COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG TEST FOR NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE
Applicant
Roche Diagnostics Corp.
Product Code
LSL · Microbiology
Decision Date
Aug 10, 2006
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.3390
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae is a qualitative in vitro test for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in endocervical swab specimens, and in male urethral swab specimens as evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic infection with N. gonorrhoeae. N. gonorrhoeae DNA is detected by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification of target DNA and by hybridization capture of amplified target using the COBAS AMPLICOR™ analyzer.
Device Story
The Roche Scripts for COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test is a software accessory consisting of a CD containing scripts that automate the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 Workstation. The workstation processes swab samples or control materials for the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG assay. The system automates sample preparation steps previously performed manually, reducing potential for human error. The output is a prepared sample ready for analysis by the COBAS AMPLICOR analyzer, which uses PCR amplification and hybridization capture to detect N. gonorrhoeae or C. trachomatis DNA. The device is intended for use in clinical laboratory settings by trained laboratory personnel. The automation improves workflow efficiency and consistency in sample processing, ultimately supporting accurate diagnostic results for patients.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Software accessory (scripts) for the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 Workstation. The system automates liquid handling and sample preparation for PCR-based diagnostic assays. The device is a software-only accessory (CD-ROM) that interfaces with the workstation to execute pre-defined processing protocols. No changes to the underlying COBAS AMPLICOR assay chemistry or detection principle.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use with the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 Workstation to automate the processing of swab samples or control material for the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The underlying assay is indicated for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae DNA in urine (symptomatic/asymptomatic males), endocervical swabs (symptomatic/asymptomatic females), and urethral swabs (symptomatic males).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Neisseria spp. direct serological test reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify Neisseria spp. from cultured isolates. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of Neisseria spp. antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) which may be used to detect the presence of Neisseria spp. directly from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus Neisseria, such as epidemic cerebrospinal meningitis, meningococcal disease, and gonorrhea, and also provides epidemiological information on diseases caused by these microorganisms. The device does not include products for the detection of gonorrhea in humans by indirect methods, such as detection of antibodies or of oxidase produced by gonococcal organisms.
Predicate Devices
COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (K974342)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY ASSAY AND INSTRUMENT COMBINATION TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K053289
B. Purpose for Submission:
To add the option for automated swab specimen preparation and control preparation using the software accessory “Roche Scripts for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae*” to direct the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 Workstation.
C. Measurand:
*Neisseria gonorrhoeae* M:Ngo PII DNA sequence
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative determination using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) DNA amplification and colorimetric detection
E. Applicant:
Roche Diagnostics Corporation
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* with optional accessory Roche Scripts for COBAS Amplicor CT/GC Test
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
866.3390 - Neisseria species, Direct Serological Test Reagents
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
LSL - DNA reagents, Neisseria
4. Panel:
83 Microbiology
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test for *Neisseria gonorrhoeae* is a qualitative in vitro test for the detection of *N. gonorrhoeae* in endocervical swab specimens, and in male urethral swab specimens as evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic infection with *N. gonorrhoeae*. *N. gonorrhoeae* DNA is detected by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification of target DNA and by hybridization capture of amplified target using the COBAS AMPLICOR™ analyzer.
{1}
2. Indication(s) for use:
This submission is intended to add the option the Roche Scripts for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test to provide software scripts to direct the automated Tecan Genesis RSP 150 Workstation to process swab samples or control material for analysis using the COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
The Tecan Genesis Robotic Sample Processor (RSP) 150 Instrument is intended for liquid pipetting and measurement tasks under official laboratory conditions.
Sample and control preparation can either be accomplished manually or automated using the optional Roche Scripts for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test accessory to direct the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 Workstation. Urine specimens are not indicated for use with the automated sample preparation option.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
Urine specimens are not indicated for use with the automated sample preparation option. Prescription Use only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not applicable
I. Device Description:
The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test performed on the COBAS AMPLICOR™ Analyzer. The COBAS AMPLICOR™ Analyzer automates the amplification, the nucleic acid hybridization and the colorimetric detection procedures of the Test. The COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae also has an Internal Control that identifies specimens that contain substances which are inhibitory to PCR.
