SYSMEX AUTOMATED COAGULATION ANALYZER, MODEL #CA-7000
K020979 · Dade Behring, Inc. · GKP · Jun 27, 2002 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
K020979
Device Name
SYSMEX AUTOMATED COAGULATION ANALYZER, MODEL #CA-7000
Applicant
Dade Behring, Inc.
Product Code
GKP · Hematology
Decision Date
Jun 27, 2002
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Traditional
Regulation
21 CFR 864.5400
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The intended use of the Sysmex® CA-7000 is as a fully automated, computerized blood plasma coagulation analyzer for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories. The instrument uses citrated human plasma to perform coagulation tests.
Device Story
The Sysmex CA-7000 is a fully automated, computerized coagulation analyzer designed for clinical laboratory use. It processes citrated human plasma samples to perform various coagulation assays, including Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), Fibrinogen, and specific factor/chromogenic assays. The device automates sample handling and measurement, providing quantitative results that assist clinicians in evaluating patient coagulation status and managing pathological conditions. Healthcare providers use the output to inform clinical decision-making regarding patient hemostasis and therapeutic monitoring. The system functions as a high-throughput diagnostic tool, replacing manual or semi-automated methods to improve laboratory efficiency and result consistency.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical correlation studies compared the CA-7000 against predicate devices (CA-6000 and BCS) using patient samples (n=104 to 381 per assay). Results showed strong correlation (r=0.953 to 0.999). Precision studies (n=40 per control level) demonstrated robust performance with total CVs generally <5% for most assays, with some reaching up to 9.2% for specific heparin controls. No clinical outcomes data provided; evidence is based on analytical method comparison and precision testing.
Technological Characteristics
Automated coagulation analyzer; utilizes citrated human plasma; performs coagulometric and chromogenic assays; computerized processing; high-throughput clinical laboratory form factor; in vitro diagnostic use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories to perform coagulation tests on citrated human plasma samples from patients requiring coagulation assessment.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A coagulation instrument is an automated or semiautomated device used to determine the onset of clot formation for in vitro coagulation studies.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). A fibrometer or coagulation timer intended for use with a coagulation instrument is exempt from the premarket notification procedures in subpart E of part 807 of this chapter subject to the limitations in § 864.9.
Behring Coagulation System (BCS™ System) (K970431, K000973)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
16 2099
## 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Information Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-7000 March 26, 2002
Dade Behring Inc. 13251 NW 9th Terrace Miami, FL 33182 Contact Person: Radames Riesgo at 305.480.7558 or by facsimile at 305.552.5288
JUN 2 7 2002
| Trade or Proprietary Name: Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-7000 | | | | | |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
| Common or Usual Name: | Automated Coagulation System | |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|
| Classification Name: | Coagulation Instrument (21 CFR §864.5400) | |
| Registration Number: | | |
| | Manufacturing Site<br>Sysmex Corporation<br>Kobe, Japan | 9613959 |
| | Importer<br>Sysmex Corporation of America<br>One Wildlife Way<br>Long Grove, IL 60047-9596 | 1422681 |
| | Distributer<br>Dade Behring Inc.<br>Glasgow Site<br>P.O. Box 6101<br>Newark, DE 19714-6101 | 2517506 |
The CA-7000 is substantially equivalent in intend use and technological characteristics to the Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-6000, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan, which was cleared by FDA under Document Control Nos. K964139, K992321, K993174 and K001145; or the Behring Coagulation System (BCS™ System), Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany, which was cleared by FDA under Document Control Nos. K970431 and K000973.
As demonstrated by clinical correlation studies, the performance claims of the proposed device are similar to the predicate devices. During those studies, specimens were evaluated from apparently healthy individuals and from patients with different pathological conditions which are expected to affect the results for a particular assay. The following summaries show the results of the comparison studies between the proposed and the predicate devices as well as the results of of the precision studies performed with the CA-7000 analyzer.
