DIMENSION VISTA IGE FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, PROTEIN 1 CALIBRATOR, PROTEIN 1 CONTROL MEDIUM, AND PROTEIN 1 CONTROL HIGH
K063425 · Dade Behring, Inc. · DGC · Feb 15, 2007 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K063425
Device Name
DIMENSION VISTA IGE FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, PROTEIN 1 CALIBRATOR, PROTEIN 1 CONTROL MEDIUM, AND PROTEIN 1 CONTROL HIGH
Applicant
Dade Behring, Inc.
Product Code
DGC · Immunology
Decision Date
Feb 15, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5510
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
Dimension Vista™ IGE Flex® reagent cartridge: The IGE method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative determination of Immunoglobulin E in human serum, heparinized plasma or EDTA plasma on the Dimension Vista® System. Measurements of IGE aid in the diagnosis of IgE mediated allergic disorders in conjunction with other clinical findings. Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator: PROT1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods on the Dimension Vista® System. Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Controls L, M and H: PROT1 CON L, M, and H are assayed intra-laboratory quality controls for assessment of precision and analytical bias in the determination of C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods on the Dimension Vista® System.
Device Story
The Dimension Vista IGE Flex reagent cartridge is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the Dimension Vista System. It utilizes an immunochemical reaction where proteins in human serum or plasma samples form immune complexes with specific antibodies. These complexes scatter light; the intensity of scattered light is proportional to the protein concentration. The system evaluates results by comparing them against a known standard (Protein 1 Calibrator). Protein 1 Controls (L, M, H) are used to assess precision and analytical bias. The device is intended for use in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing IgE-mediated allergic disorders.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated per CLSI EP5-A2 (repeatability ≤3.5%, within-lab ≤7.0%). Linearity confirmed across 18-1150 IU/mL range (R=0.996). Method comparison against predicate (n=120) showed high correlation (r=0.999, slope 1.041). Interference testing (CLSI EP7-A2) showed <9% bias for common endogenous substances. No clinical diagnostic sensitivity/specificity studies performed.
Technological Characteristics
Immunonephelometric assay using polystyrene particles coated with mouse monoclonal anti-human IgE. Reagents include phosphate buffer, polyethylene glycol, and sorbitan monolaureate. System: Dimension Vista® automated analyzer. Traceability: 2nd IRP 75/502. Reportable range: 18-1150 IU/mL. Analytical sensitivity: 0.953 IU/mL. Limit of detection: 3.6 IU/mL.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of Immunoglobulin E (IgE) in human serum, heparinized plasma, or EDTA plasma to aid in the diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergic disorders in conjunction with other clinical findings. Applicable to all patient populations (neonates, infants, children, and adults).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the immunoglobulins A, G, M, D, an E (serum antibodies) in serum. Measurement of these immunoglobulins aids in the diagnosis of abnormal protein metabolism and the body's lack of ability to resist infectious agents.
Predicate Devices
Dade Behring N Latex IgE mono assay (k991787)
Dade Behring N Protein Standard SL (k012470)
Dade Behring N/T Protein Control SL (k012468)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
Page 1 of 8
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k063425
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Analyte:
Immunoglobulin E (IgE)
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Nephelometry
E. Applicant:
Dade Behring, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Dimension Vista™ IgE Flex® reagent cartridge
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control M
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control H
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21CFR §866.5510- Immunoglobulin A, G, M, D, and E immunological test system
21CFR §862.1150- Calibrator
21CFR §862.1660- Quality control material, assayed and unassayed
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product Code:
DGC- IgE, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
JIX- Calibrator, multi-analyte mixture
JJY- Multi-analyte controls
4. Panel
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Dimension Vista™ IGE Flex® reagent cartridge: The IGE method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative determination of Immunoglobulin E in human serum, heparinized plasma or EDTA plasma on the Dimension Vista® System. Measurements of IGE aid in the diagnosis of IgE mediated allergic disorders in conjunction with other clinical findings.
