K032469 · Aesku, Inc. · LLL · Dec 16, 2003 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K032469
Device Name
AESKULISA ANA 8PRO
Applicant
Aesku, Inc.
Product Code
LLL · Immunology
Decision Date
Dec 16, 2003
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5100
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Real-World Evidence
Real-World Evidence
Submission
Device
Sponsor
RWD Sources
RWE Use Summary
Key Tags
K032469 · Dec 16, 2003
AESKULISA ANA 8PRO
Aesku, Inc.
Retrospective clinical patient samples from two German hospitals
Retrospective clinical samples were used to perform method comparison against a predicate device and to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity for the autoantibody test kits.
Clinically defined patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (e.g., SLE, CREST, Sjogren's, Polymyositis, Rheumatoid Arthritis); Sample Size: Initial 57 samples plus supplemental data (e.g., 16 U1-70, 42 snRNP-C, 45 Sm, 28 SS-A, 45 SS-B, 47 Scl-70, 46 CenpB, 14 Jo-1); Number of Sites: 2
Varelisa ANA Profile EIA kit
Percent agreement (Total, Positive, Negative) with predicate device
AI Performance
Output
Algorithm
Acceptance
Observed
Dev DS
Dev Readers
Test DS
Test Readers
Anti-U1-70 antibody detection
—
—
95.8% total agreement, 87.0% positive agreement, 100% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 73 patient samples
—
Anti-snRNP-C antibody detection
—
—
97.0% total agreement, 96.2% positive agreement, 97.9% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 99 patient samples
—
Anti-Sm antibody detection
—
—
95.1% total agreement, 96% positive agreement, 94.2% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 102 patient samples
—
Anti-SS-A antibody detection
—
—
84.7% total agreement, 80.3% positive agreement, 95.8% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 86 patient samples
—
Anti-SS-B antibody detection
—
—
91.1% total agreement, 84.7% positive agreement, 100% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 102 patient samples
—
Anti-Scl-70 antibody detection
—
—
97.1% total agreement, 100% positive agreement, 94.3% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 104 patient samples
—
Anti-Cenp-B antibody detection
—
—
97.1% total agreement, 96.1% positive agreement, 98.1% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 103 patient samples
—
Anti-Jo-1 antibody detection
—
—
100% total agreement, 100% positive agreement, 100% negative agreement
—
—
Clinical validation study: 71 patient samples
—
Indications for Use
AESKULISA ANA-8Pro is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay for the separate qualitative detection of IgG antibodies against eight cellular and nuclear antigens in human serum. The wells are separately coated with recombinant 70 kDa U1 snRNP, SS-B, SS-A 52 kDa, Scl 70, centromere protein B (CenpB), Jo-1 and highly purified native human snRNP/Sm. Sm and SS-A 60 kDa. The assay is an aid in the differential diagnosis of systemic rheumatic diseases and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
Device Story
AESKULISA test kits are solid-phase enzyme immunoassays (ELISA) for detecting IgG antibodies against specific nuclear/cellular antigens in human serum. Wells are coated with recombinant or purified native human antigens (e.g., U1 snRNP, SS-A, SS-B, Scl-70, Cenp-B, Jo-1, Sm). Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel; results are interpreted by physicians alongside other serological tests and clinical findings to aid in diagnosing systemic rheumatic diseases. The assay provides qualitative or semi-quantitative antibody detection, assisting in the differential diagnosis of conditions like SLE, MCTD, and scleroderma.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided; bench testing only.
Technological Characteristics
Solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). Wells coated with recombinant or purified native human antigens. Detects IgG antibodies. In vitro diagnostic use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative/semi-quantitative detection of IgG antibodies against cellular/nuclear antigens in human serum to aid in differential diagnosis of systemic rheumatic diseases, including SLE, MCTD, Sjögren's syndrome, systemic sclerosis, CREST syndrome, polymyositis, and dermatomyositis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An antinuclear antibody immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques the autoimmune antibodies in serum, other body fluids, and tissues that react with cellular nuclear constituents (molecules present in the nucleus of a cell, such as ribonucleic acid, deoxyribonucleic acid, or nuclear proteins). The measurements aid in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (a multisystem autoimmune disease in which antibodies attack the victim's own tissues), hepatitis (a liver disease), rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome (arthritis with inflammation of the eye, eyelid, and salivary glands), and systemic sclerosis (chronic hardening and shrinking of many body tissues).