{1}------------------------------------------------
| Test | Predicate<br>Device | Sample<br>Number<br>(n) | Coefficient of<br>Correlation<br>(r) | Regression<br>Equitation |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Prothrombin Time<br>(Innovin®, seconds) | CA-6000 | 155 | 0.999 | Y = 0.97X + 0.38 |
| Prothrombin Time<br>(Innovin®, INR) | CA-6000 | 155 | 0.999 | Y = 0.95X + 0.04 |
| Prothrombin Time<br>(Thromborel® S, seconds) | BCS | 174 | 0.997 | Y = 1.09X - 1.54 |
| Prothrombin Time<br>(Thromborel® S, % PT) | BCS | 168 | 0.984 | Y = 0.98X - 3.40 |
| Derived Fibrinogen | CA-6000 | 104 | 0.991 | Y = 1.02X + 0.12 |
| Activated Partial<br>Thromboplastin Time | CA-6000 | 151 | 0.997 | Y = 1.03X - 0.01 |
| Fibrinogen (Clauss) | CA-6000 | 134 | 0.994 | Y = 0.91X + 0.05 |
| Factor VII | BCS | 124 | 0.993 | Y = 1.14X - 2.66 |
| Factor VIII | BCS | 143 | 0.977 | Y = 1.10X - 4.46 |
| Protein C, coagulometric | BCS | 139 | 0.994 | Y = 1.14X - 4.77 |
| Thrombin Time | CA-6000 | 381 | 0.981 | Y = 0.78X + 2.72 |
| Batroxobin Time | BCS | 169 | 0.987 | Y = 1.02X + 0.75 |
| Lupus Anticoagulant<br>LA1 Screening Reagent | CA-6000 | 136 | 0.996 | Y = 0.92X - 1.25 |
| Lupus Anticoagulant<br>LA2 Confirmation Reagent | CA-6000 | 136 | 0.953 | Y = 0.66X + 10.59 |
| Lupus Anticoagulant<br>LA1/LA2 Ratio | CA-6000 | 136 | 0.987 | Y = 1.00X - 0.08 |
| Antithrombin III | BCS | 166 | 0.997 | Y = 0.96X - 1.07 |
| Heparin, chromogenic | BCS | 115 | 0.982 | Y = 1.02X + 0.01 |
| Plasminogen, chromogenic | BCS | 142 | 0.994 | Y = 0.96X + 0.55 |
| a2- Antiplasmin,<br>chromogenic | BCS | 144 | 0.982 | Y = 0.95X + 3.18 |
| Protein C, chromogenic | BCS | 156 | 0.996 | Y = 0.98X - 0.63 |
| Factor VIII, chromogenic | BCS | 136 | 0.990 | Y = 1.10X - 1.52 |
#### Summary of Method Comparison Studies Between CA-6000 or BCS
- --
{2}------------------------------------------------
| Assay | Control Level | n | mean | Within<br>Run<br>%CV | Between<br>Run<br>%CV | Total<br>%CV |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------|----------------------|-----------------------|--------------|
| Prothrombin Time | Control Plasma N | 40 | 11.9 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| (Dade® Innovin® Reagent, seconds) | Ci-Trol®Control Level3 | 40 | 37.2 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Prothrombin Time | Control Plasma N | 40 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| (Dade® Innovin® Reagent, INR) | Ci-Trol®Control Level3 | 40 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Prothrombin Time | Control Plasma N | 40 | 12.0 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| (Thromborel®S Reagent, seconds) | Control Plasma P | 40 | 25.1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| Prothrombin Time | Control Plasma N | 40 | 91.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| (Thromborel®S Reagent, % of norm) | Control Plasma P | 40 | 36.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| Derived Fibrinogen | Control Plasma N | 40 | 1.9 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 5.5 |
| (Dade® Innovin® Reagent, g/L) | Path. plasmapool | 40 | 5.7 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time | Control Plasma N | 40 | 29.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| (Dade® Actin® FSL Reagent, seconds) | Ci-Trol®Control Level3 | 40 | 70.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| Fibrinogen (Clauss) | Control Plasma N | 40 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.5 |
| (Dade® Thrombin Reagent, g/L) | Control Plasma P | 40 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| Factor VII | Control Plasma N | 40 | 99.7 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 4.1 |
| (Dade® Innovin® Reagent) | Control Plasma P | 40 | 31.5 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| Factor VIII | Control Plasma N | 40 | 104.6 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 8.1 |
| (Dade® Actin® FSL Reagent) | Control Plasma P | 40 | 33.8 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 6.8 |
| Protein C Coagulometric | Control Plasma N | 40 | 112.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 3.2 |
| (Portein C Reagent, % of norm) | Control Plasma P | 40 | 40.9 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 4.6 |
