the blood collection cassette was determined by an accelerated aging study according to the ASTM F1980 document. The sponsor concluded that the blood collection cassette has a shelf-life of 36 months. Sample stability study was conducted by collecting capillary whole blood samples on the collection cassettes and stored at room temperature for 21 days. The acceptance criteria are: the % bias between the control condition and the tested conditions must meet the NCEP acceptance criteria of bias of <3% for cholesterol, <5% for HDL and <5% for triglyceride. Results indicated that the micro serum samples are stable up to 21 days at room temperature.
In addition, a shipping study consisting of spotted dry samples shipped in presumably worst-case real-time shipping conditions, during the hottest month of the year, August, from south (Florida) and southwest (California) locations of the continental USA was conducted and the results showed acceptable stability according to the NCEP acceptance criteria for bias.
Furthermore, a sample stability study that challenge between the extreme temperatures (45°C and -20°C) was conducted to simulate the worst case scenario, consists of samples stressed at 45°C, then thawed and frozen at -20°C for two and half days was performed. The results also showed acceptable stability according to the NCEP acceptance criteria for bias.
d. Detection limit:
A detection limit study was performed to assess the detection limits of the micro serum samples for total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides based on CLSI EP-17A guideline. Limit of Blank (LoB) is determined by using the simulated blood samples: washed red blood cells from 4 different donors mixed with an osmotically balanced salt solution. Limit of Detection (LoD) was conducted by running a sample with concentration up to 4 times the LoB. Testing was done 10 times a day for 3 days on two analyzers (N=60). The calculated limit of detection for total cholesterol is 29 mg/dL, HDL-cholesterol is 11 mg/dL, and triglycerides is 4 mg/dL.
e. Analytical specificity:
An interference study was conducted to determine the effect of common interference substances based on the CLSI EP7-A guidelines. Two levels (around medical decisions points) of total cholesterol, HDL, and triglycerides were tested. Blood samples were drawn from volunteers and split into two pools: one pool was used as the control blood and the other pool was used to spike with different levels of interferents. The following interference substances were tested: bilirubin, hemoglobin, ascorbic acid, and triglycerides. Stock solutions of the above chemicals were prepared and spiked into the tested pool sample with different concentrations.
8
{8}
The % bias was calculated based on the differences between the spiked sample and the control sample. Results of the interference studies of various potential interferents were shown as follows:
For the total cholesterol assay:
Bilirubin: Interference ≤ 3% for up to 17.4 mg/dL bilirubin
Hemolysis: Interference ≤ 3% for up to 500 mg/L hemoglobin (The sponsor states that the lab will visually inspect all specimens and reject any that are hemolyzed.)
Ascorbic acid: Interference ≤ 7% for up to 6 g/L ascorbic acid
For the HDL-cholesterol assay:
Bilirubin: Interference ≤ 5% for up to 42.3 mg/dL bilirubin
Hemolysis: Interference ≤ 5% for up to 500 mg/L hemoglobin
Triglyceride: Interference ≤ 5% for up to 625 mg/L Triglycerides
Ascorbic acid: Interference ≤ 5% for up to 6 g/L ascorbic acid
For the Triglycerides assay:
Bilirubin: Interference ≤ 5% for up to 17.4 mg/dL bilirubin
Hemolysis: Interference ≤ 5% for up to 500 mg/L hemoglobin
Ascorbic acid: Interference ≤ 10% for up to 6 g/L ascorbic acid
A hematocrit study was conducted based on the CLSI EP7-A guideline. For each analyte, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides, two volunteer donors were drawn. The venous blood was drawn and spun down to separate red blood cells and plasma. Then the blood cells were mixed back with plasma to reach 35% (low), 45% (control) and 55% (high) hematocrits. The blood specimens with these 3 hematocrits were spotted onto 28 collection cassettes each, dried and packaged according to the package insert. Micro serum samples results for the low and high hematocrits were compared to the control group. The difference between the tested hematocrits (35% and 55%) and the control hematocrit (45%) was calculated and the allowable bias difference was based on the NCEP guidelines for each analyte. All the results met the NCEP % bias criteria (criteria: cholesterol is <3%, HDL is <5%, and Triglyceride is <5%). The sponsor concluded that hematocrit range at 35% to 55% do not interfere with any of the measured lipoproteins.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
{9}
