DIMENSION VISTA C3 AND C4 FLEX REAGENT CARTRIDGE, PROTEIN 1 CALIBRATOR, CONTROL LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH
Applicant
Dade Behring, Inc.
Product Code
CZW · Immunology
Decision Date
Sep 22, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5240
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Dimension Vista™ C3 Flex® reagent cartridge: The C3 method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of complement C3 in human serum and heparinized plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of C3 are used as an aid in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders associated with complement C3 protein. Dimension Vista™ C4 Flex® reagent cartridge: The C4 method is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantitative measurement of complement C4 in human serum and heparinized plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of C4 are used as an aid in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders associated with complement C4 protein. Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator: Protein 1 Calibrator is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 Complement (C3), C4 Complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG), and Immunoglobulin M (IGM) on the Dimension Vista™ System. Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L, Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control M and Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control H: Protein 1 Control L/M/H are for use as an assayed intralaboratory quality controls for the assessment of precision and analytical bias in determination of C3 Complement (C3), C4 Complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IGA), Immunoglobulin G (IGG) and Immunoglobulin M (IGM) methods on the Dimension Vista™ System.
Device Story
Dimension Vista™ C3/C4 Flex® reagent cartridges are in vitro diagnostic reagents for use on the Dimension Vista™ System. System utilizes immunochemical reaction where proteins in human serum/plasma form immune complexes with specific antibodies; complexes scatter light beam passed through sample. Scattered light intensity is proportional to protein concentration. Results evaluated against known calibrator. System intended for clinical laboratory use. Calibrator and controls (L/M/H) are liquid human serum-based products used to calibrate assays and assess precision/analytical bias. Device aids clinicians in diagnosing immunologic disorders by providing quantitative protein measurements.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Performance established via bench testing: precision (CLSI EP5-A2), linearity, analytical sensitivity, and interference studies. Method comparison performed against BN ProSpec system using 116 samples for C3 and 126 samples for C4, showing strong correlation (Passing-Bablock regression).
Technological Characteristics
Immunonephelometric assay; 840nm light source. Reagents: rabbit polyclonal antibodies. Cartridges: 12-well format with barcode identification. Calibrators/Controls: human serum-based. Connectivity: integrated with Dimension Vista System. Standards: CLSI EP5-A2, EP9-A2, EP7-A2; Traceability to CRM 470.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as an aid in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders associated with complement C3 and C4 proteins in serum and heparinized plasma samples.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A complement components immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques complement components C1q , C1r , C1s , C2 , C3 , C4 , C5 , C6 , C7 , C8 , and C9 , in serum, other body fluids, and tissues. Complement is a group of serum proteins which destroy infectious agents. Measurements of these proteins aids in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders, especially those associated with deficiencies of complement components.
Predicate Devices
Dade Behring N Antisera to Human Complement Factors (C3c, C4) (k050665)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k061852
B. Purpose for Submission:
New devices
C. Measurand:
Complement C3 and Complement C4
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative, Nephelometry
E. Applicant:
Dade Behring Inc
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Dimension Vista™ C3 Flex® Reagent Cartridge
Dimension ™ Vista C4 Flex® Reagent Cartridge
Dimension Vista Protein 1 Calibrator
Dimension Vista Protein 1 Control L
Dimension Vista Protein 1 Control M
Dimension Vista Protein 1 Control H
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.5240, Complement Components Immunological Test System
21 CFR 862.1150 Calibrator
21 CFR. 862.1660 Quality Control Material
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
CZW, complement C3 antigen, antiserum, control
DBI, Complement C4 antigen, antiserum, control
JIX, Calibrator, Multi-Analyte Mixture
JJY, Multi-Analyte Controls, all kinds (assayed and unassayed)
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
Chemistry (75)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
Dimension Vista™ C3 Flex® reagent cartridge is for quantitative measurement of complement C3 serum and heparinized plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of C3 are used as an aid in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders associated with C3 complement protein.
Dimension Vista™ C4 Flex® reagent cartridge is for quantitative measurement of complement C4 in serum and heparinized plasma on the Dimension Vista™ System. Measurements of C4 are used as an aid in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders
{1}
associated with C4 complement protein.
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Calibrator is an in vitro diagnostic product for the calibration of the C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) on the Dimension Vista™ System.
Dimension Vista™ Protein 1 Control L, M and H are for use as an assayed intralaboratory quality controls for the assessment of precision and analytical bias in determination of C3 complement (C3), C4 complement (C4), Immunoglobulin A (IgA), Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and Immunoglobulin M (IgM) on the Dimension Vista™ System.
2. Indication(s) for use:
To aid in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders associated with complement C3 and C4 Proteins
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
4. Special instrument requirements:
For use with Dade Behring Dimension Vista™ System.
