When used as a nonpedicle, noncervical posterior system, the ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for: (1) degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); (2) spondylolisthesis; (3) fracture; (4) spinal stenosis; (5) deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), (5) tumor, (6) pseudoarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion. ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for skeletally mature patients: (1) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 joint; (2) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (3) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (1.3 and below); and (4) who are having the device removed after the development of solid fusion mass. When used as a pedicle screw system in the non-cervical spine of skeletally mature patients, the ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective of neurological impairment, (2) fracture, (3) dislocation, (4) scoliosis, (6) spinal tumor, and (7) failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
Device Story
The ORIA Spinal Clip System is a posterior spinal fixation assembly used by spinal surgeons to stabilize spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion. The system consists of various mechanical components including hooks, nuts, clips, rods, crosslinks, pedicle screws, and sacral screws. These components are assembled by the surgeon to fit the patient's specific anatomical requirements. The device is implanted during surgery to provide mechanical stability for the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. By immobilizing the spinal segments, the system facilitates the development of a solid fusion mass. The device is supplied non-sterile and requires high-temperature steam sterilization prior to use.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Static and fatigue testing were performed, including compression bending, tension bending, and torsion tests. Fatigue testing followed a modified Cunningham model; constructs met performance expectations with at least two run-out points exceeding 5,000,000 load cycles at clinically useful loads.
Technological Characteristics
Constructed from certified implant-grade commercially pure titanium alloy and stainless steel. Components include hooks, nuts, clips, rods, crosslinks, pedicle screws, and sacral screws. Mechanical performance validated via static and fatigue testing (modified Cunningham model). Supplied non-sterile; requires steam sterilization (gravity cycle, 250°F/121°C for 30 minutes).
Indications for Use
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, fracture, spinal stenosis, deformities (scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis, or failed previous fusion. Specific use for severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3-4) at L5-S1. Contraindicated for non-skeletally mature patients or conditions outside specified spinal instabilities.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis is a device intended to be implanted made of an alloy, such as stainless steel, that consists of various hooks and a posteriorly placed compression or distraction rod. The device is implanted, usually across three adjacent vertebrae, to straighten and immobilize the spine to allow bone grafts to unite and fuse the vertebrae together. The device is used primarily in the treatment of scoliosis (a lateral curvature of the spine), but it also may be used in the treatment of fracture or dislocation of the spine, grades 3 and 4 of spondylolisthesis (a dislocation of the spinal column), and lower back syndrome.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
KC021679
page 1 of 4
NOV 1 9 2002
| Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Information | EUROSURGICAL, S.A. |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| Premarket Notification, Section 510(k) | OCTOBER 24, 2002 |
1. Device Name: ORIA SPINAL CLIP SYSTEM
- Common Name(s): Pedicle screw spine system
Classification Name(s): Pedicle Screw Spinal System Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation Device System
## 2. Establishment Information:
Name: Eurosurgical, S.A.
Number: 9032545
Address: BP 23-18, rue Robespierre Beaurains, FRANCE 62217 33 3 21 21 59 60 - voice 33 3 21 21 59 70 - fax www.eurosurgical.com
3. Classification(s): § 888.3050 - Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis § 888.3070 - Pedicle Screw Spinal System
Class II (special controls) apply to all such systems. Pedicle screw spinal systems must comply with the following special controls:
(i) Compliance with material standards,
(ii) Compliance with mechanical testing standard,
- (iii) Compliance with biocompatability standard, and
(iv) Labeling which contains the following statements in addition to other appropriate labeling information.
"Warning: The safety and effectiveness of pedicle screw spinal systems have been established only for spinal conditions with significant mechanical instability or deformity requiring fusion with instrumentation. These conditions are significant mechanical instability or deformity of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine secondary to degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis). The safety and effectiveness of these devices for any other conditions are unknown."
"Precaution: The implantation of pedicle screw spinal systems should be performed only by experienced spinal surgeons with specific training in the use of this pedicle screw spinal system because this is a technically demanding procedure presenting a risk of serious injury to the patient."
{1}------------------------------------------------
021679
page 2 of 4
(b) Pedicle screw spinal systems for all other uses (1) Identification. Pedicle screw spinal systems for all other uses are multiple component devices, made from a variety of materials, including alloys such as 316L stainless steel, 316LVM stainless steel, 22Cr-13Ni-5Mn stainless steel, Ti-6Al-4V, and unalloyed titanium, that allows the surgeon to build an implant system to fit the patient's anatomical and physiological requirements. Such a spinal implant assembly consists of a combination of anchors (e.g., bolts, hooks, and/or screws); interconnection mechanisms incorporating nuts, screws, sleeves, or bolts; longitudinal members (e.g., plates, rods, and/or plate/rod combinations); and/or transverse connectors.
(2) Classification. Class III (premarket approval)
(c) Date PMA or notice of completion of a PDP is required. An approved PMA or a declared completed PDP must be in effect before placing the device in commercial distribution. See Sec. 888.3.
Class II for the requested indications Device Class:
Classification Panel: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel
Product Code(s): KWP, MNH and MNI respectively
## 4. Equivalent Predicate Device:
The ORIA Spinal Clip System is substantially equivalent to several legally marketed spinal device The system has been evaluated and found to be substantially equivalent to devices systems. marketed in the following categories:
§ 888.3050 -- Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis § 888.3070 - Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation Device System § 888.3070 - Pedicle Screw Spinal System (Class II Uses)
The comparison devices use various rods, screws, crosslinks, couplers, bushings, inserts and other components intended for use in the treatment of spinal instability or deformity. Equivalency can be seen with respect to the design, material composition, labeling, indications for use, cautions, precautions and warnings.