| Thrombin Time | Control Plasma N | 40 | 16.5 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| (Test Thrombin Reagent, seconds) | Path. plasmapool | 40 | 19.7 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 5.5 |
| Assay | Control Level | n | Mean | Within<br>Run<br>%CV | Between<br>Run<br>%CV | Total<br>%CV |
| Batroxobin Time<br>(Batroxobin Reagent, seconds) | Control Plasma N<br>Path. plasmapool | 40<br>40 | 20.1<br>58.3 | 1.1<br>1.2 | 0.6<br>0.7 | 1.2<br>1.4 |
| Lupus Anticoagulant<br>(LA1 Screening Reagent)<br>(seconds) | Control Plasma N<br>LA Control High | 40<br>40 | 36.1<br>90.6 | 1.6<br>1.5 | 2.7<br>1.5 | 3.1<br>2.1 |
| Lupus Anticoagulant<br>(LA2 Confirmation Reagent)<br>(seconds) | Control Plasma N<br>LA Control High | 40<br>40 | 34.6<br>40.4 | 1.0<br>1.0 | 0.4<br>0.9 | 1.0<br>1.3 |
| Lupus Anticoagulant<br>(LA1 / LA2)<br>(ratio) | Control Plasma N<br>LA Control High | 40<br>40 | 1.04<br>2.24 | 1.0<br>1.2 | 2.5<br>0.9 | 2.7<br>1.5 |
| Antithrombin III<br>(Berichrom™ Antithrombin III (A)<br>Reagent) | Control Plasma N<br>Control Plasma P | 40<br>40 | 92.6<br>31.7 | 1.6<br>1.8 | 0.7<br>0.7 | 1.7<br>1.9 |
| Heparin<br>(Berichrom™ Heparin Reagent) | Ci-Trol®Heparin<br>Control Low<br>Ci-Trol®Heparin<br>Control High | 40<br>40 | 0.06<br>0.22 | 7.3<br>1.9 | 6.1<br>2.1 | 9.2<br>2.8 |
| Plasminogen<br>(Berichrom™ Plasminogen Reagent)<br>(% of norm) | Control Plasma N<br>Control Plasma P | 40<br>40 | 101.4<br>34.6 | 1.2<br>1.3 | 1.4<br>2.5 | 1.8<br>2.8 |
| α2-Antiplasmin<br>(Berichrom™ α2-Antiplasmin<br>Reagent)<br>(% of norm) | Control Plasma N<br>Control Plasma P | 40<br>40 | 98.8<br>35.4 | 1.5<br>3.2 | 0.9<br>1.8 | 1.7<br>3.5 |
| Protein C,<br>(Berichrom™ Protein C Reagent)<br>(% of norm) | Control Plasma N<br>Control Plasma P | 40<br>40 | 101.9<br>33.3 | 1.7<br>2.7 | 0.8<br>2.4 | 1.8<br>3.5 |
| Factor VIII Chromogenic<br>(Factor VIII Chromogenic Assay)<br>(% of norm) | Control Plasma N<br>Control Plasma P | 40<br>40 | 107.5<br>29.6 | 1.7<br>1.4 | 3.8<br>2.4 | 4.2<br>2.8 |
### Summary of Precision Studies Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-7000
{3}------------------------------------------------
(
## Summary of Precision Studies (Continued) Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-7000
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/1 description: The image is a seal for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The seal features the words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around a symbol. The symbol is a stylized representation of three human profiles facing right, with flowing lines suggesting movement or connection.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
JUN 2 7 2002
Mr. Radames Riesgo Manager, Regulatory Affairs and Compliance Dade Behring Inc. Glasgow Site P.O. Box 6101 Newark, DE 19714-6101
Re: k020979
> Trade/Device Name: Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-7000 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.5400 Regulation Name: Coagulation Instrument Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: GKP Dated: June 21, 2002 Received: June 24, 2002
Dear Mr. Riesgo:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (OS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{5}------------------------------------------------
. . Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market. .
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and 1 additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device. please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsmaldsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{6}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) Number (if known): _ K O&O 979
Device Name: Sysmex® Automated Coagulation Analyzer CA-7000
#### Indications for Use:
The intended use of the Sysmex® CA-7000 is as a fully automated, computerized blood plasma coagulation analyzer for in vitro diagnostic use in clinical laboratories.
The instrument uses citrated human plasma to perform coagulation tests.
#### (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Josephine Bautista
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices 510(k) Number -
Prescription Use (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter-Use (Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.