K030907 · Bio-Logic Systems Corp. · GWJ · May 9, 2003 · Neurology
Device Facts
Record ID
K030907
Device Name
STACKED ABR FOR NAVIGATOR PRO
Applicant
Bio-Logic Systems Corp.
Product Code
GWJ · Neurology
Decision Date
May 9, 2003
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 882.1900
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) product family is indicated for use in the recording and display of human physiological data, for auditory screening purposes and to assist in determining possible auditory and hearing-related disorders. Auditory stimuli are presented to the patient's ear through an earphone or headphones, and the corresponding Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) from the patient are recorded using EEG electrodes placed on the scalp. Standard ABR testing is most used clinically for 2 reasons: (1) to predict behavioral audiometric thresholds, and (2) as an audiological testing tool to assist in the assessment of possible auditory nervous system abnormalities. The Bio-logic Navigator Pro EP System can be used from children to adults, including including infants and geriatric patients. The use of the Bio-logic EP family of products is to be performed under the prescription and supervision of a physician or other trained health care professional.
Device Story
Device is a software modification for the Bio-logic Navigator Pro Evoked Potential system. It records EEG signals via scalp electrodes in response to auditory stimuli (clicks/tones) delivered via headphones. The system performs standard ABR and 'Stacked ABR' analysis. Stacked ABR involves collecting multiple ABRs using high-pass filtered masking noise at octave steps (8kHz to 500Hz) to isolate frequency-specific nerve fiber responses. The software automates derived-band subtraction, time-alignment of Wave V peaks to correct for latency differences, and summation to produce a total response reflecting all frequency regions. It also employs noise estimation to weight data blocks by quality and terminate averaging when residual noise reaches a threshold. Used in clinical settings by physicians or trained professionals to assist in diagnosing auditory disorders. Output is a waveform display for clinician review to determine if referral for further testing is required.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided. The submission relies on the established nature of the derived-band technique (used for >25 years) and bench testing/software validation to demonstrate that the automated features perform the same data manipulation as manual methods.
Technological Characteristics
Software-based modification to existing Evoked Response Auditory Stimulator. Hardware remains identical to predicate. Features include automated masking, filtering, time-alignment, and noise-weighted averaging. Operates on the Navigator Pro platform. Design controls meet ISO-9001, ISO-13485, and ISO-14971 standards.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients of all ages, including infants, children, adults, and geriatric patients, for auditory screening and assessment of auditory nervous system abnormalities and behavioral audiometric thresholds.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An evoked response auditory stimulator is a device that produces a sound stimulus for use in evoked response measurements or electroencephalogram activation.
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo for Bio-logic Systems Corp. The logo is a black square with the words "Bio-logic" in white letters on the bottom left corner. Below the words "Bio-logic" is a horizontal line, and below the line are the words "SYSTEMS CORP" in smaller white letters. The logo is simple and modern, and it is likely used to represent the company's brand.
MAY - 9 2003
Sk-3
K03090
One Bio-logic Plaza Mundelein, IL 60060-3700 1-800-323-8326 Fax: 847-949-8615 www.bio-logic.com
# SECTION 2: SUMMARY AND CERTIFICATION 510(K) SUMMARY
Safety and effectiveness information concerning the Bio-logic Evoked Potential product and this device modification is summarized below.
Because this is not a CLASS III device, the special certification defined for this section is not required.
| PREPARED BY: | Bio-logic Systems Corp<br>One Bio-logic Plaza<br>Mundelein, IL 60060 |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| TELEPHONE: | (847)-949-5200 |
CONTACT PERSON: Norman E. Brunner
### DATE ON WHICH THE SUMMARY WAS PREPARED: March 17, 2003
NAME OF DEVICE: Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro.
COMMON NAME: Evoked Response System.
CLASSIFICATION NAME: Evoked Response Auditory Stimulator (per CFR 882-1900).
PREDICATE DEVICE: Bio-logic Navigator Pro, reference 510(k) #K994149.
## DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE:
The Bio-logic Evoked Potential family of products is intended to be used for the recording and display of human physiological data for auditory testing purposes and to assist in determining possible auditory and hearing-related disorders. . The predicate device referenced above is the latest in a series of systems of this type marketed by Bio-logic.
