The Accurex Glucose Test Strips for use with the following glucometers: OneTouch Basic, OneTouch II and OneTouch Profile meters, all manufactured by Lifescan, Inc. It is to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood. Glucose measurements are used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
Device Story
Accurex Glucose Test Strip is a generic replacement strip for Lifescan OneTouch meters. Device uses membrane technology with glucose oxidase/peroxidase reaction to measure glucose in fresh capillary whole blood. User inserts strip into compatible meter, applies blood sample to test spot; meter displays quantitative glucose result. Used by patients for home diabetes monitoring. Device provides aid in assessing effectiveness of diabetes control. Performance validated against YSI 2300D clinical analyzer; results show high correlation with predicate device.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; device is a generic replacement for a legally marketed predicate.
Technological Characteristics
White plastic test strip containing glucose oxidase (Aspergillus niger), peroxidase (horseradish), color indicator, stabilizers, and buffers. Dimensions: 0.6" W x 1.75" L. Sensing principle: enzymatic colorimetric reaction. Requires external meter (OneTouch Basic, II, or Profile) for signal processing and display. Sterilization not specified.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood to monitor diabetes control in patients requiring glucose testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A glucose test system is a device intended to measure glucose quantitatively in blood and other body fluids. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The device, when it is solely intended for use as a drink to test glucose tolerance, is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9.
Predicate Devices
One Touch Glucose Test Strip (k923544)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k052207
B. Purpose for Submission:
New device
C. Measurand:
Glucose
D. Type of Test:
Quantitative
E. Applicant:
Incline Medical, LLC
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Accurex Glucose Test Strip
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 862.1345 – Glucose test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
CGA, NBW
4. Panel:
Chemistry (75)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The Accurex Glucose Test Strips for use with the following glucometers: OneTouch Basic, OneTouch II and OneTouch Profile meters, all manufactured by Lifescan, Inc.
It is to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood. Glucose measurements are used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Accurex Glucose Test Strip for use with the following glucometers: OneTouch Basic, OneTouch II and OneTouch Profile meters, all manufactured by Lifescan, Inc.
It is to be used for the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood. Glucose measurements are used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
This device is for over-the-counter use.
This device is for use with capillary whole blood from the fingertip only.
4. Special instrument requirements:
This device requires use of Lifescan, Inc.'s One Touch Profile, One Touch II, or One Touch Basic meters.
I. Device Description:
The Accurex Glucose Test Strip is a generic replacement for the Lifescan One Touch Glucose Test Strip. The device is a white plastic strip with a test spot indicated by a red arrow on one side and a red hash on the backside. The strip's chemical composition includes glucose oxidase (Aspergillus niger), peroxidase (horseradish), color indicator, stabilizers and buffers. The strips are supplied in two vials, each containing 25 test strips and a desiccant. A vial of control solution (92.7% water, 0.06% glucose, 0.84% preservative, and 6.44% pigment) is also supplied with the test strips.
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
{2}
One Touch Glucose Test Strip
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k923544
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For use with the One Touch® Basic®, One Touch® Profile®, and One Touch® II Meters to check blood glucose levels | Same |
| Indications for Use | For the quantitative measurement of glucose in fresh capillary whole blood. Glucose measurements are used as an aid to monitor the effectiveness of diabetes control. | Same |
| Test Principle | Membrane technology employing glucose oxidase/peroxidase reaction | Same |
| Dimensions | 0.6” W, 1.75” L | Same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Assay Range | 3 – 600 mg/dL | 0 – 600 mg/dL |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced
L. Test Principle:
{3}
The Accurex Test Strip, used together with the One Touch® Basic®, One Touch® Profile®, and One Touch® II Meters, measures the blood glucose levels using a membrane technology that employs a glucose oxidase/peroxidase reaction. The user turns on the meter, enters the calibration code into the meter, removes a test strip from the vial and inserts it in the meter, and applies a fresh sample of whole blood to the test spot. The result is displayed on the One Touch meter.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
### 1. Analytical performance:
#### a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Fifteen replicates from each of five glucose contrived whole blood samples were analyzed on the One Touch Basic wide screen meter. As a control, each whole blood sample was analyzed on the YSI clinical analyzer before and shortly after replicate testing. The results were as follows:
| YSI | Accurex | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| mg/dL | mg/dL | %CV |
| 42 | 44 | 3.2 |
| 135 | 135 | 3.2 |
| 254 | 257 | 3.5 |
| 377 | 361 | 2.3 |
| 486 | 469 | 3.1 |
#### b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The assay reportable range is 3 to 600 mg/dL.
The linearity of the test strips was determined by testing ten replicates each of five heparinized blood glucose levels contrived with glucose stock solution on five randomly selected One Touch Basic meters. The true glucose values were determined with the YSI 2300D clinical analyzer, with average levels of 6, 132, 304, 407, and 515 mg/dL.
