SYNCHRON LX SYSTEMS COMPLEMENT C3 (C3) REAGENT, SYNCHRON LX SYSTEMS COMPLEMENT C4 (C4) REAGENT, SYNCHRON LX SYSTEMS CALI
K032035 · Beckman Coulter, Inc. · CZW · Aug 7, 2003 · Immunology
Device Facts
Record ID
K032035
Device Name
SYNCHRON LX SYSTEMS COMPLEMENT C3 (C3) REAGENT, SYNCHRON LX SYSTEMS COMPLEMENT C4 (C4) REAGENT, SYNCHRON LX SYSTEMS CALI
Applicant
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
Product Code
CZW · Immunology
Decision Date
Aug 7, 2003
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 866.5240
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
C3 reagent, when used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX® Systems and Calibrator 1, is intended for quantitative determination of Complement C3 concentration in human serum or plasma by rate turbidimetry. C4 reagent, when used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX® Systems and Calibrator 1, is intended for quantitative determination of Complement C4 concentration in human serum or plasma by turbidimetry. The Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON LX® Systems Calibrator 1 (CAL 1), used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX reagents, is intended for the calibration of the immunoprotein tests on SYNCHRON LX Systems.
Device Story
The SYNCHRON LX Systems C3 and C4 reagents are liquid-stable, in vitro diagnostic reagents used for the quantitative measurement of complement components in human serum or plasma. The device operates via turbidimetric analysis (rate turbidimetry for C3; turbidimetry for C4) on the SYNCHRON LX spectrophotometric system. The system requires calibration using the LX Calibrator 1. The process involves mixing patient samples with reagents, measuring light absorbance changes, and calculating concentration based on the calibration curve. The output is a quantitative concentration value provided to clinicians to assist in assessing complement levels. The device is intended for professional use in clinical laboratories. It provides diagnostic information regarding complement protein concentrations, which are relevant to various immunological conditions.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Precision (NCCLS EP5-A): C3 total %CV 1.23-2.19%; C4 total %CV 1.68-3.09%. Linearity: r=0.999 (C3), r=0.9988 (C4). Method comparison (NCCLS EP9-A) vs. predicate: C3 (N=146, r=0.993), C4 (N=179, r=0.991). Matrix comparison (EDTA, sodium/lithium heparin) showed r ≥ 0.97. No clinical sensitivity/specificity studies performed.
Technological Characteristics
Reagent kit includes reaction buffer and polyclonal goat antibodies. Measurement via rate turbidimetry/turbidimetry at 340 nm. Automated, random-access spectrophotometric analysis. Traceable to IFCC BCR-470. Measuring range: 10-350 mg/dL (C3), 5-120 mg/dL (C4).
Indications for Use
Indicated for the quantitative determination of Complement C3 and C4 concentrations in human serum or plasma. Used in clinical laboratory settings for diagnostic testing.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A complement components immunological test system is a device that consists of the reagents used to measure by immunochemical techniques complement components C1q , C1r , C1s , C2 , C3 , C4 , C5 , C6 , C7 , C8 , and C9 , in serum, other body fluids, and tissues. Complement is a group of serum proteins which destroy infectious agents. Measurements of these proteins aids in the diagnosis of immunologic disorders, especially those associated with deficiencies of complement components.
Predicate Devices
Beckman IMMAGE® Complement C3 and C4 Reagents (K964842)
{0}
510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
A. 510(k) Number:
K032035
B. Analyte:
Complement C3 and Complement C4
C. Type of Test:
Quantitative, rate turbidimetry (C3) and turbidimetry (C4)
D. Applicant:
Beckman Coulter Inc.
E. Proprietary and Established Names:
SYNCHRON LX® Systems Complement C3 (C3) Reagent
SYNCHRON LX® Systems Complement C4 (C4) Reagent
SYNCHRON LX® Systems Calibrator 1 (Cal 1)
F. Regulatory Information:
1. Regulation section:
21 CFR 866.5240, Complement components immunological test system
21 CFR 862.1150, Calibrator
2. Classification:
Class II
3. Product Code:
CZW, Complement C3, antigen, antiserum, control
DBI, Complemen C4, antigen, antiserum, control
JIT, Calibrator, Secondary
4. Panel:
Immunology (82)
G. Intended Use:
C3 reagent, when used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX® Systems and Calibrator 1, is intended for quantitative determination of Complement C3 concentration in human serum or plasma by rate turbidimetry.
C4 reagent, when used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX® Systems and Calibrator 1, is intended for quantitative determination of Complement C4 concentration in human serum or plasma by rate turbidimetry.
The Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON LX® Systems Calibrator 1 (Cal 1), used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX regents, is intended for the calibration of the immunoprotein tests on SYNCHRON LX® Systems.
1. Indication(s) for use:
C3 reagent, when used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX® Systems and Calibrator 1, is intended for quantitative determination of Complement C3 concentration in human serum or plasma by rate turbidimetry.
{1}
Page 2 of 5
C4 reagent, when used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX® Systems and Calibrator 1, is intended for quantitative determination of Complement C4 concentration in human serum or plasma by rate turbidimetry.
The Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON LX® Systems Calibrator 1 (Cal 1), used in conjunction with SYNCHRON LX regents, is intended for the calibration of the immunoprotein tests on SYNCHRON LX® Systems.
2. Special condition for use statement(s):
Not applicable
3. Special instrument Requirements:
Use with automated, random access analyzers SYNCHRON LX 20 ((K965240), LX20 PRO (K011213) and LXi 725 (K023049). These systems were 510(k) cleared and belong to the same instrument family with the same intended use and measuring method. The LX20 PRO model differed from the LX20 by the addition of a near-infrared optics module. The LXi 725 model combines a LX20 PRO system, an Access® 2 Immunoassay analyzer and a sample handling module.
H. Device Description:
The SYNCHRON LX® Complement C3 or C4 Reagent kit consists of two Reagent Cartridges (100 tests each) and a lot-specific parameter card. The cartridge contains reaction buffer and polyclonal antibody to Complement C3 or C4. The assay kit has to be used with the analyzers in the SYNCHRON LX® family.
I. Substantial Equivalence Information:
1. Predicate device name(s):
Beckman IMMAGE® Complement C3 and C4 Reagents and Beckman Calibrator 1
2. Predicate K number(s):
K964842, K771603 and K791341 (the latter two are for the Calibrator)
3. Comparison with predicate:
| DEVICE | PREDICATE |
| --- | --- |
| A. Similarities | |
| Intended Use. - Quantitative measurement of C3 or C4 | Same |
| Sample Type - Serum and plasma (EDTA, sodium heparin and lithium heparin) | Same |
| Antibody Type and Source - Polyclonal, goat | Same |
| Reagent Form - Liquid, stable | Same |
| B. Differences | |
| Assay Method - Rate turbidimetry (C3) Turbidimetry (C4) | Rate nephelometry |
| Analytical Range - 10 - 350 mg/dL (C3) | 35 - 350 mg/dL (C3) |
| 5 - 120 mg/dL (C4) | 10 - 130 mg/dL (C4) |
| Initial Dilution - 1:20 dilution | 1:36 dilution |
| Extended Dilution Range -No | 5.83 to 12,600 mg/dL (C3) |
| | 1.67 to 4680 mg/dL (C4) |
{2}
Page 3 of 5
| DEVICE | PREDICATE |
| --- | --- |
| Instruments - LX family instruments (spectrophotometers) | IMMAGE Systems (nephelometers) |
| Precision (intra-assay %CV) –
0.96%-1.75% (C3)
1.32% - 2.37% (C4) | 2.5% - 2.9% (C3)
2.5% - 3.4% (C4) |
| Precision (total %CV) –
1.23%-2.19% (C3)
1.68% - 3.09% (C4) | 3.0% - 3.6% (C3)
3.4% - 5.2% (C4) |
J. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
None referenced.
K. Test Principle:
The SYNCHRON LX® System uses rate turbidimetry to measure C3 and turbidimetry to measure C4 in human serum or plasma. C3 or C4 in the sample combines with specific antibodies to C3 or C4 to form immunoprecipitin complexes. These complexes increase the intensity of light scatter in the reaction cuvette. The SYNCHRON LX® System monitors the change in absorbance at 340 nanometers. The change in absorbance is proportional to the concentrations of C3 or C4 in the sample. C3 or C4 concentrations are automatically calculated from the single-point adjusted, pre-determined calibration curves.
L. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1. Analytical performance:
a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Within-run and total precision studies were performed according to NCCLS Guideline EP5-A. For C3, 3 serum controls (low, medium and high) and a serum pool were assayed in duplicates, two runs per day for 20 days on a single instrument. The within-run % CV ranged from 0.96 to 1.75 and the total % CV from 1.23 to 2.19. For C4, 3 serum controls (low, medium and high) and 2 serum pools were assayed in duplicates, two runs per day for 20 days on a single instrument. The within-run % CV ranged from 1.32 to 2.37 and the total %CV ranged from 1.68 to 3.09. Results for both analytes were within acceptable limits.
b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity was evaluated by testing five serial dilutions of a high serum sample over the assay range. For C3, linear regression analysis yielded y = 0.994x - 3.55 mg/dL and r = 0.999 and for C4, y = 1.0079x - 0.4617 mg/dL and r = 0.9988. Results supported the linearity claim for the measuring range.
