K053553 · Polymedco, Inc. · DCF · Mar 9, 2006 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K053553
Device Name
NYCOCARD U-ALBUMIN AND U-ALBUMIN CONTROL
Applicant
Polymedco, Inc.
Product Code
DCF · Immunology
Decision Date
Mar 9, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5040
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The NycoCard U-Albumin is intended to measure by immunochemical techniques the albumin (a plasma protein) in urine. Measurement of albumin aids in the diagnosis of kidney and intestinal diseases. The NycoCard U-Albumin Control Kit consists of two control materials based on human urine. The controls should be used to confirm the efficacy of the MycoCard U-Albumin reagents and correct performance of the test.
Device Story
NycoCard U-Albumin is an immunochemical test system for quantitative measurement of albumin in human urine. Device aids clinicians in diagnosing kidney and intestinal diseases. System includes test reagents and control materials (human urine-based) to verify performance. Operation involves immunochemical reaction; results provide diagnostic information regarding protein levels in urine. Used in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Output assists healthcare providers in assessing renal or intestinal function.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase, sandwich-format immunometric assay. Components: membrane with immobilized monoclonal anti-albumin antibodies, gold-particle labeled antibody conjugate, phosphate/borate buffers. Quantitative measurement via NycoCard READER II color densitometer. Storage: 2-8°C. Shelf life: 12 months.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the measurement of albumin in urine to aid in the diagnosis of kidney and intestinal diseases. Intended for use with NycoCard U-Albumin Control to verify reagent efficacy and test performance.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An albumin immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the albumin (a plasma protein) in serum and other body fluids. Measurement of albumin aids in the diagnosis of kidney and intestinal diseases.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to § 866.9.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k053553
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Urine Albumin (microalbumin)
D. Type of Test:
Solid phase, sandwich-format, immunometric assay
E. Applicant:
Axis-Shield PoC AS
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
NycoCard® U-Albumin
NycoCard® U-Albumin Control
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR §866.5040, Albumin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
21 CFR §862.1660, Quality control material (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II (Special Controls) - This device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter, but subject to the limitations to the exemption outlined in 866.9(c)(5).
Class I, reserved - Controls
3. Product code:
{1}
DCF - assay
JJX -control
4. Panel:
82 (Immunology)
75 (Clinical Chemistry)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See Indications for use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The NycoCard U-Albumin is intended to measure by immunochemical techniques the albumin (a plasma protein) in urine. Measurement of albumin aids in the diagnosis of kidney and intestinal diseases.
The NycoCard U-Albumin Control Kit consists of two control materials based on human urine. The controls should be used to confirm the efficacy of the MycoCard U-Albumin reagents and correct performance of the test.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For Prescription use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
NycoCard READER II. (previously cleared under k993131)
I. Device Description:
The NycoCard U-Albumin test and NycoCard U-Albumin controls consists of the following:
- TD/Test Device: 1 x 24 units – plastic device containing a membrane coated with monoclonal anti-albumin antibodies.
- R1/ Dilution Liquid: 1 x 24 x 1.0 mL - Phosphate buffer (pH 5.6), organic solvent (<10%) and a small amount of yellow pigment.
- R2/Conjugate: 1 x 2.0 mL - Borate buffered solution containing monoclonal anti albumin antibodies labeled with ultra-small gold particles.
- R3/Wash Solution: 1 x 2.0 mL - Phosphate buffered NaCl solution (pH 7.4)
- NycoCard U-Albumin Control Kit – 2 x 1 x 1.0 mL
2
{2}
| C+/Control positive | 1 x 1.0 ml |
| --- | --- |
| C- /Control negative | 1 x 1.0 ml |
Liquid human urine materials with sodium azide $(>0.1\%)$ . The albumin concentration is printed on the vial labels.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
PolyChem Microalbumin, MIC500
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k002674
3. Comparison with predicate:
Similar colorimetric methods for measuring low levels of albumin in human urine are well established. These test methods are based on other predicate test methods and sample recommendations. The NycoCard® U-Albumin test method for the determination of low levels of albumin in human urine is substantially equivalent to other commercially available testing methods.
| Predicate Methodology | Immunoturbidimetric |
| --- | --- |
| Test Methodology | Colorimetric |
| Predicate Reagent Storage | 2 – 8°C |
| Test Reagent Storage | 2 – 8°C |
| Predicate Sample types | Urine |
| Test Sample types | Urine |
| Predicate Controls | Recommended |
| Test Controls | Recommended |
| Correlation studies were performed comparing the urine Microalbumin results generated on the NycoCard U-Albumin k053553, against the PolyChem Microalbumin, MIC500. k020852/A021 | 40 urine samples spanned form 9 mg/L to 188 m/L. The regression equation was y = 1.012x – 0.203 and r = 0.9974. |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None Referenced.
