K063562 · ETHICON, Inc. · OTP · Feb 26, 2007 · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Device Facts
Record ID
K063562
Device Name
GYNECARE PROSIMA PELVIC FLOOR REPAIR SYSTEMS
Applicant
ETHICON, Inc.
Product Code
OTP · Obstetrics/Gynecology
Decision Date
Feb 26, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 884.5980
Device Class
Class 3
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The GYNECARE PROSIMA Pelvic Floor Repair Systems, through the placement of GYNECARE GYNEMESH* PS Nonabsorbable PROLENE* Soft Mesh Implants, are indicated for tissue reinforcement and long-lasting stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor, either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect. The Systems provide maintenance of the vaginal canal during the period of healing following surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse, while supporting the position of the Mesh Implants.
Device Story
System comprises pre-cut nonabsorbable polypropylene mesh implants, vaginal support balloon assembly, and manual insertion instruments; used by surgeons in clinical settings for pelvic floor repair. Mesh provides structural reinforcement for fascial defects; balloon assembly, inflated with air, maintains vaginal canal patency and supports mesh position during initial 24-hour healing period; silicone support device remains for up to four weeks to facilitate tissue in-growth. System reduces risk of contracture, stenosis, and adhesions post-surgery. Benefits include stabilized pelvic floor anatomy and improved healing outcomes for vaginal wall prolapse.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing and cadaver testing to verify functional performance and material biocompatibility per ISO 10993-1.
Technological Characteristics
System includes nonabsorbable polypropylene mesh (PROLENE) and silicone vaginal support balloon. Materials assessed per ISO 10993-1. Manual insertion instruments included. Mechanical support provided by mesh; post-operative canal maintenance provided by air-inflated silicone balloon. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring tissue reinforcement and stabilization of pelvic floor fascial structures, including mechanical support or bridging for fascial defects, and maintenance of the vaginal canal following surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Surgical mesh for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair is a prescription device intended to reinforce soft tissue in the pelvic floor. This device is a porous implant that is made of synthetic material, non-synthetic material, or a combination of synthetic and non-synthetic materials. This device does not include surgical mesh for other intended uses (§ 878.3300 of this chapter).
{0}------------------------------------------------
K063562 1/2
# Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
Information supporting claims of substantial equivalence, as defined under the Federal Food. Drug and Cosmetic Act, respecting safety and effectiveness is summarized below.
#### Submitted by:
Patrice Napoda Mgr. Requlatory Affairs Ethicon, Inc., A Johnson & Johnson Company Route 22 West, PO Box 151 Somerville, NJ 08876
FEB 26 2007
#### Name/Classification of Device:
Class II in 21 CFR § 878.3300, Surgical Mesh (OTP) Class II in 21 CFR§ 884.3900, Vaginal Stent Class I in 21 CFR § 880.6960 Irrigating syringe Class I in 21 CFR § 878.4800 Manual surgical instrument for general use
#### Trade Name:
GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair Systems
#### Predicate Devices:
GYNECARE GYNEMESH* PS Nonabsorbable PROLENE* Soft Mesh Silimed Vaginal Stent
#### Statement of Intended Use:
The GYNECARE PROSIMA Pelvic Floor Repair Systems, through the placement of GYNECARE GYNEMESH* PS Nonabsorbable PROLENE* Soft Mesh Implants, are indicated for tissue reinforcement and long-lasting stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor, either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect. The Systems provide maintenance of the vaginal canal during the period of healing following surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse, while supporting the position of the Mesh Implants.
#### DESCRIPTION
The GYNECARE PROSIMA Anterior, Posterior, and Combined Pelvic Floor Repair Systems consist of pre-cut GYNECARE GYNEMESH PS Mesh Implant(s), and instruments to facilitate Mesh Implant placement and postoperative support. The following table summarizes the components included with each System:
{1}------------------------------------------------
| | COMPONENTS | | | | |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|------------------------------|----------------|
| PELVIC<br>FLOOR<br>REPAIR<br>SYSTEM | Mesh<br>Implant in<br>Carrier<br>(A) | Vaginal<br>Support<br>Device -<br>Balloon<br>Assembly<br>(B&C) | Anterior<br>Inserter<br>(D) | Posterior<br>Inserter<br>(E) | Syringe<br>(F) |
| Anterior | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 1 |
| Posterior | 1 | 1 | | 1 | 1 |
| Combined | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
## Summary of Technological Characteristics of New Device to Predicate Devices:
The modified device has similar technological characteristics to those of the predicate devices. Like currently marketed devices, the system contains a sterile, mesh implant made from GYNECARE GYNEMESH* PS Nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh and is intended for the repair of fascial structures of the pelvic floor. Like several of the currently marketed devices, the mesh implant within the proposed device is made of nonabsorbable polymers. The polymers used are identical to those found in GYNECARE GYNEMESH* PS Nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh, currently marketed by Ethicon. Inc.
The Vaginal Support Device-Balloon Assembly of the system, as in the predicate vaginal stent, provides support to the vaginal canal after surgery, thus reducing the possibility of contracture, stenosis and vaginal canal adhesions. The balloon portion of the assembly is inflated with air, similar to the predicate device, filling the vaginal canal space for the first twenty-four hours. The Vaginal Support Device of the assembly is made of silicon, as is the predicate device, and remains in the vaginal canal for up to four weeks, providing continuing support to the vagina and the Mesh Implants as tissue in-growth occurs. The predicate vaginal stent is intended to remain in the vaginal canal for up to twelve weeks while tissue healing occurs.
## Performance Data:
Biological reactivity of the materials has been assessed using methods specified in ISO Standard 10993-1, with results to date demonstrating that the materials are acceptable for the intended use. Results of functional performance testing (bench and cadaver testing) indicate that the proposed device meets or exceeds all functional requirements.
## Conclusions:
Based on the similarities to the predicate devices identified in this submission, we conclude that the modified device is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
· Trademark of Ethicon, Inc.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of an eagle with three heads, representing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans and provide essential human services. The eagle is enclosed in a circle with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES · USA" around the perimeter.
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002
Ms. Patrice Napoda Sr. Project Manger Ethicon, Inc. Route 22 West, P.O. Box 151 SOMERVILLE NJ 08876
SEP 2 8 2012
Re: K063562 Trade/Device Name: GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair Systems Regulation Number: 21 CFR 878.3300 Regulation Name: Surgical mesh Regulatory Class: II Product Code: OTP Dated: January 25, 2007 Received: January 26, 2007
Dear Ms. Napoda:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of February 26, 2007.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must
{3}------------------------------------------------
comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled. "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.
You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.
Sincerely yours,
Sincerely yours,
Benjamin R. Perkins
Beniamin R. Fisher, Ph.D. Director Division of Reproductive, Gastro-Renal. and Urological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
Kass 62
Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): Ko C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3 C 3
Device Name: GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair Systems
Indications for Use:
The GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair Systems, through the placement of GYNECARE GYNEMESH* PS Nonabsorbable PROLENE Soft Mesh, are indicated for tissue reinforcement and long-lasting stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor, either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect. The Systems provide maintenance of the vaginal canal during the period of healing following surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse, while supporting the position of the Mesh Implants.
*Trademark.
Prescription Use ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________(21 CFR 801 Subpa (21 CFR 801 Subpart C) (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Neil R. Oskie
(Division Sign-Off) Divison of General, Restorative, and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K063562
MX M
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.