K031327 · Cvp Diagnostics, Inc. · DXN · May 12, 2004 · Cardiovascular
Device Facts
Record ID
K031327
Device Name
VERICOR
Applicant
Cvp Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
DXN · Cardiovascular
Decision Date
May 12, 2004
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 870.1130
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The VeriCor is indicated for use in estimating non-invasively, left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDP) pressure. This estimate, when used along with clinical signs and other patient test results. including weights on a daily basis, can aid the clinician in the selection of further diagnostic tests in the process of reaching a diagnosis and formulating a therapeutic plan when abnormalities of intravascular volume are suspected.
Device Story
VeriCor provides non-invasive estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) to assess intravascular volume status; serves as alternative to invasive pulmonary artery catheterization. Input data: airway strain (via digital manometer) and continuous blood pressure (via pulse tonometer) during Valsalva maneuver. Device guides user through patient coaching; records baseline, 8-15 seconds of expiratory strain, and 15-20 seconds post-strain. Proprietary algorithm converts physiological data into LVEDP estimate. Used in clinical settings by healthcare professionals to aid diagnostic and therapeutic planning. Benefits include reduced risk compared to invasive catheterization (e.g., hemorrhage, stroke).
Clinical Evidence
Clinical studies were conducted to validate the device. The device was clinically validated in males only; use in females has not been investigated. No specific performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC) are provided in the summary document.
Technological Characteristics
System integrates a digital manometer for airway strain and a pulse tonometer for blood pressure. Connectivity via computer interface to acquire data from component devices. Operates by analyzing physiological response to Valsalva maneuver. No specific materials or sterilization methods listed.
Indications for Use
Indicated for estimating non-invasive LVEDP in adult males. Contraindicated in patients with weight <40kg, atrial flutter/fibrillation with irregular response, significant ectopy, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, history of paradoxical emboli, intracardiac shunt, significant aortic valvular disease, unstable angina, history of embolic CVA, MI within one week, uncontrolled hypertension (>160/100mmHg), hypotension (<90mmHg systolic), symptomatic bradycardia, known cholesterol emboli, or poor LV function with thrombus.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A noninvasive blood pressure measurement system is a device that provides a signal from which systolic, diastolic, mean, or any combination of the three pressures can be derived through the use of tranducers placed on the surface of the body.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" around the perimeter. Inside the circle is a stylized symbol that resembles three intertwined human profiles or figures.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUN 7 - 2004
CVP Diagnostics c/o Dr. T. Whit Athey The Health Policy Resources Group, LLC Senior Consultant 2305 Gold Mine Road, Suite 200 Brookeville, MD 20833-2233
Re: K031327 Trade Name: VeriCor Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1130 Regulation Name: Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement System Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Code: 74 DXN Dated: March 31, 2004 Received: March 31, 2004
Dear Dr. Athey:
This letter corrects our substantially equivalent letter of May 12, 2004 regarding the classification of the subject device.
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Dr. T. Whit Athey
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to continue marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4648. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at their toll free number (800) 638-2041 or at (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.
Sincerely yours,
Megacmype
). Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{2}------------------------------------------------
# Indications for Use
K031327
510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name:
Indications For Use:
The VeriCor is indicated for use in estimating non-invasively, left ventricular end-diastolic (LVEDP) pressure. This estimate, when used along with clinical signs and other patient test results. including weights on a daily basis, can aid the clinician in the selection of further diagnostic tests in the process of reaching a diagnosis and formulating a therapeutic plan when abnormalities of intravascular volume are suspected.
The device has been clinically validated in males only. Use of the device in females has not been investigated. Certain patient conditions should be considered as a basis for excluding individual patients for testing based on a possible risk to them of the Valsalva maneuver, such as the following:.
- Weight <88 pounds (40 kilograms)* 1.
- Atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation with irregular ventricular response
- Significant atrial or ventricular ectopy 3
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy 4.
- History of paradoxical emboli 5.
- Known intracardiac shunt 6.
- Significant aortic valvular disease 7.
- 8. Unstable angina
- History of embolic CVA ത
- 10. Myocardial infarction within one week of intended VeriCor testing
- 11. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP > 160mmHg or diastolic BP > 100mmHg)
- 12. Hypotension (systolic BP<90mmHg)
- 13. Symptomatic bradycardia
- 14. Known cholesterol emboli
- 15. Poor LV function with LV thrombus
*Colin tonometer recommendation
Prescription Use _ X
AND/OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)
(21 CFR 807 Subpart C)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Duna R. LaClune
(Division Sign Off)
Page 1 of
Division of Cardiovascular Device
510(k) Number
{3}------------------------------------------------
K031327
# 510(k) Summary
MAY 1 2 2004
# VeriCor
Catheter, 21 CFR Common/Classification Name: Diagnostic Intravascular 870.1200
> CVP Diagnostics 160 Commonwealth Ave; Suite 801 Boston, MA 02116
Contact: Kevin McIntyre, Prepared: September 9, 2003
### A. LEGALLY MARKETED PREDICATE DEVICES
The VeriCor is substantially equivalent to the Arrow Balloon Wedge Pressure Catheter, which is a pre-Amendments device. The VeriCor device incorporates two independent medical devices that were previously cleared by FDA: The W. E. Collins Airway Pressure Monitor was cleared by FDA as K912946, and the Colin CBM7000 Pulse Tonometer was cleared by FDA as K900247. The VeriCor is substantially equivalent to these two devices in regard to many of its technological characteristics.