The RSP Genesis 150 Workstation with Gemini software v4.2 is a microprocessor controlled sample diluter and dispenser. It is configured with eight (8) sample processing probes and/or bar code reader. Modular racks will accommodate many types of commonly used tubes and microwell plates. The RSP 150 instrument is capable of handling pipetting volume ranges between 0.5 µL and 5 mL.
The Roche Scripts v1.0.3 for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test accessory consists of a compact disc (CD) containing scripts to direct the automated Tecan Genesis RSP 150 workstation with Gemini software v4.2 to process swab samples or control material for analysis. The Roche Scripts operate by providing commands in the GEMINI computer language to direct the Tecan in pipetting, dilution, incubation and shaking, and specimen dispersion into up to eight 12-position A rings (the sample rack for the COBAS AMPLICOR Instrument).
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG test for Neisseria gonorrhoeae
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
K974342
{2}
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | DeviceCOBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG forN. gonorrhoeae with optional Roche Scripts accessory | PredicateCOBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG forN. gonorrhoeae |
| Intended Use | The COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae is a qualitative in vitro test for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae M Ngo PII DNA sequence in endocervical swab specimens, and in male urethral swab specimens as evidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic infection with N. gonorrhoeae. N. gonorrhoeae DNA is detected by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification of target DNA and by hybridization capture of amplified target using the COBAS AMPLICOR™ analyzer. | Same |
| Test Principle | DNA detection via PCR amplification of target DNA followed by hybridization capture of amplified target using the COBAS AMPLICOR™ Analyzer | Same |
| Controls provided | Positive control: DNA from N. gonorrhoeaeNegative control: plasmid DNA from C. trachomatisOptional internal control:DNA sequences with primer binding regions identical to N. gonorrhoeae target sequence | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Analytical sensitivity - Limit of Detection, Expressed as Colony Forming Units/mL (cfu/mL) | Revised test performance: 250 cfu/mL, equivalent to 3.25 cfu/test, using automated specimen preparation; 400 cfu/mL, equivalent to 5.0 cfu/test, using manual preparation for N. gonorrhoeae with swab specimens | Labeled test performance: 400 cfu/mL, equivalent to 5 cfu/test for N. gonorrhoeae with swab specimens; 100 cfu/mL, equivalent to 5 cfu/test for urine specimens, manual preparation |
| Specimen type | Urethral and endocervical swabs only (no urine samples) | Male or female urine specimens; urethral and endocervical swabs |
| Specimen and Control preparation | Manual or automated using the Roche Scripts to direct the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 workstation | Manual |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
CLSI EP5-A2 “Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods”, (2004). CLSI EP-12A “User Protocol for Evaluation of Qualitative Test Performance”, (2002).
{3}
4
L. Test Principle:
DNA detection via PCR amplification of target DNA followed by hybridization capture of amplified target using the COBAS AMPLICOR™ Analyzer. The PCR-based test system reagents and testing procedures are unchanged.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
The purpose of this submission is to demonstrate equivalency between the automated specimen preparation using Roche Scripts to direct the Tecan Genesis TSP 150, and the manual specimen preparation method. The test system was evaluated at two internal sites and one external site for analytical sensitivity, cross-contamination, precision and analytical specificity; and was subject to a clinical method comparison for 600 samples.
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The precision was determined for a panel of culture transport media specimens containing samples described in the table below.
| Panel Sample | Description |
| --- | --- |
| PS1 | Spiked M4 media at ~500 IFU/mL CT |
| PS2 | Spiked M4 media at ~300 IFU/mL CT |
| PS3 | Spiked M4 media at ~100 IFU/mL CT |
| PS4 | Spiked M4 media at ~100 IFU/mL CT and ~5000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS5 | Spiked M4 media at ~300 IFU/mL CT and ~3000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS6 | Spiked M4 media at ~500 IFU/ml CT and ~1000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS7 | Spiked M4 media at ~1000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS8 | Spiked M4 media at ~3000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS9 | Spiked M4 media at ~5000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS10 | Spiked M4 media at ~500 IFU/mL CT and ~5000 cfu/mL NG |
| PS11 | M4 media blank |
Operators at one internal and one external site tested the panel samples in triplicate, once a day for three days. A third internal site, which did not participate in any other analytical studies, also performed precision studies using the same testing protocol. Three sets of three aliquots of each of the 11 panel members were prepared for a total of 27 replicates per panel member. Multiple lots of reagents were used for preparation, amplification and detection. The results are presented in the table below.