A method comparison study was conducted based on the CLSI EP9-A2 guideline. The study was performed to compare test results obtained by the lay user's finger-stick samples with the test results by the venous samples using the Roche Cobas Mira analyzer in the clinical laboratory of the Home Access Health Corporation (HAHC). Blood samples were collected by lay user at a clinic and mailed to HAHC for analysis. In addition, professionally collected finger-stick samples were also collected and mailed at the same time. Results of the standard linear regressions were shown below:
Between the lay user's finger-stick and the venous samples:
For total cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 1.016\mathrm{X} - 4.4, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9836, \mathrm{N} = 151$ , sample range was 127-467 mg/dL
For HDL-cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9937\mathrm{X} - 0.904, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9639, \mathrm{N} = 137$ , sample range was 22-141 mg/dL
For triglycerides: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9798\mathrm{X} + 7.8, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9771, \mathrm{N} = 141$ , sample range was 33-591 mg/dL
Between the professional-collected finger-stick and the venous samples:
For total cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9863\mathrm{X} + 7.486, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9814, \mathrm{N} = 155$ , sample range was 127-467 mg/dL
For HDL-cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 1.008\mathrm{X} + 0.5872, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9581, \mathrm{N} = 142$ , sample range was 22-141 mg/dL
For triglycerides: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9788\mathrm{X} + 9.70, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9777, \mathrm{N} = 147$ , sample range was 33-875 mg/dL
Between the lay user's finger-stick and the professional's finger-stick:
For total cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 1.003\mathrm{X} - 5.4, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9195, \mathrm{N} = 111$ , sample range was 127-316 mg/dL
For HDL-cholesterol: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.931\mathrm{X} - 1.34, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9049, \mathrm{N} = 110$ , sample range was 22-129 mg/dL
For triglycerides: $\mathrm{Y} = 0.9599\mathrm{X} + 4.016, \mathrm{r}^2 = 0.9283, \mathrm{N} = 107$ , sample range was 33-506 mg/dL
Approximately $93\%$ of the home users were able to successfully self-collect a dried capillary sample while the professionals' success rate is $92\%$ . In addition, some samples are hemolyzed and cannot be used for analysis; therefore, the sponsor has put a warning statement in their package insert as follows: "Avoid excessive squeezing
10
{10}
or milking of the finger". The sponsor claims that the laboratory will visually inspect all samples and reject those that are hemolyzed.
## Laboratory Results Classification as Compared with NCEP Criteria
When 155 individual results for Cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and Triglycerides were classified according to NCEP criteria, the majority of the results were correctly classified as identified in the chart below.
| Results Classification as Compared with NCEP Criteria | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Cholesterol | HDL-Cholesterol | Triglycerides |
| Results Correctly Classified | 90 % | 90 % | 91 % |
| Misclassified high risk (indicates the percentage of the time that your results could actually be lower than the reading you obtain) | 5 % | 4 % | 6 % |
| Misclassified lower risk (indicates the percentage of the time that your results could actually be higher than the reading you obtain) | 5 % | 6 % | 3% |
b. Matrix comparison:
N/A
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
N/A
b. Clinical specificity:
N/A
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
A HDL cholesterol comparison study was performed with the CRLMN using 55 samples ranged between 24-69 mg/dL. The Home Access candidate device met the NCEP acceptance criteria of ≤ 5% bias and ≤ 4% precision. However, the CRLMN has an additional requirement of R square of >0.975, which the candidate device did not meet. The Home Access candidate device had achieved a R square of 0.9545.
4. Clinical cut-off:
{11}
N/A
5. Expected values/Reference range:
*The NCEP ATP III guidelines suggest the following classifications:
| Total cholesterol: | <200 mg/dL | Desirable |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 200-239 mg/dL | Borderline High |
| | ≥240 mg/dL | High |
| HDL-cholesterol: | <40 mg/dL | Low |
| | ≥60 mg/dL | High |
| LDL-cholesterol: | <100 mg/dL | Optimal |
| | 100-129 mg/dL | Near Optimal |
| | 130-159 mg/dL | Borderline High |
| | 160-189 mg/dL | High |
| | ≥190 mg/dL | Very High |
| Triglycerides: | <150 mg/dL | Normal |
| | 150-199 mg/dL | Borderline High |
| | 200-499 mg/dL | High |
| | ≥500 mg/dL | Very High |
*The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) - NIH, May 2001
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.