The Navigator Pro Evoked Potential Predicate Device performs ABR recording functions with two channels of simultaneous data recording. The software for the Navigator Pro implements the standard Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) functions common to most similar systems on the market for many years. One of these functions is the testing for auditory nervous system abnormalities but these measures are only effective once the abnormality has sufficiently progressed so as to affect a large number of fibers in the auditory nerve. The Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro device provides software additions to the Predicate Device for the purpose of displaying ABR activity
{1}------------------------------------------------
Special 510(k): Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro - Device Modification to Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) - Section 2
Koso907
affecting a subset of the nerve. These additional features include automated masking, filtering and data manipulation functions, which allow the observation of ABR test results for frequency band subsets of the nerve fibers in addition to the fibers as a whole.
The standard ABR test works on the basis of repeating a stimulus-response cycle. An auditory stimulation (click, tone, etc.) is presented to the patient through the use of an earphone or headphones. The EEG response from the brain is read through the use of one or more scalp electrodes placed on the patient. The response time of interest is approximately from 1 - 20 milliseconds following the stimulus. The response voltage readings for this time period are amplified, digitized and stored in the AEP system computer's memory. The stimulation is then repeated, the EEG response is read again, and this cycle is repeated many times . Each time the response is read. it is averaged together with all previous responses. The final data record is the result of averaging several thousand (usually 2000-3000) responses. This averaging process is necessary because the ABR signal is very small, much lower in voltage than the surrounding EEG "noise" present in the recording. The noise is averaged out over the many readings, because the noise will have a very low average net value. The result from the averaging process will be the signal.
The response generated from the standard ABR test is comprised of contributions from all fibers, that is, all frequency regions of the auditory nerve. Although all frequency regions contribute to the standard click-evoked ABR, its morphology is dominated by the high frequency fibers of the nerve because the contributions of the lower frequencies that would appear at longer latencies in the response are largely phase-cancelled.
Medium and large acoustic abnormalities that affect a large number of nerve fibers impact the standard ABR by changing the response parameters of the various ABR waveform landmarks. Abnormalities that impinge only on a region of nerve fibers, especially the low frequency fibers, often have no impact on the standard ABR measurements because the standard ABR is dominated by the healthy, high frequency fibers. ABR tests which provide electrophysiological data based on the response from all of the nerve fibers all at the same time do not attempt to isolate the responses of the low frequency fibers from those of the high frequency fibers.
The Stacked ABR device, the purpose of this 510(k), collects several ABR waveform responses, each representing the contribution of subsets of fibers in the acoustic nerve. It does this by collecting first a standard click alone ABR. Five additional ABRs also are collected using a stimulus comprised of the click mixed ipsilaterally with a high-pass filtered masking noise. The cut-off frequency of the high-pass noise is successively lowered from one run to the next in octave steps from 8kHz to 500 Hz. The portion of the auditory system that is masked by the noise does not contribute to the ABR. After the ABRs are collected, the derived band technique, a simple waveform subtraction process that has been used in humans for more than 25 years, is used on successive pairs of the ABR responses to derive the contribution from small frequency regions of the auditory nerve. The most prominent landmark, the peak of Wave V, is then identified in the derived bands. Since Wave V latency is affected by frequency, the Wave V peak in the derived bands will be later for lower frequency regions than for high frequency regions. In order to avoid the phase cancellation issues present in standard ABR, the Wave V peaks of the derived bands are aligned temporally before being summed to obtain a total response. This response equally reflects the contributions of all frequency regions of the auditory nerve. This is the Stacked ABR. The peak to trough amplitude of Wave V of the Stacked
**Page 8**
2 of 4
{2}------------------------------------------------
ABR can be compared to normative data or to the patient's other ear to determine whether referral for further diagnostic tests are required.
The Stacked ABR technique is a data manipulation of derived-band responses. It is possible to perform all of these manipulations using existing manual techniques in the Bio-logic Navigator Pro Evoked Potential Predicate Device. The Stacked ABR software simply automates the masking, filtering, time-shift/alignment and summing processes described above, to quickly achieve a new overall ABR more representative of the patient's hearing across all frequency bands.
In addition to the data manipulation techniques described above. Stacked ABR also uses noise estimation techniques to stop collecting data for averaging when the estimated residual noise level reaches a pre-selected low value. Standard ABR techniques stop the averaging process after a preselected number of stimulus-response cycles (sweeps). In the case of Stacked ABR, after each block of sweeps, the value of the averaged background noise for that block is estimated. Those blocks with lower noise are considered to be of higher quality than those with higher background noise, and are therefore weighted more heavily in the averaging process than those with higher noise. When the residual background noise in the average gets down to the pre-selected low level, the averaging stops. This results in a reduction of the effect of variations in the averaged physiological background noise on the interpretation of the ABR recordings.
