QUICKSCREEN OXYCODONE TEST, MODELS 9120, 9120T, 9120X AND 9121
K043051 · Phamatech, Inc. · DJG · Feb 7, 2005 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
K043051
Device Name
QUICKSCREEN OXYCODONE TEST, MODELS 9120, 9120T, 9120X AND 9121
Applicant
Phamatech, Inc.
Product Code
DJG · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
Feb 7, 2005
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3650
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test is a rapid, qualitative immunoassay for the detection of the oxycodone in urine. The cutoff concentration for this test is 100 ng/ml. This assay is intended for professional use. This test provides only a preliminary test result. A more specific alternate testing method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method. Other chemical confirmation methods are available. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary positive results are observed.
Device Story
QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test is a rapid, qualitative, one-step lateral flow immunoassay for urine drug screening. Device utilizes visual color sandwich immunochemical technology to detect oxycodone presence at 100 ng/mL cutoff. Intended for professional use in clinical settings. Operator performs test by applying urine sample to device; results are interpreted visually by the clinician. Output is a preliminary qualitative result (positive/negative). Preliminary positive results require secondary confirmation via GC/MS or alternative chemical methods. Device assists healthcare providers in identifying potential oxycodone use, facilitating clinical decision-making regarding patient management.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence includes a clinical sample correlation study and a blind labeled spiked study. Results demonstrated >99% correlation with predicate devices. No further clinical performance metrics (sensitivity/specificity) provided beyond correlation data.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunoassay; visual color sandwich technology; immunochemical principle (antibody/target analyte/antibody complex formation). Standalone, single-use test device. No electronic components, software, or external energy source required.
Indications for Use
Indicated for the qualitative detection of oxycodone in human urine at a cutoff concentration of 100 ng/mL. Intended for professional use as a preliminary screening test. Requires confirmatory testing via GC/MS or other chemical methods.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An opiate test system is a device intended to measure any of the addictive narcotic pain-relieving opiate drugs in blood, serum, urine, gastric contents, and saliva. An opiate is any natural or synthetic drug that has morphine-like pharmocological actions. The opiates include drugs such as morphine, morphine glucoronide, heroin, codeine, nalorphine, and meperedine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of opiate use or overdose and in monitoring the levels of opiate administration to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). An opiate test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
Predicate Devices
American BioMedica Corporation RapidOne OXY Test (k014101)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
1
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
ASSAY ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k043051
B. Purpose for Submission:
New submission
C. Measurand:
Oxycodone
D. Type of Test:
Lateral Flow Immunoassay Methodology
E. Applicant:
Pharmatech, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
QuickScreen Oxycodone Test Model 9120 Strip, 9120T Dip Card, 9120X Cup, and 9121 Cassette.
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
862.3650, Enzyme Immunoassay, Opiates
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
DJG
4. Panel:
91 (Toxicology)
{1}
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The QuickScreen Oxycodone Test is a rapid qualitative immunoassay for the detection of Oxycodone in human urine. The cutoff concentration for this test is 100 ng/mL. This test is intended for professional use only.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The QuickScreen Oxycodone Test is an in-vitro diagnostic screen for the detection of oxycodone in urine. This kit provides a preliminary result for the detection/presence of oxycodone in urine. It is intended for professional use only.
3. Special conditions for use statement(s):
The QuickScreen Oxycodone Test provides only a preliminary analytical test result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas chromatography/Mass spectrometry is the preferred confirmatory method. Other chemical confirmation methods are available. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when preliminary positive results are observed.
4. Special instrument requirements:
Not applicable. The device is a visually read single-use device.
I. Device Description:
The product #9120 is a single-use dip-strip device. The operators dip the test strip into the urine and the reaction is initiated by movement of the sample through the test strip.
The product #9120T is a single-use Dip Card device in a cassette format. The operator inserts the absorbent end of the device in the urine sample to the maximum level indicated by the line on the device label. The test reaction is initiated by movement of the sample through the test strip.
The product #9120X is a single-use device utilizing a cup format. The donor collects urine in the cup to the recommended volume. The reaction is initiated by movement of the sample through the test strip. Test strips are incorporated into the sides of a sample cup.
The product #9121 is a single-use Cassette Version device. The operator lays the cassette on a level surface and adds 4 drops of urine to the Sample Well with the provided sample pipette. The reaction is initiated by movement of the sample through the test strip.