# L. Test Principle:
The NycoCard U-Albumin is a solid phase, sandwich-format, immunometric
{3}
assay. The test device contains a membrane coated with immobilized albumin specific monoclonal antibodies. When the diluted sample is applied to the test device, the sample flows through the membrane, and immobilized antibodies on the membrane capture the albumin molecules. Albumin trapped on the membrane will bind the gold-antibody conjugate that is added in a sandwich-type reaction. The paper layer underneath the membrane absorbs excess liquid. Due to the bound gold particles, the membrane appears purple with color intensity proportional to the albumin concentration of the sample. The color intensity is measured quantitatively by using the color densitometer NycoCard READER II.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
##### Intra assay Precision
Intra assay precision (within run) was assessed at three levels. Twenty replicates of the same sample within one analytical run were evaluated at three levels. The mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) in percent were calculated. An intra assay CV of < 5% was determined to be acceptable. The data are presented in the table below.
Intra Assay Precision on NycoCard® READER II.
Results are reported in mg/L.
| Analyzer
NycoCard® READER II | | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | n | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| U-Albumin | Mean | 17.9 | 51.7 | 152.5 |
| | SD | 0.85 | 2.52 | 7.54 |
| | %CV | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.9 |
##### Inter assay Precision
Inter assay (between run) precision was determined by analyzing duplicates of three different samples in each of ten different runs over ten different occasions. An inter assay CV of < 10% was determined to be acceptable. The data are presented in the table below.
Inter Assay Precision on NycoCard® READER II.
Results are reported in mg/L.
| Analyzer
NycoCard® READER II | | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Days | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| | n | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| U-Albumin | Mean | 12.6 | 51.8 | 148.8 |
| | SD | 1.10 | 4.61 | 8.38 |
| | %CV | 8.7 | 8.9 | 5.6 |
{4}
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity studies
The sponsor claims a reportable range for their assay of 6 – 200 mg/L. Linearity of the assay was evaluated using a dilution series that spanned most of the reportable range of the test. Serial dilution sets were prepared using 7% BSA and made up fresh and assayed with each of three calibrated runs. The results at each level of analyte were averaged and the linear fit was assessed.
The NycoCard® U-Albumin was found to be linear from 17.3 to 189.7 mg/L. The results are summarized below.
Summary of the NycoCard® U-Albumin Linearity Study.
Means in mg/L.
| Theoretical Level | Mean Actual Level | Standard Deviation | % CV | Deviation from Theoretical | % Deviation | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.9 | 17.3 | 0.58 | 3.3 | -1.5 | -8.1 | 91.9 |
| 37.7 | 35.3 | 1.15 | 3.3 | -2.4 | -6.4 | 93.6 |
| 56.6 | 56.7 | 0.58 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 100.1 |
| 75.5 | 77.0 | 3.46 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 102.0 |
| 94.3 | 94.3 | 3.79 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
| 113.2 | 115.7 | 2.31 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 102.2 |
| 132.1 | 134.7 | 2.89 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 102.0 |
| 150.9 | 149.0 | 3.61 | 2.4 | -1.9 | -1.3 | 98.7 |
| 169.8 | 172.7 | 2.31 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 101.7 |
| 188.7 | 189.7 | 0.58 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 100.5 |
| Linear Fit Parameters | |
| --- | --- |
| Slope: | 1.018 |
| Intercept: | -1.378 |
| r²: | 0.9992 |
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Calibration
The NycoCard® U-Albumin test was calibrated using an in house reference preparation and an external control preparation. Both preparations were assayed against the IFCC/BCR/CAP Reference Preparation ERM 470.
The in house reference preparation is prepared using urine ultra filtrated to remove any trace of albumin. Ultra-pure human albumin is then added to a final
{5}
concentration of 200 mg/l. The other calibrators at 100, 50, 20, and 10 mg/L are prepared by diluting the 200 mg/L reference preparation to the appropriate concentration.
