K023245 · Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc. · NJJ · Oct 21, 2002 · Ophthalmic
Device Facts
Record ID
K023245
Device Name
BLOOD FLOW ANALYZER (BFA), MODEL 408-100-01
Applicant
Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc.
Product Code
NJJ · Ophthalmic
Decision Date
Oct 21, 2002
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 886.1930
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
Tonometry for Measuring and Recording Intraocular Pressures and Intraocular Pressure Pulse Amplitudes, Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow, Pulsatile Ocular Blood Volume, Pulsatility Index Equivalent (PEQ).
Device Story
Electronic pneumatic tonometer measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) via sterilized single-use probe with integral membrane. Device samples IOP at 200 Hz for 5-15 seconds. Inputs: pneumatic pressure signals from eye contact. Processing: mathematical equations link IOP fluctuations to ocular volume changes and blood flow based on cardiac cycle. Outputs: IOP, pulse amplitude, pulsatile ocular blood volume, pulsatile ocular blood flow, and pulsatility index equivalent (PEQ). Used in clinical settings by eye care professionals. Provides quantitative ocular hemodynamic data to assist in glaucoma assessment and ocular vascular evaluation.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing and normative data study. Normative study conducted at six UK centers (n=1502 total, 777 normal subjects) to establish baseline pulsatile ocular blood flow. Normal defined by absence of glaucoma, ocular history, systemic hypertension, diabetes, vascular disease, or use of ocular/systemic beta-blockers. Reproducibility assessed via repeated measures on healthy volunteers; test-retest reliability confirmed no significant bias or first-exposure effect.
Technological Characteristics
Electronic pneumatic tonometer. Single-use probe with integral membrane for corneal isolation. 200 Hz sampling rate. 20 psi pump. ISO 9001/EN 46001/EN 13485 certified manufacturing. Software-based calculation of hemodynamic parameters.
Indications for Use
Indicated for measuring and recording intraocular pressure, intraocular pressure pulse amplitudes, pulsatile ocular blood flow, pulsatile ocular blood volume, and pulsatility index equivalent in patients requiring tonometric assessment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A tonometer and accessories is a manual device intended to measure intraocular pressure by applying a known force on the globe of the eye and measuring the amount of indentation produced (Schiotz type) or to measure intraocular tension by applanation (applying a small flat disk to the cornea). Accessories for the device may include a tonometer calibrator or a tonograph recording system. The device is intended for use in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K023245
# 510(k) SUMMARY
## Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Blood Flow Analyzer
### Submitter:
Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc. 2355 South 1070 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84119 Phone: 801-977-8970 Fax: 801-977-8973 Contact Person: David M. Silver Summary Preparation Date: September 25, 2002
### Device:
| Trade Name: | Blood Flow Analyzer (BFA) |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Common Names: | Tonometer and Accessories, Blood Flow Analyzer |
| Classification Name: | 886.1930 - Tonometer, AC Powered |
| Product Code: | 86 NJJ - Tonometer, Analyzer, Ocular Blood Flow |
## Legally Marketed Predicate Device:
K970887, Blood Flow Analyzer (BFA), Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc.
### Establishment Registration Number: 1722205
### Description of Device:
The Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc. Blood Flow Analyzer (BFA) is an electronic pneumatic tonometer capable of measuring and recording the intraocular pressure. The pressure measurements are made at a rate of 200 times per second over a period of 5-15 seconds. Contact with the eye is by means of a sterilized single-use per patient probe having an integral membrane that isolates the cornea from the internal pneumatic operation of the BFA. The pulsatile ocular blood flow is derived from the intraocular pressure measurements
{1}------------------------------------------------
acquired with the pneumatic tonometer using mathematical equations that link intraocular pressure to ocular volume change and volume flow.
The Blood Flow Analvzer (BFA) measures intraocular pressure with a high frequency response. The observed oscillations in pressure occur as a result of accommodating changes in the intraocular blood volume induced by the arterial blood pulse. The fundamental phenomenon can be gleaned by considering periodic bolus flow. As a bolus of blood enters the eye through the ophthalmic arterial system, the eye will expand. Since the fluid is incompressible and the eye is an elastic chamber, the eye will expand in volume in an amount that is equal to the volume of the blood that is entering the eye. Simultaneously, blood is escaping from the eye through the venous system, but at a rate that is slower than the incoming bolus. During the interval between boluses, the venous continues to drain. The inflow of fluid to the eye chamber is greater than the outflow for parts of each cardiac cycle and the inflow is less than the outflow during other parts of the cycle. Clearly the average inflow must equal the outflow rate. Thus. the net flow into the chamber is positive during periods of above average inflow, and is negative when inflow is less than average. The volume of the eve expands during periods of positive net flow, and contracts when the net flow is negative. Because of the elastic nature of the corneal-scleral shell of the eve, as the volume of the eve fluctuates with the cardiac cvcle, the intraocular pressure will fluctuate in direct response to the volume changes. Therefore, the intraocular pressure is physiologically related to the volume and volume change in the eve. The linkage between pressure and volume is the pressure-volume relation. The pressure-volume relation was derived by analyzing the pressure responses to injections of volumes of fluid to living human eves measured by direct cannulation of the eye connected to a manometer.
