The Monobind AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test system for the quantitative determination of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) in human whole blood dried on Whatman 903 filter paper. It is intended to be used to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism. For Prescription Use Only. This kit is not to be used for confirmatory testing, prenatal testing or to monitor therapy. This kit will not detect secondary hypothyroidism due to failure of the hypothalamus nor will it detect tertiary hypothyroidism due to pituitary failure. A definitive clinical diagnosis should not be based on the results of a single test but should be made by the physician after all of the clinical and laboratory findings have been evaluated. An additional diagnostic procedure, using serum as the sample, should be performed to confirm a diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism.
Device Story
Solid phase two-site immunoenzymometric assay (ELISA) for TSH quantification. Input: dried whole blood spot on Whatman 903 filter paper. Process: specimen added to streptavidin-coated well; biotinylated monoclonal anti-TSH antibodies added to form complex; incubation; wash step; enzyme-labeled anti-TSH antibody added to form sandwich complex; second incubation; wash; substrate added to produce color proportional to TSH concentration. Output: colorimetric measurement of TSH levels. Used in clinical laboratory settings by technicians. Results interpreted by clinicians alongside other patient information to screen for congenital hypothyroidism.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study performed using 264 patient samples from 3-7 day old infants, comparing the subject device to the predicate DPC RIA kit. Regression analysis yielded y = 1.0182x + 0.3306 with r^2 = 0.9783. Concordance across clinical ranges (0-20, 20-40, >40 μIU/ml) was evaluated. Reference range study conducted on 158 normal newborn specimens (0-7 days old) showed a range of 0.7-25.52 μIU/ml.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase two-site immunoenzymometric assay. Components: streptavidin-coated 96-well microplate, biotinylated monoclonal anti-TSH IgG, enzyme-labeled polyclonal goat anti-TSH IgG, TMB/H2O2 substrate. Detection via microplate spectrophotometer. Calibrators/controls prepared in dried blood spots on Whatman 903 filter paper. Measuring range: 2-250 μIU/ml. No specific software algorithm class mentioned; manual/spectrophotometric data reduction.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of TSH in dried whole blood spots on Whatman 903 filter paper to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A thyroid stimulating hormone test system is a device intended to measure thyroid stimulating hormone, also known as thyrotrophin and thyrotrophic hormone, in serum and plasma. Measurements of thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k063437
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative enzyme immunoassay
E. Applicant:
Monobind, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §862.1690, Thyroid stimulating hormone test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
JLW, Radioimmunoassay, thyroid-stimulating hormone
4. Panel:
Clinical Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indication for use below.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Monobind AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay is an *in vitro* diagnostic test system for the quantitative determination of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) in human whole blood dried on Whatman 903 filter paper. It is intended to be used to screen newborns for congenital hypothyroidism.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription Use Only.
This kit is not to be used for confirmatory testing, prenatal testing or to monitor therapy. This kit will not detect secondary hypothyroidism due to failure of the hypothalamus nor will it detect tertiary hypothyroidism due to pituitary failure.
A definitive clinical diagnosis should not be based on the results of a single test but should be made by the physician after all of the clinical and laboratory findings have been evaluated. An additional diagnostic procedure, using serum as the sample, should be performed to confirm a diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism.
{1}
4. Special instrument requirements:
A microplate spectrophotometer.
I. Device Description:
For the assay: NTSH Enzyme Reagent (enzyme-labeled affinity-purified polyclonal goat anti-TSH IgG in Tris buffer with red dye and stabilizers), NTSH Biotin Reagent (anti-TSH monoclonal IgG labeled with biotin in Tris buffer with green dye and stabilizers), one streptavidin-coated 96-well microplate, Wash Solution (surfactant in phosphate buffered saline with preservative), Substrate Solution (tetramethylbenzidine and hydrogen peroxide in acetate buffer) and Stop Solution (0.4N HCl).
Neo-TSH Calibrators: Six levels of TSH antigen in dried blood spots (plus preservative) at approximate levels of 0 (A), 4 (B), 18 (C), 40 (D), 100 (E), and 250 (F) $\mu$IU/ml dried on Whatman 903 filter paper.
Neo-TSH Controls: Three levels of TSH antigen in dried blood spots (plus preservative) on Whatman 903 filter paper.
