Area under receiver operating characteristics curve 0.56 (95% CI: 0.52-0.61)
—
—
Clinical study of 649 patients scheduled for coronary angiography
—
Indications for Use
Cholesterol 1,2,3™ is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantification of skin cholesterol. Cholesterol 1,2,3™ uses a detector reagent that reacts with skin cholesterol in proportion to the amount of cholesterol on the surface of the epidermis. An indicator reagent (horseradish peroxidase substrate) is added and color allowed to develop. Color intensity is proportional to the amount of bound skin cholesterol in the palmar surface of the skin. The color intensity (hue) can be measured objectively by use of a handheld reflectance spectrophotometer.
Device Story
Device quantifies skin cholesterol on palmar surface; utilizes detector reagent reacting with epidermal cholesterol; indicator reagent (horseradish peroxidase substrate) added to develop color; color intensity (hue) measured by handheld reflectance spectrophotometer. Used by clinicians to aid risk assessment for coronary heart disease in patients with prior myocardial infarction or suspected multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Output provides objective hue measurement; used alongside clinical evaluation and blood tests to focus diagnostic/management options. Benefits include additional risk stratification data for specific patient populations.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 750 individuals (649 angiography patients, 101 controls). Evaluated correlation between skin cholesterol levels and multi-vessel coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis). Results showed skin cholesterol provided statistically significant contribution (p=0.01) to risk assessment after adjusting for HDL. AUC for skin cholesterol was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.52-0.61). Precision testing reported within-day CV of 7-11% and day-to-day CV of 3-8%.
Technological Characteristics
Handheld reflectance spectrophotometer; utilizes chemical detector reagent and horseradish peroxidase substrate for colorimetric assay; measures hue angle of palmar skin; standalone device; non-invasive; intended for professional use.
Indications for Use
Indicated for risk assessment of coronary heart disease in patients with history of myocardial infarction or suspected significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in >1 vessel via angiography) where further evaluation is considered. Not for general population screening or as a substitute for blood cholesterol tests.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A lipoprotein test system is a device intended to measure lipoprotein in serum and plasma. Lipoprotein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases.
Predicate Devices
Synchron CX® Systems HDL Cholesterol Reagent (K895851)
{0}------------------------------------------------
JUN 2 4 2002
IMI - International Medical Innovations Inc., Section 510(k) Notification Cholesterol 1,2,3TM
## Summary of Safety & Effectiveness Cholesterol 1,2,3TM
#### 1.0 Submitted By:
Thomas M. Tsakeris Devices & Diagnostics Consulting Group, Inc. 16809 Briardale Road Rockville, MD 20855 Phone: 301-330-2076 Fax: 301-330-2568 E-mail: ttsak@erols.com
#### 2.0 Date Submitted:
May 30, 2002
#### 3.0 Device Name:
Cholesterol 1,2,3 TM
#### 4.0 Predicate Devices:
| Predicate | Manufacturer | Docket<br>Number |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------|
| Synchron CX® Systems HDL Cholesterol<br>Reagent | Beckman Instruments, Inc. | K895851 |
| HDL Cholesterol Plus | Roche Diagnostics<br>Corporation | K000568 |
#### 5.0 Description:
The Cholesterol 1,2,37M spectrophotometer in conjunction with the Cholesterol 1,2,3™ reagents are intended for use in the quantitative determination of cholesterol in the epidermal layer of the skin.
### 6.0 Intended Use and Indications for Use:
#### 6.1 Intended Use:
Cholesterol 1,2,37% is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantification of skin cholesterol. Cholesterol 1,2,3™ uses a detector reagent that reacts with skin cholesterol in proportion to the amount of cholesterol on the surface of the epidermis. An indicator reagent (horseradish peroxidase substrate) is added and color allowed to develop. Color intensity is proportional to the amount of bound skin cholesterol in the palmar surface of the skin. The color intensity (hue) can be measured objectively by use of a handheld reflectance spectrophotometer.