#### B. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The VeriCor device is intended to be used as one of several tools that will assist the cardiologist in assessment of the volume status of a patient, i.e., when the questions of either volume overload or volume depletion arises. A principal measure of intravascular volume status is the filling pressure in the left ventricle as best reflected by the left ventricular enddiastolic pressure (LVEDP). Measurement of the left ventricular enddiastolic pressure requires the placement of a catheter in the left ventricle of the heart to measure the pressures directly. This procedure involves a moderate risk to the patient but could result in arterial hemorrhage, stroke and death. Accordingly, it cannot be used as a routine procedure for patient assessment or for monitoring over time.
An estimate of LVEDP may be obtained with somewhat less risk to the patient by catheterization of the pulmonary artery as described above. The resulting measurement, called the Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP), correlates well with LVEDP. PCWP is widely used as an alternative to direct measurement of LVEDP, even though it has
{4}------------------------------------------------
potential for complications and limitations in accuracy that are recognized.
The proposed device, the VeriCor, is intended to provide another point on the risk/benefit curve for assessment tools. The VeriCor is non-invasive, so it involves much less risk than catheterization of either the left ventricle or the pulmonary artery. The VeriCor device provides measurements that are well correlated with PCWP measurements.
The Colin CBM7000 Pulse Tonometer and the W. E. Collins Airway Pressure Monitor each have an interface connection for a computer to read data from the devices. In the VeriCor, a computer reads data from these devices during a sequence of procedures with the patient, including the Valsalva maneuver, and, using a proprietary algorithm, converts the data to estimates of the left ventricular pressure.
The digital manometer is used to measure the airway strain of the patient blowing into the mouthpiece. The pulse tonometer provides an instantaneous and continuous measure of non-invasive blood pressure before, during and after the Valsalva manuever. Data are recorded from both devices so as to provide a baseline followed by a minimum of eight and a maximum of 15 seconds of modest expiratory strain which is followed by 15 to 20 seconds of post-strain recording. The computer controller acquires the data from the devices and provides a dialog with the health-professional user. The user coaches the patient to perform the necessary actions, and one or more practice sessions are used to ensure that the patient can perform those actions correctly.
## C. INTENDED USE
The VeriCor is indicated for use in estimating non-invasively, left ventricular enddiastolic (LVEDP) pressure. This estimate, when used along with clinical signs and symptoms and other patient test results, including weights on a daily basis, can aid the clinician in the selection of further diagnostic tests in the process of reaching a diagnosis and formulating a therapeutic plan when abnormalities of intravascular volume are suspected.
The device has been clinically validated in males only. Use of the device in females has not been investigated. Certain patient conditions should be considered as a basis for excluding individual patients for testing based on a possible risk to them of the Valsalva maneuver, such as the following:
- 1. Weight <88 pounds (40 kilograms)*
- 2. Atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation with irregular ventricular response
- 3. Significant atrial or ventricular ectopy
- 4. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
- 5. History of paradoxical emboli
000059
{5}------------------------------------------------
- 6. Known intracardiac shunt
- 7. Significant aortic valvular disease
- 8. Unstable angina
- 9. History of embolic CVA
- 10. Myocardial infarction within one week of intended VeriCor testing
- 11. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP >160mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 100mmHg)
- 12. Hypotension (systolic BP<90mmHg)
- 13. Symptomatic bradycardia
- 14. Known cholesterol emboli
- 15. Poor LV function with LV thrombus
*Colin tonometer recommendation
### D. SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE SUMMARY
The VeriCor is a medical device, and it has similar indications for use and target population as the legally marketed predicate device. The differences in indications statements do not change the intended diagnostic effect. The VeriCor has the same technological characteristics as two of the predicate devices, the W. E. Collins Airway Pressure Monitor (K912946), and the Colin CBM7000 Pulse Tonometer (K900247), though it has different technological characteristics from the primary predicate device. The different technological characteristics could affect the tradeoff between safety and effectiveness compared to the primary predicate device. However, no new safety and effectiveness issues are raised by the VeriCor device, and there are established scientific techniques for assessing the safety and effectiveness of the device. The performance testing carried out on the device assures substantial equivalence.
#### E. TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The VeriCor device incorporates the technological characteristics of the two previously cleared component devices, the W. E. Collins Airway Pressure Monitor (K912946), and the Colin CBM7000 Pulse Tonometer (K900247)
## TESTING F.
The results from clinical studies of the device are presented in the 510(k).
#### G. CONCLUSIONS
This 510(k) has demonstrated "substantial equivalence" as it is defined in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and related requlations and guidance documents issued by FDA.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.