SPACELABS MEDICAL FULL DISCLOSURE SYSTEM, MODEL 91810
K063490 · Spacelabs Medical, Inc. · DQK · Mar 15, 2007 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K063490
Device Name
SPACELABS MEDICAL FULL DISCLOSURE SYSTEM, MODEL 91810
Applicant
Spacelabs Medical, Inc.
Product Code
DQK · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
Mar 15, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1425
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device
Indications for Use
The Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System is indicated for use in clinical situations where there is a need for review of physiological waveform information and alarm events up to 72 hours after the fact. The Full Disclosure System is also indicated in those situations where a retrospective analysis of monitoring patients' ECG waveform data, that can be annotated and edited, is desired The intended use of the Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System is to interface with the Spacelabs monitoring network in order to provide the user with a means of recalling waveform information and retrospectively analyzing up to 72 hours of monitoring patient's most recent ECG waveform data.
Device Story
Software application installed on off-the-shelf (OTS) PC with Microsoft OS; interfaces with Spacelabs patient monitoring network. Inputs: historical physiological waveforms (ECG, arterial/pulmonary/central venous/intracranial/left atrial/umbilical pressures, SpO2, CO2/multigas, respiration) and alarm events stored in network database. Operation: retrieves up to 72 hours of data for display/printing; applies shape-based retrospective algorithm to ECG data to identify clinically significant events. Output: visual/printed waveform reports and annotated ECG analysis results. Used by clinicians in hospital settings to review patient history and support clinical decision-making. Benefits: provides extended retrospective visibility into patient physiological status and alarm history.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. No clinical data provided. Validation focused on software performance, data recall accuracy, and retrospective analysis algorithm functionality.
Technological Characteristics
Software application for OTS PC; Microsoft OS. Connectivity: networked to Spacelabs bedside monitors. Algorithm: shape-based retrospective ECG analysis. Data storage: 72-hour history. Software development: robust process with full specification and validation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for clinical environments requiring review of physiological waveforms and alarm events up to 72 hours post-acquisition; includes retrospective analysis, annotation, and editing of ECG waveform data for monitored patients.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A programmable diagnostic computer is a device that can be programmed to compute various physiologic or blood flow parameters based on the output from one or more electrodes, transducers, or measuring devices; this device includes any associated commercially supplied programs.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Premarket Notification Spacelabs Medical, Inc. Full Disclosure System, Model 91810 Summary of Safety and Effectiveness
MAR 1 5 2007 This 510(k) summary of safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 1992.
| Subject: | 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Information for the Spacelabs<br>Medical Full Disclosure System, Model 91810 |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Submitter: | Spacelabs Medical, Inc.<br>5150 220th Ave SE<br>Issaquah, WA 98029-6834 |
| | David J. Geraghty<br>Phone: 1 425 657 7200<br>Fax: 1 425 657 7207<br>david.geraghty@slmd.com |
| Establishment<br>Registration<br>Number: | 3023361 |
| Proprietary<br>Name: | Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System, Model 91810 |
| Common<br>Name | Full Disclosure System |
| Classification: | Programmable Diagnostic Computer,<br>Product Code 74 DQK; 21CFR 870.1425. Class II |
| Performance<br>Standard: | To the best of Spacelabs Medical, Inc.'s knowledge, performance standards<br>have not been promulgated by FDA for this device. |
{1}------------------------------------------------
Device Description:
The Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System (FD), model 91810, is a software application intended to be installed on an Off-The-Shelf (OTS) computer system utilizing a Microsoft operating system. The primary purpose of the FD system is to review, up to 72 hours of monitored patients' historical physiological waveform and alarm event information. The system also provides for a Retrospective Analysis of the stored ECG waveform data.
The Full Disclosure system is a software application that provides fulldisclosure functionality for Spacelabs Medical bedside monitors. Depending on options purchased, a maximum of 72 hours of patient waveform history can be viewed for patients connected to the monitoring network. The system supports the following waveform channels: ECG Primary and secondary, Arterial pressure, Pulmonary artery pressure, Central venous pressure, Right atrial pressure, Intracranial pressure, Left atrial pressure, General pressure, Umbilical artery pressure, Pulse oximetry, Umbilical venous pressure, Adult or neonatal ventilator Flexport, Carbon dioxide / multigas Flexport or module, Sp02/ET02 Flexport and Respiration.
The Full Disclosure application allows the user to view and print the full array of waveform information collected from Spacelabs Medical bedside monitors connected to the Spacelabs Medical patient monitoring network. The Alarm events, 12 Lead Reports and waveform information is available to the user for up to 72 hours after the information is stored in the network's database.
In addition, the system incorporates a shape-based, Retrospective Algorithm that may be applied to the ECG waveform data, if desired. This Retrospective Algorithm can identify clinically significant ECG events and make them available for viewing and printing. When ECG analysis is performed, the results are stored locally, not in the database. Preference information, such as display and report options, is saved on the local machine, not in the database.
Intended Use:
The Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System is indicated for use in clinical situations where there is a need for review of physiological waveform information and alarm events up to 72 hours after the fact. The Full Disclosure System is also indicated in those situations where a retrospective analysis of monitoring patients' ECG waveform data, that can be annotated and edited, is desired
The intended use of the Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System is to interface with the Spacelabs monitoring network in order to provide the user with a means of recalling waveform information and retrospectively analyzing up to 72 hours of monitoring patient's most recent ECG waveform data.
November 9, 2006 Page 2 of 3
■
(063490
交 20f3
{2}------------------------------------------------
K063490
pg 3 of 3
## Test Discussion:
The Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System, Model 91810 and the Spacelabs Medical ECG analysis system, model 91810, K962930 are substantially equivalent in design concepts, technologies and materials. The Full Disclosure System was validated through rigorous testing that, in part, support the compliance of the software to the Standards mentioned in Section 9 of this submission. Additionally, the Full Disclosure software was developed following a robust software development process and was fully specified and validated. The test program verified that data available to the Full Disclosure System could be accurately recalled and that the Retrospective Analysis performed as expected.
Test · Conclusion:
The Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System, Model 91810, is substantially equivalent to its predicate devices in design concepts, technologies and materials. Testing demonstrates that Full Disclosure System is as safe and effective as the Spacelabs Medical ECG Analysis System, K962930.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR 1 5 2007
Spacelabs Medical Mr. David Geraghty 5150 220th Ave SE Issaquah, WA 98029-6834
Re: K063490 Trade Name: Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1425 Regulation Name: Programmable diagnostic computer Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: DQK Dated: February 27, 2007 Received: March 1, 2007
Dear Mr. Geraghty,
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. David Geraghty
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (240) 276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Bflumenafor
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510(k) Number (if known): K063490
## Device Name: Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System, Model 91810
Indications for Use:
The Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System is indicated for use in clinical situations where there is a need for review of physiological waveform information and alarm events up to 72 hours after the fact. The Full Disclosure System is also indicated in those situations where a retrospective analysis of monitoring patients' ECG waveform data, that can be annotated and edited, is desired
The intended use of the Spacelabs Medical Full Disclosure System is to interface with the Spacelabs monitoring network in order to provide the user with a means of recalling waveform information and retrospectively analyzing up to 72 hours of monitoring patient's most recent ECG waveform data.
Prescription Use XX (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use (21 CFR 801 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE OF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Bhumma
n of Cardlov 510(k) Number
Page 1 of 1
000010
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.