K030020 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · MSD · Jun 16, 2003 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
K030020
Device Name
HEMOSPLIT LONG-TERM HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER
Applicant
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Product Code
MSD · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Jun 16, 2003
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Abbreviated
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5540
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The HemoSplit™ long-term hemodialysis catheter is indicated for use in attaining short-term or long-term vascular access for hemodialysis, hemoperfusion or apheresis therapy. Access is attained via the internal jugular vein, external jugular vein, subclavian vein, or femoral vein. Catheters greater than 40 cm are intended for femoral vein insertion.
Device Story
Dual-lumen radiopaque polyurethane catheter; straight or precurved configurations; bifurcated distal tip allows independent lumen movement in bloodstream. Features double-D cross-sectional shaft; venous tip molded for over-the-guide wire placement; integral suture wing for securement; acetal occlusion clamps on extension legs. Arterial and venous lumens identified by color-coded luer connectors. Used by clinicians for vascular access; provides blood flow path for hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, or apheresis. Benefits patient by facilitating reliable long-term blood access.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Conformance to ISO 594-1/2, ISO 10555-1/3, and ISO 10993 standards. Biocompatibility testing met requirements for externally communicating blood-contacting long-term devices. Design verification testing performed per FDA guidance for intravascular catheters.
Technological Characteristics
Radiopaque polyurethane dual-lumen catheter; double-D cross-section. Polycarbonate luer connectors. Acetal occlusion clamps. Sterilized via ethylene oxide (AAMI/ANSI/ISO 11135). Complies with ISO 10555-1/3 for intravascular catheters and ISO 594-1/2 for luer fittings.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients requiring short-term or long-term vascular access for hemodialysis, hemoperfusion, or apheresis therapy via internal jugular, external jugular, subclavian, or femoral veins.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A blood access device and accessories is a device intended to provide access to a patient's blood for hemodialysis or other chronic uses. When used in hemodialysis, it is part of an artificial kidney system for the treatment of patients with renal failure or toxemic conditions and provides access to a patient's blood for hemodialysis. The device includes implanted blood access devices, nonimplanted blood access devices, and accessories for both the implanted and nonimplanted blood access devices.(1) The implanted blood access device is a prescription device and consists of various flexible or rigid tubes, such as catheters, or cannulae, which are surgically implanted in appropriate blood vessels, may come through the skin, and are intended to remain in the body for 30 days or more. This generic type of device includes various catheters, shunts, and connectors specifically designed to provide access to blood. Examples include single and double lumen catheters with cuff(s), fully subcutaneous port-catheter systems, and A-V shunt cannulae (with vessel tips). The implanted blood access device may also contain coatings or additives which may provide additional functionality to the device. (2) The nonimplanted blood access device consists of various flexible or rigid tubes, such as catheters, cannulae or hollow needles, which are inserted into appropriate blood vessels or a vascular graft prosthesis (§§ 870.3450 and 870.3460), and are intended to remain in the body for less than 30 days. This generic type of device includes fistula needles, the single needle dialysis set (coaxial flow needle), and the single needle dialysis set (alternating flow needle). (3) Accessories common to either type include the shunt adaptor, cannula clamp, shunt connector, shunt stabilizer, vessel dilator, disconnect forceps, shunt guard, crimp plier, tube plier, crimp ring, joint ring, fistula adaptor, and declotting tray (including contents).
Special Controls
*Classification.* (1) Class II (special controls) for the implanted blood access device. The special controls for this device are:(i) Components of the device that come into human contact must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. Material names and specific designation numbers must be provided.
(ii) Performance data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
(A) Pressure versus flow rates for both arterial and venous lumens, from the minimum flow rate to the maximum flow rate in 100 milliliter per minute increments, must be established. The fluid and its viscosity used during testing must be stated.
(B) Recirculation rates for both forward and reverse flow configurations must be established, along with the protocol used to perform the assay, which must be provided.
(C) Priming volumes must be established.
(D) Tensile testing of joints and materials must be conducted. The minimum acceptance criteria must be adequate for its intended use.
(E) Air leakage testing and liquid leakage testing must be conducted.
(F) Testing of the repeated clamping of the extensions of the catheter that simulates use over the life of the device must be conducted, and retested for leakage.
