The European ICEM Registry was used to support the expanded indications for the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter by demonstrating safety and effectiveness in a broader patient population (including combination surgeries, re-operations, and emergent cases) compared to the original US IDE study population.
Post-market registry; Cardiac surgery; Safety endpoint; Real-world clinical practice
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
European ICEM Registry; Prospective, consecutive enrollment registry
1645 patients undergoing cardiac surgery (including CABG, valve surgery, emergent cases, and re-operations); Sample Size: 1645; Number of Sites: 17
The EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is indicated for use with the EMBOL-X Aortic Cannula in first time, nonemergent cardiac surgery procedures to capture and remove particulate emboli from the ascending aorta and heart during and following cross clamp removal in patients aged 18 years and older.
Device Story
Device consists of heparin-coated mesh filter on flexible frame, locking cartridge housing, and proximal plunger mechanism. Used during cardiac surgery; introduced into aorta via EMBOL-X Aortic Cannula. Filter captures and retains particulate emboli as blood passes through basket; remains in situ for up to 60 minutes. Operated by surgical team. Output is physical capture of emboli, reducing potential for embolic events. Benefits patient by removing debris from circulation during/following cross-clamp removal.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical evidence from prospective European ICEM Registry (17 centers, 1645 patients). Composite safety endpoint compared to US IDE study (K022071). 98.2% of filters captured one or more particulates. Results showed comparable safety and effectiveness across broader patient populations, including those with prior surgeries or combination procedures.
Indicated for patients aged 18 years and older undergoing first-time, non-emergent cardiac surgery procedures to capture and remove particulate emboli from the ascending aorta and heart during and following cross-clamp removal.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A cardiopulmonary bypass arterial line blood filter is a device used as part of a gas exchange (oxygenator) system to filter nonbiologic particles and emboli (blood clots or pieces of foreign material flowing in the bloodstream which will obstruct circulation by blocking a vessel) out of the blood. It is used in the arterial return line.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for this device is the FDA guidance document entitled “Guidance for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Arterial Line Blood Filter 510(k) Submissions.”
{0}------------------------------------------------
## NOV 0 3 2003
## 510(K) SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS
1000
The following 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness information is provided in accordance with the requirements of 21 CFR §807.92 and SMDA 1990.
| 510(k) Number: | K031946 |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date Prepared: | OCTOBER 20 2003 |
| Applicant: | Edwards Lifesciences LLC |
| Address: | Research Medical Division, 6864 South 300 West, Midvale, UTAH<br>84047 |
| Phone Number: | 801 565 6231 |
| Fax Number: | 801 565 6177 |
| Contact Person: | Karen Jones |
| Trade Name: | EMBOL•X® Intra-Aortic Filter |
| Common Name: | Arterial Line Blood Filter |
| Classification Name: | Filter, Blood, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Arterial Line; 21 CFR<br>§870.4260; Class II |
| Device Description: | The EMBOL•X Intra-aortic Filter device consists of three primary<br>components: (1) a distal heparin-coated mesh filter, mounted onto a<br>flexible frame to form a filter basket for particulate emboli capture and<br>retention; (2) a locking cartridge housing for attachment to the EMBOL•X<br>Aortic Cannula side port, permitting access to the aorta and to ensure<br>correct orientation of the filter during use; and (3) a proximal syringe-like<br>plunger mechanism to deploy and withdraw the distal basket into and<br>from the aorta, via the cannula, during surgery. The filter is introduced<br>surgically into the aorta via the previously placed cannula, and particulates<br>are captured and removed as blood passes through the filter basket. The<br>filter may remain in situ for up to 60 minutes. The EMBOL•X Intra-aortic<br>Filter utilizes conventional medical grade materials and processes, and is |
provided packaged, labeled, and sterile, intended for single-use.
CONFIDENTIAL
{1}------------------------------------------------
- The EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is indicated for use with the EMBOL-X Intended Use: Aortic Cannula in first time, non-emergent cardiac surgery procedures to capture and remove particulate emboli from the ascending aorta and heart during and following cross clamp removal in patients aged 18 years and older.
Substantial equivalence is derived from a composite of characteristics Predicate from multiple predicate devices and detailed in K022071. The EMBOL-Devices: X Intra-aortic Filter is substantially equivalent in intended use, clinical application, principle of operation, design and materials, sterility and biocompatibility, and performance to the EMBOL-X Aortic Filter (K022071), the Medtronic Percusurge Guardwire plus temporary occlusion and aspiration system (K003992) and/or the Edwards Lifesciences AF-1025D/AF-1040D DURAFLO (heparin treated) arterial blood filter (K820044).
