K051824 · Third Wave Technologies, Inc. · NTI · Aug 18, 2005 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K051824
Device Name
INVADER UGT1A1 MOLECULAR ASSAY
Applicant
Third Wave Technologies, Inc.
Product Code
NTI · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Aug 18, 2005
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3360
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Software as a Medical Device
Indications for Use
The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for the detection and genotyping of the *1 (TA6) and *28 (TA7) alleles of the UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene in genomic DNA from whole peripheral blood as an aid in the identification of patients with greater risk for decreased UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity. For professional use. The information provided from this test may supplement therapeutic decision-making and should only be used in conjunction with routine monitoring by a physician. Because of the variability in the knowledge of clinical utility with certain drugs that are metabolized by UGT1A1, clinicians should use professional judgment in the interpretation of results from this type of test. The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay should not be used: 1) as the only test to determine specific drug dose. Other clinical information and patient history should primarily be considered, 2) to aid in predicting a patient's drug response for drugs that are not metabolized by the enzyme encoded by UGT1A1, and 3) to aid in predicting a patient's response to drugs for which the mutant UGT1A1 phenotype has not been clearly established.
Device Story
The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for genotyping UGT1A1 alleles from genomic DNA extracted from whole peripheral blood. The assay uses sequence-specific Invader DNA probes, a structure-specific Cleavase® enzyme, and a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) system. The process involves two concurrent isothermal reactions: a primary reaction where probes hybridize to target DNA and are cleaved by the enzyme, and a secondary reaction where released 5'-flaps trigger FRET signal amplification. The assay uses a biplex format to detect the UGT1A1 TA repeat and an internal control (alpha actin) in a single well. Results are processed by universal interpretative software and a third-party microtiter plate reader. The output is a genotype call used by clinicians to identify patients at risk for decreased UGT1A1 activity, which may inform dosage adjustments for drugs like irinotecan to reduce toxicity risk.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated using 285 genomic DNA samples compared to bi-directional DNA sequencing, showing 100% agreement. Reproducibility studies across three sites (n=900) showed 98.1% correct genotype call rate after retesting. Interference studies confirmed robustness against bilirubin, lipids, EDTA, and hemoglobin. No clinical prospective patient outcome trials were required for this 510(k).
Technological Characteristics
In vitro diagnostic assay using sequence-specific DNA probes, structure-specific cleavage enzyme, and FRET system. Isothermal reaction at 63°C. Biplex format for genotype and internal control detection. Requires external fluorometer (Tecan GENios/FL or Bio-Tek FLX800). Software-based interpretation. Reagents stored at -20°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for detection and genotyping of UGT1A1 *1 (TA6) and *28 (TA7) alleles in genomic DNA from whole peripheral blood to identify patients at risk for decreased UGT activity. For professional use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A drug metabolizing enzyme genotyping system is a device intended for use in testing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from clinical samples to identify the presence or absence of human genotypic markers encoding a drug metabolizing enzyme. This device is used as an aid in determining treatment choice and individualizing treatment dose for therapeutics that are metabolized primarily by the specific enzyme about which the system provides genotypic information.
Special Controls
The special control is FDA's guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping System."
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping Test System.” See § 862.1(d) for the availability of this guidance document.
Predicate Devices
AmpliChip CYP450 Test for CYP2C19 (k043576)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k051824
B. Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of new device
C. Measurand:
Genomic DNA extracted from human whole blood (the UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) locus)
D. Type of Test:
Genetic test for single nucleotide polymorphism detection
E. Applicant:
Third Wave Technologies Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR§862.3360, drug metabolizing enzyme genotyping system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
NTI, drug metabolizing enzyme genotyping system
4. Panel:
Toxicology (91)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
See indications for use below
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test for the detection and genotyping of the *1 (TA6) and *28 (TA7) alleles of the UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene in genomic DNA from whole peripheral blood as an aid in the identification of patients with greater risk for decreased UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For professional use.
