The Benzodiazepine Enzyme Immunoassay is a homogenous immunoassay with a 200 ng/mL and/or 300 ng/mL cutoff. The assay is intended for use in the qualitative and semi-quantitative analyses of benzodiazepines in human urine. The assay is designed for professional use with a number of automated clinical chemistry analyzers. This immunoassay is calibrated using oxazepam at and around the 200 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL cutoff levels. The device is for in vitro diagnostic use, and intended for prescription use. The Benzodiazepine Drugs of Abuse Calibrators and Controls are intended for in vitro diagnostic use for the validation of Benzodiazepine enzyme immunoassays to detect benzodiazepines in human urine.
Device Story
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for benzodiazepine detection in human urine; utilizes monoclonal antibodies against benzodiazepine compounds/metabolites, substrate, and enzyme-labeled benzodiazepine. Operates via competition between sample drug and enzyme-labeled drug for fixed antibody binding sites; enzyme activity inversely proportional to drug concentration. Enzyme activity converts NAD to NADH, measured spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. Used in clinical laboratories by professional staff on automated chemistry analyzers. Provides qualitative or semi-quantitative results to aid in drug screening; requires confirmatory testing (GC/MS) for positive results. Benefits include rapid preliminary screening for benzodiazepine presence in clinical toxicology settings.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision evaluated via within-run and run-to-run studies (n=21/n=12). Method comparison performed on 116 clinical urine specimens against predicate and confirmed via GC/MS or HPLC. Sensitivity/specificity demonstrated at 200 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL cutoffs. Linearity (R²=0.9981) and cross-reactivity profiles established. No clinical studies performed.
Technological Characteristics
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay; liquid reagents containing monoclonal antibodies, substrate, and G6PDH-labeled benzodiazepine. Calibrators/controls consist of drug-free human urine matrix spiked with oxazepam. Operates on automated clinical chemistry analyzers (e.g., Hitachi 717) measuring absorbance at 340 nm. Requires constant temperature and accurate timing.
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of benzodiazepines in human urine for professional use on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. Provides preliminary analytical results; requires confirmation by alternative chemical method (e.g., GC/MS).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A benzodiazepine test system is a device intended to measure any of the benzodiazepine compounds, sedative and hypnotic drugs, in blood, plasma, and urine. The benzodiazepine compounds include chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, oxazepam, chlorzepate, flurazepam, and nitrazepam. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of benzodiazepine use or overdose and in monitoring levels of benzodiazepines to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A benzodiazepine test system is not exempt if it is intended for any use other than employment or insurance testing or is intended for Federal drug testing programs. The device is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 862.9, provided the test system is intended for employment and insurance testing and includes a statement in the labeling that the device is intended solely for use in employment and insurance testing, and does not include devices intended for Federal drug testing programs (*e.g.,* programs run by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. military).
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
DEVICE ONLY TEMPLATE
A. 510(k) Number:
K032365
B. Analyte:
Benzodiazepines
C. Type of Test:
Ready-to-use Enzyme Immunoassay for the qualitative and semi-quantitative analyses of benzodiazepines in human urine.
Oxazepam calibrators.
D. Applicant:
Lin-Zhi International, Inc.
E. Proprietary and Established Names:
Benzodiazepine Enzyme Immunoassay
Benzodiazepine Drugs of Abuse Calibrators and Controls
F. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR § 862.3170, Benzodiazepine test system
§ 862.3200, Clinical toxicology calibrator
§ 862.3280, Clinical toxicology control material
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product Code:
JXM, DLJ, LAS
4. Panel:
Toxicology (91)
G. Intended Use:
1. Intended Use(s):
Refer to the Indications for Use.
2. Indication(s) for use:
The Benzodiazepine Enzyme Immunoassay is a homogenous immunoassay with a 200 ng/mL and/or 300 ng/mL cutoff. The assay is intended for use in the qualitative and semi-quantitative analyses of benzodiazepines in human urine. The assay is designed for professional use with a number of automated clinical chemistry analyzers.
This immunoassay is calibrated using oxazepam at and around the 200 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL cutoff levels.
The device is for in vitro diagnostic use, and intended for prescription use.