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K032469
B. Analyte:
Anti-U1-70, anti-snRNP-C, anti-Sm, anti-SS-A, anti-SS-B, anti-Scl-70, anti-Cenp-B and anti-Jo-1 antibodies
C. Type of Test:
Qualitative and semi-quantitative, EIA
D. Applicant:
AESKU, Inc.
E. Proprietary and Established Names:
AESKULISA® ANA 8Pro Test Kit
AESKULISA® ENA 6Pro Test Kit
AESKULISA® U1-70 Test Kit
AESKULISA® snRNP-C Test Kit
AESKULISA® Sm Test Kit
AESKULISA® SS-A Test Kit
AESKULISA® SS-B Test Kit
AESKULISA® Cenp-B Test Kit
AESKULISA® Scl-70 Test Kit
AESKULISA® Jo-1 Test Kit
F. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.5100, Antinuclear antibody immunological test system
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product Code:
LLL, Extractable antinuclear antibody, antigen and control
LJM, Antinuclear antibody (enzyme-labeled), antigen and control
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
G. Intended Use:
AESKULISA ANA 8Pro is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay for the separate qualitative detection of IgG antibodies against eight cellular and nuclear antigens in human serum. The wells are separately coated with recombinant 70 kDa U1 snRNP, SS-B, SS-A 52 kDa, Scl 70, centromere protein B (CenpB), Jo-1 and highly purified native human snRNP/Sm, Sm and SS-A 60 kDa. The assay is an aid in the differential diagnosis of systemic rheumatic diseases and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA ENA 6Pro is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay for the separate semi-quantitative detection of IgG antibodies against six cellular and nuclear antigens in human serum. The wells are coated with recombinant SS-B, SS-A 52 kDa, Scl 70,
{1}
Page 2 of 9
Jo-1 and highly purified native human snRNP/Sm, Sm and SS-A 60 kDa. The assay is an aid in the differential diagnosis of systemic rheumatic diseases and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA U1-70 is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay employing recombinant human 70 kDa protein of the U1-snRNP complex for the semi-quantitative and qualitative detection of antibodies against the 70 kDa U1-RNP in human serum. The assay is an aid in the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA snRNP-C is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay for the qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of antibodies against the snRNP complex in human serum. The assay employs native human U1-snRNP complex purified from the cell line HeLa. The U1-snRNP complex comprises of the Smith antigen (Sm) and RNPs, the 70kDa U1-specific protein plus protein A and C. The assay is an aid for the diagnosis of mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA Sm is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay with purified native Smith antigen (Sm) from human eukaryotic cells (HeLa) for the qualitative and semiquantitative detection of antibodies against Sm in human serum. Anti-Sm antibodies recognize specific conformational epitopes only accessible on native human Sm. The assay is an aid in the differential diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA SS-A is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay for the semi-quantitative and qualitative detection of antibodies against Ro/ SS-A in human serum. The assay employs human Ro/SS-A antigen composed of purified native 60kDa and recombinant human 52 kDa Ro/SS-A protein. Anti-SS-A antibodies preferentially react with the native 60kDa molecule where as most antibodies to the 52 kDa protein prefer the denatured molecule. The assay is an aid in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA SS-B is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay employing human recombinant La-antigen/ SS-B for the qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of antibodies against La-antigen / SS-B in human serum. The assay is an aid in the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA Scl-70 is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay with human recombinant 70 kDa fragment of DNA topoisomerase I for the qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of antibodies against Scl-70 (70 kDa scleroderma antigen) in human serum.
{2}
Page 3 of 9
The assay is an aid in the differential diagnosis of systemic sclerosis and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA CENP-B is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay employing purified recombinant human 80 kDa centromere protein B (Cenp-B) for the qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of IgG antibodies against Cenp-B in human serum. The assay serves as an aid in the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis and CREST syndrome and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
AESKULISA Jo-1 is a solid phase enzyme immunoassay with recombinant human histidyl-tRNA-synthetase (HRS) for the semi-quantitative and qualitative detection of antibodies against Jo-1 in human serum. The assay is an aid in the diagnosis of polymyositis and dermatomyositis and should be used in conjunction with other serological tests and clinical findings.
1. Indication(s) for use:
Same as Intended Use.