{1}
The information provided from this test may supplement therapeutic decision-making and should only be used in conjunction with routine monitoring by a physician. Because of the variability in the knowledge of clinical utility with certain drugs that are metabolized by UGT1A1, clinicians should use professional judgment in the interpretation of results from this type of test. The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay should not be used: 1) as the only test to determine specific drug dose. Other clinical information and patient history should primarily be considered, 2) to aid in predicting a patient's drug response for drugs that are not metabolized by the enzyme encoded by UGT1A1, and 3) to aid in predicting a patient's response to drugs for which the mutant UGT1A1 phenotype has not been clearly established.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Tecan GENios, Tecan GENios FL, or Bio-Tek FLX800 fluorometers
Call Reporting Software (CRS), UGT1A1_CRS_v060705.xlt
# I. Device Description:
The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay is an in vitro diagnostic test that utilizes sequence-specific DNA probes, a structure-specific cleavage enzyme and a universal fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) system combined with interpretative software and third party microtiter plate reader instrumentation. The assay is designed to identify specific nucleic acid sequences and query for the presence of known sequence polymorphisms through analysis of structure-specific cleavage of a series of probes that are specifically complementary either to wild type or mutant sequences of the "TATA Box" promoter region of the UGT1A1 *1 (TA6) and *28 alleles (TA7) of the UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene.
# J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
AmpliChip CYP450 Test for CYP2C19
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k043576
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay | AmpliChip CYP450 Test for CYP2C19 (K043576) |
| Sample | genomic DNA obtained from a human whole peripheral blood sample | Same |
| Reference method | bi-directional DNA sequencing | Same |
| Detection | Single nucleotide polymorphism | Same |
{2}
Page - 3/9
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Outcome data | Assay signal results are interpreted by a software program and are assigned a genotype that is presented to the end user in a report format | same |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay | AmpliChip CYP450 Test for CYP2C19 (K043576) |
| Genotype | UGT1A1 *1 and *28 | 2C19 *1, *2, and *3 |
| Reaction conditions | 1) No thermal cycling; isothermal reaction at 63° C
2) Utilizes signal amplification
3) Reactions occur in multiple plastic microtiter wells | 1) Utilizes thermal cycling
2) Utilizes target DNA amplification
3) Reactions occur on a single glass slide |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
| User Fees and Refunds for Premarket Notification Submissions (510(k)s) - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdufma/guidance/1511.html |
| --- | --- |
| Drug Metabolizing Enzyme Genotyping System - Class II Special Controls Guidance Document - Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1551.html |
| Shelf Life of Medical Devices | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/415.pdf |
| Guidance for Off-the-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices; Final | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/585.html |
| A New 510(k) Paradigm - Alternate Approaches to Demonstrating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/parad510.html |
| Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices; Final | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/377.html |
| Statistical Guidance on Reporting Results from Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Tests; Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers | http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/osb/guidance/1428.html |
{3}
Page - 4/9
L. Test Principle:
The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay permits the analysis of specific nucleic acid sequences and a query for the presence of known sequence polymorphisms. The basis of the Invader assay is the ability of an enzyme, provided with the test, to recognize and cleave specific structures formed by the addition of two oligonucleotides. The two oligonucleotides, a discriminatory primary probe and an invader probe, hybridize in tandem to the target DNA to an overlapping structure. The 5'-end of the discriminatory probe includes a 5'-flap that does not hybridize to the target DNA. The 3'-nucleotide of the bound invader probe overlaps the primary probe, but need not hybridize to the target DNA. A specific enzyme (the cleavage enzyme) recognizes this overlapping structure and cleaves off the unpaired 5'-flap of the discriminatory probe, releasing it into the buffer. The discriminatory probe is designed to have a melting temperature close to the reaction temperature. Thus, under the assay conditions, the discriminatory probe cycles on the target DNA isothermally. This allows for multiple round of discriminatory probe cleavage for each target DNA, and therefore to an amplification of the number of released 5'-flaps.
In a second reaction within the same reaction tube, each released 5'-flap can serve as an invader oligonucleotide on a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) cassette to create another overlapping structure that is recognized and cleaved by the same enzyme mentioned above (cleavage enzyme). When the FRET cassette is cleaved, a fluorophore is separated from a quencher and detectable fluorescence signal is generated. Similar to the initial reaction, the released 5'-flap and FRET cassette cycle, results in amplified fluorescence signal. The initial and secondary reactions run concurrently in the same well.