A commercially available human serum protein calibrator traceable to ERM 470, is used as an external control preparation. The commercially available calibrator is aslo diluted to 100, 50, 20, and 10 mg/l in 0.9% NaCl.
## Stability of sample material
Human urine samples were stored under various conditions before analysis using NycoCard® U-Albumin and the NycoCard® READER II. The sponsor defined a significant change in result as >2xCV_between runs, i.e. >10.2 See below:
## Stability at -20 °C
25 fresh urine samples were analyzed in duplicate and then frozen at -20 °C. After one week storage an aliquot from each sample was thawed, analyzed and frozen again. The same aliquot was thawed, analyzed and frozen again after two weeks and three months storage at -20 °C. After three months another aliquot from the same sample was thawed for the first time and analyzed. The data are presented in the table below.
## Stability at 4 and 23 °C
61 fresh urine samples were analyzed in duplicate and stored at 4 and 23 °C. The samples were re-tested after one and two weeks. The data are presented in the table below.
## Stability of diluted samples
92 fresh urine samples were diluted in R1/Dilution Liquid according to the test procedure described in the NycoCard® U-Albumin package insert. The samples were analyzed and stored at 4 and 23 °C for two weeks. The data are presented in the table below.
Stability of urine samples at various storage conditions.
| Sample storage condition | Samples (N) | Increased Result^{1} | Decreased result^{2} | Unstable samples (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3 months at -20 °C | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 weeks at 4 °C | 61 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 2 weeks at 23 °C | 61 | 5 | 3 | 13 |
| 2 weeks at 4 °C, diluted | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 weeks at 23 °C, diluted | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N: number of samples
1: Increased result was defined as recovery > target*1.102 (2xCV_between run)
2: Decreased result was defined as recovery < target*0.898 (2xCV_between run)
No significant change in measured albumin concentration was observed after
{6}
three months storage at -20 °C.
One sample showed significantly increased recovery after two weeks of storage at 4 °C, while three samples showed lower recovery and five samples increased recovery after two weeks storage at 23 °C.
No significant change in measured albumin concentration was observed for the diluted samples stored at 4 °C and 23 °C.
## Stability of the test kit and components
The sponsor defined a significant change in stability as a persistent change of assay performance of more than 2xSD (standard deviation) based on the reproducibility between runs data, compared to mean at the start of the stability studies. See below:
## NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit, cool storage (4 °C)
Test kits from three validation lots of NycoCard® U-Albumin were stored refrigerated at 4 °C. The test kits were tested regularly using four levels of urine samples (stored at -20 °C) and NycoCard® U-Albumin C+/Control Positive.
The test result was measured as color intensity (K/S) by the NycoCard® READER II.
$$
\text{Color intensity (K/S)} = \frac{(1 - R)^2}{2R}
$$
Where K is the light absorbed, S is the light scattered and R is the reflectance.
The data are presented in the graphs below.
Stability of the NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit, validation lot 1, at 4 °C. Color intensity (K/S) as a function of storage time.

{7}
Stability of the NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit, validation lot 2, at $4^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Color intensity (K/S) as a function of storage time.

NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit stability (4 °C)
2. Validation lot
Stability of the NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit, validation lot 3, at $4^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . Color intensity (K/S) as a function of storage time.

NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit stability (4 °C)
3. Validation lot
Real time stability test was performed for 16, 17 and 14 months for validation lot 1, 2 and 3, respectively. No significant change in performance was observed over this period of time. The shelf life for NycoCard® U-Albumin was set as 12 months.
{8}
# NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit in use
NycoCard® U-Albumin test kits were stored according to the recommendations given in the NycoCard® U-Albumin Package Insert (Storage and Stability, Opened kits section): the R2/Conjugate vials, TD/Test Device bags and C+/Control Positive vials were stored refrigerated $(4^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , while R1/Dilution liquid microcentrifuge tubes and R3/Washing Solution vials were stored at room temperature $(23^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ protected from light.
The NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit components were used in an ordinary manner over a 3 months period. Reference materials in three levels and the control were analyzed in one replicate each day. The data are presented below.
Stability of the NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit in use. Color intensity (K/S) as a function of storage time.

The NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit (enlarged to last the total test period) was used regularly for 87 days. No significant change in performance was observed during this period of time.
# Stability of NycoCard® U-Albumin test kit after transport stress
To simulate transport stress, NycoCard® U-Albumin test kits were exposed to the following conditions:
- Continuous storage at $4^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ , followed by
- 2 days on a roller at room temperature $(23^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , followed by
- 2 days refrigerated $(4^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , followed by
- 2 days at high temperature $(37^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ , followed by
- 2.5 days at room temperature $(23^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$
Test kits stored refrigerated $(4^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$ were used as a control in the study. The data are presented in the table below.
{9}
Stability of NycoCard® U-Albumin test kits after exposure to transport stress.
| Sample | Albumin (mg/l) | Recovery (albumin mg/l) | | Deviation (%) Stressed kit vs. Control |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Stressed test kit | Control | |
| 1 | 10 | 14 | 12 | +16 |
| 2 | 20 | 25 | 22 | +14 |
| 3 | 50 | 50 | 51 | - 2 |
| 4 | 100 | 105 | 117 | -10 |
For sample 1 and 2 a percent change > 10% was observed.
## Stability of NycoCard® U-Albumin Control
Two validation lots of NycoCard® U-Albumin Positive Control were stored at 4, 23 and 37 °C and tested regularly in the NycoCard® U-Albumin assay. The data are presented in the graphs below.
Stability of NycoCard® U-Albumin C+/Positive Control validation lot 1 at 4, 25 and 37 °C as a function of storage time.

Stability of NycoCard® U-Albumin C+/Positive Control validation lot 2 at 4, 25 and 37 °C as a function of storage time.
{10}

No significant change in measured results was observed for positive control, validation lot 1, stored at 4 and $23^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . A $50\%$ reduction in recovery was observed after approximately 7.5 months storage at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
No significant change in measured results was observed for positive control, validation lot 2, stored at 4 and $23^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ . A $50\%$ reduction in recovery was observed after approximately 6.5 months storage at $37^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ .
# d. Detection limit:
# Sensitivity
Functional sensitivity was assessed by diluting a pool to 10 different concentrations below the lower limit of the normal test range for each analyte. Each dilution was assayed in replicates of ten. The mean, standard deviation and percent coefficient of variation were calculated for the ten replicates of each dilution. The functional sensitivity of the test was defined at the value of the dilution where the CV is approximately $20\%$ (taking into consideration that the actual mean was within $\pm 10\%$ of the expected target). The functional sensitivity results are summarized below:
| | Sensitivity | %CV |
| --- | --- | --- |
| U-Albumin | 6.0 | 13.6 |
# e. Analytical specificity:
A morning urine sample was sterile filtrated and h-albumin was added to final concentrations of approximately 20 and $150\mathrm{mg / l}$
{11}
Samples containing added substances were tested in duplicate in the NycoCard® U-Albumin assay. Aliquots without substances added were used as controls in the study. The test result was measured as color intensity (K/S) by the NycoCard® READER II.
The sponsor defined no interference from an added substance on the assay performance as recovery within mean $\pm 2\mathrm{SD}$ of the controls. The control sample data is presented in the table below. The effect of possible interfering substances at various concentrations on the measured albumin value is presented below.
Control samples (urine samples without possible interfering substance) $n = 24$ .
| Albumin | 0 mg/l | 20 mg/l | 150 mg/l |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| mean (K/S) | 0.145 | 0.365 | 1.89 |
| SD | 0.008 | 0.020 | 0.10 |
| CV | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Calculated range of no interference1 | 0.129-0.161 | 0.325-0.405 | 1.70-2.08 |
mean recovery $\pm 2\mathrm{SD}$
Effect of possible interfering substances on the measured urine albumin value. Results compared with control samples.