{2}
J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
American BioMedica Corporation RapidOne OXY Test
2. Predicate 510(k) number(s):
k014101
3. Comparison with predicate:
Both devices are for the qualitative determination of the same analyte(s) in the same matrix, and utilize the same cutoff concentration. Both are visually-read single use devices.
| | ABMC
Oxycodone
Test | QuickScreen
Oxycodone
Test Model
9120 | QuickScreen
Oxycodone
Test Model
9120T | QuickScreen
Oxycodone
Test Model
9120X | QuickScreen
Oxycodone
Test Model
9121 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Format | Dip Card | Dip Strip | Dip Card | Cassette | Cup Version |
| In Vitro
Diagnostic
Use | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Intended Use | Detection of
Oxycodone
or
Oxycodone
Metabolites
in Urine | Detection of
Oxycodone
or
Oxycodone
Metabolites
in Urine | Detection of
Oxycodone
or
Oxycodone
Metabolites
in Urine | Detection of
Oxycodone
or
Oxycodone
Metabolites
in Urine | Detection of
Oxycodone
or
Oxycodone
Metabolites
in Urine |
| Specimen | Urine | Urine | Urine | Urine | Urine |
| Methodology | Lateral Flow
Immunoassay | Lateral Flow
Immunoassay | Lateral Flow
Immunoassay | Lateral Flow
Immunoassay | Lateral Flow
Immunoassay |
| Qualitative | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Antibodies | Monoclonal
Polyclonal | Monoclonal
Polyclonal | Monoclonal
Polyclonal | Monoclonal
Polyclonal | Monoclonal
Polyclonal |
| Analyte | Oxycodone | Oxycodone | Oxycodone | Oxycodone | Oxycodone |
| Cutoff | 100 ng/mL | 100 ng/mL | 100 ng/mL | 100 ng/mL | 100 ng/mL |
| Control
Feature | Procedural
Control Line | Procedural
Control Line | Procedural
Control Line | Procedural
Control Line | Procedural
Control Line |
| End User | Health Care
Professional | Health Care
Professional | Health Care
Professional | Health Care
Professional | Health Care
Professional |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced.
{3}
4
L. Test Principle:
The QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test is a competitive immunoassay that is used to screen for the presence of Oxycodone and its metabolites in urine. It is a chromatographic absorbent device in which drugs or drug metabolites in the sample compete with drug/protein conjugate on a porous membrane for a limited number of antibody/ dye conjugate binding sites. The test device employs a unique combination of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to selectively identify Oxycodone and its metabolites.
In the procedure, the absorbent end of the device is inserted in the urine sample. Urine is absorbed into the device by capillary action, mixes with the antibody/ dye conjugate and flows across the pre-coated membrane. When sample Oxycodone levels are below 100 ng/mL (the detection sensitivity of the test) antibody/ dye conjugate binds to the drug / protein conjugate immobilized in the Test Region (T) of the device. This produces a colored Test Band that regardless of its intensity indicates a negative result.
When sample Oxycodone levels are at or above 100 ng/mL, the free drug in the sample binds to the antibody/ dye conjugate, preventing the antibody/ dye conjugate from binding to the drug/ protein conjugate immobilized in the Test Region (T) of the device. This prevents the development of a distinct colored band, indicating a potentially positive sample.
In either case, a colored Control Band is produced in the Control Region (C) by a non-specific antibody-dye/ conjugate reaction. This band serves as a built in quality control device, demonstrating migration of the urine sample across the membrane as well as confirming that the test is complete.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
To determine the precision of the QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test within and between assays, eight separate normal urine pools were spiked with Oxycodone metabolites as follows:
| | Concentration (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| <1% to 25% of cutoff | 20 |
| 26% to 50% of cutoff | 31 |
| 51% to 75% of cutoff | 62 |
| 76% to cutoff | 77 |
| Cutoff to 125% of cutoff | 105 |
| 126% to 150% of cutoff | 152 |
| 151% to 175% of cutoff | 173 |
| 176% to 200% of cutoff | 199 |
{4}
One replicate of each level was assayed twice a day for twenty days, in accordance with package insert instructions using two lots of the QuickScreen Oxycodone Test. The interpretations of either negative or positive result was recorded in each case and used to evaluate precision. The results of this evaluation are listed in the table below.