{1}
Page 2 of 10
The Benzodiazepine Drugs of Abuse Calibrators and Controls are intended for in vitro diagnostic use for the validation of Benzodiazepine enzyme immunoassays to detect benzodiazepines in human urine.
3. Special condition for use statement(s):
The Benzodiazepine Enzyme Immunoassay provides only a preliminary analytical result. A more specific alternative chemical method must be used in order to obtain a confirmed analytical result. Gas Chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is the preferred confirmatory method. Other chemical confirmation methods are available. Clinical consideration and professional judgment should be applied to any drug of abuse test result, particularly when the preliminary test result is positive.
Semi-quantitative analysis is helpful in estimating the concentrations of drugs in the samples. This can aid users in preparing dilutions of the samples for further analysis.
4. Special instrument Requirements:
For professional use with a number of automated clinical chemistry analyzers that are capable of maintaining a constant temperature, pipetting sample, mixing reagents, measuring changes in absorbance at 340 nm and timing the reaction accurately.
Performance for the assay as well as the calibrators and controls was demonstrated in this submission on the Hitachi 717 automated chemistry analyzer.
H. Device Description:
LZI's Benzodiazepine Enzyme Immunoassay contains two liquid reagents which contain the key components of the immunoassay. The assay uses monoclonal antibodies against benzodiazepine compounds and metabolites, substrate, and enzyme labeled-benzodiazepine.
The Calibrators and Controls consist of a drug-free human urine matrix spiked with the following concentrations of oxazepam:
| Reference Material | Benzodiazepine EIA |
| --- | --- |
| | Oxazepam |
| Calibrator #2/Control I | 100 ng/mL |
| Calibrator #3/Cutoff A/Control II | 200 ng/mL |
| Calibrator #4/Cutoff B/Control III | 300 ng/mL |
| Calibrator #5 | 1000 ng/mL |
| Control IV | 400 ng/mL |
{2}
Page 3 of 10
# I. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Syva EMIT® II Plus Benzodiazepine Assay
Multi-Drug Urine Calibrators and Controls
2. Predicate K number(s):
K993985
K935101
3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Intended Use | Intended for qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of benzodiazepines in human urine | Intended for qualitative and semi-quantitative determination of benzodiazepines in human urine |
| Assay cutoff | 200ng/ml or 300 ng/ml | 200ng/ml or 300 ng/ml |
| Sensitivity | Functional sensitivity – 15 ng/ml | 15 ng/ml – distinguished from zero with 95% confidence |
| Method principle | Enzymatic immunoassay | Enzymatic immunoassay |
| Differences | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| Control levels | 100, 200, 300, and 400 ng/ml | 150, 225, 250, and 375 ng/ml |
| Calibrator and Control | Oxazepam | Lormetazepam |
Calibrators and controls use similar matrix compositions and concentrations of oxazepam.
# J. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
Guidance for Prescription Use Drugs of Abuse Assays Premarket Notifications, published November 2000.
# K. Test Principle:
The benzodiazepine assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for use on clinical chemistry analyzers. Calibrators or cutoff controls, ranging in concentration from 0 – 1000 ng/mL, are run with the assay. The assay is based on competition between drug in the sample and drug labeled with the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) for a fixed amount of antibody in the reagent. Enzyme activity decreases upon antibody binding, so that when free drug is present in the sample, the drug concentration is proportional to the increase in enzyme activity. This enzyme activity results in the
{3}
conversion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to NADH, resulting in an absorbance change that can be measured spectrophotometrically at $340~\mathrm{nm}$ .
# L. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
# 1. Analytical performance:
# a. Precision/Reproducibility:
For both the qualitative and semi-quantitative assays, within run and run-to-run precision tests were performed on one single Hitachi 717 automated chemistry analyzer by one individual chemist. All calibrators and controls are diluted from a $1\mathrm{mg/mL}$ commercially purchased oxazepam standard solution, then spiked into a urine-based calibrator buffer matrix. All calibrators and controls values are confirmed by GC/MS $(+/-10\%)$ .
