DIMENSION VISTA TRF FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, PROTEIN 1 CALIBRATOR PROTEIN 1 CONTROL L,CONTROL M, CONTROL H
K063322 · Dade Behring, Inc. · DDG · Jan 24, 2007 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K063322
Device Name
DIMENSION VISTA TRF FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, PROTEIN 1 CALIBRATOR PROTEIN 1 CONTROL L,CONTROL M, CONTROL H
Applicant
Dade Behring, Inc.
Product Code
DDG · Immunology
Decision Date
Jan 24, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5880
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Transferrin Flex® reagent cartridge: The TRF method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum, heparinized plasma or EDTA plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of transferrin aid in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and iron deficiency anemia. Protein 1 Calibrator: PROT1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), Prealbumin (PREALB) and Transferrin (TRF) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System. Protein 1 Controls L, M and H: PROT 1 CON L, M, and H are assayed intra-laboratory quality controls for assessment of precision and analytical bias in the determination of C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), Prealbumin (PREALB) and Transferrin (TRF) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System.
Device Story
Dimension Vista™ Transferrin Flex® reagent cartridge uses immunonephelometry to quantify transferrin in human serum or plasma samples. Input: patient sample mixed with rabbit polyclonal antiserum to human transferrin; immune complexes form, scattering light. Output: intensity of scattered light, proportional to transferrin concentration. Used in clinical laboratory settings on Dimension Vista™ System; operated by laboratory technicians. Results assist clinicians in diagnosing malnutrition, inflammation, infection, and iron deficiency anemia. System includes liquid, ready-to-use Protein 1 Calibrator and Protein 1 Controls (L, M, H) for calibration and quality control assessment of precision and bias.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical studies provided. Bench testing only. Precision testing (CLSI EP5-A2) showed repeatability <3.3% and within-lab imprecision <3.5%. Linearity confirmed (0.28-6.95 g/L, r=0.999). Method comparison against predicate (n=180) yielded slope 1.087, r=0.992. Interference testing showed minimal bias (<8-10%) for common endogenous/exogenous substances. Matrix comparison (serum vs. plasma) showed no significant bias.
Technological Characteristics
Immunonephelometric assay using rabbit polyclonal antiserum. Liquid, ready-to-use reagent cartridge. Measuring range 0.35 to 5.6 g/L. Traceable to ERM-DA470. Requires Dimension Vista™ System. Standards referenced: CLSI EP5-A2 (precision), EP9-A2 (method comparison), EP7-A2 (interference).
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum, heparinized plasma, or EDTA plasma to aid in diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and iron deficiency anemia. Used on the Dimension Vista System.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A transferrin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the transferrin (an iron-binding and transporting serum protein) in serum, plasma, and other body fluids. Measurement of transferrin levels aids in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and red blood cell disorders, such as iron deficiency anemia.
Predicate Devices
Dade Behring N Antisera to Human Transferrin assay (k053075)
N Protein Standard SL (k012470)
N/T Protein Control SL (k012468)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
Page 1 of 7
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k063322
B. Purpose for Submission:
New Device
C. Analyte:
Transferrin
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, immunonephelometry
E. Applicant:
Dade Behring, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Dimension Vista™ Transferrin Flex® reagent cartridge
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control M
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control H
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21CFR §866.5880- Transferrin immunological test system
21CFR §862.1150- Calibrator
21CFR §862.1660- Quality control material
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product Code:
DDG - Transferrin, antigen, antiserum, control
JIX - Calibrator, multi-analyte mixture
JJY - Multi-analyte controls, all kinds (assayed and unassayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Transferrin Flex® reagent cartridge: The TRF method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum, heparinized plasma or EDTA plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of transferrin aid in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and iron deficiency anemia.
Protein 1 Calibrator: PROT1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), Prealbumin (PREALB) and Transferrin (TRF) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System.
Protein 1 Controls L, M and H: PROT 1 CON L, M, and H are assayed intra-laboratory quality controls for assessment of precision and analytical bias in the determination of C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A
{1}
(IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), Prealbumin (PREALB) and Transferrin (TRF) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System.
2. Indication(s) for use:
Same as intended use.
3. Special condition for use statement(s):
Prescription use only.
4. Special instrument Requirements:
Dimension Vista™ System
I. Device Description:
Dimension Vista™ Flex® regent cartridge (TRF): TRF reagent consists of a Reaction buffer and an antiserum to polyclonal rabbit antiserum to human transferrin.
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator:
PROT1 CAL is a multi-analyte, liquid, human serum based product containing C3, C4, IgA, IgG, IgM, prealbumin and transferrin.