Percent Correct
| | Test 1 | Test 2 | Overall | Percent Correct |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Day | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 1 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 2 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 3 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 4 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 5 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 6 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 7 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 8 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 9 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 10 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 11 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 12 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 13 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 14 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 15 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 16 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 17 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 8 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 19 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
| 20 | 8/8 | 8/8 | 16/16 | 100% |
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable. The assay is intended for qualitative use.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
There are no controls or calibrators provided with or specifically identified for use in the package insert.
STABILITY
The sponsor specifies the method used to analyze the material, environmental storage conditions, frequency of testing, baseline against which measurements are compared, and acceptance criteria for the study. Accelerated studies are being used by the sponsor to estimate the expiration date, however, on-going real time
{5}
studies are being performed.
# d. Detection limit:
Sensitivity of this assay is characterized by validating performance around the claimed cutoff concentration of the assay, including a determination of the lowest concentration of drug that is capable of producing a positive result.
QuickScreen™ and ABMC RapidOne Oxy compared to GC/MS Method Correlation around Cut-off
QuickScreen 18 22
RapidOne Oxy 18 22
GCMS 18 22
Sample range across assay range: quantification by GC/MS
| ng/mL | 75-80 | 81-85 | 86-90 | 91-95 | 96-100 | 101-105 | 106-110 | 111-115 | 116-125 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sample n | 8 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Pharmatech | 8 neg | 4 neg | 1 neg | 6 neg | 3 neg 1 pos | 3 pos | 3 pos | 4 pos | 7 pos |
| ABMC | 8 neg | 4 neg | 1 neg | 6 neg | 3 neg 1 pos | 3 pos | 3 pos | 4 pos | 7 pos |
All results indicating a positive sample were confirmed by GC/MS testing. All samples which were confirmed to be Oxycodone positive were confirmed to be positive at a level $>100\mathrm{ng / mL}$ .
# e. Analytical specificity:
Specificity studies included testing of cross-reacting metabolites, potential exogenous interferents and potential endogenous interferents. Each chemical or biological analyte was spiked into aliquots of a normal urine pool. The pools were tested for possible interference in the assay in accordance with the package insert procedure. The chemical/agent and the concentration (in $\mu \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{mL}$ ) at which tested is recorded. Any chemical/agent producing a result equivalent to the cutoff (i.e.: positive) is noted in the following table. No compound tested at the level indicated exhibited any sign of interference in the test.
| Chemical Analytes | μg/mL | Test Result | Chemical Analysis | μg/mL | Test Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acetone | 10,000 | Neg | Mephentermine | 100 | Neg |
| 4-Aceamidophenol | 1,000 | Neg | Meprobamate | 100 | Neg |
| 6-Acetylmorphine | 100 | Neg | Mescaline | 100 | Neg |
| 6-Acetylcodeine | 100 | Neg | Metanephrine DL | 100 | Neg |
| Albumin | 100 | Neg | (±) Methadone | 100 | Neg |
{6}