#### 6.2 Indications for Use:
Skin cholesterol as measured by Cholesterol 1,2,37M can be used as part of risk assessment for coronary heart disease in persons with a history of myocardial infarction and/or in persons suspected of having significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in >1 vessel as diagnosed by coronary angiography) where further diagnostic evaluation is being Test results, when considered in conjunction with clinical evaluation, blood considered. cholesterol tests and other risk factors identified for coronary artery disease, will aid the physician in focusing diagnostic and patient management options.
{1}------------------------------------------------
IMI - International Medical Innovations Inc., Section 510(k) Notification Cholesterol 1,2,3 TM
#### 7.0 Summary of Performance Data
Skin cholesterol levels were measured in 750 individuals (649 patients scheduled for coronary angiography and 101 age and gender matched controls). The patients were mostly Caucasian. For the 649 case patients who underwent coronary angiography, three coronary arteries (LAD, LCX and RCA) were scored as having no stenosis, up to 50% stenosis and greater than 50% stenosis.
As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1, the risk of significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in >1 vessel) increased as skin cholesterol levels increased in subjects with HDL levels less than 41 mg/dL. In subjects with HDL levels greater than 41 mg/dL the risk of multi-vessel disease was highest in the middle skin cholesterol tertile. The prevalence of significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease for angiography patients in this study was 36.5% (237/649).
Figure 1. Relative Risks of Significant Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease (>50% stenosis in >1 vessel} According to Skin Cholesterol Tertile and HDL Range (the risk of significant multivessel coronary artery disease for subjects with HDL <41 is considered as one). Units of measure for skin cholesterol and HDL are hue angle (h') and mg/dL respectively.
Image /page/1/Figure/5 description: The image is a line graph that shows the relative risk of skin cholesterol tertile. The x-axis represents the skin cholesterol tertile, with values of 1 (<110), 2 (110-135), and 3 (>135). The y-axis represents the relative risk, ranging from 0 to 1.4. There are three lines on the graph, representing HDL >50, HDL 41-50, and HDL <41.
{2}------------------------------------------------
IMI - International Medical Innovations Inc., Section 510(k) Notification Cholesterol 1,2,3TM
Table 1. Data presented in Figure 1 are shown in this table. Data are presented as average relative risks of significant multi-vessel disease with 95% confidence intervals and ratios of number of patients with significant multi-vessel disease to total number (the risk of significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease for subjects with HDL<41 is considered as one).
| | Skin Cholesterol (SC) Level (hue angle) | | | |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| HDL Level<br>(mg/dL) | <110 | 110-135 | >135 | Average Relative<br>Risk for<br>HDL Group |
| >50 | 0.53<br>(0.29; 0.85)<br>(12/56) | 0.78<br>(0.48; 1.12)<br>(17/54) | 0.58<br>(0.27; 1.01)<br>(8/34) | 0.63<br>(0.47; 0.83)<br>(37/144) |
| 41-50 | 0.67<br>(0.40; 1.01)<br>(15/55) | 1.15<br>(0.78; 1.53)<br>(21/45) | 0.99<br>(0.67; 1.33)<br>(22/55) | 0.92<br>(0.74; 1.12)<br>(58/155) |
| <41 | 0.83<br>(0.62; 1.07)<br>(37/109) | 1.04<br>(0.82; 1.28)<br>(50/118) | 1.10<br>(0.88; 1.33)<br>(55/123) | 1<br>(142/350) |
| Average<br>Relative Risk<br>for SC Group | 0.72<br>(0.57; 0.88)<br>(64/220) | 1.00<br>(0.84; 1.17)<br>(88/217) | 0.99<br>(0.83; 1.16)<br>(85/212) | |
The logistic regression analysis of skin cholesterol and HDL levels as risks factors for significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease showed that the skin cholesterol had statistically significant contribution (p=0.01) to the risk of significant multi-vessel disease even after adjusting for HDL cholesterol. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve for the skin cholesterol was 0.56 with 95% confidence interval of 0.52-0.61.