2. Special condition for use statement(s):
For prescription use only
3. Special instrument Requirements:
None
H. Device Description:
Each device consists of antigen coated 96 well microtiter plate, horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-human IgG, TMB substrate, cut-off control, positive control, negative control, calibrators, washing buffer concentrate (5x), sample buffer concentrate (5x) and stop solution. The calibrators and the positive and cut-off controls are diluted human sera. The negative control is BSA/PBS.
I. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Varelisa ANA Profile EIA kit
2. Predicate K number(s):
K951205
3. Comparison with predicate:
| DEVICE | PREDICATE |
| --- | --- |
| A. Similarities | |
| Intended Use. Determination of antibodies against nucleic antigens (U1-70, snRNP-complex, Sm, SS-A, SS-B, Scl-70, Cenp-B and Jo-1) in human serum to aid in the diagnosis of rheumatological disorders like systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis or Sjögren’s syndrome. | Determination of antinuclear antibodies (U1-snRNP, Sm, RNP-Sm, SSA, SSB, Scl-70, Centromere, and Jo-1 antibodies) in human serum or plasma to aid in the diagnosis of rheumatological disorders |
| Assay type – ELISA | Same |
| Antigens - Same | Same |
{3}
Page 4 of 9
| Reporter conjugate - Horseradish peroxidase
Substrate - TMB | Same
Same |
| --- | --- |
| B. Differences | |
| Assay Format – Qualitative and semi-quantitative
Sample Type – Serum
Incubation Time – 30/15/15 minutes | Qualitative
Serum and plasma
30/30/10 minutes |
J. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced.
K. Test Principle:
Purified native or recombinant autoantigens are coated separately in wells of microtiter plates. Diluted patient serum is added to the microtiter well and antibody specific to the antigen will bind to the immobilized antigen if present. Unbound sample is washed away and an enzyme labeled anti-human IgG antibody is added to each well and bind to the antigen/antibody complex. After washing away any unbound enzyme conjugate, the chromogenic substrate is added. The color intensity in the wells is proportional to the amount of each autoantibody in the sample.
L. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
AESKULISA ANA 8Pro – Intra-assay reproducibility was determined by assaying 8 specimens 9 times on one plate and for inter-assay reproducibility, 8 specimens were assayed 9 times for 4 days. Results were summarized below.
| Intra-Assay | | | Inter-Assay | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ANA 8 Pro | Mean OD Ratio | CV (%) | ANA 8 Pro | Mean OD Ratio | CV (%) |
| U1RNP | 3.1 | 0.8 | U1RNP | 3.2 | 0.8 |
| Sn RNP | 2.1 | 0.4 | Sn RNP | 4.2 | 1.0 |
| Sm | 1.8 | 1.0 | Sm | 4.1 | 1.1 |
| SSA | 3.5 | 1.2 | SSA | 3.9 | 0.9 |
| SSB | 2.8 | 1.0 | SSB | 1.5 | 0.7 |
| Scl-70 | 1.2 | 1.5 | Scl-70 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| CenpB | 1.5 | 1.1 | CenpB | 2.5 | 1.2 |
| Jo-1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | Jo-1 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
AESKULISA ENA 6Pro - Intra-assay reproducibility was determined by assaying 6 specimens 12 times on one plate and for inter-assay reproducibility, 6 specimens were assayed 12 times for 3 days. Results were summarized below.
| Intra-Assay | | | Inter-Assay | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ANA 6 Pro | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | ANA 6 Pro | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| SnRNP | 20.0 | 3.1 | Sn RNP | 21.7 | 2.8 |
| Sm | 51.6 | 1.7 | Sm | 54.6 | 3.9 |
| SSA | 45.7 | 1.5 | SSA | 44.2 | 1.3 |
| SSB | 124.8 | 2.6 | SSB | 123.3 | 2.4 |
| Scl-70 | 19.3 | 3.1 | Scl-70 | 22.4 | 3.7 |
| Jo-1 | 65.5 | 4.2 | Jo-1 | 68.4 | 1.7 |
{4}
For the individual devices, intra-assay reproducibility was determined by assaying 3 specimens (high, medium and low titer) 24 times on one plate and for inter-assay reproducibility, 3 specimens were assayed 18 times for 3 days. Results were summarized below.
