TRIAGE BNP TEST FOR THE BECKMAN COULTER IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEMS, MODEL CATALOG #98200
Applicant
Biosite Incorporated
Product Code
NBC · Clinical Chemistry
Decision Date
Dec 23, 2003
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1117
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The Triage® BNP test is intended for use with the Beckman Coulter Immunoassay Systems (Access, Access 2, Synchron LXi 725, and UniCel Dxl 800) for the rapid in vitro quantitative measurement of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) in plasma specimens using EDTA as the anticoagulant. The test is used as an aid in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of congestive heart failure. The test also is used for the risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Device Story
The Triage BNP test is an in vitro diagnostic assay for quantitative measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in EDTA plasma. The device utilizes a two-site immunoenzymatic 'sandwich' assay principle; patient plasma is incubated with paramagnetic particles coated with mouse omniclonal anti-human BNP antibody and a mouse monoclonal anti-human BNP antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate. After magnetic separation and washing, a chemiluminescent substrate (Lumi-Phos 530) is added; light emission, measured by a luminometer, is directly proportional to BNP concentration. The assay is performed on Beckman Coulter Immunoassay Systems (Access, Access 2, Synchron LXi 725, UniCel DxI 800) in clinical laboratory settings. Results are determined via a stored multi-point calibration curve. Clinicians use the output (BNP concentration) to aid in diagnosing congestive heart failure, assessing disease severity, and risk-stratifying patients with acute coronary syndromes. The test provides objective biochemical data to support clinical decision-making regarding heart failure management.
Clinical Evidence
Method comparison study performed using 412 EDTA plasma samples across the measurable range. Comparison against predicate Biosite Triage BNP test showed a correlation of 0.95, slope of 1.00, and intercept of -0.15 (Passing-Bablok regression). Applying a 100 pg/mL cutoff yielded 96.1% agreement between methods.
Indicated for patients requiring diagnosis or severity assessment of congestive heart failure and risk stratification for acute coronary syndromes. Uses EDTA plasma specimens.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) test system is an in vitro diagnostic device intended to measure BNP in whole blood and plasma. Measurements of BNP are used as an aid in the diagnosis of patients with congestive heart failure.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control is “Class II Special Control Guidance Document for B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Premarket Notifications; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers.”
Predicate Devices
Triage® B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) test (k021317)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
DEVICE ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
k033383
B. Analyte:
B-type natriuretic peptide test system (BNP)
C. Type of Test:
Quantitative
D. Applicant:
Biosite Incorporated
E. Proprietary and Established Names:
Triage® B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Test for the Beckman Coulter Immunoassay Systems, Triage® BNP Calibrators, Triage® BNP QC Controls
F. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
862.1117, B-type natriuretic peptide test system
862.1150, Calibrator, Secondary
862.1660, Single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed)
2. Classification:
Class II, Class II, Class I
3. Product Code:
NBC; JIT; JJX
4. Panel:
75
G. Intended Use:
1. Indication(s) for use:
The Triage® BNP test is intended for use with Beckman Coulter Immunoassay Systems (Access, Access 2, Synchron LXi 725 and UniCel DxI 800) for the in vitro quantitative measurement of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) in plasma specimens using EDTA as the anticoagulant. The test is used as an aid in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of congestive heart failure (also referred to as heart failure). The test is also used for the risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes.
2. Special condition for use statement(s):
{1}
Page 2 of 7
3. Special instrument Requirements:
Beckman-Coulter Access Immunoassay Analyzer, Beckman-Coulter Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzer, Beckman-Coulter Synchron LXi 725 Clinical System, Beckman-Coulter Dxl 800 Access Immunoassay System
H. Device Description:
The test kit contains three reagents, R1a, R1b, and R1c. R1a consists of paramagnetic particles coated with mouse omniclonal anti-human BNP antibody suspended in TRIS buffered saline, with bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.1% ProClin 300, and < 0.1% sodium azide; R1b consists of purified mouse and goat IgG in TRIS buffered saline with 0.1% ProClin 300 and < 0.1% sodium azide; R1c consists of mouse monoclonal anti-human BNP antibody-alkaline phosphatase bovine conjugate in PBS buffered saline with BSA, 0.1% ProClin 300, and < 0.1% sodium azide. Triage® BNP Calibrators and Triage® BNP QC Controls are provided separately. Triage® BNP Calibrators are provided at 6 levels- zero and approximately 25, 100, 500, 2500, and 5000 pg/ml. Triage® BNP QC Controls are provided at 3 levels - approximately 80, 400, and 2200 ng/ml.
I. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Triage® B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) test
2. Predicate K number(s):
k021317
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Triage® BNP for Beckman-Coulter Systems | Triage® BNP |
| Intended Use | Same | Same |
| Standardization | Same | Same |
| Calibration | Same | Same |
| material | | |
| Differences | | |
| Item | Triage® BNP for Beckman-Coulter Systems | Triage® BNP |
| Analyzer | Beckman-Coulter Access Immunoassay Analyzer, Beckman-Coulter Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzer, Beckman-Coulter Synchron LXi 725 Clinical System, Beckman-Coulter Dxl 800 Access Immunoassay System | Biosite Triage® Meter |
{2}
Page 3 of 7
J. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
NCCLS EP 5-A, prEN ISO 17511
K. Test Principle:
The Triage BNP test is a two-site immunoenzymatic (“sandwich”) assay. A sample is added to a reaction vessel with mouse monoclonal anti-human BNP antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate and paramagnetic particles coated with mouse omniclonal anti-human BNP antibody. BNP in human plasma binds to the immobilized anti-BNP on the solid phase, while the mouse anti-BNP conjugate reacts specifically with bound BNP. After incubation in a reaction vessel, separation in a magnetic field and washing, remove materials not bound to the solid phase. A chemiluminescent substrate, Lumi-Phos 530, is added to the reaction vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of BNP in the sample. The amount of analyte in the sample is determined from a stored, multi-point calibration curve.
L. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Performance characteristics for precision were determined for the Access Immunoassay Analyzer and were validated on the Access 2 and UniCel Dxl 800 analyzers. The only difference between the Synchron LXi 725 Clinical System and the Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzer is the sampling mechanism, so performance characteristics for the Access 2 Immunoassay analyzer also apply to the Synchron LXi 725 Clinical System. Precision studies performed on the Access 2 and UniCel Dxl analyzers demonstrated that the imprecision of each of the platforms is within the test imprecision reported in the package insert for the Access analyzer.
Reproducibility of the Triage BNP test was determined in studies using 5 levels of commercially available and in-house human control material with two lots of reagents. The study included a total of 20 assays, 2 replicates per assay, over 20 days. Representative data were calculated based on NCCLS EP5-A guidelines. Within run precision % CV ranged from 1.0 % at 1344 pg/mL to 3.1% at 41 pg/mL, with total precision ranging from 2.1 % CV at 3966 pg/mL to 6.7 % CV at 1344 pg/mL for the Access analyzer.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Multiple dilutions of 4 plasma samples spiked with purified BNP to final concentrations of approximately 5000 pg/mL, using unspiked plasma as the diluent resulted in recoveries ranging from 85.0% to 100.3 % on the Access analyzer. Linearity for the other Beckman-Coulter platforms met acceptance criteria.
{3}
Page 4 of 7
c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
The analyte in the Triage® BNP Calibrators is traceable to the manufacturer's working calibrators. The traceability process is based on prEN ISO 17511.
d. Detection limit:
To establish the lowest limit of detection (LLD) distinguishable from zero with 95 % confidence, a six point calibration curve and ten replicates of the zero calibrator were run on 10 Access instruments and 2 Access reagent lots. The lowest detectable level of BNP distinguishable from zero was determined to be < 1 pg/mL. The analytical sensitivities for the other Beckman-Coulter platforms were also found to be < 1 pg/mL.
