ACON MONONUCLEOSIS RAPID TEST STRIP (WHOLE BLOOD/SERUM/PLASMA)
K042272 · ACON Laboratories, Inc. · KTN · Feb 28, 2005 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K042272
Device Name
ACON MONONUCLEOSIS RAPID TEST STRIP (WHOLE BLOOD/SERUM/PLASMA)
Applicant
ACON Laboratories, Inc.
Product Code
KTN · Immunology
Decision Date
Feb 28, 2005
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5640
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Strip and the ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device are rapid chromatographic immunoassays for the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies to infectious Mononucleosis in whole blood, serum or plasma to aid in the diagnosis of infectious Mononucleosis infection in adults at 18 years of age and older. They are intended for health professionals including professionals at point-of-care sites.
Device Story
Rapid chromatographic immunoassay for qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies associated with infectious mononucleosis; utilizes bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen coated on test strip membrane. Input: human whole blood, serum, or plasma samples. Operation: sample and buffer applied to test strip/device; mixture migrates chromatographically; interaction with antigen produces colored line at test region if heterophile antibodies present. Procedural control line confirms proper wicking. Used at point-of-care sites by healthcare professionals. Output: visual colored line interpretation at 5 minutes. Results aid clinical diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study conducted across three sites using 611 total specimens (serum, plasma, whole blood). Compared against Genzyme OSOM Mono Test. Results for ACON Test Strip: 98% positive percent agreement (181/184), >99% negative percent agreement (427/427). Results for ACON Test Device: 98% positive percent agreement (181/184), >99% negative percent agreement (427/427). Analytical performance included precision, detection limit, cross-reactivity, and interference studies. No clinical diagnostic sensitivity/specificity data provided.
Technological Characteristics
Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay. Materials: purified IM heterophilic antigen-coated particles and membrane. Format: test strip or cassette device. No external energy source or instrumentation required. Manual procedure.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies specific to infectious mononucleosis in human whole blood, serum, or plasma to aid in diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis in adults 18 years of age and older. Intended for use by healthcare professionals at point-of-care sites.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An infectious mononucleosis immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques heterophile antibodies frequently associated with infectious mononucleosis in serum, plasma, and other body fluids. Measurements of these antibodies aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.
Predicate Devices
Genzyme OSOM® Mono Test
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
k042272
B. Purpose for Submission:
New devices
C. Measurand:
Heterophile antibodies
D. Type of Test:
Qualitative chromatographic immunoassays
E. Applicant:
ACON Laboratories, Inc.
F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Strip (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma)
ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma)
G. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 866.5640: Infectious Mononucleosis Immunological Test System
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product code:
KTN – System, Test, Infectious Mononucleosis
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
H. Intended Use:
1. Intended use(s):
The ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Strip (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma) is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies specific to infectious Mononucleosis in human whole blood, serum or plasma to aid in the diagnosis of infectious Mononucleosis infection in adults at 18 years of age and older. It is intended for healthcare professionals and professionals at point-of-care sites.
The ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma) is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies specific to infectious Mononucleosis in human whole blood, serum or plasma to aid in the diagnosis of infectious Mononucleosis infection in adults at 18 years of age and older. It is intended for healthcare professionals and
{1}
professionals at point-of-care sites.
2. **Indication(s) for use:**
The ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Strip (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma) is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies specific to infectious Mononucleosis in human whole blood, serum or plasma to aid in the diagnosis of infectious Mononucleosis infection in adults at 18 years of age and older. It is intended for healthcare professionals and professionals at point-of-care sites.
The ACON® Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma) is a rapid chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies specific to infectious Mononucleosis in human whole blood, serum or plasma to aid in the diagnosis of infectious Mononucleosis infection in adults at 18 years of age and older. It is intended for healthcare professionals and professionals at point-of-care sites.
3. **Special conditions for use statement(s):**
For prescription use.
4. **Special instrument requirements:**
None
I. **Device Description:**
The Rapid Test Strip assay consists of tests strips with a test line coated with bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen, disposable sample tubes, disposable heparinized capillary tubes and dispensing bulb, positive and negative controls, sample buffer, procedure card, package insert and a workstation.