{4}
5
Summary of Result for Precision: COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG for N. gonorrhoeae
| | Automated | | | Manual | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Total | Correct | % | Total | Correct | % |
| PS1 | 59 | 59 | 100.0 | 59 | 59 | 100.0 |
| PS2 | 59 | 58 | 98.3 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS3 | 59 | 58 | 98.3 | 59 | 58 | 98.3 |
| PS4 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS5 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 | 60 | 59 | 98.3 |
| PS6 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS7 | 60 | 59 | 98.3 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS8 | 60 | 58 | 96.7 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS9 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS10 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 | 60 | 60 | 100.0 |
| PS11 | 59 | 58 | 98.3 | 59 | 58 | 98.3 |
| | | | | | | |
| Total | 656 | 650 | 99.1 | 657 | 654 | 99.5 |
The overall percentage of correct results was determined as 99.1% (650/656) for the automated method, and 99.5% (654/657) for the manual method, which are determined as equivalent.
b. Linearity/reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The recommended Positive, Negative and Internal Control material were tested as sufficient number of times with acceptable results on all testing days.
d. Detection limit:
The Limit of Detection of the COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG for N. gonorrhoeae on the COBAS AMPLICOR™ Analyzer was determined using M4 culture transport media specimens containing 1 x 10⁸ IFU/mL of Neisseria gonorrhoeae culture (ATCC strain 19242). The panel contained the following dilutions, which bracket the current labeled limit of detection (in bold):
NG: 50, 100, 200, 250, 400, 500 cfu/mL (0.62, 1.25, 2.5, 3.12, 5.00, 6.25 cfu/test)
Three operators at two separate internal sites and one external site tested the panel once a day for two days in duplicate, for a total of 24 replicates per dilution for each sample processing/testing combination. The Limit of Detection (LOD), the lowest dilution at which ≥ 95% of replicates (23/24 or 24/24) yielded positive results, for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG for N. gonorrhoeae is 250 cfu/mL (3.25 cfu/test) for the automated preparation and 400 cfu/mL (5.0 cfu/test) for the manual specimen preparation.
{5}
The 250 cfu/mL result for the automated method differs from the current labeled LOD of 400 cfu/mL for the manual method.
The results of study are presented in the table below.
Summary of analytical sensitivity for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae with automated and manual specimen preparation
| Sample cfu/mL | Dilution | N | Automated | | N | Manual | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | Positive | % | | Positive | % |
| NG –1 0.62 | 50 | 24 | 10 | 41.7 | 19 | 1 | 5.3 |
| NG – 2 1.25 | 100 | 24 | 13 | 54.2 | 23 | 12 | 52.2 |
| NG – 3 2.5 | 200 | 24 | 21 | 87.5 | 24 | 5 | 20.8 |
| NG –4 3.12 | 250 | 24 | 23 | 95.8 | 23 | 10 | 43.5 |
| NG–5 5 | 400 | 24 | 24 | 100.0 | 24 | 23 | 95.8 |
| NG–6 6.25 | 500 | 24 | 23 | 95.8 | 24 | 24 | 100.0 |
e. Analytical specificity:
The analytical specificity was tested using the automated sample preparation directed by the Roche Scripts compared to the manual method by examining spiked samples with varying concentrations of the test analytes. The same method and concentrations used in the Precision panel testing were utilized for analytical specificity. Data from the three sites were pooled and the percentage of false positives and negatives were calculated. The following table shows the agreement of the specificity results between the automated and the manual methods.