All products that contain human components have been found to be non-reactive for Hepatitis B surface antigen, HIV 1 & 2 and HCV antibodies by FDA licensed reagents.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s): DPC Neonatal TSH RIA Kit (¹²⁵I)
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s): k772192
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Predicate device (k772192) | Proposed device |
| Intended Use | It is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid in screening for thyroid disorders in neonates. | Same |
| Test principle | Quantitative immunoassay | same |
| Number of calibrator levels | Six | same |
| Sample type | Blood spot on Whatman 903 filter paper | same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Predicate device (k772192) | Proposed device |
| Reaction tube/location | Polystyrene tube | Streptavidin coated 96-well microplate |
| Instrument for quantitating labeled TSH | Gamma counter | Spectrophotometer |
| Antibody label | ¹²⁵I | biotin |
{2}
3
K. Standard/Guidance Documents Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced.
L. Test Principle:
The Monobind AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay is a solid phase two-site immunoenzymometric assay based on the direct sandwich technique in which two specific antibodies are directed against two separate antigenic determinants on the hTSH molecule. In this method, TSH dried whole blood calibrator, patient specimen, or control is first added to a streptavidin coated well. Elution buffer containing biotinylated monoclonal antibodies are added and the reactants mixed. Reaction between the biotinylated anti-TSH and the TSH in the dried blood spot forms a complex that binds to the streptavidin coated to the well due to the inherent affinity of streptavidin and biotin. After the completion of the first incubation period, excess reactants are washed off via a wash step and the enzyme conjugate (another specific anti-TSH antibody linked to an enzyme) is added to the Ag-Ab complex deposited on the plastic surface. The enzyme labeled anti-TSH antibody binds to the TSH making a sandwich complex with two antibodies bound to the antigen during a second incubation. The microplate is washed to remove unreacted enzyme. Finally, the activity of the enzyme present on the surface of the well is quantitated by reaction with a substrate to produce color. The color is measured with a microplate spectrophotometer. The enzyme activity on the well is directly proportional to the TSH concentration in the dried blood spot. By utilizing several different dried spots of known antigen concentration, a dose response cure can be generated from which the antigen concentration of an unknown can be ascertained.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The inter- and intra-assay precision of the AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay was determined by analyses of three different levels of three pooled human whole blood spotted controls. The number mean values, standard deviations (SD) and coefficient of variation for each of these control sera are presented below:
Intra-assay: twenty replicates of each of three pooled human blood spotted controls (low, medium, and high levels of TSH) were assayed in the same assay. An intra-assay precision of 5.1 – 8.6% was obtained:
| | Low pool | Medium pool | High pool |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Number (n) | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Mean | 10.6 | 43.3 | 87.1 |
| 1 SD | 0.91 | 3.61 | 4.42 |
| % CV | 8.6 | 8.3 | 5.1 |
Inter-assay: one duplicate of each of three pooled human blood spotted controls (low, medium and high levels of TSH) was assayed in 10 assays done
{3}
over a period of six months that involved five different sets of reagents and three different technicians. An inter-assay precision of 6.0-10.8% was obtained.
| | Low pool | Medium pool | High pool |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Number (n) | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Mean | 11.05 | 42.22 | 85.10 |
| 1 SD | 1.20 | 3.76 | 5.11 |
| % CV | 10.80 | 8.90 | 6.00 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The claimed range for this assay is 2 - 250 uIU/ml.
A pool of human blood was purchased and hematocrit was adjusted to 55%. An aliquot of this sample was assayed using Monobind’s liquid phase TSH Elisa test (k971980) to give the baseline of TSH present in the sample. This original sample was spiked with TSH (standardized against WHO 2nd IRP 80/558) to 300 uIU/mL and then used to dilute the spiked sample to various concentrations across the measuring range before spotting on filter paper. Four replicates of each concentration were measured.
Linear regression statistics:
$$
y = 1.0139x - 0.4243
$$
$$
r^2 = 0.996
$$
| Target value (μIU/ml) | Observed value (μIU/ml) | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 300 | 289.36 | 96.4 |
| 250 | 255.03 | 102.0 |
| 200 | 194.84 | 97.42 |
| 150 | 143.21 | 95.47 |
| 100 | 92.72 | 92.72 |
| 50 | 50.75 | 101.5 |
| 25 | 25.72 | 102.9 |
| 12.5 | 12.15 | 97.2 |
| 6.25 | 6.42 | 102.7 |
| 2.0 | 1.91 | 95.5 |
The recovery at each dilution was within 10% of the expected value.
Hook effect:
Two different sera were taken and spiked to different levels with TSH stock solution made from the WHO 2nd IRP 89/558. Results showed no hook effect for the Monobind AccuBind Neo-TSH Assay when concentrations up to 10,000 uIU/ml TSH were tested.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
{4}
Controls and calibrators: For the calibrators and controls, a master dose response curve is generated using master calibrators referenced to the WHO 2nd IRP 80/558 standard for TSH.
Controls and calibrators are created by adding purified, lyophilized TSH to a pooled whole blood sample with low TSH value (and preservatives) to the various desired TSH levels. These samples are spotted on Whatman 903 filter paper. Values for each control and calibrator are assigned by using the master curve described above.