(G) Mechanical hemolysis testing must be conducted for new or altered device designs that affect the blood flow pattern.
(H) Chemical tolerance of the device to repeated exposure to commonly used disinfection agents must be established.
(iii) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device.
(iv) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device for continued sterility, package integrity, and functionality over the requested shelf life that must include tensile, repeated clamping, and leakage testing.
(v) Labeling of implanted blood access devices for hemodialysis must include the following:
(A) Labeling must provide arterial and venous pressure versus flow rates, either in tabular or graphical format. The fluid and its viscosity used during testing must be stated.
(B) Labeling must specify the forward and reverse recirculation rates.
(C) Labeling must provide the arterial and venous priming volumes.
(D) Labeling must specify an expiration date.
(E) Labeling must identify any disinfecting agents that cannot be used to clean any components of the device.
(F) Any contraindicated disinfecting agents due to material incompatibility must be identified by printing a warning on the catheter. Alternatively, contraindicated disinfecting agents must be identified by a label affixed to the patient's medical record and with written instructions provided directly to the patient.
(G) Labeling must include a patient implant card.
(H) The labeling must contain comprehensive instructions for the following:
(
*1* ) Preparation and insertion of the device, including recommended site of insertion, method of insertion, and a reference on the proper location for tip placement;(
*2* ) Proper care and maintenance of the device and device exit site;(
*3* ) Removal of the device;(
*4* ) Anticoagulation;(
*5* ) Management of obstruction and thrombus formation; and(
*6* ) Qualifications for clinical providers performing the insertion, maintenance, and removal of the devices.(vi) In addition to Special Controls in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this section, implanted blood access devices that include subcutaneous ports must include the following:
(A) Labeling must include the recommended type of needle for access as well as detailed instructions for care and maintenance of the port, subcutaneous pocket, and skin overlying the port.
(B) Performance testing must include results on repeated use of the ports that simulates use over the intended life of the device.
(C) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
(vii) In addition to Special Controls in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this section, implanted blood access devices with coatings or additives must include the following:
(A) A description and material characterization of the coating or additive material, the purpose of the coating or additive, duration of effectiveness, and how and where the coating is applied.
(B) An identification in the labeling of any coatings or additives and a summary of the results of performance testing for any coating or material with special characteristics, such as decreased thrombus formation or antimicrobial properties.
(C) A Warning Statement in the labeling for potential allergic reactions including anaphylaxis if the coating or additive contains known allergens.
(D) Performance data must demonstrate efficacy of the coating or additive and the duration of effectiveness.
(viii) The following must be included for A-V shunt cannulae (with vessel tips):
(A) The device must comply with Special Controls in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (v) of this section with the exception of paragraphs (b)(1)(ii)(B), (b)(1)(ii)(C), (b)(1)(v)(B), and (b)(1)(v)(C), which do not apply.
(B) Labeling must include Warning Statements to address the potential for vascular access steal syndrome, arterial stenosis, arterial thrombosis, and hemorrhage including exsanguination given that the device accesses the arterial circulation.
(C) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate safe and effective use and capture any adverse events observed during clinical use.
(2) Class II (performance standards) for the nonimplanted blood access device.
(3) Class II (performance standards) for accessories for both the implanted and the nonimplanted blood access devices not listed in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(4) Class I for the cannula clamp, disconnect forceps, crimp plier, tube plier, crimp ring, and joint ring, accessories for both the implanted and nonimplanted blood access device. The devices subject to this paragraph (b)(4) are exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 876.9.
Medcomp Ash Split-Cath II Hemodialysis Catheter (K020465)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 3
# JUN 1 6 2003
K030020, AI Response HemoSplit
## HemoSplit Catheter 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness 21 CFR 807.92(a).
## General Information:
| Submitter Name: | Bard Access Systems, Inc.<br>[Wholly owned Subsidiary of C. R. Bard, Inc.] |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Address: | 5425 W. Amelia Earhart Drive<br>Salt Lake City, UT 84116 |
| Telephone Number: | (801) 595-0700 ext. 5525 |
| Fax Number: | (801) 595-5425 |
| Contact Person: | Glenn Norton |
| Date of Preparation: | April 14, 2003 |
## Device Information:
| Device Names: | HemoSplit™ Dual Lumen Catheter |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Trade Names: | HemoSplit™ |
| Common/Usual Name: | Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter |
| Classification Name: | 78MSD Catheter, Hemodialysis, Implanted<br>21 CFR 876.5540 (b)(1) - Class III<br>Implanted Blood Access Device |
| Classification Panel: | Gastroenterology and Renal |
Class III - No effective date has been established for the requirement for premarket approval for the device described in paragraph (b)(1).
