The Osse-Lign System is indicated for general orthopedic repairs. This includes such procedures as long bone fractures, bone grafting and reinforcement of bone. This system may also be used for supplementary fixation and reduction with approved bone plates, screws, pins, nails and bone grafting material.
Device Story
Osse-Lign is an orthopedic implant system for fracture fixation and bone reduction. It utilizes 2mm diameter 316LVM stainless steel cables in a 7x7x7 configuration. Unlike traditional cerclage methods requiring extensive soft tissue dissection to encircle bone, Osse-Lign uses specialized instrumentation (crimping, cutting, tensioning tools, and cable passers) to allow minimally invasive insertion and in-line fixation. Surgeons use the system to tension and secure cables across fracture sites or in conjunction with other hardware. By avoiding full bone encirclement, the system aims to preserve periosteal blood flow and reduce surgical trauma. The device is intended for use by orthopedic surgeons in clinical settings.
Indicated for general orthopedic repairs in patients requiring long bone fracture fixation (femur, tibia, humerus), joint fracture fixation (ankle, knee, hip, shoulder, elbow), and other fractures (olecranon, pelvis, patella, acetabular, trochanteric). Used for bone grafting, reinforcement, supplementary fixation with plates/screws/nails, and temporary reduction for ORIF.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A bone fixation cerclage is a device intended to be implanted that is made of alloys, such as cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and that consists of a metallic ribbon or flat sheet or a wire. The device is wrapped around the shaft of a long bone, anchored to the bone with wire or screws, and used in the fixation of fractures.
Dall-Miles™ Cerclage System by Howmedica (K971741, K961569)
SDB Cerclage System by Pioneer Laboratories (K992616)
Stainless Steel Cerclage Wire (pre-1976)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 510(K) SUMMARY
MAR 1 1 ZUU3
## Subject 510(k) Number
K023564
# Sponsor
Osseus, LLC
1118 South Orange Avenue; Suite 203 Orlando, Florida 32806
### Official Contact
Shawn T. Huxel, President/GM 34 Woodlane Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 Phone - (908) 997-0127 Fax - (908) 842-0347 Mobile - (908) 896-5893
Proprietary Name
Osse-Lign
### Common Name
Metallic Internal Fixation Device
#### Classification Name and Reference
888.3010 - Bone Fixation Cerclage
## Regulatory Class Class II
Device Product Code (Panel 87) JDQ
### Date Prepared 22 October, 2002
{1}------------------------------------------------
## Brief Description of Device
There is a need for an orthopaedic implant system that combines the minimally invasive techniques possible with traditional tension band wires with the strength, tensioning and security of modern cable systems.
Current tension cable devices currently in use achieve the re-approximation and compression of fractured bones by a cerclage method. The cable or wire is wrapped around the outside of the bone, implants and/or grafts. A crimp or swage fitting is then attached to the cable in such a way that both ends of the cable pass through the crimp or swage in opposite directions. Thus, a circle of cable is formed with the cable sliding freely through the crimp or swage. The circle or loop of cable is then tightened around the bone with one of a variety of tensioning tools. The tension is increased until the bony fragments are appropriately compressed together. A second tool is then used to crimp or swage the cable in order to prevent the cable from sliding, thereby securing the cable in tension. subsequently compressing the bone. A third tool is then used to cut the excess cable material.
Existing cerclage systems have numerous drawbacks. The cerclage method requires that the cable encircles the bone. As a result, an open surgical approach with extensive dissection of soft tissues must be performed. The cerclage method also requires large tools capable of tensioning the cable in two directions 180 degrees apart and crimping the cable with large devices. This increases the need for a large incision. Often, in order to securely grip the crimp for tensioning, tension in the cable must sometimes be released, resulting in loss of compression at the fracture site. Furthermore, by encircling the bone completely, periosteal blood flow is restricted in the area near the cable, potentially inhibiting fracture healing. Finally, many fracture types could benefit from the application of strong, flexible fixation with cables, but are not prone to the application of a cerclage method.
The Osse-Lign system incorporates cables that are similar in form and material to existing cable systems. However, the Osse-Lign system incorporates a unique set of tools, cable attachments and surgical approaches that permit the surgeon to achieve fracture compression and fixation either without completely encircling the bone or with a minimally invasive cerclage technique. Insertion of the Osse-Lign cables through minimally invasive surgical approaches is made possible by the unique implants and instrumentation. Finally, the in line cable fixation capability permits the use of cables through, rather than around fractures thereby increasing the possible indications for cables in fracture fixation.