Stability: Study protocols, preliminary data and acceptance criteria for stability testing were provided for the Monobind AccuBind Neo-TSH Elisa Assay at room (20-25°C), refrigerated (2-8°C) and elevated (37°C) temperatures and found to be acceptable. Based on the accelerated stability data, twelve month stability at 2-8°C is claimed for the Assay kit. Real-time studies will continue to confirm and extend the dating.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of the Blank (LoB) was determined after 16 tests of the '0' level NeoTSH Calibrator. CLSI guideline EP17 was not followed to evaluate the LoB. The LoB (the mean + 2 standard deviations) was calculated to be 0.5 μIU/ml.
The low limit of the claimed assay measuring range (2 uIU/mL) was determined based on the linearity study described above.
e. Analytical specificity:
Cross reactivity between potential interfering substances and this assay was tested by spiking high levels of these substances into a pooled blood sample and calculating changes in assay results with and without the substance added. No cross reactivity was observed with hLH (1,000 mIU/ml), hFSH (1,000 mIU/ml), hCG (10,000 mIU/ml) or hPRL (1,000 ng/ml). No effect on the performance of the assay was observed with up to 200 ug/ml of bilirubin, 36 - 55% hematocrit, or in samples enhanced with 4% additional packed red blood cells.
Testing to evaluate whether there is end-of-run effect (due to time delay in reagent dispensing) with the AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay showed that there was no drift in the measurement of the control material whether these samples were placed in the beginning, middle, or end of the microwell plate.
Additional potential effects on TSH are noted in the package insert and literature is provided as references to support some of this information:
1. TSH concentration, in the circulation, is dependent upon a multiplicity of factors: hypothalamus gland function, thyroid gland function, and the responsiveness of pituitary to TRH. Thus, thyrotropin concentration alone
5
{5}
is not sufficient to assess clinical status.
2. TSH values may be elevated by pharmacological intervention. Domperiodone, amiodazon, iodide, phenobarbital, and phenytoin have been reported to increase TSH levels¹.
3. A decrease in thyrotropin values has been reported with the administration of propranolol, methimazol, dopamine and d-thyroxine¹.
¹ Young, D.S., Pestaner, L.C., and Gilberman, U., "Effects of Drugs on Clinical Laboratory Tests", ClinicalChemistry, 21, 3660 (1975).
f. Assay cut-off: Not applicable.
## 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
264 patient samples from 3-7 day old infants were used tested on both the predicate device, DPC RIA kit, and the AccuBind Neo-TSH Microwell Elisa Assay. Samples were obtained from the NJ Department of Health laboratory; patients were referred to this laboratory for routine thyroid testing mandated by universal screening for congenital hypothyroidism. 103 samples from 3-7 day old infants considered hypothyroid from testing on the predicate device were also tested on the proposed device. These patient samples were referred to the laboratory for thyroid status check.
Regression statistics:
$$
y = 1.0182x + 0.3306
$$
$$
r^2 = 0.9783
$$
range = 0.64-26.6 (normal samples); 29.0-264.7 (hypothyroid samples)
| | Predicate device | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 0-20 μIU/ml | 20-40 μIU/ml | >40 μIU/ml |
| Proposed device | 0-20 μIU/ml | 161 | 2 | - |
| | 20-40 μIU/ml | 2 | 17 | 2 |
| | >40 μIU/ml | - | 1 | 79 |
b. Matrix comparison: Not applicable.
## 3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable.
{6}
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off:
The sponsor references the guideline for newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism from the American Academy of Pediatrics for interpretation of screening results as follows:
| Category | TSH μIU/ml Serum |
| --- | --- |
| Slightly Elevated | 20 – 40 |
| Positive (Hypothyroid) | > 40 |
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Recommended guidelines for newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism have been published by the American Academy of Pediatrics. For infants 2-6 days old, these recommendations categorize TSH concentrations as “normal”, “elevated” or “only slightly elevated” relative to values of 20 and 40 uIU/mL. According to the AAP guidelines, “any infant with a low T4 and TSH concentration greater than 40 mU/L is considered to have primary hypothyroidism until proved otherwise.” Furthermore, “in cases in which the screening TSH concentration is only slightly elevated, above 20 mU/L but less than 40 mU/L, another filter paper specimen should be obtained for a subsequent test.”
A study of 158 newborn normal specimens (0-7 days old) was completed and the following range was observed: 0.7-25.52μIU/mL.
| Age (Days) | Days (0 – 3) | Days (0 – 5) | Days (0 – 7) | Number & % < 20 μIU/ml) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Total (n) | 50 | 86 | 158 | 153 (97.4%) |
| Range(μIU/ml) | (0.55 – 17.20) | (0.55 – 21.40) | (0.55 – 25.52) | |
| Mean (μIU/ml) | 7.54 | 8.66 | 8.75 | |
| At 95% (n) | 0.57-15.11 (48) | 0.57-18.7 (81) | 0.57-25.52 (156) | |
| At 90% (n) | 0.52–13.98 (46) | 0.52 – 14.65 (81) | 0.52-18.7 (157) | |
The manufacturer recommends that each laboratory determine their own in-house range using the method with a population indigenous to the area in which the laboratory is located.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.