| Substance | Concentration1 | Range 2xSD | Range 3xSD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Creatinine | 5 mmol/l | Within1 | |
| | 20 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 60 mmol/l | Within | |
| Glucose | 0.5 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 30 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 50 mmol/l | Within | |
| Sodium chloride | 50 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 250 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 500 mmol/l | Within | |
| Sodium nitrite | 0.01 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 0.1 mmol/l | Within | |
| | 10 mmol/l | Within | |
| Urea | 5 g/l | Within | |
| | 80 g/l | Not within2 | Within |
| | 200 g/l | Not within | Within |
| Acetone | 3 mg/l | Within | |
| | 1200 mg/l | Within | |
| | 2400 mg/l | Within | |
| Bilirubin | 0.5 mg/l | Within | |
| | 25 mg/l | Within | |
| | 50 mg/l | Not within | Within |
{12}
| Substance | Concentration1 | Range 2xSD | Range 3xSD |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Myoglobin | 0.5 mg/l | Within | |
| | 50 mg/l | Within | |
| | 500 mg/l | Within | |
| β2-microglobulin | 0.3 mg/l | Within | |
| | 25 mg/l | Within | |
| | 250 mg/l | Within | |
| IgG | 10 mg/l | Within | |
| | 50 mg/l | Within | |
| | 500 mg/l | Within | |
| IgA | 10 mg/l | Within | |
| | 50 mg/l | Within | |
| | 500 mg/l | Within | |
| Hemoglobin | 0.005 mg/l | Within | |
| | 0.5 mg/l | Within | |
| | 50 mg/l | Within | |
| | 500 mg/l | Within | |
| Whole blood (EDTA) | 0.005 mg Hb/l | Within | |
| | 0.5 mg Hb/l | Within | |
| | 50 mg Hb/l | Not within | Not within |
| | 500 mg Hb/l | Not within | Not within |
| pH | 4 | Not within | Within |
| | 7 | Within | |
| | 9 | Within | |
SD: Standard Deviation
1Within: Obtained results are within 2xSD or 3xSD range of the control results.
2Not within: Obtained results are not within 2xSD or 3xSD range of the control results.
Samples that contained added urea or bilirubin, and whose pH varied, obtained single test results that were outside the 2xSD range of the control values. All test results were within 3xSD. The data are presented in detail in the tables below.
The effect of urea on the urine albumin measurement. Mean of duplicate measurements.
| Albumin | Normal urine | 20 mg/l | 150 mg/l |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2xSD1 | 0.129-0.161 | 0.325-0.405 | 1.70-2.08 |
| 5 g urea/l | 0.131 | 0.357 | 1.81 |
| 80 g urea/l | 0.134 | 0.340 | 1.67 |
| 200 g urea/l | 0.128 | 0.331 | 1.66 |
Range of no interference. 2xSD (Standard Deviation) of the control sample test results.
The addition of $80\mathrm{g / l}$ urea results in urine albumin measurements slightly below
{13}
the 2xSD range of no interference for the sample with $150\mathrm{mg / l}$ albumin. The addition of $200~\mathrm{g / l}$ urea results in urine albumin measurements slightly below the 2xSD range for the normal sample and the sample with $150\mathrm{mg / l}$ albumin. The sample with $20\mathrm{mg / l}$ albumin was not affected.
The effect of bilirubin on the urine albumin measurement. Mean of duplicate measurements.
| Albumin | Normal urine | 20 mg/l | 150 mg/l |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2xSD1 | 0.129-0.161 | 0.325-0.405 | 1.70-2.08 |
| 0.5 mg bilirubin/l | 0.130 | 0.344 | 1.75 |
| 25 mg bilirubin/l | 0.126 | 0.353 | 1.85 |
| 50 mg bilirubin/l | 0.137 | 0.323 | 1.78 |
Range of no interference. 2xSD (Standard Deviation) of the control sample test results.
The addition of $25\mathrm{mg / l}$ of bilirubin results in urine albumin measurements slightly below the 2xSD range of no interference for the normal urine sample. Lower or higher bilirubin concentrations do not affect the urine albumin analysis. The addition of $25\mathrm{mg / l}$ of bilirubin results in urine albumin measurements slightly below the 2xSD range for the sample with $150\mathrm{mg / l}$ albumin.
The effect of pH on the urine albumin measurement. Mean of duplicate measurements.
| Albumin | Normal urine | 20 mg/l | 150 mg/l |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2xSD1 | 0.129-0.161 | 0.325-0.405 | 1.70-2.08 |
| pH 5 | 0.143 | 0.380 | 1.90 |
| pH 4 | 0.135 | 0.315 | 1.83 |
| pH 9 | 0.136 | 0.375 | 1.75 |
Range of no interference. 2xSD (Standard Deviation) of the control sample test results.