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L and H:
PROT1 CON L, M and H are multi-analyte, liquid, human serum based products containing C3, C4, IgA, IgG, IgM, prealbumin and transferrin.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s) and 510(k) numbers:
Dade Behring N Antisera to Human Transferrin assay (k053075)
N Protein Standard SL (k012470)
N/T Protein Control SL (k012468)
2. Comparison with predicate:
Dimension Vista™ Transferrin Flex® regent cartridge
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For the quantitative determination of transferrin in human serum, heparinized plasma, or EDTA plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. | For the quantitative in vitro determination of transferrin and haptoglobulin in human serum, heparinized and EDTA plasma, as well as of transferrin in human urine by means of immunonephelometry on the BN Systems. |
| Indications for Use | Measurements are used as an aid in the diagnosis of malnutrition, acute inflammation, infection, and iron deficiency anemia. | Same |
| Method | Immunonephelometry | Same |
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Measurement type | Quantitative | Same |
| Capture Antibody | Rabbit polyclonal | Same |
| Measuring Range | 0.35 to 5.6 g/L | Same |
| Reference Interval (Expected values) | 2.0 – 3.6 g/L | Same |
| Storage: Unopened | 2-8°C | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Instrument system | Dimension Vista® System | BN ProSpec® System |
| Matrices | Serum, lithium heparin plasma, EDTA plasma | Serum, lithium heparin plasma, EDTA plasma and urine. |
| Stability: Open | 21 days 2-8°C | 4 weeks 2-8°C |
| Stability: On board | Unopened 90 days | 5 days 8 hr/day for 5 ml vials; 3 days for 2ml vials |
# Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | PROT1 CAL is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 Complement (C3), C4 Complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), Immunoglobulin M (IGM), Prealbumin (PREALB), and Transferrin (TRF) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System | For establishment of reference curves for specific immunonephelometric determinations |
| Composition | Pooled human sera | Same |
| Reagent Preparation | Liquid, Ready-to-use | Same |
| Traceability | ERM®-DA470 (CRM 470) L, M, and H | Same |
{3}
Page 4 of 7
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analytes | 7 analytes | 26 analytes |
| Instrument system | Dimension Vista® System | BN Systems |
| Stability: Open | 9 days 2-8°C | 14 days 2-8°C |
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L, M and H
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Assayed intra-laboratory quality controls for the assessment of precision and analytical bias in the determination of specific assays | Assayed controls for accuracy and precision in the quantitative determination of specific analytes |
| Composition | Pooled human sera | Same |
| Reagent Preparation | Liquid, Ready-to-use | Same |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analytes | 7 analytes | 26 analytes |
| Instrument system | Dimension Vista™ System | BN Systems and the TurbiTime System |
| Concentration Range | Low, medium and High | Low and High |
| Stability Open | 9 days 2-8°C | 14 days 2-8°C |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI Evaluation of Precision Performance of Clinical Devices; Approved Guideline: EP5-A2, CLSI Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline EP9-A2, CLSI Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline EP7-A2.
L. Test Principle:
Proteins contained in human body fluids form immune complexes in an immunochemical reaction with specific antibodies. These complexes scatter a beam of light passed through the sample. The intensity of the scattered light is proportional to the concentration of the respective protein in the sample. The result is evaluated by comparison with a standard of known concentration.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility: Precision testing was done in accordance with CLSI Approved Guideline EP5-A2. Two samples derived from serum pools and two samples derived from plasma pools representing TRF concentrations that span the measuring range, and the PROT1 CON L, M and H were analyzed in duplicate, for 20 days, two runs per day. The repeatability and within-lab standard deviations (SD) and percent coefficient
{4}
of variation (%CV) were calculated by the analysis of variance method. Repeatability imprecision was <3.3%, and Within-Lab irreproducibility was <3.5%.
| Material | Mean g/L | Repeatability | | Within-Lab | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| PROT2 CON L | 1.99 | 0.047 | 2.36 | 0.057 | 2.85 |
| PROT1 CON M | 2.66 | 0.058 | 2.18 | 0.083 | 3.13 |
| PROT2 CON H | 3.97 | 0.093 | 2.35 | 0.112 | 2.82 |
| Serum pool | 1.53 | 0.023 | 1.53 | 0.031 | 1.99 |
| Serum pool | 4.3 | 0.087 | 2.01 | 0.112 | 2.60 |
| Plasma pool | 0.79 | 0.026 | 3.27 | 0.027 | 3.46 |
| Plasma pool | 2.55 | 0.036 | 1.41 | 0.060 | 2.37 |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity across the range was confirmed by testing a calibrator with a high concentration of transferrin. The calibrator was serially diluted in 5, approximately two fold increments (measuring range from 0.28 to 6.95 g/L). Each dilution was tested in replicates of three. Data were analyzed using linear regression analysis: regression analysis of theoretical concentration versus measured concentration produced the following results:
| Slope | Y-Intercept g/L | Correlation Coefficient | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.038 | -0.045 | 0.999 | 15 |
Recovery testing with European reference material ERM ®-DA470* was performed with 5 replicates of a TRF sample 2.45 g/L. Results ranged from 97.1 -100.2% with a mean recovery of 98.8%.