| Chemical Analytes | μg/mL | Test Result | Chemical Analysis | μg/mL | Test Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Acetylsalicylic Acid | 2,000 | Neg | (+) Methamphetamine | 100 | Neg |
| N-Acetylprocainamide | 100 | Neg | Methaqualone | 100 | Neg |
| Alphenal | 100 | Neg | (±) 3,4-Methylenedioxy-methamphetamine | 100 | Neg |
| Alprazolam | 100 | Neg | Methylphenidate | 1,000 | Neg |
| Amantadine | 100 | Neg | Methyprylon | 100 | Neg |
| (+) Amethopterin | 100 | Neg | Metoclopramide | 100 | Neg |
| Amikacin | 200 | Neg | (±) Metoprolol | 100 | Neg |
| DL-Aminoglutethimide | 100 | Neg | Morphine | 0.30 | Neg |
| Amino pyrene | 100 | Neg | Morphine 3-β-D Glucuronide | 0.30 | Neg |
| Amitriptyline | 100 | Neg | 2-Methyl-3-(3,4Dihydrophenly) DL & L Alanine | 100 | Neg |
| Amobarbital | 100 | Neg | (±) Methylenedioxy meth-amphetamine | 100 | Neg |
| Amoxicillin | 300 | Neg | 6-Methylenedioxymeth-amphetamine | 100 | Neg |
| Ampicillin | 100 | Neg | Nafcillin | 100 | Neg |
| D-Amphetamine | 100 | Neg | Nalorphine | 0.50 | Neg |
| DL-Amphetamine | 100 | | | | |
| L-Amphetamine | 100 | | | | |
| Apomorphine | 100 | Neg | Naloxone | 0.40 | Neg |
| Ascorbic Acid | 60,000 | Neg | Naltrexone | 5.00 | Neg |
| Aspartame | 100 | Neg | Naphazoline | 100 | Neg |
| Aspartic Acid D, L, & DL | 100 | Neg | α Naphthaleneacetic Acid | 100 | Neg |
| Atropine | 100 | Neg | β Naphthaleneacetic Acid | 100 | Neg |
| Barbital | 100 | Neg | Naproxen | 1,000 | Neg |
| Barbituric Acid | 100 | Neg | Netilmicin | 100 | Neg |
| Benzoic Acid | 100 | Neg | Niacinamide | 100 | Neg |
| Benzoylecgonine | 100 | Neg | Nialamide | 100 | Neg |
| Benzphetamine | 100 | Neg | Nicotinic Acid | 100 | Neg |
| Benztropine methane sulfonate | 100 | Neg | Nifedipine | 100 | Neg |
| Bilirubin | 100 | Neg | Nitrazepam | 100 | Neg |
| **Bromazepam** | 100 | Neg | Nomifensine | 100 | Neg |
| 2-Bromo-α | 100 | Neg | Norcodeine | 100 | Neg |
{7}
| Chemical Analytes | μg/mL | Test Result | Chemical Analysis | μg/mL | Test Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ergocryptine | | | | | |
| (+)-
Brompheniramine | 100 | Neg | 11 Nor Δ^{8} THC
Carboxylic Acid | 10 | Neg |
| Butabarbital | 100 | Neg | 11 Nor Δ^{9} THC
Carboxylic Acid | 5 | Neg |
| Butalbital | 100 | Neg | NOR doxepin | 100 | Neg |
| Butethal | 100 | Neg | Norethindrone | 100 | Neg |
| Caffeine | 20,000 | Neg | Normorphine | 10 | Neg |
| Cannabidiol | 100 | Neg | Nortriptyline | 100 | Neg |
| Cannabinol | 100 | Neg | Noscapine | 200 | Neg |
| Carbamazepine | 100 | Neg | Nylidrin | 100 | Neg |
| Cephalexin | 100 | Neg | Orphenadrine | 1,000 | Neg |
| Chloramphenicol | 100 | Neg | Oxalic Acid | 1,000 | Neg |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 100 | Neg | Oxazepam | 100 | Neg |
| Chloroquine | 200 | Neg | Oxycodone | 0.45 | Neg |
| Chloropropamide | 100 | Neg | Oxymetazoline | 100 | Neg |
| (+) and (±)
Chlorpheniramine | 100 | Neg | Papaverine | 100 | Neg |
| Chlorpromazine | 100 | Neg | Penicillin G | 100 | Neg |
| Chloropropamide | 100 | Neg | Pentazocine | 100 | Neg |
| Chlorprothixene | 100 | Neg | Pentobarbital | 100 | Neg |
| Cimetidine | 100 | Neg | Phencyclidine | 100 | Neg |
| Clemastine | 100 | Neg | Phenelzine | 100 | Neg |
| Clonazepam | 100 | Neg | Pheniramine | 100 | Neg |
| Clonidine | 100 | Neg | Phenobarbital | 100 | Neg |
| Clomipramine | 100 | Neg | Phenothiazine | 100 | Neg |
| Cocaine | 100 | Neg | Phentermine | 100 | Neg |
| Codeine | 100 | Neg | Phenyl acetone | 100 | Neg |
| (-)- Cotinine | 100 | Neg | Phenylbutazone | 100 | Neg |
| Creatinine | 10,000 | Neg | trans 2 phenyl
cyclopropylamine | 100 | Neg |
| Cyclobenzaprine | 100 | Neg | L-Phenylephrine | 100 | Neg |
| Cyclizine | 100 | Neg | (R) (+) α
Phenylethylamine | 100 | Neg |
| Cyproheptadine | 100 | Neg | (±)α Phenylethylamine | 100 | Neg |
| Cyclosporin A | 100 | Neg | β Phenylethylamine | 100 | Neg |
| Cyproheptadine | 100 | Neg | (±)
phenylpropanolamine | 100 | Neg |
| Deoxyephedrine | 100 | Neg | Piroxicam | 100 | Neg |
| Desmethyldiazepam | 100 | Neg | Potassium Chloride | 500 | Neg |
| Dextromethorphan | 0.50 | Neg | Prazepam | 100 | Neg |