AESKULISA U1-70
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 151 | 2.3 | 148 | 2.6 |
| 2 | 72 | 3.6 | 70 | 4.1 |
| 3 | 26 | 4.5 | 24 | 3.9 |
AESKULISA snRNP
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 19.1 | 1.0 | 19.1 | 1.6 |
| 2 | 50.5 | 3.3 | 51.3 | 3.7 |
| 3 | 85.1 | 6.2 | 83.6 | 6.4 |
AESKULISA Sm
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 64.2 | 4.6 | 50.4 | 3.3 |
| 2 | 41.5 | 3.3 | 29.6 | 2.3 |
| 3 | 20.4 | 1.9 | 12.7 | 1.4 |
AESKULISA SS-A
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 78.2 | 8.1 | 102.4 | 3.8 |
| 2 | 44.3 | 2.8 | 62.5 | 5.5 |
| 3 | 22.9 | 2.0 | 26.3 | 1.9 |
AESKULISA SS-B
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 20.7 | 1.8 | 21.6 | 1.8 |
| 2 | 55.5 | 3.1 | 58.9 | 4.2 |
| 3 | 87.0 | 6.0 | 88.5 | 5.2 |
AESKULISA Scl-70
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 66.5 | 7.7 | 57.5 | 4.4 |
| 2 | 37.7 | 4.3 | 52.2 | 4.2 |
| 3 | 19.4 | 1.9 | 17.7 | 1.3 |
{5}
Page 6 of 9
AESKULISA CenpB
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 265 | 1.5 | 261 | 1.4 |
| 2 | 122 | 2.3 | 119 | 2.5 |
| 3 | 44 | 4.1 | 46 | 3.8 |
AESKULISA Jo-1
| Sample | Intra-Assay | | Inter-Assay | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean U/mL | CV (%) | Mean U/mL | CV (%) |
| 1 | 15.3 | 1.0 | 15.3 | 1.0 |
| 2 | 63.3 | 7.5 | 63.3 | 7.5 |
| 3 | 112.9 | 9.3 | 112.9 | 9.3 |
Originally the sponsor had submitted individual devices for SS-A subtypes (SS-A60 and SS-A52). Since devices for autoantibody subtypes have never been cleared by the agency due to lack of information to support their use in differential diagnosis and patient management, the sponsor was asked to withdraw the SS-A60 and SS-A52 from the 510(k) submission and the sponsor agreed.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
AESKULISA ANA-8Pro - A medium and a high titer Scl-70 serum were diluted to 1:100, 1:200, 1:400 and 1:800. Percent recovery for the high sample ranged from 93.4% to 100% and for the medium sample, 94.1% to 95.4%.
AESKULISA ENA 6Pro - A medium and a high titer U1-70 serum were similarly diluted and tested as described for the AESKULISA ANA 8Pro. Percent recovery for the high sample ranged from 97.3% to 99.3% and for the medium sample, 93.5% to 98.7%.
For the individual devices, a medium and a high titer antigen specific serum sample were similarly diluted and tested as described for the AESKULISA ANA 8Pro. Percent recoveries for the high and medium samples were summarized below.
| Analyte | High Titer Sample % Recovery | Medium Titer Sample % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| snRNP | 97.0 - 100 | 91.2 - 105.3 |
| Sm | 97.0 - 100 | 91.2 - 105.3 |
| SS-A | 96.6 - 102 | 92.2 - 105 |
| SS-B | 94.3 - 98.0 | 90.0 - 106.6 |
| Scl-70 | 90.7 - 101.2 | 93.3 - 99.8 |
| CenpB | 98.0 - 100.3 | 98.8 - 101.5 |
| Jo-1 | 94.3 - 97.1 | 91.3 - 98.3 |
c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
{6}
Controls and calibrators are traceable to CDC reference ANA sera. A negative, a positive and a cut-off control are included in each device. The calibrators are supplied in 4 or 6 concentrations depending on the device.
d. Detection limit (functional sensitivity): Not applicable.
e. Analytical specificity:
The devices were also tested for cross-reactive with other autoantibodies namely anti-gliadin, anti-cardiolipin, anti-thyroid peroxidase, anti-thyroglobulin and anti-proteinase 3. All results were negative. Interference testing with hemolyzed, lipemic or icteric samples were not performed but the package insert specified that these types of samples should not be used.