- The EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter has similar intended use, design intent, Technological principle of operation, materials, sterility and biocompatibility, accessory Characteristics: requirements, and labeling as that of the predicate devices. Any noted differences between the devices (specific indications for use, method of device delivery, specific physical dimensions and geometry) do not raise new types of safety or effectiveness questions, do not introduce new technological issues, and therefore do not impact the substantial equivalence of the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter.
- The results of biocompatibility, in-vitro (bench), and pre-clinical Non-Clinical Test (animal) tests from K022071 demonstrate that the EMBOL-X Intra-Results: aortic filter is sterile, biocompatible, meets established internal performance specifications, and satisfies the requirements of relevant external standards and applicable FDA guidance.
- Data to support the expanded indications for the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Summary of Clinical Filter were obtained from the post market European ICEM Registry of Studies: 1645 patients. Seventeen (17) centers in Europe enrolled patients in this prospective, consecutive enrollment registry.
The European Registry patient population was compared to the Filter Arm of the US IDE Study through analyses of the Composite Safety endpoint as defined in the US IDE Study (K022071).
{2}------------------------------------------------
The patient population of the Registry included the following patients: those undergoing combination CABG and valve surgery (14.9%); those who have had prior CABG or valve surgery (4.7%); those undergoing emergent cardiac surgery (1.5%); other cardiac surgery (eg. Myxoma excision. 2.7%) and patients less than 60 years (20.7%). In addition, there were a significant number European Registry patients who met the criteria for the US IDE Clinical Study or patients undergoing first time, non-emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement or mitral valve repair or replacement only, aged 60 years and older (51.9%).
A total of 98.2% of the EMBOL-X® Aortic Filters used in the Registry captured one or more particulates.
The composite safety endpoint was comparable between the IDE Eligible Registry patients and the Filter arm of the US IDE Study. There were no increases in the composite safety endpoint between the IDE Eligible Registry patients and the Non-IDE Eligible Registry patients which were combination CABG/Valve or re-operations. Patients undergoing emergent cardiac surgery had higher event rates and patients < 60 yrs had lower event rates, both are expected given the preoperative risk factors. Further adjustments for preoperative risk factors when compared to a published, validated univariate analyses of morbidity indicated that the observed odds ratio was less than the expected. Similarly, analyses of mortality and preoperative patient risk factors indicate that the observed mortality was comparable to the expected mortality rate seen in the European Registry patients.
## Conclusions Drawn From European Registry
The results from the post market European Registry demonstrate that there are no safety issues when the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is used in a broader patient population in cardiac surgery. The use of the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter does not pose any additional risk to the treated patient population when compared to the US IDE Clinical Study in K022071 and the clinical data from the European Registry demonstrate that the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is compatible with cardiac surgery procedures. It was therefore concluded that the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is safe and effective when used as indicated in the instructions for use.
- Review of the clinical performance of the device in a post market Summary: European Registry provides valid clinical evidence and reasonable assurance that the EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is safe and effective for its intended use in a larger cardiac surgery patient population, namely first time, non-emergent cardiac surgery procedures in patients aged 18 years and older.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized image of three human profiles facing to the right, with flowing lines above them.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
NOV 0 3 2003
Edwards Lifesciences, LLC. c/o Ms. Jean C. Chang Consultant to Edwards Lifesciences Embol-X, Inc. 6864 South 300 West Midvale, UT 84047
Re: K031946 EMBOL-X Intra-Aortic Filter Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.4260 Regulation Name: Cardiopulmonary Bypass Arterial Line Blood Filter Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Code: 74 DTM Dated: October 21, 2003 Received: October 22, 2003
Dear Ms. Chang:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Ms. Jean C. Chang
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4646. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
## INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known): K031946
Device Name: EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter
The EMBOL-X Intra-aortic Filter is indicated for use Indications For Use: with the EMBOL-X Aortic Cannula in first time, nonemergent cardiac surgery procedures to capture and remove particulate emboli from the ascending aorta and heart during and following cross clamp removal in patients aged 18 years and older.
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Qian Wella
Fordiovascular Devices KO31946 510(k) Number
Prescription Use X OR (Per 21 CFR §801.109) Over-The-Counter Use
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.