The assay measuring range for C3 is 10-350 mg/dL and for C4, 5-120 mg/dL.
c. Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
Calibrators are traceable to the IFCC reference preparation for plasma proteins, BCR-470 (EC-JRC-IRMM). Traceability process is based on prEN ISO 17511.
{3}
Page 4 of 5
d. Detection limit (functional sensitivity):
Analytical sensitivity is defined as the lowest measurable concentration that can be distinguished from zero with 95% confidence and was determined from the mean instrument reaction absorbance (IR) of 20 replicates plus 2 SD of samples below and above the minimal dose detection (MDD) (see example below). Analytical sensitivity for C3 is 10 mg/dL and for C4 is 5 mg/dL.
| Sample (C3) | Concentration (mg/dL) | | Reaction Rate (Abs/min) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Below MDD | 8.14 | Mean IR (N=20) | 0.00997 |
| | | SD | 0.00088 |
| | | 2SD | 0.00177 |
| | | Mean IR + 2SD | 0.01174 |
| Above MDD | 10.85 | Mean IR (N=20) | 0.01940 |
| | | SD | 0.00088 |
| | | 2SD | 0.00177 |
| | | Mean IR + 2SD | 0.01764 |
| 0.01764 > 0.01174 = PASS | | | |
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference was determined either by spiking different concentrations of each interfering substance into aliquots of a positive serum pool or by mixing a positive sera with a sample containing the test substance in various proportions. Interfering substances tested include hemoglobin (500 mg/dL), bilirubin (30 mg/dL), triglyceride (3+ lipemic pool), IgM (500 mg/dL) and rheumatoid factor (300 IU/mL). Recovery results were acceptable if they were less than 9% change of the known specimen mean concentration. No significant interference was observed.
f. Assay cut-off:
Not applicable.
2. Comparison studies:
a. Method comparison with predicate device:
Method comparison studies were based on NCCLS EP9-A. Patient samples covering the assay range were tested by both predicate and new devices. Results were analyzed by Deming Regression analysis and summarized below.
| Device | Concentration Range (mg/dL) | N | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) | Correlation Coefficient (r) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C3 | 10 – 350 | 146 | 1.052 (1.0317,1.0738) | -0.459 (-3.425, 2.4227) | 0.993 |
| C4 | 5 – 120 | 179 | 01.088 (1.0668, 1.1099) | -1.119 (-1.8168, -0.4399) | 0.991 |
b. Matrix comparison:
Anti-coagulant effects were evaluated by comparing EDTA, sodium heparin and lithium heparin plasma samples with serum samples.
{4}
For each anti-coagulant, plasma and serum samples were drawn from 56 healthy volunteers. Paired samples were analyzed using the C3 or C4 reagent on the LX System. The acceptance criterion was $r \geq 0.97$ . Deming regression analysis and bias plot were used to evaluate the results which are summarized below.
| Analyte | Anticoagulant | Level of Anticoagulant Tested | Deming Regression Analysis | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C3 | Lithium | 14 U/mL | y = 0.966x + 0.28 | r = 0.985 |
| | Sodium | 14 U/mL | y = 0.979x - 0.95 | r = 0.979 |
| | EDTA | 1.5 mg/mL | y = 0.855x + 5.27 | r = 0.988 |
| C4 | Lithium | 14 U/mL | y = 0.899x + 1.21 | r = 0.978 |
| | Sodium | 14 U/mL | y = 0.900x + 0.76 | r = 0.992 |
| | EDTA | 1.5 mg/mL | y = 0.967x + 0.34 | r = 0.985 |
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity: Not performed.
b. Clinical specificity: Not performed.
4. Clinical cut-off: Not applicable.
5. Expected values/Reference range: The reference interval values were previously established using the predicate device on 123 apparently healthy, non-smoking, adult male and female subjects. The values selected $(95^{\mathrm{th}}$ percentile) were verified with the new devices. The C3 range is from $79 - 152\mathrm{mg / dL}$ and the C4 range is from16-38 mg/dL.
# M. Conclusion:
Based on the review of information provided in this 510 (k), the analytical performance of the SYNCHRON LX® Systems complement C3 (C3) Reagent, SYNCHRON LX® Systems Complement C4 (C4) Reagent and SYNCHRON LX® Systems Calibrator 1 (Cal 1) correlated with the performance of the IMMAGE® Complement C3 and C4 Reagents and Beckman Calibrator and therefore, demonstrate that the new device is substantially equivalent to the marketed device.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.