#### Definition and Calculation of Parameters:
TONOMETRY: The BFA is fundamentally a tonometer, using a pneumatic mode of operation. To measure the intraocular pressure, the instrument utilizes a probe that is a sterilized single-use per patient accessory. The probe tip is manufactured with an integral membrane that separates the tonometer's pneumatic air flow from the cornea. The BFA acquires the intraocular pressure of the eye 200 times per second and electronically captures the pressure readings in its computer memory. The BFA is capable of performing all of the standard. classic tonometric measurements, tonographic procedures and tonometric provocative tests. In addition, the BFA intraocular pressure measurement provides a value for the maximum intraocular pressure per pulse, the minimum intraocular pressure per pulse, and the average intraocular pressure per pulse. The difference between the maximum and minimum intraocular pressures per pulse is the amplitude of the intraocular pressure per pulse (Pulse Amplitude).
PULSATILE OCULAR BLOOD VOLUME: Using the pressure-volume relation and the BFA intraocular pressure measurements permits the calculation
{2}------------------------------------------------
of the change in volume of the eve sampled at 200 times per second. For each cardiac pulse. the difference between the minimum volume and the maximum volume during the pulse is the amplitude of the volume change for that pulse. The amplitude of the volume change per pulse is the pulsatile ocular blood volume (Pulse Volume).
PULSATILE OCULAR BLOOD FLOW: Over a single cardiac cvcle, the pulsatile ocular blood flow rises rapidly to a peak value at systole and then falls usually somewhat more slowly to a minimum value at diastole. The average pulsatile ocular blood flow is obtained from the pulsatile ocular blood flow curve as the average of the inflow during each pulse multiplied by the number of pulses per second. The reproducibility of the BFA pulsatile ocular blood flow measurement has been assessed using the method of repeated measures on normal healthy volunteers. The reliability of the BFA pulsatile ocular blood flow measurement has been further confirmed using test-retest repeated measurements on normal patients showing that variation in bias and first exposure effect were not significant. The pulsatile ocular blood flow result is presented in microliters per second or microliters per minute (user's choice).
PULSATILITY INDEX EQUIVALENT (PEQ): Gosling defined the pulsatility index (PI) in terms of the waveform of fluid velocity in vessels to be PI = (Peak to Peak)/Mean, where peak to peak is the magnitude of difference between the maximum and minimum velocity during a pulse cycle and mean is the mean value of the velocity during the pulse cycle. Color Doppler Imaging techniques can compute this quantity in terms of velocities. The BFA has actual net flow values (not just velocities) and therefore the "pulsatility index" is not computed relative to velocities. Instead, a "pulsatility index equivalent" is computed, where the word "equivalent" is used to denote that the concept is similar to the pulsatility index except that flow is used instead of velocity. The BFA calculates the peak to peak difference in flow and the mean flow from its pulsatile ocular blood flow curve and then performs the quotient (Peak to Peak)/Mean to produce the pulsatility index equivalent.
#### Study Protocol for Normative Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow:
A protocol and patient questionnaire were used to obtain data for determining the normative pulsatile ocular blood flow in males and females. The study was conducted at six optometric centers in the United Kingdom in 1995 and sponsored by OBF Labs (UK), Ltd. The definition for "normal" is a patient that answered all five questions of the patient questionnaire in the negative. Therefore the "normal" patient will have no family history of glaucoma. will have no significant ocular history (ocular diseases, ocular treatments or previous ocular surgery), will have no use of ocular medications, will have no significant medical history (systemic hypertension, diabetes, or vascular disease), and will have no use of systemic beta blockers. The overall sample size was 1502, with 777 subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria to be considered normal. The
{3}------------------------------------------------
normative data set was analyzed at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London and was referred to as "normal controls" for comparison of pulsatile ocular blood flow in asymmetric normal tension glaucoma and normal subjects.
#### Changes Between The Blood Flow Analyzer Cleared Under K970887 And The Blood Flow Analyzer That Is The Subject of This 510(k) Submission:
The differences in the device from K970887 to this present submission are mainly cosmetic. Briefly, the changes were: outer casing, LCD screen, button color, pump (from a 12 psi to 20 psi), and software changes. These changes were incorporated into the device utilizing documented procedures. Paradigm is in substantial compliance with 21 CFR Part 820 and is an ISO 9001/EN 46001/EN13485 Certified manufacturing facility.
#### Intended Use of the Device:
The intended Indications for Use for the Blood Flow Analyzer are: Tonometry for Measuring and Recording Intraocular Pressures and Intraocular Pressure Pulse Amplitudes, Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow, Pulsatile Ocular Blood Volume, Pulsatility Index Equivalent (PEQ).
{4}------------------------------------------------
### DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services - USA. The seal features the department's name arranged in a circular pattern around a central emblem. The emblem is a stylized representation of a human figure embracing a bird, symbolizing care and protection.
OCT 21 2002
Food and Drug Administratio 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850
Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc. c/o David M. Silver, Ph.D; Director 2355 South 1070 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84119
K023245 Re: .
Trade Name: Blow Flow Analyzer (BFA) Classification Regulation Number: 886.1930 Regulation Name: Tonometer Regulatory Class: II Product Code: NJJ Dated: September 30, 2002 Received: September 30, 2002
Dear Dr. Silver:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807): labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - David M. Silver, Ph.D; Director
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4613. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrl/dsma/dsmamain.html
Sincerely yours,
A. Ralph Rosenthal
A. Ralph Rosenthal, M.D. Director Division of Ophthalmic and Ear, Nose and Throat Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
{6}------------------------------------------------
510(k) Number (if known):
KC23245
Blood Flow Analyzer (BFA) Device Name:
Indications For Use:
Tonometry for Measuring and Recording Intraocular Pressures and Intraocular Pressure Pulse Amplitudes
Pulsatile Ocular Blood Flow
Pulsatile Ocular Blood Volume
Pulsatility Equivalence Index (PEQ)
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE – CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Evenette Been
Division of Ophthalmic Ear,
Nose and Throat Devises
510(k) Number K023245
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.