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator: PROT1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods on the Dimension Vista® System.
{1}
Page 2 of 8
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Controls L, M and H: PROT1 CON L, M, and H are assayed intra-laboratory quality controls for assessment of precision and analytical bias in the determination of C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods on the Dimension Vista® System.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as above
3. Special condition for use statement(s):
Prescription use only
4. Special instrument Requirements:
Dimension Vista® System
I. Device Description:
Dimension Vista™ IGE Flex® reagent cartridge: IGE Flex® reagent cartridge consists of three reagents: IgE Reagent consists of polystyrene particles coated with monoclonal antibodies to human IgE. IGE Supplement Reagent 1 consists of phosphate buffer, polyethylene glycol, and sorbitan monolaureate. IGE Supplement Reagent 2 consists of mouse immunoglobulin in a phosphate buffer.
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator:
PROT1 CAL is a multi-analyte, liquid, human serum based product containing C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), immunoglobulin A (IGA), immunoglobulin E (IGE) immunoglobulin G (IGG), immunoglobulin M (IGM), and prealbumin (PREALB)
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L, M and H:
PROT1 CON L, M and H are multi-analyte, liquid, human serum based products containing C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), immunoglobulin A (IGA), immunoglobulin E (IGE), immunoglobulin G (IGG), immunoglobulin M (IGM), and prealbumin (PREALB)
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and 510(k) numbers:
Dade Behring N Latex IgE mono assay k991787
Dade Behring N Protein Standard SL k012470
Dade Behring N/T Protein Control SL k012468
2. Comparison with predicate:
Dimension Vista™ IgE Flex® regent cartridge
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of Immunoglobulin E in human serum, heparinized plasma or EDTA plasma on the Dimension Vista® System. | For the quantitative in vitro determination of IgE in human serum, EDTA and heparinized plasma by means of particle enhanced immunonephelometry using the BN Systems |
| Indications for Use | Measurements aid in the | Same |
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | diagnosis of IgE mediated allergic disorders in conjunction with other clinical findings. | |
| Method | Immunonephelometry | Same |
| Measurement type | Quantitative | Same |
| Capture antibody | Mouse monoclonal | Mouse monoclonal |
| Reportable range | 18- 1150 IU/mL | Same |
| Matrices | Serum, heparin plasma (Li and Na), and EDTA plasma | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Instrument system | Dimension Vista® System | BN ProSpec® System |
| Stability: opened | 21 days | 4 weeks |
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator</table>
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For the calibration of the C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods on the Dimension Vista® System | For establishment of reference curves for the determination of [26 specific analytes] on the BN Systems, as well as of IgM, C3c, ceruloplasmin and Ig/L-chains (types kappa and lambda) by radial immunodiffusion (RID) using Partigen plates. |
| Composition | Pooled Human sera | Same |
| Reagent Preparation | Liquid, Ready-for-Use | Same |
| Traceability | 2ndIRP 75/502 | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analytes | C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin | IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA, IgM, IgE, C3c, C4, transferrin, albumin, α1-antitrypsin, |
{3}
Page 4 of 8
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) | α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, prealbumin, hemopexin, ceruloplasmin, retinol binding protein, Ig Light chain kappa, Ig Light chain lambda, soluble transferrin receptor, ferritin, β2-microglobulin and total protein, IgM, C3c, ceruloplasmin and Ig/L-chains (types kappa and lambda). |
| Instrument system | Dimension Vista® System | BN Systems |
| Stability: Open | 9 days 2-8°C | 14 days 2-8°C |
## Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L, M and H
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Assayed intra-laboratory quality controls for the assessment of precision and analytical bias in the determination of C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System. | Assayed accuracy controls for accuracy and precision controls in the determination of [26] human serum proteins by immunonephelometry with the BN Systems, by immunoturbidimetry with the TurbiTime System and by radial immunodiffusion (RID) with Partigen plates. |
| Composition | Pooled human sera | Same |
| Reagent Preparation | Liquid, Ready to use | Same |
| Concentration Range | Low, Medium and High | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analytes | C3 complement (C3), C4 | IgG, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, |
{4}
Page 5 of 8
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin E (IGE), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), and Prealbumin (PREALB) methods. | IgG4, IgA, IgM, IgE, C3c, C4, transferrin, albumin, α1-antitrypsin, α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, α1-acid glycoprotein, prealbumin, hemopexin, ceruloplasmin, retinol binding protein, Ig Light chain kappa, Ig Light chain lambda, soluble transferrin receptor, ferritin, β2-microglobulin and total protein. |
| Instrument system | Dimension Vista® System | BN Systems and the TurbiTime System |
| Stability Open | days 2-8°C | 14 days 2-8°C |
## K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Chemistry Devices; Approved Guideline: EP5-A, CLSI Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline EP7-A2.