Figure 2 and Table 2 show that the probability to have prior myocardial infarction (MI) increased as skin cholesterol in individuals with low HDL levels. In subjects with HDL levels >41 mg/dL, history of MI was lowest in the first skin cholesterol tertile and highest in second tertile. The prevalence of history of MI for angiography patients in this study was 34.7% (225/649).
{3}------------------------------------------------
Figure 2. Relative Risks of Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI) According to Skin Cholesterol tertile and HDL range (the risk of prior MI for subjects with HDL<41 is considered as one). Units of measure for skin cholesterol and HDL are hue angle (hº) and mg/dL respectively.
Image /page/3/Figure/2 description: The image is a graph that shows the relative risk of different levels of HDL cholesterol. The x-axis is the skin cholesterol tertile, and the y-axis is the relative risk. There are three lines on the graph, representing HDL >50, HDL 41-50, and HDL <41. The graph shows that the relative risk of HDL >50 is lower than the relative risk of HDL 41-50 and HDL <41.
Table 2. Data presented in Figure 2 are shown in this table. Data are presented as average relative risks of prior MI with 95% confidence intervals and ratios of number of patients with prior MI to total number (the risk of prior MI for subjects with HDL < 41 is considered as one).
| | Skin Cholesterol (SC) Level (hue angle) | | | |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| HDL Level<br>(mg/dL) | <110 | 110-135 | >135 | Average Risk for<br>HDL Group |
| >50 | 0.24<br>(0.09; 0.49)<br>(6/56) | 0.62<br>(0.37; 0.93)<br>(15/54) | 0.39<br>(0.15; 0.78)<br>(6/34) | 0.42<br>(0.28; 0.59)<br>(27/144) |
| 41-50 | 0.45<br>(0.23; 0.74)<br>(11/55) | 0.80<br>(0.49; 1.15)<br>(16/45) | 0.61<br>(0.36; 0.92)<br>(15/55) | 0.61<br>(0.46; 0.78)<br>(42/155) |
| <41 | 0.82<br>(0.62; 1.07)<br>(40/109) | 1.04<br>(0.78; 1.20)<br>(52/118) | 1.17<br>(0.96; 1.37)<br>(64/123) | 1<br>(156/350) |
| Average Risk<br>for SC Group | 0.58<br>(0.46; 0.72)<br>(57/220) | 0.91<br>(0.71; 1.01)<br>(83/217) | 0.90<br>(0.75; 1.05)<br>(85/212) | |
Figure 3 and Table 3 show that the angiography patients with low skin cholesterol (<110) and high HDL (>50 mg/dL) had the highest probability of being without disease (no stenosis at any three arteries). Conversely, the patients with high skin cholesterol (>135) and low HDL (<41 mg/dL) had the lowest probability of being without disease. However, skin cholesterol level cannot be used to rule out coronary artery disease as even in the lowest skin cholesterol tertile significant percentages of subjects had coronary artery disease (only 26.9% of angiography subjects with skin cholesterol (<110) were without stenosis at three arteries). The skin cholesterol test cannot be used to screen the general population for no CAD. The
{4}------------------------------------------------
IMI - International Medical Innovations Inc., Section 510(k) Notification Cholesterol 1,2,3TM
prior probability (prevalence) of no disease for angiography patients in this study was 23.6% (153/649).
Figure 3. Probability of No Coronary Artery Disease According to Skin Cholesterol Tertile and HDL Range. Units of measure for skin cholesterol and HDL are hue angle (h') and mg/dL respectively.
Image /page/4/Figure/3 description: The figure is a line graph that shows the relationship between skin cholesterol tertile and the percent without significant disease, broken down by HDL levels. The x-axis represents skin cholesterol tertile, with values of 1 (<110), 2 (110-135), and 3 (>135). The y-axis represents the percent without significant disease, ranging from 0 to 50. The graph shows three lines representing HDL levels: HDL >50, HDL 41-50, and HDL <41.