Qualitative analysis: The five calibrators were evaluated. Within run precision was measured by running 21 replicates of six different analyte concentrations on the Hitachi 717 analyzer, while run-to-run precision was tested with 12 runs over a 3 week period. Typical results ( $\Delta \mathrm{mA} / \mathrm{min}$ ) are as follows:
| | Within Run (n=21) | | | Run-to-Run (n=12) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean | SD | %CV | Mean | SD | %CV |
| Negative | 361.0 | 3.1 | 0.86 | 360.0 | 2.5 | 0.70 |
| 100 ng/mL | 417.8 | 3.5 | 0.84 | 417.9 | 2.5 | 4.42 |
| 200 ng/mL | 455.5 | 3.5 | 0.76 | 457.0 | 1.9 | 0.51 |
| 300 ng/mL | 483.3 | 3.5 | 0.73 | 483.6 | 2.4 | 0.55 |
| 1000 ng/mL | 559.7 | 4.9 | 0.74 | 561.8 | 3.3 | 0.58 |
Semi-quantitative analysis: The analyzers were first calibrated using five calibrators as reference (0, 100, 200, 300, and $1000\mathrm{ng / ml}$ ). Within run precision was determined by measuring the controls (100, 200, 300, and $400\mathrm{ng / ml}$ ) 21 times on the Hitachi 717 analyzer. Run-to-run precision was established using 12 runs over a 3 week period. The results $(\mathrm{ng / mL})$ are summarized below:
| | Within Run (n=21) | | | Run-to-Run (n=12) | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | Mean | SD | %CV | Mean | SD | %CV |
| 100 ng/mL | 105.7 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 95.8 | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| 200 ng/mL | 203.6 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 192.0 | 6.5 | 3.4 |
| 300 ng/mL | 281.8 | 11.1 | 3.9 | 294.8 | 15.5 | 5.3 |
| 400 ng/mL | 373.9 | 15.3 | 4.1 | 398.6 | 15.4 | 3.9 |
# b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
The assay was challenged by spiking negative urine samples with known amounts of oxazepam at the following levels: 20, 50, 100, 180, 225, 375, 450, 600, and $800\mathrm{ng / ml}$ $(n = 5$ for each concentration). The assay correctly identified spiked levels $+ / - 25\%$ of the cutoffs using both the $200\mathrm{ng / mL}$ and $300\mathrm{ng / ml}$ levels.
{4}
For semi-quantitative analysis, 45 negative urine samples were spiked with various amounts of oxazepam (20-800 ng/ml, n=5 at each concentration). The average recovery is summarized in the following table:
| Target Conc. (ng/mL) | Found (ng/mL) | % Recovery |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20 | 18.9 | 94.4 |
| 50 | 52.1 | 104.3 |
| 100 | 108.2 | 108.2 |
| 180 | 173.4 | 96.3 |
| 225 | 218.8 | 97.3 |
| 375 | 379.8 | 101.3 |
| 450 | 468.1 | 104.0 |
| 600 | 575.1 | 95.9 |
| 800 | 791.2 | 98.9 |
Linearity values for the semi-quantitative analysis (targeted value vs. measured value) are as follows:
Slope $= 0.9838$
y intercept $= 3.4623$
$\mathrm{R}^2 = 0.9981$
# c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
Calibrators and commercial controls are specified in the labeling but are sold separately from the kit. Calibrators and controls are obtaining clearance in this submission.
A description of the concentrations is found in the table below. All calibrators and controls are diluted from a $1\mathrm{mg / mL}$ oxazepam standard solution, and are composed of drug-free human urine spiked with known concentrations of oxazepam.
| Reference Material | Benzodiazepine EIA |
| --- | --- |
| | Oxazepam |
| Calibrator #2/Control I | 100 ng/mL |
| Calibrator #3/Cutoff A/Control II | 200 ng/mL |
| Calibrator #4/Cutoff B/Control III | 300 ng/mL |
| Calibrator #5 | 1000 ng/mL |
| Control IV | 400 ng/mL |
The calibrators contain five levels of calibrator material (calibrators #2-#5 plus a negative calibrator). These are used in the semi-quantitative determination of benzodiazepines in urine specimens. Qualitative evaluation is performed using the negative control and one of the cutoff controls, Cutoff A or Cutoff B respectively, for the 200 and $300\mathrm{ng / mL}$ assay cutoffs. There are four levels of control material (Controls I - IV) which are used in the validation of the assay.