I. Device Description:
The Dade Dimension C3 and C4 devices are in the form of cartridges each with 12 wells: 1-8 contains reaction buffer, 9-12 contains antiserum to human C3 or C4. The cartridges hold all the reagents for a test method. A bar code label on the cartridge identifies the test method, lot number, expiration date, and the maximum number of tests for which the cartridge can supply reagents.
Dimension Vista Protein 1 Calibrator carton contains 6 vials of reagent with 2mL per vial. The calibrator is a liquid human serum based product containing multiple analytes namely C3, C4, IgA, IgM and IgG.
Dimension Vista Protein 1 Controls consist of three levels (low, medium and high). Each level contains 6 vials with 2 mL per vial. The controls are ready to use human serum based products containing C3, C4, IgA, IgM, IgG.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Dade Behring N Antisera to Human Complement Factors (C3c, C4)
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k050665 (C3 and C4)
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended use | For quantitative determination of C3 and C4 protein as an aid in | Same |
{2}
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | the diagnosis of C3 and C4 associated immunological disorders | |
| Antibody | Rabbit polyclonal | Same |
| Methodology | Nephelometric | Same |
| Traceability | CRM 470 IFCC/BCR/CAP | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Instrument | Dimension™ Vista System | BN™System |
| Sample type | Serum and lithium heparin plasma | Serum and plasma (EDTA and heparin) |
| Reportable range | C3-0.16-4.1 g/L C4- 0.06-1.6g/L | C3c - 0.12 - 4.1g/L C4 - 0.06 - 1.9g/L |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2, CLSI EP9-A2, CLSI EP7-A2.
# L. Test Principle:
The method used for quantitative measurement of C3 and C4 is immunonephelometry. The samples when mixed with reagents (automatically done by the instrument) in the cartridge an immunological reaction results in forming an immune complexes with C3 or C4 contained in the sample. A light beam is passed through the complex and the intensity of light scattering is measured at $840\mathrm{nm}$ . The intensity of scattered light is proportional to the concentration of the respective analyte in the sample. C3 or C4 concentrations are automatically calculated by the instrument from the multiple calibration curves.
# M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were performed according to CLSI EP5-A2. During each day of testing two separate samples for each test material were analyzed for 20 days. For C3, samples tested included 4 serum pools and 3 controls (low, medium and high). For C4, 3 controls (L, M, H), 2 plasma samples and 2 serum samples with different analyte concentrations. The acceptance criteria are shown below.
The maximum observed repeatability (SD)
| Analyte | Concentration | Acceptable SD Maximum |
| --- | --- | --- |
| C3 | 0.75g/L | 0.16g/L |
| | 1.2g/L | 0.18g/L |
| C4 | 0.15g/L | 0.02g/L |
| | 0.23g/L | 0.03g/L |
{3}
The following table is a summary of the precision data:
| Material | Mean g/L | Within-run SD (%CV) | Run-to-Run SD (%CV) | Day-to-Day SD (%CV) | Total Precision SD (%CV) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C3 | | | | | |
| Protein1 Con L | 0.946 | 0.0321 (3.4) | 0.0172 (1.8) | 0.0107 (1.1) | 0.0380 (4.0) |
| Protein 1 Con M | 1.499 | 0.035 (2.3) | 0.009 (0.6) | 0.000 (0.0) | 0.036 (2.4) |
| Protein 1 Con H | 1.843 | 0.043 (2.3) | 0.000 (0.0) | 0.002 (0.1) | 0.043 (2.4) |
| Serum pool 1 | 1.993 | 0.030 (1.5) | 0.039 (2.0) | 0.028 (1.4) | 0.057 (2.9) |
| Serum pool 2 | 1.979 | 0.057 (2.9) | 0.018 (0.9) | 0.013 (0.7) | 0.061 (3.1) |
| Serum pool VL | 0.289 | 0.017 (5.9) | 0.000 (0.0) | 0.003 (1.1) | 0.017 (6.0) |
| Serum pool VH | 3.939 | 0.091 (2.3) | 0.078 (2.0) | 0.000 (0.0) | 0.120 (3.0) |
| C4 | | | | | |
| Protein 1 Con L | 0.1301 | 0.0048 (3.7) | 0.0000 (0.0) | 0.0017 (1.3) | 0.0051 (3.9) |
| Protein 1 Con M | 0.2052 | 0.0039 (1.9) | 0.0017 (0.8) | 0.0034 (1.7) | 0.0054 (2.6) |
| Protein 1 Con H | 0.3201 | 0.0051 (1.6) | 0.0042 (1.3) | 0.0015 (0.5) | 0.0068 (2.1) |
| Serum low | 0.1389 | 0.0047 (3.4) | 0.0033 (2.4) | 0.0000 (0.00) | 0.0057 (4.1) |
| Serum high | 1.4038 | 0.0449 (3.2) | 0.0094 (0.7) | 0.0000 (0.0) | 0.0459 (3.3) |
| Plasma low | 0.1272 | 0.0049 (3.8) | 0.0025 (1.9) | 0.0011 (0.9) | 0.0056 (4.4) |
| Plasma high | 0.4202 | 0.0131 (3.1) | 0.0206 (4.9) | 0.0000 (0.0) | 0.0244 (5.8) |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity across the assay range was determined by testing serial dilutions of a high C3 and a high C4 sample over the assay measuring range. Each dilution was tested in replicates of five. Percent recovery was calculated as mean of observed/expected concentration x 100. The mean percents recovery for C3 and C4 were $94.9\%$ (ranged from $87.2\%$ to $100\%$ ) and $99.5\%$ (ranged from $92.7\%$ to $104.1\%$ ). Linear regression analysis showed for C3, the slope was 0.989, the intercept was -0.0332 and $\mathrm{r}^2$ of 0.999. For C4, the slope was 1.0108, intercept was -0.0019 and $\mathrm{r}^2$ 0.9996.