Specificity results for COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for N. gonorrhoeae
| | | COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for N. gonorrhoeae | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | N | Automated | | N | Manual | |
| Positive Samples | | False negatives | % | | False negatives | % |
| PS4 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS5 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 | 60 | 1 | 1.7 |
| PS6 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS7 | 60 | 1 | 1.7 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS8 | 60 | 2 | 3.3 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS9 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS10 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Overall | 420 | 3 | 0.7 | 420 | 1 | 0.2 |
{6}
| Negative Samples | | False positives | | | False positives | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PS1 | 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 59 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS2 | 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 60 | 0 | 0.0 |
| PS3 | 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 59 | 1 | 1.7 |
| PS11 | 59 | 1 | 1.7 | 59 | 1 | 1.7 |
| Overall | 236 | 4 | 1.7 | 237 | 2 | 0.8 |
The false negative rate and false positive rate for automated sample preparation are within 95% of false negative and false positive rate for manual sample preparation. The analytical specificity automated results are equivalent to the manual method results.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable
g. Cross-Contamination Testing
This study evaluated the potential for cross contamination / carryover of the COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG for N. gonorrhoeae assay with automated sample preparation directed by the Roche Scripts; in comparison to manual sample preparation. This test was designed to observe the effects of potential aerosolization / splash over the entire A-ring. Positive specimens or M4 media blanks were prepared as samples.
Positive samples were prepared from stock cultures of Chlamydia trachomatis (ATCC strain Vr 885, Serovar D) at 1.44 x 10⁷ IFU/mL and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (ATCC 19242) at 1.0 x 10⁸ IFU/mL diluted in M4 media. High concentration of ~10,000 IFU/mL of C. trachomatis alone and ~10,000 IFU/mL of both C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae combined were utilized. An additional set of rings was prepared and run containing all blanks in the sample positions. Data from rings containing all blanks were not included in the calculations. Testing was performed on three instruments using 8 rings once a day over five days. The overall false positive rate was 0.4% (1/270) with automated specimen preparation and 0.8% (2/263) with manual preparation, Seven blank samples returned an inhibitory result. The difference in the false positivity rates are not statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, and the results are equivalent.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
This method comparison study was designed to demonstrate the equivalency between the automated specimen preparation technique directed by the Roche Scripts and the manual specimen preparation method for 600 samples. The acceptance criteria were based on a concordance of the initial test results; inhibitory or equivocal results were not repeated.
The two methods should agree in their performance where at least 90% positive
{7}
agreement as well as 90% negative agreement is observed for the individual patient groups. The following table shows the agreement of the Roche Scripts directing the automated method versus the manual method comparison, without discrepant resolution, assuming that the manual result is the true result.
## Method Comparison for COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for N. gonorrhoeae
| | | Number Tested | Agreement | Confidence Interval |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Overall Agreement | Concordance | 567 / 597 | 95.0% | 92.9% - 96.6% |
| | % positive | 83 / 89 | 93.3% | 85.9% - 97.5% |
| | % negative | 483 / 494 | 97.8% | 96.1% - 98.9% |
| | | | | |
| Endocervical | Concordance | 156 / 164 | 95.1% | 90.6% - 97.9% |
| | % positive | 17 / 17 | 100.0% | 80.5% - 100.0% |
| | % negative | 139 / 144 | 96.5% | 92.1% - 98.9% |
| | | | | |
| Urethral | Concordance | 408 / 430 | 94.9% | 92.4% - 96.8% |
| | % positive | 66 / 72 | 91.7% | 82.7% - 96.9% |
| | % negative | 341 / 347 | 98.3% | 96.3% - 99.4% |
| | | | | |
| No interferent | Concordance | 442 / 464 | 95.3% | 92.9% - 97.0% |
| | % positive | 73 / 78 | 93.6% | 85.7% - 97.9% |
| | % negative | 368 /375 | 98.1% | 96.2% - 99.2% |
| | | | | |
| Interferent | Concordance | 57 / 62 | 91.9% | 82.2% - 97.3% |
| | % positive | 6 /6 | 100.0% | 54.6% - 100.0% |
| | % negative | 51 / 53 | 96.2% | 87.0% - 99.5% |
This table summarizes the combinations of concordance of test results for overall agreement as well as for the specific subgroups. Testing of both methods shows that the overall agreement concordance is 95.0%, and the % positive and % negative agreement for all subgroups are > 90.0%, which is acceptable.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
The cutoffs for the N. gonorrhoeae specimen results and the Internal Control (IC) specimen results were determined in the previous submission for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG for N. gonorrhoeae (K974342).