{5}
Page 6 of 10
Traceability of calibrators and controls is established through GS/MS analysis with an acceptance criterion of +/- 10%.
Real time stability studies of these calibrators and controls have been performed for 10 months and are ongoing. The assay reagents are aliquoted into two parts, one stored at 2-8°C and the other stored at room temperature. The rate performance of these populations are then assayed at various time points and compared.
d. Detection limit:
Functional sensitivity was demonstrated to be 15 ng/mL. Ten replicates each of 4 concentrations of oxazepam-spiked negative urine (from 0 - 25 ng/mL) were assayed (semi-quantitative), and the means and standard deviations were calculated. The %CV was below 20% at 15 ng/mL.
e. Analytical specificity:
To test cross-reactivity and potential interference, various potentially interfering substances were tested in the assay. Test compounds were spiked into the drug-free urine calibrator matrix to various concentrations and evaluated against the cutoff calibrator.
The top table lists the concentration of each test compound that gave a (positive) response approximately equivalent to that of the cutoff calibrator. Potentially interfering non-benzodiazepine compounds are listed in the bottom table as the concentration that gave a (negative) response below the response of the cutoff calibrator.
Response equivalent to cutoff:
| Benzodiazepine Compounds (Cross-reactivity) | ng/mL at 200 ng/mL cutoff | ng/mL at 300 ng/mL cutoff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Oxazepam | 200 | 300 |
| Alprazolam | 75 | 100 |
| Bromazepam | 2100 | 5000 |
| Chlordiazepoxide | 65 | 125 |
| Clobazam | 750 | 1300 |
| Clonazepam | 65 | 125 |
| Diazepam | 80 | 200 |
| Flunitrazepam | 50 | 70 |
| Flurazepam | 90 | 135 |
| Lormetazepam | 50 | 75 |
| Lorazepam | 90 | 165 |
| Medazepam | 23 | 70 |
| Nitrazepam | 150 | 220 |
| Norfludiazepam | 15 | 25 |
{6}
| Benzodiazepine Compounds (Cross-reactivity) | ng/mL at 200 ng/mL cutoff | ng/mL at 300 ng/mL cutoff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prazepam | 75 | 105 |
| Temazepam | 80 | 115 |
| Triazolam | 45 | 105 |
| Oxazepam-glucuronide | >10000 | >10000 |
| Lorazepam-glucuroinde | >10000 | >10000 |
| Temazepam-glucuronide | >10000 | >10000 |
No interference seen at:
| Non-benzodiazepines (Interference test) | (μg/mL) 200 ng/mL cutoff | (μg/mL) 300 ng/mL cutoff |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Acetaminophen | 1000 | 1000 |
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 1000 | 1000 |
| Amitriptyline | 180 | 400 |
| Amobarbital | 1000 | 1000 |
| Amphetamine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Benzoylecgonine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Caffeine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Chlorpromazine | 200 | 500 |
| Cocaine | 400 | 700 |
| Codeine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Dextromethorphan | 1000 | 1000 |
| Ephedrine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Imipramine | 300 | 500 |
| Meperidine | 600 | 1000 |
| Methadone | 1000 | 1000 |
| Methamphetamine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Methaqualone | 1000 | 1000 |
| Morphine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Nortriptyline | 600 | 1000 |
| Phenobarbital | 1000 | 1000 |
| Promethazine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Propoxyphene | 1000 | 1000 |
| Secobarbital | 1000 | 1000 |
| Valproic Acid | 1000 | 1000 |
| Lidocaine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Chlorpheniramine | 100 | 150 |
| Ecgonine | 1000 | 1000 |
| Bupropion | 1000 | 1000 |
| Ranitidine | 1000 | 1000 |
It is possible that other substances and/or factors not listed above may interfere with the test and cause false positive results.
{7}
Page 8 of 10
The sponsor did not evaluate the effects of pH, specific gravity, or albumin on this assay.
Glucuronide metabolites of oxazepam, lorazepam, and temazepam do not cross-react with the antibodies in this immunoassay. The cross-reactivity of other glucuronide metabolites with this assay is not known.
f. Assay cut-off:
The identified cutoff concentrations of the assay are 200 ng/ml and 300 ng/ml.