c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
Calibration material values were referenced to the European reference material ERM ®-DA470*.
d. Detection limit:
Analytical sensitivity was determined by assaying analyte-free System Diluent 20 times and determining the mean value plus two SDs: 0.062 g/L.
e. Analytical specificity:
i. Interference Studies Interference testing was performed according to CLSI EP7-A2, to determine the effect of various endogenous and exogenous substances on the Dimension Vista™ TRF assay. For the following interferents, the percent bias was determined by testing a control samples without the interferent and comparing it to the value obtained from a test sample to which the potential interferent was added: bilirubin (conjugated and unconjugated, 60 mg/dL), hemoglobin (1000 mg/dL), creatinine (30 mg/dL), albumin (6 g/dL), urea (500 mg/dL), cholesterol (500 mg/dL), uric acid (20 mg/dL). Minimal interference (<8%) was observed. Interference by
Page 5 of 7
{5}
triglycerides (native and clarified) was tested on 5 test samples containing a known amount of triglycerides and comparing results from the same sample after centrifugation. Interference was less than 6%. Samples containing rheumatoid factor (>500 IU/ml) or total protein >120 g/L were mixed 1:1 with TRF concentrations and % recovery was compared to samples without RF using 5 replicates. No interference was observed up to 350 IU/ml and 88 g/L TP. Additionally, 41 potentially interfering drugs were also assayed and shown to exhibit minimal interference (<10%).
ii. Cross-reactivity with autoimmune antibodies common to other systemic autoimmune diseases was not tested.
iii. Antigen Excess: The effect of antigen excess was evaluated using a serum sample with a high concentration of transferrin (above the assay range). No effect was seen up to 9.46 g/L. Samples whose values exceed 5.6 g/L using the initial 1:20 dilution are reported as “exceeds assay range” to alert the user to repeat the assay using a higher dilution.
f. Assay cut-off:
See Expected values
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
The Dimension Vista™ TR assay was compared to the Dade Behring N Antisera to Human Transferrin assay on the BN ProSpec® System by evaluating serum and plasma samples with concentrations ranging from 0.79 to 5.43 g/L. Regression analysis of these results yielded the following statistics:
| Comparative Method | Slope (95%CI) | Y-Intercept (g/L) (95%CI) | Correlation Coefficient | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| N Antisera to Human Transferrin on the BN ProSpec® | 1.087 (1.071 to 1.102) | 0.060 (-0.088 to -0.032) | 0.992 | 180 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Ten matched samples of serum, EDTA, lithium heparin and sodium heparin plasma containing concentrations of transferrin spanning the measuring range (0.37 to 4.92 g/L), were assayed and compared. Regression analysis showed no significant bias between the four matrices and yielded the following information:
| % Recovery statistics for anticoagulant-plasma vs. serum | | Slope (95%CI) | Y-Intercept (g/L) | Correlation Coefficient | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lithium heparin plasma | Mean = -0.5%
(Range = -4.5%-4.4%) | 0.98
(0.956-1.01) | 0.03 | 0.998 | 10 |
| Sodium heparin plasma | Mean = 0.8%
(Range = -2.7%-5.0%) | 1.02
(0.987-1.05) | -0.02 | 0.998 | 10 |
{6}
| % Recovery statistics for anticoagulant-plasma vs. serum | | Slope (95%CI) | Y-Intercept (g/L) | Correlation Coefficient | n |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDTA plasma | Mean = -2.9% (Range = -7.9%-1.5%) | 0.95 (0.920-0.98) | 0.03 | 0.998 | 10 |
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity: Not provided
b. Clinical specificity: Not provided
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable): Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off: See assay range
5. Expected values/Reference range: A reference range for normal transferrin levels is provided and supported by additional testing using the Dimension Vista™ TRF assay supplied by sponsor. Results support the reference interval 2.0-3.6g/L. This reference interval applies to serum samples from healthy adults.
N. Proposed Labeling: The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion: The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Page 7 of 7
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.