Adjusting pH to 4 gave urine albumin results slightly below the 2xSD range of no interference for the urine sample with $20\mathrm{mg / l}$ albumin. Samples with a normal albumin concentration or $150\mathrm{mg / l}$ albumin were not affected by the low pH.
Addition of whole blood to the urine sample resulted in single test results outside both the 2xSD and 3xSD range of the control values. This is due to biological high content of albumin in human whole blood. The data are presented in detail in below.
The effect of whole blood (measured as Hb content) on the urine albumin measurement. Mean of duplicate measurements.
{14}
| Albumin | Normal urine | 20 mg/l | 150 mg/l |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2xSD¹ | 0.129-0.161 | 0.325-0.405 | 1.70-2.08 |
| 0.005 mg Hb/l | 0.145 | 0.348 | 1.88 |
| 0.5 mg/l | 0.143 | 0.366 | 1.79 |
| 50 mg/l | 0.243 | 0.444 | 1.94 |
| 500 mg/l | 1.13 | 1.31 | 2.75 |
Hb: hemoglobin
$^{1}$ Range of no interference. 2xSD (Standard Deviation) of the control sample test results.
Whole blood contains large concentrations of albumin. Traces of blood in urine samples will thus influence the measurement of urine albumin. Addition of whole blood up to $0.5\mathrm{mgHb / L}$ urine does not affect the urine albumin analysis.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable for this type of device.
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
# Comparison Studies
Correlation studies were performed comparing the urine microalbumin results generated on the NycoCard® READER II against the results generated from a legally marketed test.
The 40 urine samples spanned from $9\mathrm{mg / L}$ to $188\mathrm{mg / l}$ . The regression equation was $\mathrm{y} = 1.012\mathrm{x} - 0.203$ and $\mathrm{r} = 0.9974$ . The summary of the correlation data is presented in the table and graph below.
Correlation Data Summary for urine microalbumin the NycoCard® READER II and the PolyChem. Results in mg/l.
| Variable X,Y | Mean | Std. Dv. | r(X,Y) | r² | t | p | N |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PolyChem | 63.3 | 59.61 | 0.9974 | 0.9948 | 84.887 | 0.000 | 40 |
| NycoCard® READER II | 63.8 | 60.48 | | | | | |
{15}
Plot of the Comparison Study Results

b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable.
b. Clinical specificity:
{16}
Not applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The sponsor has provided the following reference ranges:
| Category | 24-h collection (mg/24h) | Timed collection (ug/min) | Spot collection (ug/mg creatinine) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Normal | <30 (mg/24h) | <20 (ug/min) | <30 (ug/mg creatinine) |
| Microalbuminuria | 30-299 | 20-199 | 30-299 |
| Clinical albuminuria | ≥300 | ≥200 | ≥300 |
The sponsor recommends that each laboratory establish its own reference range to reflect the age, sex, diet and geographical location of the population.
Normal Values (<20 mg/L)
Albumin is normally excreted in the urine at the rate 5-20 µg/min (up to 30 mg/24 hours), giving a urine albumin concentration up to 20 mg/L with a normal urine volume.
Increased Values
Microalbuminuria is present when the urine albumin excretion is persistently elevated to 30-300 mg/24 hours, giving a urine albumin concentration of 20-200 mg/L with a normal urine volume⁴
The urine albumin excretion rate (UAER) is given as µg/min when timed urine is used:
$$
\frac{C_{\text{albumin}} \times V_{\text{urine}}}{C_{\text{sampling time, min}}} = \mu g / min
$$
$$
C_{\text{albumin}} = \text{albumin concentration, mg/L}
$$
$$
V_{\text{urine}} = \text{total urine volume, mL}
$$
The expected range presented in the proposed package insert was established from scientific literature with references listed below:
1. Henry, J.B., Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods 20ᵗʰ ed. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia (1976).
{17}
2. Tietz, N.W. Textbook of Clinical Chemistry 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia (1994).
3. Fielding, B.A., Price, D.A., Houlton, C.A., Clin. Chem. 29(2):355-357 (1983).
4. American Diabetes Association, Diabetes Care, Vol 25 Supplement 1 (2002)
**N. Proposed Labeling:**
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
**O. Conclusion:**
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
18
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.