Table 3. Data presented in Figure 3 are shown in this table. Data are presented as average percent without coronary artery disease (no stenosis at any three arteries) with 95% confidence intervals.
| | Skin Cholesterol (SC) Level (hue angle) | | | | | |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| HDL Level<br>(mg/dL) | <110 | 110-135 | >135 | Average Risk for<br>HDL Group | | |
| >50 | <b>37.5%</b><br>(21/56)<br>(24.9%; 51.5%) | <b>38.9%</b><br>(21/54)<br>(25.9%; 53.1%) | <b>44.1%</b><br>(15/34)<br>(27.2%; 62.1%) | <b>39.6%</b><br>(57/144)<br>(31.5%; 48.1%) | | |
| | 41-50 | <b>30.9%</b><br>(17/55)<br>(19.1%; 44.8%) | <b>20.0%</b><br>(9/45)<br>(9.6%; 34.6%) | | <b>21.8%</b><br>(12/55)<br>(11.8%; 35.0%) | <b>24.5%</b><br>(38/155)<br>(18.0%; 32.1%) |
| | | <41 | <b>19.3%</b><br>(21/109)<br>(12.3%; 27.9%) | | <b>20.3%</b><br>(24/118)<br>(13.5%; 28.7%) | |
| Average Risk<br>for SC Group | | | <b>26.9%</b><br>(59/220)<br>(21.1%; 33.2%) | <b>24.9%</b><br>(54/217)<br>(19.3%; 31.2%) | <b>18.9%</b><br>(40/212)<br>(13.8%; 24.8%) | |
{5}------------------------------------------------
IMI - International Medical Innovations Inc., Section 510(k) Notification Cholesterol 1,2,3 M
As shown in table 4, data of this study demonstrated that there is no correlation of skin cholesterol with HDL (coefficient of correlation = - 0.06 with 95% confidence interval (-0.15; 0.02)).
| | Skin Cholesterol (SC) Level (hue angle) | | | |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|
| HDL<br>Level<br>(mg/dL) | <110 | 110-135 | >135 | |
| >50 | 8.6%<br>56 | 8.3%<br>54 | 5.2%<br>34 | 22.2%<br>144 |
| 41-50 | 8.5%<br>55 | 6.9%<br>45 | 8.5%<br>55 | 23.9%<br>155 |
| <41 | 16.8%<br>109 | 18.2%<br>118 | 19.0%<br>123 | 53.9%<br>350 |
| | 33.9%<br>220 | 33.4%<br>217 | 32.7%<br>212 | 100%<br>649 |
Table 4. Distribution of Skin Cholesterol Levels and HDL Concentration.
# 8.0 Specific Performance Characteristics
### 8.1 Precision
Table 1 shows the reproducibility of Cholesterol 1,2,300 within-day, between days, and from batch to batch.
| Table 1. Reproducibility of Cholesterol 1,2,3 "M: Mean CV (range) | | | | | |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
| | Within-Day | Day-to-Day | Batch-to-Batcha |
|-----------------------|-------------|------------|-----------------|
| Low skin cholesterol | 11% (5-19%) | 8% (4-17%) | 10% (1-17%) |
| High skin cholesterol | 7% (2-13%) | 3% (1-5%) | |
4 3 lots of Cholesterol 1,2,310 were compared
For within day variability, three replicate Cholesterol 1,2,37M tests were carried out on the palmar surface of each hand on twenty candidates (10 individuals in each of the low and high skin cholesterol ranges) with a single lot of Cholesterol 1,2,3™. Three different areas of the palm were used. For day-to-day variability, a single Cholesterol 1,2,37M test was carried out on twenty candidates (10 individuals in each of the low and high skin cholesterol ranges) for 5 consecutive days. A single lot of Cholesterol 1,2,37M was used. For between lot variability, ten candidates were tested with three different Cholesterol 1,2,3™ kit lots. All three tests for each individual were performed on the same day on three different areas of the palm.