{8}
| Chemical Analytes | μg/mL | Test Result | Chemical Analysis | μg/mL | Test Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5,5 Diallylbarbituric Acid | 100 | Neg | Prednisolone | 100 | Neg |
| Diazepam | 100 | Neg | Primidone | 100 | Neg |
| **Diflunisal** | 100 | Neg | Procainamide | 100 | Neg |
| Digoxin | 100 | Neg | Procaine | 100 | Neg |
| Dihydrocodeine | 100 | Neg | Prochlorperazine | 100 | Neg |
| 4-Dimethylaminoantipyrine | 100 | Neg | Promazine | 100 | Neg |
| Diphenhydramine | 100 | Neg | Promethazine | 100 | Neg |
| Diphenoxylate | 100 | Neg | (+) propoxyphene | 100 | Neg |
| Diphenylhydantoin 5,5 | 100 | Neg | 2-propylpentioic Acid | 100 | Neg |
| Disopyramide | 100 | Neg | Protriptyline | 100 | Neg |
| Doxepin | 100 | Neg | Pyrilamine | 100 | Neg |
| Doxylamine | 100 | Neg | Quinidine | 100 | Neg |
| 2 Ethylidene-1,5 Dimethyl-3,3 Diphenyl pyrrolidine | 100 | Neg | Quinine | 100 | Neg |
| Ψ Ephedrine (+)(±) and (-) | 1,000 | Neg | Ranitidine | 100 | Neg |
| Ephedrine (+) (±) and (-) | 1,000 | Neg | Riboflavin | 750 | Neg |
| Epinephrine (±) and (-) | 1,000 | Neg | (-) Scopolamine | 100 | Neg |
| Erythromycin | 100 | Neg | Secobarbital | 100 | Neg |
| Estriol | 100 | Neg | Sodium Chloride | 60,000 | Neg |
| Estrone 3 Sulfate | 100 | Neg | Sulindac | 100 | Neg |
| Ethanol | 10,000 | Neg | Temazepam | 100 | Neg |
| Ethosuximide | 100 | Neg | Terbutaline | 100 | Neg |
| Ethyl-p-Aminobenzoate | 100 | Neg | Tetracycline | 200 | Neg |
| Ethylmorphine | 0.35 | Neg | Tetraethylthiuram Disulfide | 100 | Neg |
| Fenfluramine | 100 | Neg | Δ^{8} Tetrahydrocannabinol | 100 | Neg |
| Fenoprofen | 100 | Neg | Δ^{9} Tetrahydrocannabinol | 100 | Neg |
| Fentanyl | 10 | Neg | Tetrahydrozoline | 100 | Neg |
| Flunitrazepam | 100 | Neg | Theophylline | 100 | Neg |
| Flurazepam | 100 | Neg | Thioridazine | 100 | Neg |
| Furosemide | 100 | Neg | cis- Thiothixene | 100 | Neg |
| Gentamicin | 100 | Neg | Tobramycin | 100 | Neg |
{9}
| Chemical Analytes | μg/mL | Test Result | Chemical Analysis | μg/mL | Test Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Gentisic Acid | 100 | Neg | Triamterene | 100 | Neg |
| Glucose | 60,000 | Neg | Triazolam | 100 | Neg |
| DL Glutethimide | 100 | Neg | Trifluoperazine | 200 | Neg |
| Griseofulvin | 100 | Neg | Triflupromazine | 100 | Neg |
| Guaiacol glyceryl Ester | 100 | Neg | DL Trihexyphenidyl | 100 | Neg |
| Hemoglobin, human | 100 | Neg | Trimethobenzamide | 100 | Neg |
| Heroin | 100 | Neg | Trimethoprim | 100 | Neg |
| Hexobarbital | 100 | Neg | Trimipramine | 300 | Neg |
| Hydrochlorothiazide | 100 | Neg | Triprolidine | 100 | Neg |
| Hydrocodone | 0.40 | Neg | Tyramine | 100 | Neg |
| 5 Hydroxyindol-3 Acetic Acid | 100 | Neg | Urea | 60,000 | Neg |
| o Hydroxy hippuric Acid | 2,000 | Neg | Uric Acid | 100 | Neg |
| 5 Hydroxyindole-2 Carboxylic Acid | 100 | Neg | Vancomycin | 100 | Neg |
| 11 Hydroxy9 THC | 5 | Neg | (±) Verapamil | 1,000 | Neg |
| 3 Hydroxytyramine | 100 | Neg | Zomepirac | 100 | Neg |
| Levorphanol | 0.5 | Neg | | | |
| Lidocaine | 100 | Neg | | | |
| Lithium Carbonate | 100 | Neg | | | |
| (±) Lorazepam | 100 | Neg | | | |
| Lormetazepam | 100 | Neg | | | |
| Lysergic Acid Diethylamide | 2.5 | Neg | | | |
| Medazepam | 100 | Neg | | | |
| Melanin | 100 | Neg | | | |
| Meperidine | 100 | Neg | | | |
Interference and cross reactivity studies were performed by testing the drug analytes in the QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test with other biological compounds found in urine as well as various chemical agents. Below is a list of drugs which yield a positive result at or above the concentration (ng/mL) stated:
| Analyte | Concentration (ng/mL) |
| --- | --- |
| Hydrocodone | 25,000 ng/mL |
| Hydromorphone | 50,000 ng/mL |
| Norcodeine | 100,000 ng/mL |
| Oxycodone | 100 ng/mL |
| Oxymorphone | 100 ng/mL |
a. Assay cut-off:
{10}
The assay cutoff was determined using spiked urine samples in a controlled study. The assay cutoff for the Pharmatech, Inc. QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test is 100 ng/mL.