Measuring range (reportable range): for $\mathrm{C3} = 0.16 - 4.1\mathrm{g / L}$ for initial 1:20 dilution of samples that are automatically processed by the instrument. Samples with results in excess of $4.1\mathrm{g / L}$ can be repeated on a higher dilution (1:200). Samples with results less than $0.16\mathrm{g / L}$ can be repeated on a lower dilution (1:5). Samples with results less than $0.04\mathrm{g / L}$ will be reported as "less than $0.04\mathrm{g / L}$ " by the instrument.
For Compliment 4 the measuring range is $0.06 - 1.6\mathrm{g / L}$ . This is the measuring range for the initial 1:10 dilution of samples that are automatically processed by the instrument. Samples with excess of $1.6\mathrm{g / L}$ can be repeated on a higher dilution (1:100). Samples with results less than $0.06\mathrm{g / L}$ can be repeated on a lower dilution (1:2.5). Samples less than $0.015\mathrm{g / L}$ will be reported as "less than $0.015\mathrm{g / L}$ " by the instrument.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods): Reference standard used was ERM®-DA470 (CRM 470). C3 and C4 values of the master lots of the calibrator and controls are assigned against the reference standard.
d. Detection limit:
{4}
The detection limits was determined by assaying the diluent and Cal 1 twenty times each. The analytical sensitivity for C3 was 0.047 g/L and 0.003 g/L for C4.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interferences by endogenous substances namely conjugated bilirubin (60 mg/dL), unconjugated bilirubin (60 mg/dL), creatinine (30 mg/dL), hemoglobin (1000 mg/dL), IgG (5 g/dL), albumin (6 g/dL), urea (500 mg/dL), cholesterol (500 mg/dL), uric acid (20 mg/dL) and triglycerides (924 mg/dL) were spiked into aliquots of a serum sample and assayed for C3 and C4. The spiked samples were compared to the unspiked sample and % recoveries were calculated. The acceptance criterion for % recovery was ±10%. Results showed no interference at the concentrations tested. Interference due to RF and total protein was also determined and no significant interference was observed.
In addition, drug interference was assessed. No observable interference with the drugs tested.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparison between Dimension Vista and BN ProSpec was performed on 116 samples for C3 (58 serum and plasma n=58). Passing-Bablock regression analysis yielded a slope of 0.960 (95% CI: 0.943, 0.975) and intercept of 0.041 (95%CI: 0.016, 0.069).
For C4, 66 serum samples and 60 plasma samples were tested. Passing-Bablock analysis of the results yielded a slope of 1.041 (95% CI: 1.025, 1.059) and intercept 0.006 (95%CI: 0.001, 0.016).
b. Matrix comparison:
Anti-coagulant effects were evaluated using 10 samples, comparing serum and plasma (lithium heparin and sodium heparin) with C3 concentrations ranging from 0.31-3.96 g/L. Linear regression analysis was performed and results are summarized below.
| Analyte | Matrix | Linear Regression Analysis | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Slope | Intercept | Correlation coefficient (r) |
| C3 | Serum vs. lithium plasma | 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.01) | -0.02 | 1.00 |
| | Serum vs. sodium plasma | 1.02 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.06) | -0.06 | 1.00 |
| C4 | Serum vs. lithium plasma | 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.11) | -0.04 | 1.00 |
| | Serum vs. sodium plasma | 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.14) | -0.05 | 1.00 |
3. Clinical studies:
{5}
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The reference interval quoted is from literature for healthy subjects (same for both serum and plasma).
Expected values:
C3 = 0.9-1.8g/L
C4 = 0.1-0.4g/L
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.