## Predicate Devices:
- Opti-Flow (renamed HemoGlide) Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter, K010567, clearance date � 3/28/2001
- Medcomp Ash Split-Cath II Hemodialysis Catheter, K020465, clearance date 05/22/2002 �
## Summary of Change:
The modification to the HemoGlide Long-Term Dialysis Catheter, called HemoSplit, is a redesign of the distal tip configuration in which the lumens are bifurcated at a fixed point of separation, allowing independent movement of the lumens beyond the fixed point. The body of the HemoSplit catheter has the same basic design as HemoGlide with respect to the catheter shaft, bifurcation, and extension legs. However, the catheter shaft material is changed, as arethe new material/design for the luer connector.
## Device Description:
HemoSplit Long-Term Dialysis Catheters are dual lumen catheters available in straight and precurved configurations with multiple insertion lengths. HemoSplit catheter bodies are made from a polyurethane material that is radiopaque. The dual lumen shaft has a double-D cross-sectional design with a venous lumen tip opening molded to facilitate over-the-guide wire placement. The arterial and venous lumens are separated a maximum of 8cm proximal to the distal tip of the venous lumen, and are able to float freely in the blood stream. The molded bifurcation has an integral suture wing that is
{1}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 of 3
K030020, AI Response HemoSplit
suitable for use with StatLock® securement devices. Each extension leg coming out of the bifurcation has an atraumatic acetal occlusion clamp, which closes to the lumen. The clamps have integral tags with the priming volumes of the individual lumen printed on them. Red and blue colorcoded luer connectors identify the arterial and venous lumens, respectively.
## Intended Use of Devices:
The HemoSplit™ long-term hemodialysis catheter is indicated for use in attaining short-term or longterm vascular access for hemodialysis, hemoperfusion or apheresis therapy. Access is attained via the internal jugular vein, external jugular vein, subclavian vein, or femoral vein.
Catheters greater than 40 cm are intended for femoral vein insertion.
## Technological Comparison to Predicate Devices:
The technological characteristics of the HemoSplit Dual Lumen Catheter are substantially equivalent to those of the predicate HemoGlide and Ash Split-Cath II catheters in terms of intended use, application, user population, basic design, performance, labeling, packaging, and sterilization method.
## 510(k) Substantial Equivalence Decision Tree:
New device is compared to Marketed Device?
Yes.
## Does the new device have the same indication statement as the predicates?
Yes, with minor modifications.
## Does the new device have the same technological characteristics, eg. design, material, etc. ?
Yes. The principles of operation and basic design are a combination of the two predicate devices. The labeling of the Split-Cath II indicates that it is made of Carbothane. The split-tip configuration is fundamentally the same as the Split-Cath II. The dual lumen bifurcated catheter body and extension legs are the same as the HemoGlide. However, the HemoGlide's acetal luer connectors have been replaced with polycarbonate (PC) luer connectors.
## Could the new characteristics affect safety or effectiveness?
Yes. The split-tip configuration, the catheter body material change, and material/design change of the connector/bond could affect the safety or effectiveness of the device.
## Do the new characteristics raise new types of safety and effectiveness questions?
No. Safety and effectiveness questions are the same for all long-term dialysis catheters.
## Do accepted scientific methods exist for assessing effects of the new characteristics?
Yes. Reliance was placed on recognized standards to evaluate the device's performance. (See Non-Clinical Performance Data below.)
## 000026
{2}------------------------------------------------
P392 : o 3
K030020, Al Response HemoSplit
## Are performance data available to assess effects of new characteristics?
Yes. Bench testing was performed according to the referenced standards. The test results met the requirements and were compared to the predicate devices.
## Do performance data demonstrate equivalence?
Yes. Performance data demonstrate that the HemoSplit Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheters are substantially equivalent to the predicate HemoGlide Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheters and Ash Split-Cath II Hemodialysis Catheters.