## L. Test Principle:
Polystyrene particles coated with antibodies specific to human IgE are aggregated when mixed with samples containing IgE. These aggregates scatter a beam of light passed through a sample. The intensity of the scattered light is proportional to the concentration of the respective protein in the sample. The result is evaluated by comparison with a standard of known concentration.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility: Precision testing was done in accordance with CLSI Approved Guideline EP5-A2. Controls (PROT1 CON L, M, and H) and six samples (4 derived from serum pools and 2 derived from plasma pools), representing IgE concentrations across the measuring range and near the clinical decision points, were analyzed in duplicate, for 20 days, two times per day. The repeatability and within-lab standard deviations (SD) and percent coefficient of variation (% CV) were calculated. Repeatability imprecision was ≤3.5%, and within-lab imprecision was ≤7.0%.
| Material | Mean IU/mL | Repeatability | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| PROT1 CON L | 52.1 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 7.0 |
| PROT1 CON M | 187.6 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 10.2 | 5.4 |
| PROT1 CON H | 449.4 | 10.8 | 2.4 | 25.7 | 5.7 |
{5}
| Material | Mean IU/mL | Repeatability | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Serum pool | 15.7 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.8 |
| Serum pool | 16.9 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 |
| Serum pool | 64.0 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 6.2 |
| Serum pool | 889.8 | 16.3 | 1.8 | 41.7 | 4.7 |
| Plasma pool | 54.2 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 5.6 |
| Plasma pool | 223.9 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 5.6 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range: Linearity across the assay measuring range (18 - 1150 IU/mL) was confirmed by testing a calibrator with a high concentration of immunoglobulin E. The calibrator was serially diluted with System Diluent in 5, approximately two-fold increments. The range of IgE values in the study was 14.7 to 1368.7 IU/mL. Each dilution was tested in replicates of three. Data were analyzed using linear regression analysis. The acceptance criteria for confidence intervals around the slope (0.9 and 1.1) and correlation coefficient $(\geq 0.95)$ were met. Regression analysis of theoretical concentration versus measured concentration produced the following results:
| Slope | Intercept | R | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 0.951 | 14.490 | 0.996 | 21 |
The method used to fit the linear regression line was Passing-Bablok. Recovery of protein reference material 2nd IRP 75/502 ranged from $98.7 - 100.6\%$ with a mean recovery of $100.0\%$ .
c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
The Calibrator is referenced to the second international reference preparation for human serum IgE, $2^{\mathrm{nd}}$ IRP 75/502. Detailed description of the value assignments for Calibrator and Controls was provided.
d. Detection limit:
Analytical sensitivity was determined by assaying analyte-free System Diluent 20 times and determining the mean value plus two SDs: $0.953\mathrm{IU / mL}$ . Package insert states the limit of detection represents the lower limit of the reportable range and is reported as $3.6\mathrm{IU / mL}$ .