The Rapid Test Device assay consists of tests strips with a test line coated with bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen encased in a plastic housing, disposable sample droppers, disposable heparinized capillary tubes and dispensing bulb, positive and negative controls, sample buffer, procedure card, and a package insert.
J. **Substantial Equivalence Information:**
1. **Predicate device name(s):**
[Wyntek] Genzyme OSOM® Mono Test
2. **Predicate 510(k) number(s):**
K972231
3. **Comparison with predicate:**
{2}
| Similarities – ACON Test Strip vs. Genzyme OSOM | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies to infectious mononucleosis to aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis infection | For the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies to infectious mononucleosis to aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis infection |
| Capture antigen | Bovine erythrocyte extract | Bovine erythrocyte extract |
| Specimen types | Serum, plasma, whole blood | Serum, plasma, whole blood |
| Test method | Chromatographic membrane strip based immunoassay | Chromatographic membrane strip based immunoassay |
| Reaction vessel | Test tube | Test tube |
| Controls | External positive and negative controls; built in procedural control line | External positive and negative controls; built in procedural control line |
| Endpoint | Colored lines (5 minutes) | Colored lines (5 minutes) |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| No significant differences noted. | | |
| Similarities – ACON Test Device vs. Genzyme OSOM | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | For the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies to infectious mononucleosis to aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis infection | For the qualitative detection of heterophile antibodies to infectious mononucleosis to aid in the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis infection |
| Capture antigen | Bovine erythrocyte extract | Bovine erythrocyte extract |
| Specimen types | Serum, plasma, whole blood | Serum, plasma, whole blood |
| Test method | Chromatographic membrane strip based immunoassay | Chromatographic membrane strip based immunoassay |
| Reaction vessel | Test tube | Test tube |
| Controls | External positive and negative controls; built in procedural control line | External positive and negative controls; built in procedural control line |
{3}
| Similarities – ACON Test Device vs. Genzyme OSOM | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | procedural control line | procedural control line |
| Endpoint | Colored lines (5 minutes) | Colored lines (5 minutes) |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Reaction vessel | Strip holder frame | Test tube |
K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced.
L. Test Principle:
The ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test Strip (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma) is a qualitative membrane strip based immunoassay for the detection of infectious Mononucleosis (IM) heterophile antibodies in whole blood, serum or plasma. Bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen is coated on the test line region of the strip. Patient samples and controls along with sample buffer are placed in the bottom of sample tubes and the strip is inserted. This mixture migrates chromatographically along the length of the test strip and interacts with the coated bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen. If the sample contains IM antibodies, a colored line will appear in the test line region indicating a positive result. If the sample does not contain IM heterophile antibodies, a colored line will not appear in this region indicating a negative result. To serve as a procedural control, a colored line will always appear at the control line region, indicating that proper volume of specimen has been added and membrane wicking has occurred. The test is interpreted after 5 minutes.
The ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device (Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma) is a qualitative membrane strip based immunoassay for the detection of infectious Mononucleosis (IM) heterophile antibodies in whole blood, serum or plasma. Bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen is coated on the test line region of the strip. The device is placed on a clean, level surface. Patient samples and controls followed by sample buffer are dropped into the sample well of the device. This mixture migrates chromatographically along the length of the test device and interacts with the coated bovine erythrocyte extracted antigen. If the sample contains IM antibodies, a colored line will appear in the test line region indicating a positive result. If the sample does not contain IM heterophile antibodies, a colored line will not appear in this region indicating a negative result. To serve as a procedural control, a colored line will always appear at the control line region, indicating that proper volume of specimen has been added and membrane wicking has occurred. The test is interpreted after 5 minutes.
M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Intra-lot (within-run) precision and lot-to-lot (between-run) were tested with three separately manufactured lots. Test standards at three levels (negative,
{4}
low positive and moderate positive) were run in replicates of 10. Day-to-day (between-day) precision studies were also tested with three separately manufactured lots. Each day, test standards at each of the three antibody levels were run in triplicate after sample application. In order to track the test line intensity more precisely, a scanner was also used to determine the quantitative readings as optical density unit (ODU) of test line intensity right after the 5 minute visual reads were taken. These scanner data are used as references only.