The following regression resulted: $y = 0.95x + 0.46$ , $r^2 = 0.99$ . The average levels on the Accurex strips were 9.3, 121, 289, 394, and $489\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . All the data points reside within the A zone of the Clarke error grid.
An additional study to support linearity between 489 and $600\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and to include a sample between approximately $50 - 70\mathrm{mg / dL}$ was performed per FDA's request. As before, ten replicates each of two samples were tested. The average reference results were 67 and $573\mathrm{mg / dL}$ , which were similar to the average Accurex strip results of 67 and $563\mathrm{mg / dL}$ . The recalculated
{4}
regression including the additional data is as follows: $y = 0.97 - 0.72$, $r^2 = 0.996$.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
The Accurex Control Solution is an aqueous material containing d-glucose, preservatives, and pigment. The assigned glucose range is established in the bulk and filled solutions. The assigned glucose range is based on the values from single use vial testing data with a batch of strips run on ten One Touch meters. The upper limit is equal to the average glucose value + 3SD. The lower limit is equal to the average glucose value - 3SD. The labeled range is 71-105 mg/dL.
Accelerated and real time stability data were provided. Three lots of control solution are stored at $40^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and $75\%$ relative humidity (accelerated) and $25^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ and $50\%$ relative humidity (real time) and tested at several time points. Average glucose values and $\% \mathrm{CVs}$ were calculated for up to 34 weeks. Accelerated and real time data were adequate, with average glucose values within the assigned range and CVs less than $5\%$.
The sponsor recommends in their labeling a second, higher, level of control material that has been validated for use with this system.
d. Detection limit:
The minimum detection limit is $3\mathrm{mg / dL}$. To evaluate low range sensitivity of the Accurex strip, one lot was tested with five One Touch Basic meters. Three replicates of four patient samples were run on each meter, and the results were compared to the YSI 2300D clinical analyzer. The reference values ranged from 3 to $46\mathrm{mg / dL}$. Using the Accurex strips, the values ranged from 3 to $43\mathrm{mg / dL}$. The following regression resulted: $\mathrm{y} = 0.95 + 0.16$, $\mathrm{r}^2 = 0.99$.
e. Analytical specificity:
Heparinized blood was first adjusted to a normal glucose level with a glucose stock solution. Then an aliquot of the resulting blood sample was spiked with various concentrations of commonly known interfering substances (endogenous and exogenous). The potential interference was evaluated with five randomly selected One Touch Basic meters.
No interference was observed with Gentisic, Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, Salicylate, bilirubin, uric acid, Tolbutamide, Tolazamide, L-dopa, and lipids. The results showed that sodium fluoride causes a significant drop in glucose values at an elevated level. Therefore, tubes containing sodium fluoride or other forms of fluoride salts or conjugates are not appropriate for collection of
5
{5}
specimen to be used with this test. Strong antioxidants such as ascorbic acid also showed notable decreases in glucose values at high levels.
Hematocrit values between 30% and 55% do not interfere with the results of this assay.
f. Assay cut-off:
See “Detection limit” above.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
See “Other clinical supportive data” below.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
A clinical study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the Accurex Glucose Test Strip in comparison to the predicate device. One hundred and forty (140) subjects, with 1 month to 57 years of experience using a glucometer to monitor their glucose levels, participated in the study. Subjects were given a box of predicate strips, a box of Accurex strips, and two One Touch Basic glucometers (strips and glucometers included instructions) and instructed to perform testing with both strips. A capillary sample was also obtained by the clinic personnel to perform a reference assay using the YSI 2300D clinical analyzer. Subjects and a trained observer were asked to fill out a questionnaire recording the results they obtained and comments.
The results were as follows:
{6}
| | Accurex | Predicate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| # Patients | 124 | 125 |
| Correlation Coefficient (r) | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| Slope | 0.96 | 0.89 |
| Intercept | 2.1 mg/dL | 7.4 mg/dL |
For the subject device, 7% of the samples were not included due to low blood sample, incorrect strip insertion or incorrect blood application. Three percent (3%) of the samples were not included due to low sample volume errors with the clinical analyzer.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected whole blood glucose levels that the sponsor provides in the labeling for people without diabetes are based on literature.
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.