K061943 · Anatomica AB · KWP · May 25, 2007 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K061943
Device Name
ANATOMICA POSTERIOR CERVICAL FIXATION SYSTEM
Applicant
Anatomica AB
Product Code
KWP · Orthopedic
Decision Date
May 25, 2007
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3050
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The Anatomica Posterior Cervical Fixation System is intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (Occiput - T3). The system is intended for posterior, cervical, non-pedicle fixation, or for posterior, noncervical pedicle fixation for the following indications: - . degenerative disc disease(DDD) (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); - . spondylolisthesis; - . trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation); - . spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e.,scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis); - . tumor: - . pseudoarthrosis; and - . failed previous fusion. Occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. Pedicle bone screws are limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (T1, T3) when treating thoracic conditions only. Pedicle screws are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine. Hooks and wires (not pedicle screws) are used to achieve cervical fusion for the occipital/cervical loop.
Device Story
Titanium spinal fixation system for occipito-cervico-thoracic (OCT) stabilization; components include screws, hooks, wires, and rods connected via expansion loops, compression loops, ME connectors, lateral connectors, or cable lock connectors. Used by surgeons in clinical settings to promote spinal fusion. Occipital screws used for occiput; hooks/wires used for cervical spine; screws used for thoracic spine (T1-T3). System provides mechanical stabilization to the spine to facilitate fusion; benefits patient by addressing instability caused by trauma, degeneration, or deformity. Surgeon assembles construct intraoperatively to achieve desired fixation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Static bend, fatigue bend (fatigue life and incremental load block), and torsion testing performed in accordance with ASTM F1717-01 (Standard test methods for spinal implant constructs in a vertebrectomy model). No clinical data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Titanium spinal fixation system. Components: screws, hooks, wires, rods, and various connectors (expansion/compression loops, ME, lateral, cable lock). Mechanical testing per ASTM F1717-01. Non-sterile, manual assembly. No software or electronic components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring spinal fusion at the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (Occiput-T3) due to degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, trauma (fracture/dislocation), spinal stenosis, spinal curvatures (scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, or failed previous fusion. Contraindicated for pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of an alloy, such as stainless steel, that consists of various hooks and a posteriorly placed compression or distraction rod. The device is implanted, usually across three adjacent vertebrae, to straighten and immobilize the spine to allow bone grafts to unite and fuse the vertebrae together. The device is used primarily in the treatment of scoliosis (a lateral curvature of the spine), but it also may be used in the treatment of fracture or dislocation of the spine, grades 3 and 4 of spondylolisthesis (a dislocation of the spinal column), and lower back syndrome.
{0}------------------------------------------------
## Section 5: 510(k) Summary
MAY 2 5 2007
In response to the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990, the following is a summary of the safety and effectiveness information upon which the substantial equivalence determination is based.
The safety and effectiveness of the Anatomica Cervical System is based upon a determination of the substantial equivalence as well as the safety and effectiveness of its predicate devices
| Sponsor/Manufacturer: | Anatomica AB | |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--|
| | Stora Åvägen 25 | |
| | 436 34 Askim<br>Sweden<br>Tel: +46 (0)31-748 89 00 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Fax: +46 (0)31-28 72 76 | |
| Official Correspondent: | Marcos Velez-Duran | |
| | M Squared Associates, Inc. | |
| | 719 A Street, NE | |
| | Washington, DC 20002 | |
| | Telephone: 202-546-1262 Ext 206 | |
| | Facsimile: 202-546-3848 | |
| | Email: MVelez-Duran@MSquaredAssociates.com | |
| Date: | July 7, 2006 | |
| Proprietary Name: | Anatomica Posterior Cervical Fixation System | |
| Common Name: | Spinal fixation system | |
| CFR Section Number: | 888.3050 Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis, and | |
| | 888.3070 Pedicle screw spinal system | |
| Proposed Regulatory Class: | II | |
| Device Product Code: | KWP - Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis, and | |
| | MNI - Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation | |
| Reason for 510(k): | The subject device is a new device intended for commercial | |
| | distribution in the U.S.A. | |
Page 7 of 50
page 1 of 2
{1}------------------------------------------------
Predicate Devices: Altius OCT System by Interpore Cross, 510(k) K033961 and K043229.
Device Description : The Anatomica Cervical System is a titanium spinal fixation system for occipito-cervico-thoracic (OCT) fixation that contains screws, hooks, and wires that are assembled to rods using one of several types of connectors (expansion loop, compression loop, ME connector, lateral connector, cable lock connector). The occiput screws are for use in the occiput. The wires are for use in the cervical spine. The screws are for use in the thoracic spine (T1-T3). The hooks are for use in the cervical spine.
Intended Use: Both the subject device and the predicate device are intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (Occiput to T3).
Performance Testing: Articles provided from regular production lots were tested for Static Bend, Fatigue Bend- fatigue life, Fatigue Bend-incremental load block, and Torsion in accordance with ASTM F1717-01, Standard test methods for spinal implant constructs in a vertebrectomy model.
Basis for Substantial Equivalence: The subject Anatomica Posterior Cervical Fixation System is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed Altius OCT System (Interpore Cross, 510(k) #K033961 and #K043229). Both the predicate and subject device systems are manufactured from Titanium and address the same indications for use. Both systems share similar design features and have been shown through mechanical testing to have similar performance characteristics.
page 2 of 2
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The logo features a stylized eagle with three stripes forming its body and wing. The eagle faces to the right. Encircling the eagle is the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" in a circular arrangement.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAY 2 5 2007
Anatomica AB % M Squared Associates, Inc. Mr. Marcos Velez-Duran Consultant for Anatomica AB 719 A Street. NE Washington, DC 20002
Re: K061943
Trade/Device Name: Anatomica Posterior Cervical Fixation System Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3070 Regulation Name: Pedicle screw spinal system Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: KWP, MNI Dated: March, 30, 2007 Received: April 2, 2007
Dear Mr. Velez-Duran:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA), You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA 's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set
{3}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Marcos Velez-Duran
forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at 240-276-0120. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (240) 276-3150 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/industry/support/index.html.
Sincerely yours,
Mark M. Milliken
Mark N. Melkerson Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Section 4: Indications for Use Statement
510(k) Number: To be assigned
Device Name: Anatomica Posterior Cervical Fixation System
Indication for Use: The Anatomica Posterior Cervical Fixation System is intended to promote fusion of the cervical spine and occipito-cervico-thoracic junction (Occiput - T3). The system is intended for posterior, cervical, non-pedicle fixation, or for posterior, noncervical pedicle fixation for the following indications:
- . degenerative disc disease(DDD) (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies);
- . spondylolisthesis;
- . trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation);
- . spinal stenosis; curvatures (i.e.,scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis);
- . tumor:
- . pseudoarthrosis; and
- . failed previous fusion.
Occipital bone screws are limited to occipital fixation only. Pedicle bone screws are limited to placement in the upper thoracic spine (T1, T3) when treating thoracic conditions only. Pedicle screws are not intended to be placed in the cervical spine. Hooks and wires (not pedicle screws) are used to achieve cervical fusion for the occipital/cervical loop.
| Prescription Use | X |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D) | |
| | AND/OR |
| Over-The-Counter Use | |
| (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) | |
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of General, Restorative,
and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K061943
Page 1 of 1
Page 6 of 50
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.