The biplex format of the assay enables simultaneous detection of two DNA sequences in a single well. It allows the detection of the UGT1A1 genotype specified in the indication for use and an alpha actin internal control in each well. The biplex format uses two different discriminatory probes, each with a unique 5'-flap, and two different fluorescence resonance energy transfer cassettes, each with a spectrally distinct fluorophore.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
The reproducibility of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay was evaluated with a panel of 20 blinded whole blood samples that represented UGT1A1 *1 (TA₆/₆) (n = 6), UGT1A1 *28 heterozygous (TA₆/₇) (n = 4), UGT1A1 *28 homozygous (TA₇/₇) (n = 4), and other genotypes (n = 5), at a concentration of 100 to 700 ng per reaction. The testing was conducted at three different sites, including two external sites and a laboratory at Third Wave Technologies Inc. using one lot or reagents. The samples underwent DNA extraction (in triplicate) using the Qiagen QIAamp DNA Extraction methodology. DNA from the samples underwent subsequent Invader analysis at each site on each of five days. Each site utilized a different fluorometer to determine the performance of the assay. The genotype of the different blood samples was determined by bi-directional DNA sequence analysis. The results from this study are summarized below:
{4}
Page - 5/9
| Table 1. Inter-laboratory reproducibility of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay | | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| UGT1A1 Genotype^{1} | # tested | 1^{st} run tests per site | Site | 1^{st} Run Results | | | | | | | Correct Call Rate for all runs |
| | | | | Genotype Calls | Correct Calls | Incorrect Calls | # Invalid^{2} | Correct Call Rate | # Invalid after 2^{nd} run^{2} | Incorrect Calls for all runs | |
| *1 (TA_{6/6}) | 6 | 90 | 1 | 82 | 79^{3} | 3^{3} | 8 | 87.8% | 2 | 3^{3} | 94.4%^{3} |
| | | | 2 | 90 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| | | | 3 | 84 | 84 | 0 | 6 | 93.3% | 1 | 0 | 98.9% |
| *28 hetero-zygous (TA_{6/7}) | 5 | 75 | 1 | 69 | 69 | 0 | 6 | 92% | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| | | | 2 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100% |
| | | | 3 | 70 | 70 | 0 | 5 | 93.3% | 1 | 0 | 98.7% |
| *28 homo-zygous (TA_{7/7}) | 4 | 60 | 1 | 53 | 50^{3} | 3^{3} | 7 | 83.3% | 1 | 3^{3} | 93.3%^{3} |
| | | | 2 | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| | | | 3 | 55 | 55 | 0 | 5 | 91.7% | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Other | 5 | 75 | 1 | 68 | 63^{3} | 5^{3} | 7 | 84.0% | 1 | 5^{3} | 92.0%^{3} |
| | | | 2 | 75 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| | | | 3 | 70 | 70 | 0 | 5 | 93.3% | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total | 20 | 900 | | 851 | 840^{3} | 11^{3} | 49 | 93.3% | 6 | 11^{3} | 98.1%^{4} |
| ^{1}Genotype determined using bi-directional sequencing | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ^{2}Invalid = reported to user as “Low Signal”. Insufficient signal generated to make a genotype call | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ^{3}Site 1 experienced user error that resulted in mis-order of 9 genotyping reactions (3 samples for all 3 replicates on day 5). | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ^{4}Correct call rate for all runs is based on 883/900 genotype calls. | | | | | | | | | | | |
Correct genotype calls for UGT1A1 were obtained for 840/900 (93.3%) samples after the 1<sup>st</sup> run. After retesting 49 samples, 43/49 were correctly identified after the 2<sup>nd</sup> run. The total correct genotype calls for the combined first and second runs was 883/900 (98.1%). Nine samples were mis-ordered in the reaction plate at site 1 on day 5. As a result, the 3 replicates for each sample produced genotype results that were inconsistent with the bi-directional sequencing result for those samples. Discrepancy resolution by sequencing of the template in the original Invader® assay plates confirmed that the genotypes present in the assay wells were consistent with the reported genotypes of the assay.
From the 49 invalid calls after the 1st run, 20 were due to an invalid “Positive Control” result, 20 were due to an invalid “Negative Control” result, and the remaining nine were due to “Low Signal” as a result. After retesting, 6 genotype reactions were still reported as “Low Signal.”
Lot-to-Lot reproducibility:
Whole blood samples (n = 40) underwent DNA extraction and subsequent bi-directional DNA sequence analysis. The same DNA samples were then analyzed using the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay using three different lots of the reagents. The observed agreement between all three lots of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay and bi-
{5}
Page - 6/9
directional DNA sequencing was 100% (120/120). The 95% one-sided lower confidence limit was 92.8%.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Assay Shelf Life Stability: Archived genomic DNA samples representing UGT1A1*1, UGT1A1*28 (heterozygous) and UGT1A1*28 (homozygous) genotypes were used for testing. These samples were derived from whole blood samples anticoagulated with tripotassium EDTA, subjected to genomic DNA extraction using the Qiagen QIAamp 96 Blood Kit method, and quantitated using the PicoGreen method. The DNA had been stored at +4-8°C in AE buffer for ~3 months in a monitored refrigerator, according to Qiagen's recommended storage conditions. The stability of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay was evaluated using three different lots of assay components. Each lot was tested for Standard Storage conditions (unopened kit stored at -20°C until time of testing). The assay demonstrated 100% agreement with bi-directional DNA sequencing genotypes up to the expiration date of 30 days, when stored at -20°C.