## Non-Clinical Performance Data
As this change is being submitted via Abbreviated 510(k), the modification of the HemoGlide catheter was done with conformance to recognized standards:
## ISO 594-1:1986, Conical fittings with a 6% (Luer) taper for syringes, needles and certain other medical equipment - Part 1: General Requirements
ISO 594-2:1986, Conical fittings with a 6% (Luer) taper for syringes, needles and certain other medical equipment - Part 2: Lock Fittings.
In addition, design verification testing was conducted in conformance of FDA's Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission for Short-Term Intravascular Catheters, dated 3/16/95, to in-house protocols, and performed or evaluated based on the following FDA Guidance's and recognized standards:
- Guidance on Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission for Short-Term and Long-Term ● Intravascular Catheters, dated 3/16/95
- ISO 10555-1:1997, Sterile, single-use intravascular catheters, Part 1. General requirements ●
- ISO 10555-3:1997, Sterile, single-use intravascular catheters, Part 3. Central venous catheters ●
- AAMI/ANSI/ISO-10993-1: 1997, Biological evaluation of medical devices Part 1: Evaluation ● and testing, and the FDA Modified ISO 10993 Test Profile
- AAMI/ANSUISO 11135:1994, Medical devices - Validation and routine control of ethylene oxide sterilization
Results from biocompatibility testing met the requirements of ISO-10993, "Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part-1: Evaluation and Testing" and the FDA Modified ISO 10993 Test Profile for externally communicating blood contacting long term devices.
All test results confirm the modified device to be substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
## Conclusions:
The HemoSplit Long-Term Dialysis Catheter met all the performance criteria of the tests performed and, based on FDA's decision tree, is substantially equivalent to the predicate Opti-Flow Long-Term Dialysis Catheter, K010567, concurrence date March 28, 2001, and the Medcomp Ash Split-Cath II Hemodialysis Catheter, K020465, clearance date 05/22/2002
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of two main elements: the department's name arranged in a circular fashion around the left side and top, and a stylized symbol on the right. The symbol features three abstract human profiles facing right, stacked one above the other, creating a sense of depth and unity.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
JUN 1 6 2003
Mr. Glenn Norton Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist Bard Access Systems, Inc. 5425 W. Amelia Earhart Drive SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116
Re: K030020
Trade/Device Name: HemoSplit Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter Regulation Number: 21 CFR §876.5540 Regulation Name: Blood access device and accessories Regulatory Class: III Product Code: 78 MSD Dated: April 14, 2003 Received: April 15, 2003
Dear Mr. Norton:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of Act. However, you are responsible to determine that the medical devices you use as components in the kit have either been determined as substantially equivalent under the premarket notification process (Section 510(k) of the act), or were on the market prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments. If you purchase your device components in bulk (i.e., unfinished) and further process (e.g., sterilize) you must submit a new 510(k) before including these components in your kit. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
{4}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2 - Mr. Glenn Norton
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4616. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21 CFR Part 807.97). You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597, or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours.
David A. Bozman
Nancy C. Brogdon Director, Division of Reproductive, Abdominal, and Radiological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{5}------------------------------------------------
## HemoSplit™ Long-Term Catheter
## INDICATION(S) FOR USE STATEMENT*
I state in my capacity as Senior Regulatory Affairs Specialist of Bard Access Systems, that this notification [510(k)] for the HemoSplit™ Long-Term Hemodialysis Catheter is indicated for the following:
"The HemoSplit™ long-term hemodialysis catheter is indicated for use in attaining short-term or long-term vascular access for hemodialysis, hemoperfusion or apheresis therapy. Access is attained via the internal jugular vein, external jugular vein, subclavian vein, or femoral vein.
Catheters greater than 40 cm are intended for femoral vein insertion."
Signature of 510(k) Submitter:
Printed Name of Submitter:
Glenn Norton
4-14-03
Date:
*Suggested language and format to meet the requirements of sections 513(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, and sections 807.92(a)(5) and 801.4 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21.
Concurrence of Office of Device Evaluation
510(k) Number
K030020
David A. Segura
Division Sign-Off Office of Device Evaluation
*Prescription Use* ✓
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.