### Implants
The Osse-Lign system comprises implants and instruments designed to permit the insertion, tensioning, crimping and cutting of cables without the need for cerclage or large incisions. The outer diameter of the cable is 2 millimeters (2mm). The cable and all
{2}------------------------------------------------
implants are manufactured from certified medical implant grade 316LVM (Low Carbon, Vacuum Melt) Stainless Steel. 316LVM Stainless Steel is currently used in a number of orthopedic and general surgical implants. The cable is of a 7X7X7 configuration.
Cables have fittings mechanically swaged or crimped onto the ends of the cable in the factory setting using power-crimping tools. No welding, adhesives, coatings or other materials are required in these processes thereby eliminating the risk of corrosion or introduction of impurities into the metal during the assembly process.
Instruments
The Osse-Lign System instrumentation consists of the following reusable manual orthopedic instruments:
- Crimping Tool ●
- Cutting Tool .
- Tensioning Tool ●
- Flip Anchor Insertion Tool/Cable Passer .
{3}------------------------------------------------
K623564 14/5
### Indications for Use
The Osse-Lign System is indicated for general orthopedic repairs. This includes such procedures as long bone fractures, bone grafting and reinforcement of bone. This system may also be used for supplementary fixation and reduction with approved bone plates, screws, pins, nails and bone grafting material.
Long Bone Fractures
- Femur fractures .
- 프 Tibia fractures
- 트 Humerus fractures
Joint Fractures
- Ankle fractures 해
- D Knee Fractures
- Hip Fractures
- Shoulder Fractures 트
- 트 Elbow Fractures
Other bone fractures
- Olecranon 트
- Pelvis fractures .
- Patella fractures
- Acetabular fractures
- 트 Trocanteric reattachment
- Fixation of fractures in conjunction with I/M nailing and plating techniques ■
- Stabilization of cortical onlay strut graft 대
- Temporary reduction techniques for ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) ■
{4}------------------------------------------------
# Basis for Substantial Equivalence
The substantial equivalence of the Osse-Lign System is based on the equivalence in intended use, materials, operational principals, and indications and contraindications to:
KO23564 15/-
- BMP™ Cable System by Biomet (K982545) 트
- Dall-Miles™ Cerclage System by Howmedica (K971741, K961569) ■
- SDB Cerclage System by Pioneer Laboratories (K992616) ■
- Stainless Steel Cerclage Wire manufactured prior to 1976 ■
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized image of an eagle or bird-like figure with three horizontal lines extending from its head, representing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the bird-like figure.
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
MAR 11 2003
Mr. Shawn T. Huxel President/GM Osseus, LLC 34 Woodlane Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
Re: K023564
> Trade/Device Name: Osse-Lign Internal Fracture Fixation System Regulatory Number: 21, CFR 888.3010 Regulation Name: Bone fixation cerclage Regulatory Class: II Product Code: JDQ Dated: February 24, 2003 Received: February 25, 2003
Dear Mr. Huxel:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Shawn T. Huxel
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
L. Mark N. Millikens
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{7}------------------------------------------------
## Indications for Use
510 (K) NUMBER IF KNOWN: KO 2 35 (e)
DEVICE NAME: Osse-Lign Internal Fracture Fixation System
The Osse-Lign System is indicated for general orthopedic repairs. This includes such procedures as long bone fractures, bone grafting and reinforcement of bone. This system may also be used for supplementary fixation and reduction with approved bone plates, screws, pins, nails and bone grafting material.
#### Long Bone Fractures
- 및 Femur fractures
- . Tibia fractures
- 트 Humerus fractures
#### Joint Fractures
- . Ankle fractures
- . Knee Fractures
- 제 Hip Fractures
- 트 Shoulder Fractures
- Elbow Fractures 제
#### Other bone fractures
- t Olecranon
- L Pelvis fractures
- Patella fractures l
- 프 Acetabular fractures
- l Trocanteric reattachment
- Fixation of fractures in conjunction with I/M nailing and plating techniques I
- 요 Stabilization of cortical onlay strut graft
- Temporary reduction techniques for ORIF (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) t
## (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE, IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
or
Over-the-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-1996)
Mark N Milken
1000-1 Ciere of Restorative and Nearchogical Devices
510(k) Number Page 13 of 183
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.