## 2. Comparison studies:
### a. Method comparison with predicate device:
To compare the accuracy of the QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test to detect the presence or absence of Oxycodone in urine samples to results obtained with the American Biomedical RapidOne Oxy Test (ABMC) (k014101) predicate device. A total of one hundred and ninety two (192) samples obtained from clinical sites were used. All sample collection was performed at these clinical sites. Testing was performed at Pharmatech. Immediately upon completion of the assays, results were visually scored as “negative” (absence of Oxycodone metabolites in concentrations of 100 ng/mL or greater) or “positive” (presence of Oxycodone or Oxycodone metabolites in concentrations of 100 ng/mL or greater) by the technician. Quality assurance personnel then verified all results. After all in-house testing was completed the samples were analyzed by gas chromatography / mass spectrometry. Test results were recorded in the equivalency summary protocol by QC personnel.
## Results
Of the 192 urine samples collected 192 were tested. The performance characteristics of the QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test to the ABMC RapidOne assay are presented in the table below.
QuickScreen™ versus ABMC Uncorrected Clinical Correlation
| | Positive | Negative |
| --- | --- | --- |
| QuickScreen | 98 | 94 |
| RapidOne Oxy | 98 | 94 |
| Sensitivity | 98/98 | = 100% |
| Specificity | 94/94 | = 100% |
| Accuracy | 192/192 | = 100% |
ABMC
| QuickScreen | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | + | 98 | 0 |
| | - | 0 | 94 |
As presented in the above chart one hundred ninety two (192) urine samples evaluated in the ABMC – QuickScreen comparison study, ninety eight (98) were positive and ninety four (94) were negative by the ABMC RapidOne Oxy test. The QuickScreen test identified 98 positive and 94 negative samples.
{11}
Lastly, the performance characteristics of the QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test, ABMC RapidOne Oxy Test are compared to the GC/MS method presented in the table below.
QuickScreen™ and ABMC RapidOne Oxy compared to GC/MS Method Combined Correlation
| QuickScreen | 80 | 72 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| RapidOne Oxy | 80 | 72 |
| GC/MS | 80 | 72 |
Sample range across assay range: quantification by GC/MS
| Ng/mL | 0-100 | 101-200 | 201-300 | 301-400 | 401-500 | 501-800 | 801-1000 | 1001-2000 | >2000 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Sample n = | 72 | 16 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 7 |
All results indicating a positive sample were confirmed by GC/MS testing. All samples which were confirmed to be Oxycodone positive were confirmed to be positive at a level >100 ng/mL
Overall the QuickScreen™ Oxycodone Test obtained an accuracy of 100% when compared to the ABMC predicate device. The QuickScreen™ test correctly detected 100% of the positive samples and 100% of the negative samples.
b. Matrix Comparison
Not applicable since this test is for Oxycodone in Urine samples only.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity:
Clinical studies are not typically submitted for this device type.
b. Clinical specificity:
Clinical studies are not typically submitted for this device type.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable):
Not applicable
{12}
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable for this device type.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not applicable for this device type.
N. Conclusion:
The submitted material in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
13
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.