The visual read results for the intra-lot, lot-to-lot and day-to-day studies for both the ACON test strip and device were in agreement with the expected results for the negative and the two positive samples. They were also in agreement with the results from the scanner. CVs for the scanner results were all less than 0.2%.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Not applicable as these are qualitative assays.
c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
None given.
d. Detection limit:
To determine the analytical sensitivity of the ACON test strip and test device a strong positive specimen was diluted to the following concentrations: 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, 1:128, 1:256, 1:512, and 1:1024 with negative plasma. Different diluted positive specimens were also tested using a slide agglutination method. The diluted positive samples were randomized and run blind-coded in replicates of 10. One operator ran the test while the other three readers interpreted the results at 5 minutes. A scanner was also used to obtain quantitative intensity readings. The detection level for the ACON test strip was 1:256 (scanner reading of 3.5 – 3.7 ODU) and for the test device it was 1:512 (scanner reading of 3.3 – 3.7 ODU).
e. Analytical specificity:
Crossreactivity Study:
To determine if the ACON test strip and test device cross react with other disease specimens closely related to IM - RF, HBsAg, HBeAg, HBcAb, HBeAb, HCV, TB, syphilis and HIV positive specimens were tested. These samples were tested in triplicate with visual interpretations take at the 5 minute read time and at 10 minutes after sample application. None of the specimens showed any cross-reactivity with the ACON test strip or device and the recommended read time of 5 minutes or at the extended 10 minutes.
Interference Study:
To determine if various potentially interfering chemical substances or if lipemic and icteric samples will interfere with the ACON test strip or test device, a two part study was conducted. Part I – Analytes suspected of possible interference were spiked at high concentrations into IM negative and
{5}
IM positive sera. The analytes included acetaminophen, caffeine, aspirin, Gentistic, oxalic acid, creatine, methanol, ascorbic acid, albumin, hemoglobin, bilirubin, acetoacetic acid, and samples with hematocrits of 20, 40, and 60%. The samples were tested in triplicate on 3 lots with visual interpretations at 5 minutes and 10 minutes after sample application. All results were as expected with the negative sample testing negative and the positive sample testing positive. Part II – Five lipemic and 6 icteric plasma samples were subject to measurements of triglyceride/total cholesterol and total/direct bilirubin, respectively. Subsequently, lipemic, icteric and control plasma samples were used as diluents. An IM positive specimen was diluted to 1:256 for test strips and to 1:512 for test devices. These IM positive and negative lipemic and icteric plasma samples were tested with results interpreted at the 5 minute and 10 minute read times. None of the substances at the concentrations tested interfered with the expected test results at either the 5 minute read time or 10 minutes after sample application for either the Test Strip or Test Device.
f. Assay cut-off:
Establishment of the ACON Mono Test Strip or Test Device cut-off (positive versus negative) employed a study using serial diluted positive samples containing heterophile antibody specific to IM together with the comparison of a slide mono device. A strong positive sample was serially diluted and tested with the slide test and the ACON devices. Cut-off values were established by determining the positive result obtained with the lowest dilution. Validation of the cut-off was established by testing positive and negative samples (side by side with the slide test) and plotting the results by histogram. The plot showed distinction between the positive and negative samples.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Two-hundred forty serum and 240 plasma specimens were provided to three testing sites. One-hundred and thirty whole blood specimens were tested at two ACON sites. Specimens were tested according to package insert instructions. All sites followed the same clinical study protocol.