## INTENDED USE:
The Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) product family is indicated for use in the recording and display of human physiological data, for auditory testing purposes and to assist in determining possible auditory and hearing-related disorders. Auditory stimuli are presented to the patient's ear through an earphone or headphones, and the corresponding Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) from the patient are recorded using EEG electrodes placed on the scalp. Standard ABR testing is most used clinically for 2 reasons: (1) to predict behavioral audiometric thresholds, and (2) as an audiological testing tool to assist in the assessment of possible auditory nervous system abnormalities.
The Bio-logic Navigator Pro EP System can be used for patients of all ages, from children to adults, including infants and geriatric patients. The use of the Bio-logic EP family of products is to be performed under the prescription and supervision of a physician or other trained health care professional.
3 of
{3}------------------------------------------------
Special 510(k): Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro - Device Modification to Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) - Section 2
K 030907
# SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS SUMMARY
To establish the safety and effectiveness of this modification to the Bio-logic Evoked Potential software, the modification was designed and incorporated into the product in accordance with the Bio-logic internal Product Development procedures which are intended to meet ISO-9001, ISO-13485 and FDA QSR Design Control specifications. A detailed Hazard/Risk analysis for the EP family of products was performed using the Fault Tree analysis (FTA) approach, and a detailed Risk Assessment for the Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro was written in accordance with ISO-14971, the International Standard: Application of Risk Management to Medical Devices.
The Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro software does not make any final decisions that result in any automatic forms of diagnosis or treatment. All program "recommendations" are subject to review by the EP Technologist or Physician, and may be modified, overridden or deleted as determined by a qualified user. The program provides additional functionality to allow the qualified user to review all raw data collected and perform other data analysis to suit his or her requirements.
The chart below provides a summary comparison of the technological characteristics of the new Stacked ABR device relative to the predicate Navigator Pro device. This is to demonstrate that this new Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro device has no significant differences which would adversely affect product safety and effectiveness.
| Parameter for comparison | Similarity or Difference |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Intended Use | No differences. |
| Population | No differences. |
| Hardware Configuration | No differences. |
| Computer Control Software | The Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro software is built on<br>the Navigator Pro software of the Predicate Device.<br>There are new automated features added to implement<br>derived-band ABRs, time-shifting and alignment to<br>enhance the wave V responses, termination of averaging<br>based on estimated residual noise level, and weighting<br>the averages with lower noise more highly than those<br>averages with higher noise. |
| Patient information and tracking. | No differences. |
| Patient connections (transducers and<br>electrodes) | No differences. |
| Presentation of Data / User Interface | The User Interface is essentially the same, except that the<br>presentation of data includes the Stacked ABR program<br>options. |
| Physical Characteristics | No differences. |
| Safety Characteristics | No differences. The basic patient connection and<br>isolation circuits are the same for both products. |
| Product Labeling | No differences. |
| Anatomical sites. | No differences. |
4 of 4
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo is a circular emblem with an abstract image of an eagle or bird-like figure in the center. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" are arranged around the upper half of the circle. The logo is black and white.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAY - 9 2003
Mr. Norman E. Brunner Vice President of Research & Development Bio-logic Systems Corporation One Bio-logic Plaza Mundelein, Illinois 60060-3700
Re: K030907
Trade/Device Name: Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro Regulation Number: 21 CFR 882.1900 Regulation Name: Evoked response auditory stimulator Regulatory Class: II Product Code: GWJ Dated: April 18, 2003 Received: April 21, 2003
Dear Mr. Brunner:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration. Iisting of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Norman E. Brunner
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97) you may obtain. Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
Muriam C. Provost
for Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known):
K030907
Device Name: Stacked ABR for Navigator Pro - Modification to Bio-logic Evoked Potential.
Indications For Use:
The Bio-logic Evoked Potential (EP) product family is indicated for use in the recording and display of human physiological data, for auditory screening purposes and to assist in determining possible auditory and hearing-related disorders. Auditory stimuli are presented to the patient's ear through an earphone or headphones, and the corresponding Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) from the patient are recorded using EEG electrodes placed on the scalp. Standard ABR testing is most used clinically for 2 reasons: (1) to predict behavioral audiometric thresholds, and (2) as an audiological testing tool to assist in the assessment of possible auditory nervous system abnormalities.
The Bio-logic Navigator Pro EP System can be used from children to adults, including including infants and geriatric patients. The use of the Bio-logic EP family of products is to be performed under the prescription and supervision of a physician or other trained health care professional.
### (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96):
Miriam C. Provost
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of General, Restorative
and Neurological Devices
| Labels | Values |
|---------------|---------|
| 510(k) Number | K030907 |
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.