## રું Device Description:
- System Components Include: Hooks Nuts Clips Rods Crosslinks Pedicle Screws Sacral Screws Unique Instrumentation
Materials: Certified implant grades of commercially pure titanium alloy and stainless steel are used to make the implants of the system.
## Intended Use - Indications for Use:
When used as a nonpedicle, noncervical posterior system, the ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for: (1) degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the
{2}------------------------------------------------
Koa1679 page 3 of 4
disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); (2) spondylolisthesis; (3) fracture; (4) spinal stenosis; (5) deformities (i.e., scoliosis, lordosis), (5) tumor, (6) pseudoarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion.
ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for skeletally mature patients: (1) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 joint; (2) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only: (3) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (1.3 and below); and (4) who are having the device removed after the development of solid fusion mass.
When used as a pedicle screw system in the non-cervical spine of skeletally mature patients, the ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective of neurological impairment, (2) fracture, (3) dislocation, (4) scoliosis, (6) spinal tumor, and (7) failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
Testing Summary: Static and fatigue testing were conducted. Static tests of compression bending, tension bending and torsion of a typical system configuration indicated design performance was met. All samples were fatigue tested according to a modified Cunningham model. Samples subjected to cyclic fatigue testing also performed according to expectations. Constructs were tested and an SN curve established. At least two run out points exceeded 5,000,000 load cycles at clinically useful loads.
#### 6. Company Contact:
Mr. Emmanuel Margerit Eurosurgical, S.A. BP 23-18, rue Robespierre Beaurains, FRANCE 62217 33 3 21 21 59 60 - voice 33 3 21 21 59 70 - fax www.eurosurgical.com
- 7. Submission Correspondent:
Mr. David W. Schlerf Buckman Company, Inc. 200 Gregory Lane, Suite C-100 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3389 925.356.2640 - 925.356.2654 - fax
#### 8. Performance Standards:
United States Food and Drug Administration mandated performance standards for this device do not exist. Various voluntary performance standards are utilized. Voluntary standards utilized include ASTM. Standard Operating Procedures, vendor & process certification procedures, Quality Systems Regulations, ISO materials standards and ISO 9001 series quality regulations.
{3}------------------------------------------------
Koa1679 page 40f4
Eurosurgical, S.A. also meets appropriate general controls authorized under Sections 501, 502, 510, 516, 518, 519, and 520 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
## Special Controls: 9.
Special controls were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 63, No. 143, July 27, 1998 (Orthopedic Devices: Classification and Reclassification of Pedicle Screw Spinal Systems). The following special controls apply to the marketing of this device when used as a posterior pedicle system:
- Compliance with material standards, (i)
- Compliance with mechanical testing standard, (ii)
- (iii) Compliance with biocompatability standard, and
- Compliance with specified labeling requirements. (iv)
#### 10. Sterilization Information:
The ORIA Spinal Clip System is supplied "NON-STERILE" and must be sterilized prior to use. The recommended sterilization process is high temperature sterilization. The recommended sterilization cycle will produce a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of at least 106.
## The validated cycle is:
| Method: | Steam |
|----------------|---------------|
| Cycle: | Gravity |
| Temperature: | 250°F (121°C) |
| Exposure Time: | 30 minutes |
{4}------------------------------------------------
# DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a stylized eagle with three stripes extending from its head, representing the department's mission to protect the health of all Americans and provide essential human services. The text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES • USA" is arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
## Public Health Service
Food and Drug Administration 9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville MD 20850 .
Eurosurgical S.A. c/o Mr. David W. Schlerf Regulatory Consultant Buckman Company 200 Gregory Lane Suite C-100 Pleasant Hill, California 94529
> K021679 Trade Name: ORIA Spinal Clip System Regulation Numbers: 888.3050 and 888.3070 Regulation Names: Spinal Interlaminal Fixation Orthosis; Pedicle Screw Spinal System; and Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation Device System
Regulatory Class: II Product Codes: KWP: MNI; and MNH Dated: September 8, 2002 Received: September 30, 2002
Dear Mr. Schlerf:
Re:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food. Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{5}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2 - Mr. David W. Schlerf
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.
Sincerely vours.
Mark n Milkenson
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Number : K021697 צו ורוב | R
# Device Name(s): ORIA Spinal Clip System
# Intended Use(s) of the Device:
When used as a nonpedicle, noncervical posterior system, the ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for: (1) degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies); (2) spondylolisthesis; (3) fracture; (4) spinal stenosis; (5) deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), (5) tumor, (6) pseudoarthrosis, (7) tumor resection, and/or (8) failed previous fusion.
ORIA Spinal Clip System is indicated for skeletally mature patients: (1) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at L5-S1 joint; (2) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (3) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine (1.3 and below); and (4) who are having the device removed after the development of solid fusion mass.
When used as a pedicle screw system in the non-cervical spine of skeletally mature patients, the ORLA Spinal Clip System is indication and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chromic instabilities of the thoracic. lumbar, and sacral spine: (1) degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, (2) fracture, (3) dislocation, (4) scoliosis, (6) spinal tumor, and (7) failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NECESSARY Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
OR
Mark A. Millers
Division Sign-Off Division of General, Restorativ and Neurological Devices
510(k) Number K021679
Over-The-Counter Use
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
(Optional format 1-2-96
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.