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test Strip versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test – Plasma:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 59 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 1 | 180 |
Positive Percent Agreement = 59/60 = 98% (91%-99%)*
Negative Percent Agreement = 180/180 = >99%**
Overall Percent Agreement = 239/240 = >99%**
*Denotes 95% confidence interval
**Denotes a 97.5% confidence interval
{6}
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test **Strip** versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test – Serum:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 73 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 0 | 167 |
Positive Percent Agreement = 59/60 = >99% **
Negative Percent Agreement = 167/167 = >99% **
Overall Percent Agreement = 240/240 = >99% **
** Denotes a 97.5% confidence interval
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test **Strip** versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test – Whole Blood:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 49 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 2 | 80 |
Positive Percent Agreement = 49/51 = 96% (87%-99%)*
Negative Percent Agreement = 80/80 = >99% (95%-100%)**
Overall Percent Agreement = 129/131 = >99% (95%-99%)**
*Denotes 95% confidence interval
** Denotes a 97.5% confidence interval
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test **Strip** versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test – All Specimens:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 181 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 3 | 427 |
Positive Percent Agreement = 181/184 = 98% (95%-99%)*
Negative Percent Agreement = 427/427 = >99% (99%-100%)**
Overall Percent Agreement = 608/611 = >99% (99%-99.9%)**
*Denotes 95% confidence interval
** Denotes a 97.5% confidence interval
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test **Device** versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test – Plasma:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 59 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 1 | 180 |
Positive Percent Agreement = 59/60 = 98% (91%-99%)*
Negative Percent Agreement = 180/180 = >99% (98%-100%)**
Overall Percent Agreement = 239/240 = >99% (98%-99%)**
*Denotes 95% confidence interval
{7}
** Denotes a $97.5\%$ confidence interval
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test - Serum:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 72 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 1 | 167 |
Positive Percent Agreement $= 72 / 72 = 99\%$ $(93\% -99\%)^{*}$
Negative Percent Agreement $= 167 / 167 = >99\%$ $(98\% -100\%)^{**}$
Overall Percent Agreement $= 239 / 240 = >99\%$ $(98\% -99\%)^{**}$
*Denotes 95% confidence interval
** Denotes a $97.5\%$ confidence interval
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test - Whole Blood:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 50 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 1 | 80 |
Positive Percent Agreement $= 50 / 51 = 98\%$ $(90\% -99\%)^{*}$
Negative Percent Agreement $= 80 / 80 = >99\%$ $(96\% -100\%)^{**}$
Overall Percent Agreement $= 130 / 131 = >99\%$ $(96\% -99\%)^{**}$
*Denotes 95% confidence interval
** Denotes a $97.5\%$ confidence interval
ACON Mononucleosis Rapid Test Device versus Genzyme OSOM Mono Test - All Specimens:
Genzyme OSOM Mono Test
| | | + | - |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ACON Mononucleosis | + | 181 | 0 |
| Rapid Test Strip | - | 3 | 427 |
Positive Percent Agreement $= 181 / 184 = 98\%$ $(95\% -99\%)^{*}$
Negative Percent Agreement $= 427 / 427 = >99\%$ $(99\% -100\%)^{**}$
Overall Percent Agreement $= 608 / 611 = >99\%$ $(99\% -99.9\%)^{**}$
* Denotes 95% confidence interval
** Denotes a $97.5\%$ confidence interval
# b. Matrix comparison:
Both the new devices and the predicate device can be used in serum, plasma and whole blood. To determine the effect of different anticoagulants on the ACON test strip and test device specimens containing K2EDTA, Na2EDTA, sodium citrate, potassium citrate, sodium oxalate, sodium heparin, and potassium heparin were collected. Thirty-five positive whole blood specimens and 35 positive plasma specimens were prepared by adding a strong positive into the collected anticoagulant specimens. All samples were
{8}
run in triplicate. Both the test strip and the test device gave the expected positive and negative results for each type of antigcoagulated plasma tested.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical Sensitivity: Not given
b. Clinical specificity: Not given
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off: See assay cut-off
5. Expected values/Reference range: The incidence of EBV-associated infectious mononucleosis in the US has been estimated at 45 per 100,000 and is highest in adolescent and young adults, about 2 out of 1,000. No seasonal pattern of EBV infection occurs. The incubation period is 10 to 60 days, though 7 to 14 days is common for children and adolescents.
N. Proposed Labeling: The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10. The components of the tests (positive and negative controls) contain human source materials. Human samples were tested in the studies to support a substantially equivalent determination.
O. Conclusion: The submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and supports a substantial equivalence decision.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.