{8}
9
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Interpretive Criteria for COBAS AMPLICOR™ CT/NG for *N. gonorrhoeae*
| NG Specimen result | | IC Results | | Interpretation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A_{660} | COBAS Flag | A_{660} | COBAS FLAG | |
| < 0.2 | Negative | ≥ 0.2 | Positive | N. gonorrhoeae not detected |
| < 0.2 | Negative | < 0.2 | Negative | Inhibitory specimen |
| ≥ 2.0 | Positive | Any | Any | N. gonorrhoeae DNA detected |
| ≥ 0.2, <2.0 | GZ 0.2 – 2.0 | Any | Any | Equivocal (inconclusive) |
GZ = Grey Zone
N. Instrument Name:
Tecan Genesis RSP-RC 150 Workstation Instrument, with Roche Scripts v1.0.3 accessory
O. System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
The Genesis RSP 150 Workstation is a multiple task liquid handling system that combines a system of microprocessor-controlled liquid handling and other components to one instrument. The User controls the system via a personal computer, equipped with the Genesis Instrument Software, Gemini Software v4.2, and the Roche Scripts. Genesis RSP is designed to handle liquid volumes ranging between 0.5 µL and 5 µL depending on the installed configuration.
The liquid system is the central component of Genesis pipetting function. It transmits the precise movement of the diluter pistons to the tips through the system liquid. The system liquid is delivered to the system in a container and is aspirated and distributed in the whole system via tubes, valves and connectors. The distribution of the system liquid is effected by the movement of the diluter pistons in several strokes. Disposable tips with filter shall be used where no carry over is tolerable.
2. Software:
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development processes for this line of product types in submission K963268:
Yes ☐ X ☑ or No ☐
3. Specimen Identification:
The Positive Identification (PosID2) reads Barcodes on Carriers, Racks and Containers on both, the primary, e.g. sample tube, as well as the secondary side, e.g. microplates by means of a scanner. With its gripper, it pulls carriers towards the rear of the instrument for barcode identification on tubes and microplates, and then, pushes the carrier back into operating position. To use the PosID2, all carriers, racks and containers (sample tubes,
{9}
microplates, reagent bottles, troughs) must be labeled with barcodes. Exact positioning of these labels is required for optimal function.
4. Specimen Sampling and Handling:
To minimize the potential for well-to-well carryover, the Roche Scripts direct the liquid handling arms of the Tecan RSP 150 to discard the pipet tip immediately after any pipetting step involving contact with a sample- or control containing well. Design features intended to minimize the potential for cross-contamination via aerosolization and splashing are listed below:
- Use of disposable pipet tips with aerosol barrier filters
- Low disposable tip eject option: tips are ejected into a narrow slit box to reduce aerosolization during the ejection step
- Use of a deep well plate for extraction steps
The Gemini 4.2 software and the Tecan Genesis RSP 150 have liquid class settings which control the accuracy of the aspiration and dispense functions of the liquid handling arm. These liquid classes have several sub-options which are configured to the liquid being handled. The sub-options include:
- LAG, STAG, TAG (air gap settings at specific places within the pipet tip)
- Rate / speed of aspiration and dispense settings
- Position of pipet tip in well to optimize liquid aspiration
- Mixing characteristics
5. Calibration:
Liquid class handling settings are determined for each liquid by performing volumetric test cases. The documentation for the test cases is provided in the submission.
6. Quality Control:
An on-line interactive Troubleshooting guide normally detects problems and offers immediate advice for corrective actions pertaining to operations, communication, positioning, and identification errors. Daily, weekly, and periodic preventative maintenance schedules are provided in the Tecan User Manual.
P. Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data Not Covered In The "Performance Characteristics" Section above:
The sponsor acknowledges that the analytical studies cited in the risk assessment as controls for the Tecan functions are more properly identified as verification activities. Roche audited Tecan, and confirmed that Tecan validated the Gemini v4.2 software.
The Roche Scripts CD's are standalone software designed to run on Off-the-Shelf (OTS) Tecan equipment. Roche Scripts are installed at the user site in read-only mode, and cannot be altered by the User.
Q. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
R. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.