{6}------------------------------------------------
IMI - International Medical Innovations Inc., Section 510(k) Notification Cholesterol 1,2,3TM
## 8.2 Skin Cholesterol Values in Healthy Subjects
Table 6 shows the levels of skin cholesterol in the control Caucasian and African-American populations. The mean skin cholesterol values for these healthy subjects are within the lowest tertile of the angiographic subjects (<110).
| | Caucasians* | African Americans** |
|-----------------|-------------|---------------------|
| N | 101 | 94 |
| Mean | 105.0 | 88.7 |
| 2.5 percentile | 66 | 62 |
| 97.5 percentile | 169 | 131 |
Table 6. Expected Skin Cholesterol Values in Control Subjects
* mean age: 61 (40-82), 41% female ** mean age 42 (19-70), 79% female
Figure 4 shows the distribution of skin cholesterol for the control population by race.
Image /page/6/Figure/7 description: This bar graph compares the skin cholesterol hue angle of Caucasian and African American subjects. The x-axis represents the skin cholesterol hue angle, divided into categories such as "<75", "76-85", "86-95", "96-105", "106-115", "116-125", "126-135", "136-145", and ">145". The y-axis represents the number of subjects. For example, in the 86-95 range, there are approximately 21 Caucasian subjects and 25 African American subjects.
Figure 4. Distribution of Skin Cholesterol by Race
This summary of safety and effectiveness is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Safe Medical Device Act of 1990 and the implementing regulation 21 CFR 807.92.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/7/Picture/1 description: The image shows the seal of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The seal features a stylized eagle with three lines forming its body and wings. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the eagle.
# JUN 2 4 2002
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
International Medical Innovation, Inc. c/o Thomas M. Tsakeris President Devices & Diagnostics Consulting Group, Inc. 16809 Briardale Road Rockville, MD 20855
Re: k014018
Trade/Device Name: Cholesterol 1,2,3™ Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1475 Regulation Name: Lipoprotein test system Regulatory Class: I, reserved Product Code: LBS Dated: May 31, 2002 Received: May 31, 2002
Dear Mr. Tsakeris:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act and the limitations described below. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
The Office of Device Evaluation has determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that this device will be used for an intended use not identified in the proposed labeling and that such use could cause harm. Therefore, in accordance with Section 513(i)(1)(E) of the Act, the following limitation must appear in the Warnings section of the device's labeling:
The safety and effectiveness of this device for use in screening the general population for coronary artery disease or for use as a substitute for blood cholesterol tests or a substitute for other risk factors identified for coronary artery disease have not been established.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 - Mr. Thomas M. Tsakeris
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and permits your device to proceed to the market. This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification if the limitation statement above is added to your labeling, as described.
Please note that the above labeling limitations are required by Section 513(i)(1)(E) of the Act. Therefore, a new 510(k) is required before these limitations are modified in any way or removed from the device's labeling.
If you desire specific information about the application of other labeling requirements to your device (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4616. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification"(21 CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers. International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.
Sincerely yours,
Bernard E. Statland, M.D., Ph.D. Director Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{9}------------------------------------------------
## 510(k) Number (if known): K014018
Device Name: Cholesterol 1,2,3TM
## Intended Use Statement
Cholesterol 1,2,37M is an in vitro diagnostic test for the quantification of skin cholesterol. Cholesterol 1.2.37M uses a detector reagent that reacts with skin cholesterol in proportion to the amount of cholesterol on the surface of the epidermis. An indicator reagent (horseradish peroxidase substrate) is added and color allowed to develop. Color intensity is proportional to the amount of bound skin cholesterol in the palmar surface of the skin. The color intensity (hue) can be measured objectively by use of a handheld reflectance spectrophotometer.
## Indications For Use Statement
Skin cholesterol as measured by Cholesterol 1,2,37M can be used as part of risk assessment for coronary heart disease in persons with a history of myocardial infarction and/or in persons suspected of having significant multi-vessel coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis in >1 vessel as diagnosed by coronary angiography) where further diagnostic evaluation is being considered. Test results, when considered in conjunction with clinical evaluation, blood cholesterol tests and other risk factors identified for coronary artery disease, will aid the physician in focusing diagnostic and patient management options.
> (Division Sign-Off) Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number: K014018
For Prescription Use V (Per 21 CFR 801.109)
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
A. Butner
6124/02
(Division Sign-Off) Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices K 2000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 510(k) Number.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.