e. Analytical specificity:
Hemoglobin (up to 500 mg/dL), triglycerides (triolein up to 3000 mg/dL), bilirubin (conjugated up to 20 mg/dL), fibrinogen (up to 800 mg/dL) or human serum albumin (up to 1500 mg/dL) added to plasma specimens containing BNP did not interfere with the recovery of BNP. In addition, several pharmaceuticals were evaluated for potential cross reactivity and interference with the assay. None interfered with the recovery of BNP. The labeling contains the information that the drug Neseritide is measured as BNP and recommends that patients who are candidates for Neseritide therapy should have BNP measured before therapy is started.
f. Assay cut-off:
BNP results less than or equal to 100 pg/mL are representative of normal values in patients without CHF. BNP results greater than 100 pg/mL are considered abnormal and suggestive of patients with CHF.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
A comparison of 412 EDTA plasma samples measured values using the Triage® BNP test on the Access Immunoassay System and the Triage® BNP test gave the following statistical data using the Passing- Bablock regression analysis: n = 412, range of observations = 5 - 4970 pg/mL, slope = 1.00, r = 0.95, intercept = -0.15. A separate study was performed to validate the method comparison on the other Beckman-Coulter platforms. In the study, 64 samples were used for the method comparison, with BNP concentrations ranging from 1-3,500 pg/mL. 15 samples had BNP concentrations above 1,000 pg/mL. The regression equation for the Access Immunoassay Analyzer versus the Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzer was determined to be Access 2 = 0.97 x Access + 8.37, r = 0.997. The regression equation for the Access Immunoassay
{4}
Page 5 of 7
Analyzer versus the UniCel DxI 800 Access Immunoassay System was determined to be Access $2 = 1.05 \times \mathrm{DxI} + 8.81$, $r = 0.997$

b. Matrix comparison:
EDTA plasma is the only sample type indicated.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity:
Clinical studies were performed for the predicate Triage® BNP test and the results of the studies are included in the labeling for the Triage® BNP for the Beckman-Coulter Immunoassay systems.
Males
| | Age < 45 | Age 45-54 | Age 55-64 | Age 65-74 | Age 75+ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sensitivity | 81.6% | 76.0% | 75.6% | 79.3% | 82.4% |
| 95% Confidence Interval | 70.8-92.5% | 67.5-84.6% | 68.2-82.9% | 72.6-86% | 76.1-88.7% |
| Specificity | 98.9% | 99.5% | 98.3% | 98.9% | 95.8% |
| 95% Confidence Interval | 97.4-100.4% | 98.5-100.5% | 97.7-98.9% | 98.4-99.4% | 94.7-96.9% |
Females
| | Age < 45 | Age 45-54 | Age 55-64 | Age 65-74 | Age 75+ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sensitivity | 82.1% | 69.0% | 82.4% | 97.9% | 91.9% |
| 95% Confidence Interval | 68.0-96.3% | 57.1-80.9% | 71.9-92.8% | 93.7-102.0% | 85.2-98.7% |
| Specificity | 100.0% | 98.9% | 96.4% | 95.0% | 75.7% |
| 95% Confidence Interval | 100.0-100.0% | 97.5-100.4% | 95.5-97.4% | 93.4-96.7% | 72.2-79.2% |
b. Clinical specificity:
{5}
Page 6 of 7
See above
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable):
4. Clinical cut-off:
The clinical cut-off was determined from clinical studies performed for the predicate Traige® BNP test. The information from these studies is included in the labeling for this device. The circulating BNP concentration was determined from 1286 individuals without CHF (676 women and 610 men) using the Traige® BNP Test. This population included individuals with hypertension, diabetes, renal insufficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There are no statistically significant changes in BNP concentration associated with hypertension, diabetes, renal insufficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The decision threshold was determined by the 95% confidence limit of BNP concentration in the non-CHF population age 55 and older. The most appropriate decision threshold apparent from these distributions is 100 pg/mL. This value translates into a general specificity of the test of 98%, i.e. less than 2% expected false positives in individuals without CHF. Each laboratory should establish a reference range that represents the patient population that is to be evaluated.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Expected values were determined from clinical studies performed for the predicate Triage® BNP test and are included in the labeling for this device.