d. Detection limit:
Lower Limit of Detection: The lower limit of detection of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay was determined by analysis of dilutions of genomic DNA samples to 150, 100 and 50 ng DNA/reaction. Forty (40) replicates of genomic DNA samples representing the *1, *28 heterozygous, and *28 homozygous UGT1A1 alleles were tested and compared to bi-directional DNA sequencing results. There was 100% agreement between the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay and bi-directional DNA sequencing for all samples at each of tested concentrations. The ability of the assay to detect UGT1A1 *1, UGT1A1 *28 (heterozygous) and UGT1A1*28 (homozygous) genotypes is not adversely affected by lower than recommended patient sample DNA concentrations. The lower limit of patient sample DNA is defined as 100 ng per reaction, or 10 ng/μL.
Upper Limit of Detection: The upper limit of detection of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay was determined by analysis of genomic DNA samples at 800 ng DNA/reaction. Forty (40) replicates of genomic DNA samples representing the *1, *28 heterozygous, and *28 homozygous UGT1A1 alleles were tested at a concentration of 800 ng/reaction and compared to bi-directional DNA sequencing results. There was 100% agreement between the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay and bi-directional DNA sequencing demonstrating the capability to accurately detect UGT1A1 TATA box sequences at DNA concentration levels at the recommended upper DNA concentration limit of 700 ng per reaction, or 70 ng/μL.
e. Analytical specificity:
Interfering Substances
The potentially interfering substances Bilirubin, Lipids, K2 EDTA, 5% Qiagen Buffer AW2, 1% Qiagen Buffer AW2, and Hemoglobin were either added to the blood sample or directly
{6}
to the purified genomic DNA, depending on the nature of the proposed interferent. Compounds added to the blood samples include endogenous substances and those associated with blood collection. Specifically, the substances included bilirubin, lipids, and dipotassium EDTA. Bilirubin and lipids were added to blood samples to evaluate assay performance with samples acquired from individuals with "high-test" levels of either substance. Dipotassium EDTA was added to blood samples to represent an incomplete blood draw, resulting in an increased amount of anticoagulant in the whole blood sample. Compounds that were added directly to purified genomic DNA include Qiagen Buffer AW2 and hemoglobin. Buffer AW2 was added directly to the purified DNA sample, to mimic the impact of incomplete removal of residual wash buffer. While hemoglobin is endogenous to the original blood sample, it was added to the purified DNA to determine its direct impact on assay performance. Sixteen samples of known UGT1A1 genotype (as determined through bidirectional DNA sequence analysis) underwent genomic DNA isolation using the Qiagen QIAamp methodology, and were tested along with four subtractive blanks, two controls, and a No Target Control (NTC). Interference was measured by calculation of percent agreement of genotype calls between spiked and non-spiked samples. The sponsor reports that the percent agreement of the genotype between the spiked and non-spiked samples varied between $87.5\%$ and $100\%$ . The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay performance was not adversely affected by higher than normal blood levels of bilirubin (5-fold, or $8\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ) or lipids (mono-, di-, and triglycerides, 2-fold, or $150\mathrm{mg / dL}$ ). Hemoglobin (2-fold, or $0.025\%$ ) or $1\%$ residual Qiagen AW2 DNA extraction buffer also did not affect the assay. Decreased performance was seen with DNA samples containing $5\%$ residual Qiagen DNA extraction AW2 buffer. $5\%$ AW2 buffer resulted in 1 incorrect genotype call and 1 "low signal".