f. Assay cut-off:
To determine the cut-off value, serial dilutions (1:3) of an antibody specific patient serum are tested in triplicates. The $\mathrm{OD}_{450}$ value for each dilution is plotted (linear-log with a 4 parameter fitting) against the dilution factor to determine the linear range. The dilution in the linear range with an OD value of $\sim 2$ is defined as Calibrator F and assigned an arbitrary unit of $300\mathrm{U / mL}$ . Calibrator F is diluted and calibrated to the respective CDC ANA reference serum (the antibody concentrations of the CDC ANA reference sera were determined by indirect immunofluorescence on Hep2 cells and are expressed as antibody titers). The selected cut-off is equivalent to an OD of 0.5 to 0.6 of that of the reference serum. To validate the cut-off of the 9 analytes in the AESKULISA ANA 8 Pro, 40 healthy subjects from two German hospitals were tested. Results were summarized below.
| | OD Ratio Values | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | U1-70 | snRNP | Sm | SSA | SSA-52 | SSB | CenpB | Scl-70 | Jo11 |
| Mean | 0.261 | 0.276 | 0.244 | 0.246 | 0.166 | 0.245 | 0.254 | 0.310 | 0.231 |
| SD | 0.019 | 0.048 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 0.033 | 0.041 | 0.049 | 0.051 | 0.044 |
| Mean + 3 SD | 0.409 | 0.419 | 0.357 | 0.359 | 0.264 | 0.367 | 0.402 | 0.464 | 0.363 |
The other devices in the submission were similarly tested. The cutoff value for semi-quantitative determination is $>15\mathrm{U / mL}$ for all assays.
# 2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
In the original submission, only 57 clinically defined patient samples were tested on the predicated device, the new device and IFA. These samples were from two German hospitals and included 16 SLE, 1 SLE/CREST Overlap, 5 Progressive Systemic Sclerosis, 6 Sjogren's Syndrome, 2 SHARP Syndrome, 3 CREST Syndrome, 3 anti-Jo-1, 5 Polymyositis-Sjogren's Overlap Syndrome, 1 Polymyositis, 7 Rheumatoid Arthritis and 8 sera for other diseases (HLA-B27 disease, suspected CREST or PSS, MCTD, psiorasis arthritis, fever
{7}
Page 8 of 9
of unknown origin and with elevated ANA after tick bite). This limited dataset is insufficient to support substantial equivalence claim for the individual autoantibody devices. The sponsor was asked to provide data on additional positive samples and the sponsor supplemented data from 16 U1-70, 42 snRNP-C, 45 Sm, 28 SS-A, 45 SS-B, 47 Scl-70, 46 CenpB and 14 Jo-1 patient samples. The table below summarizes the number of samples tested and % agreement with the predicate device:
| Device | # samples | % Total Agreement | % Positive Agreement | % Negative Agreement |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| U1-70 | 73 | 95.8% | 87.0% | 100% |
| snRNP-C | 99 | 97.0% | 96.2% | 97.9% |
| Sm | 102 | 95.1% | 96% | 94.2% |
| SS-A | 86 | 84.7% | 80.3% | 95.8% |
| SS-B | 102 | 91.1% | 84.7% | 100% |
| Scl-70 | 104 | 97.1%% | 100% | 94.3% |
| CenpB | 103 | 97.1% | 96.1% | 98.1% |
| Jo-1 | 71 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
But when the analytes were combined together as in the AESKULISA ANA 8Pro, the overall agreement with the predicate device was only 54.4% based on comparative results of the original 57 patient samples. The majority of the discrepancy was due to positive reactivity to SS-A when tested with the predicate device and when compared to the clinical diagnosis, would be considered in some cases false positives and in others nonspecific.
b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity:
The clinical sensitivity was 100% for all of the individual autoantibody devices except AESKULISA SS-A which was 98.8%.
b. Clinical specificity:
The clinical specificity was 100% for all of the individual autoantibody devices.
4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range:
Not performed. The sponsor referred the expected values in published literature.
M. Conclusion:
Based on the review of information provided in this 510 (k), the analytical performance of the AESKULISA ANA 8Pro which includes analytes of the individual autoantibody devices (AESKULISA U1-70, AESKULISA snRNP-C, AESKULISA Sm, AESKULISA SS-A, AESKULISA SS-B, AESKULISA Scl-70, AESKULISA CenpB and AESKULISA Jo-1) and the ENA panel, AESKULISA ENA
{8}
Page 9 of 9
6Pro correlated with the performance of the Varelisa ANA Profile EIA kit and therefore, demonstrate that the new device is substantially equivalent to the marketed device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.