Characterization of how the device performs around the claimed cutoff concentrations is included in the precision section above.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
One hundred and sixteen (116) unaltered clinical urine specimens were tested with LZI’s benzodiazepine immunoassay and with the predicate device. No pre-determined criteria were applied in the selection of samples to be tested. All positive samples were confirmed with GC/MS or HPLC. A portion of samples having drug concentrations below the cutoff concentrations were also evaluated by GC/MS or HPLC.
**200 ng/mL cutoff:**
Using LZI’s assay, 66 samples were found to be positive, and 50 samples were found to be negative.
| | Predicate Assay | | % Agreement | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | | Negative |
| LZI Benzodiazepine EIA | Positive | 59 | 7* | 89.4% |
| | Negative | 0 | 50 | 100% |
**300 ng/mL cutoff:**
Using LZI’s assay, 63 samples were found to be positive, and 53 samples were found to be negative.
| | Predicate Assay | | % Agreement | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Positive | | Negative |
| LZI Benzodiazepine EIA | Positive | 57 | 6* | 90.5% |
| | Negative | 0 | 53 | 100% |
* All discrepant samples were confirmed as containing benzodiazepines by GC/MS or HPLC.
The study included an acceptable number of samples that contained (apparent) benzodiazepine levels close to the cutoff values. Because of the number of
{8}
Page 9 of 10
benzodiazepine family members and metabolites, each with varying cross-reactivity to the antibodies in the immunoassay, it is sometimes difficult to find clinical samples meeting the criteria. To further challenge cutoff performance, analysis using spiked urine was performed at values +/- 25% of the cutoff values (see Linearity section above).
The device as compared to GC/MS or HPLC analysis performed as follows:
| 200 ng/mL cutoff | GC/MS or HPLC | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | positive | negative |
| LZI Benzodiazepine EIA | positive | 64 | 2 |
| | negative | 8 | 42 |
10 Discrepancies:
LZI negative / HPLC 518 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 101 ng/mL Demoxepam
68 ng/mL Oxazepam
1889 ng/mL Temazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 280 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 526 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 1811 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / GC/MS 286 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / GC/MS 261 ng/mL Alprazolam
LZI negative / GC/MS 252 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI positive / HPLC 114 ng/mL Oxazepam
LZI positive / GC/MS 185 ng/mL Oxazepam
| 300 ng/mL cutoff | GC/MS or HPLC | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | positive | negative |
| LZI Benzodiazepine EIA | positive | 61 | 2 |
| | negative | 11 | 42 |
13 Discrepancies:
LZI negative / 461 ng/mL Clonazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 518 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 101 ng/mL Demoxepam
68 ng/mL oxazepam
1889 ng/mL Temazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 280 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 526 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / HPLC 1811 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / GC/MS 307 ng/mL Oxazepam
LZI negative / GC/MS 286 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / GC/MS 261 ng/mL Alprazolam
{9}
Page 10 of 10
LZI negative / GC/MS 311 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI negative / GC/MS 252 ng/mL Lorazepam
LZI positive / HPLC 114 ng/mL Oxazepam
LZI positive / GC/MS 185 ng/mL Oxazepam
The GC/MS and HPLC analysis included measurements of the following benzodiazepine compounds: clonazepam, demoxepam, alprazolam, oxazepam, lorazepam, temazepam, and norfludiazepam. Note that the sponsor claims that some of the false negative samples contained glucuronide-conjugated drug which their EIA antibody cannot detect. This was not analyzed by GC/MS or HPLC.
EIA assays were performed at the manufacturer's facility. GC/MS and HPLC analysis was performed at VA Medical Center, TX.
b. Matrix comparison: Not applicable.
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity: Not Applicable.
b. Clinical specificity: Not Applicable.
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b are not applicable): Not Applicable.
4. Clinical cut-off: Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range: Not applicable.
M. Conclusion:
I recommend that the Lin-Zhi International, Inc. Benzodiazepine Enzyme Immunoassay is substantially equivalent to the legally marketed predicate device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.