f. Assay cut-off: Not applicable
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Whole blood samples $(n = 285)$ underwent DNA extraction and subsequent bi-directional DNA sequence analysis. The same DNA samples were then analyzed using the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay. The observed agreement between the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay and bi-directional DNA sequencing was $100\%$ (285/285). The one-sided $95\%$ confidence lower limit ranged from $90.5\%$ to $97.3\%$ . The one-sided $95\%$ confidence lower limit overall agreement with bi-directional DNA sequencing was $98.95\%$ (see Table):
| UGT1A1 Genotype (bi-directional sequencing) | # of geno-types tested | # of replicates per sample | # of correct genotype calls in 1strun | # of invalid calls in 1strun | Percent agreement | 95% One-sided CI lower limit |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| *1 (TA6/6) | 73 | 1 | 73 | 0 | 100% | 96.0% |
| *28 heterozygous (TA6/7) | 109 | 1 | 109 | 0 | 100% | 97.3% |
| *28homozygous (TA7/7) | 30 | 1 | 30 | 0 | 100% | 90.5% |
| Others | 73 | 1 | 73 | 0 | 100% | 96.0% |
| Total | 285 | 1 | 285 | 0 | 100% | 98.95% |
{7}
Page - 8/9
b. Matrix comparison:
Component Tolerance Study
Whole blood samples (n=20) anticoagulated with dipotassium EDTA were subjected to the Qiagen QIAamp DNA extraction procedure. An aliquot of the DNA samples were tested using the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay with non-standard reaction conditions by manipulating the parameters of both sample and reagent volume addition to the reaction. The reagents, Oligo Mix and the Enzyme-Buffer Mix, were manipulated separately. A second aliquot of the DNA samples were PCR amplified and analyzed by bi-directional sequencing to assign a reference genotype. Twenty genomic DNA samples, 2 sample controls, and a NTC sample were tested in singlicate with each assay Oligo Mix. Four Subtractive Water Blank (Blank) samples were also included on each plate. Standard reagent and sample volumes and +/-10% or +/-20% of the standard sample or reagent volume were added to the appropriate reaction mixes. One reaction mix condition was tested per plate. The percent agreement of final calls between each non-standard and standard reaction condition was determined by comparison of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay result to the genotype as confirmed using bi-directional DNA sequencing. The sponsor determined 100% agreement (86.1% at one sided 95% confidence lower limit) across all reagent and sample manipulations between the reference genotypes and the Invader genotypes for the 20 samples tested. The Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay performance was not adversely affected by ±20% variation in reagent or sample volumes.
Freeze –Thaw Stability
The Freeze-Thaw Stability of the Invader® UGT1A1 DNA Assay was evaluated using identical sets of assay components from a single lot. Whole blood samples (n=20) anticoagulated with potassium EDTA were subjected to the Qiagen QIAamp DNA extraction procedure and tested in singlicate using Invader® UGT1A1 DNA Assay kits that were subjected to differing numbers of freeze thaw cycles (1, 3, 5, 10). Two controls and an NTC sample were also included in the test sample set. Four Subtractive Water Blank (Blank) samples were also included on each plate. For each freeze thaw cycle, all components were stored at -20°C until frozen solid (excluding the Enzyme/Buffer mix which does not freeze due to the presence of glycerol as an ingredient) and then thawed at room temperature until liquid. The percent agreement of final calls between reagents subjected to each freeze thaw cycle (3, 5, 10) and reagents subjected to 1 cycle (baseline) was determined. The sponsor observed that the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay accurately detected each of the UGT1A1 genotypes present in the test samples. Performance was not adversely affected after being subjected to 10 freeze-thaw cycles, supporting the recommendation in the package insert of no more than five (5) cycles. Agreement between the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay and the bi-directional DNA sequence comparison genotype was 100%. The-sided 95% Confidence Lower Limit for the agreement of the 20 samples at each cycle point (1, 3, 5, & 10 freeze-thaw cycles) was 86.1%.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not applicable
b. Clinical specificity: Not applicable
{8}
Page - 9/9
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Sample preparation Equivalency Study:
The performance of the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay was evaluated with samples extracted with both the Qiagen QIAamp® 96 DNA Blood Kit and the Qiagen QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc, Valencia, CA). Sixty (60) human whole blood samples anticoagulated with dipotassium EDTA, representing UGT1A1 *1 (TA(6/6)) (n = 13), UGT1A1 *28 heterozygous (TA(6/7)) (n = 24), homozygous (TA(7/7))(n = 10), and other genotypes (n = 13). The listed genotypes were again established through bi-directional sequence analysis, and were processed using both extraction methods. The resultant genomic DNA samples from both extraction methods were tested in singlicate using the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay. In addition to the processed blood samples, two positive control samples, a No Target Control, and four Subtractive Blanks (Blank) were also included on each plate. Genomic DNA from each sample was previously quantified by the PicoGreen methodology (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The ranges of genomic DNA concentrations obtained from the two Qiagen QIAamp® extraction methods were recorded and assessed for suitability for use in the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay. Results: There was 100% agreement, with a 1-sided 95% confidence lower limit of 95.1%, between the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay results obtained for each sample preparation method on all 60 samples. The results demonstrate that either DNA extraction/purification methodology provides genomic DNA samples suitable for use with the Invader® UGT1A1 Molecular Assay. DNA concentrations ranged from 13 ng/μL to 78 ng/uL, covering most of the range of 10 – 70 ng/μL recommended in the package insert.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable
N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
O. Conclusion:
The submitted information in this Premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.