e. Analytical specificity:
i. Interference Studies: Interference testing was performed according to CLSI EP7-A2, to determine the effect of various endogenous and exogenous substances on the Dimension Vista™ IgE assay. For the following interferents, the percent bias was determined by testing a control sample without the interferent and comparing it to the value obtained from a test sample to which the potential interferent was added: bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated, $60\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ), hemoglobin $(1000\mathrm{mg / dL})$ , creatinine $(30\mathrm{mg / dL})$ , albumin $(6\mathrm{g / dL})$ , urea $(500\mathrm{mg / dL})$ , cholesterol $(500\mathrm{mg / dL})$ , uric acid $(20\mathrm{mg / dL})$ . Sample concentrations represented the lowest and highest clinical decision points $\sim 15$ IU/mL and $\sim 260 - 310$ IU/mL. Interference $(< 9\%)$ was within the acceptance criteria $\pm 10\%$ . Triglyceride interference
{6}
Page 7 of 8
was evaluated by testing five samples containing known amount of triglyceride and comparing the results to the same sample after centrifugation. The study demonstrated that clarified samples produced the same results as original samples (% CV < 6%) but did not demonstrate that assay performance is not affected by triglycerides since the baseline IgE concentrations in these samples without triglycerides were not known. A statement that lipemic samples should be avoided was placed in the specimen handling section. Additionally, 41 potentially interfering drugs were also assayed and shown to exhibit minimal interference (<10%).
ii. Cross-reactivity with autoimmune antibodies common to other systemic autoimmune diseases was not tested.
iii. Antigen Excess: The effect of antigen excess was evaluated using a serum sample with a high concentration of IgE (above the assay range). No prozone effect was observed up to at least 34,327 IU/mL. Samples whose values exceed 1150 IU/mL using the initial 1:20 dilution are reported as "exceeds assay range" to alert the user to repeat the assay using a higher dilution.
f. Assay cut-off:
See Expected Values.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Information regarding age and clinical status of the samples are not available. The Dimension Vista™ IGE assay was compared to the Dade Behring N Latex IgE mono assay on the BN ProSpec® System by evaluating 68 serum and 52 plasma samples with concentrations ranging from 18.2 IU/mL to 1126.5 IU/mL. Regression analysis of these results yielded the following results:
| Comparative Method | Slope (95% CI) | Y-Intercept IU/mL (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient r | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| IGE on the BN ProSpec® | 1.041 (1.034-1.046) | 0.151 (0.899-1.092) | 0.999 | 120 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Ten matched samples of serum, EDTA, lithium heparin and sodium heparin plasma containing concentrations of IgE spanning the measuring range (25.88 to 923.73 IU/mL), were assayed and compared. Regression analysis between the four matrices yielded the following information:
| % recovery vs. serum | | Slope (95%CI) | Y-Intercept (IU/mL) | Correlation Coefficient | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium heparin plasma | Mean = -0.6%
(Range = -6.4%-7.5%) | 1.04 (1.00-1.08) | -14.31 | 0.998 | 10 |
| Sodium heparin plasma | Mean = 1.6%
(Range = -1.7%-8.0%) | 1.02 (0.986-1.06) | -3.38 | 0.998 | 10 |
{7}
Page 8 of 8
| EDTA | Mean = -0.5%
(Range = -6.5%-4.5%) | 1.02
(0.991-1.04) | -7.93 | 0.999 | 10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity: Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable): Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off: See Expected values.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Neonates < 1.5 IU/mL
Infants in first year of life < 15 IU/mL
Children (1 - 5 years) < 60 IU/mL
Children (6 - 9 years) < 90 IU/mL
Children (10 - 15 years) < 200 IU/mL
Adults < 100 IU/mL
These reference values were established using an EIA method in a comprehensive study (448 children, 200 adults) conducted in Europe. In clinically healthy adult subjects, IgE levels exhibit a wide distribution range and do not follow a normal distribution.
IgE concentrations in children are highly dependent on age. Adult values are achieved at about 7 to 10 years of age. Higher values occur at about 10 to 15 years of age. Concentrations of up to approximately 100 IU/mL in adults can be considered the upper limit of the reference range.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.