Descriptive Statistics - BNP Concentration (pg/ml)
Non-CHF Population
| | All | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | All | Age < 45 | Age 45-54 | Age 55-64 | Age 65-74 | Age 75+ |
| Median | 12.3 | 7.7 | 11.1 | 17.9 | 19.8 | 53.9 |
| 95th Percentile | 73.5 | 39.6 | 64.5 | 76.1 | 84.7 | 179.4 |
| Percent < 100 pg/ml | 98.0% | 99.5% | 99.2% | 97.4% | 96.9% | 84.2% |
| Minimum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Maximum | 252.0 | 251.3 | 252.0 | 207.7 | 197.9 | 218.5 |
| N | 1286 | 423 | 385 | 229 | 192 | 57 |
| | Males | | | | | |
| | All | Age < 45 | Age 45-54 | Age 55-64 | Age 65-74 | Age 75+ |
| Median | 7.1 | 5.0 | 7.2 | 9.0 | 15.7 | 39.0 |
| 95th Percentile | 56.9 | 23.8 | 39.0 | 72.4 | 62.7 | 77.9 |
| Percent < 100 pg/ml | 98.9% | 98.9% | 99.5% | 98.3% | 98.9% | 95.8% |
| Minimum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Maximum | 252.0 | 251.3 | 252.0 | 207.7 | 127.3 | 218.5 |
| N | 610 | 183 | 196 | 118 | 89 | 24 |
| | Females | | | | | |
| | All | Age < 45 | Age 45-54 | Age 55-64 | Age 65-74 | Age 75+ |
| Median | 18.5 | 11.6 | 17.7 | 28.2 | 27.6 | 67.1 |
| 95th Percentile | 84.2 | 47.4 | 71.7 | 80.5 | 95.4 | 179.5 |
| Percent < 100 pg/ml | 97.2% | 100.0% | 98.9% | 96.4% | 95.1% | 75.8% |
| Minimum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Maximum | 197.9 | 92.6 | 142.8 | 143.2 | 197.9 | 194.1 |
| N | 676 | 240 | 189 | 111 | 103 | 33 |
{6}
Page 7 of 7
## CHF Population - All
| | All CHF* | NYHA Functional Class | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | I | II | III | IV |
| Median | 359.5 | 95.4 | 221.5 | 459.1 | 1006.3 |
| 5th Percentile | 22.3 | 14.8 | 9.9 | 37.6 | 147.2 |
| Percent > 100 pg/ml | 80.6% | 48.3% | 76.6% | 86.0% | 96.3% |
| Minimum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Maximum | >5000 | 904.6 | 4435.8 | >5000 | >5000 |
| N | 804 | 118 | 197 | 300 | 187 |
## CHF Population - Males
| | All CHF* | NYHA Functional Class | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | I | II | III | IV |
| Median | 317.8 | 87.8 | 232.6 | 458.9 | 1060.3 |
| 5th Percentile | 21.9 | 16.8 | 10.7 | 25.0 | 196.5 |
| Percent > 100 pg/ml | 78.9% | 46.5% | 78.8% | 85.2% | 97.2% |
| Minimum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Maximum | >5000 | 904.6 | 2710.6 | >5000 | >5000 |
| N | 558 | 101 | 146 | 203 | 106 |
## CHF Population - Females
| | All CHF | NYHA Functional Class | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | I | II | III | IV |
| Median | 499.7 | 114.7 | 191.2 | 469.2 | 996.5 |
| 5th Percentile | 30.7 | 6.8 | 9.7 | 45.6 | 121.0 |
| Percent > 100 pg/ml | 84.6% | 58.8% | 70.6% | 87.6% | 95.1% |
| Minimum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 11.7 | 15.5 |
| Maximum | >5000 | 519.6 | 4435.8 | 4582.0 | 4706.5 |
| N | 246 | 17 | 51 | 97 | 81 |
*2 CHF with unknown NYHA class (male)
## M. Conclusion:
Based upon a review of the information presented in this submission, I recommend that this device is substantially equivalent to devices regulated by 21CFR 862.1117 B-type natriuretic peptide test system; 862.1150, Calibrator, Secondary; 862.1660, Single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed).
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.