ALLOFIT ACETABULAR SYSTEM 32MM ALPHA DURASUL INSERTS
K013935 · Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc. · LZO · Dec 13, 2001 · Orthopedic
Device Facts
Record ID
K013935
Device Name
ALLOFIT ACETABULAR SYSTEM 32MM ALPHA DURASUL INSERTS
Applicant
Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.
Product Code
LZO · Orthopedic
Decision Date
Dec 13, 2001
Decision
SESE
Submission Type
Special
Regulation
21 CFR 888.3353
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
Components of the Allofit Acetabular System are intended for use in total hip arthroplasty for treatment of the following: - patient conditions of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD); e.g., avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g., rheumatoid arthritis. - those patients with failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists. - revision of a previously failed hip arthroplasty.
Device Story
Allofit Acetabular System 32mm Alpha Durasul Inserts are orthopedic components for total hip arthroplasty; designed as modular inserts for titanium acetabular shells. Device features peripheral locking mechanism and peg-shaped apex eminence for stability; spikes in shell dome provide rotational resistance. Inserts are implanted intraoperatively by surgeons. Device provides bearing surface for hip joint; intended to restore joint function and reduce pain in patients with degenerative or inflammatory joint disease or failed prior surgeries. Benefits include improved stability and wear characteristics via Durasul material.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Substantial equivalence is based on design, material, and technological similarities to the predicate device.
Technological Characteristics
Acetabular insert component; material: Durasul (polyethylene per ISO 5834-1/2); titanium shell interface. Features peripheral locking mechanism and apical peg. Standard and hooded configurations. Non-powered, mechanical implant.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty due to noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (e.g., avascular necrosis, osteoarthritis), inflammatory joint disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis), failed previous surgery with persistent pain/deformity/dysfunction, or revision of failed hip arthroplasty.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis is a device intended to be implanted to replace a hip joint. This device limits translation and rotation in one or more planes via the geometry of its articulating surfaces. It has no linkage across-the-joint. The two-part femoral component consists of a femoral stem made of alloys to be fixed in the intramedullary canal of the femur by impaction with or without use of bone cement. The proximal end of the femoral stem is tapered with a surface that ensures positive locking with the spherical ceramic (aluminium oxide, A12 03 ) head of the femoral component. The acetabular component is made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with nonporous metal alloys, and used with or without bone cement.
{0}------------------------------------------------
#### 510(k) SUMMARY DEC 1 3 2001
K013935
In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration Rule to implement provisions of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and in conformance with 21 CFR 807, this is to serve as a Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for the Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd. Allofit Acetabular System 32mm Alpha Durasul Inserts.
| Manufacturer: | Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd. |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| | Grabenstrasse 25<br>CH-6341 Baar, Switzerland |
| US Distributor: | Sulzer Orthopedics Inc.<br>9900 Spectrum Drive<br>Austin, Texas 78717<br>(512) 432-9900 |
| Date: | November 27, 2001 |
| Contact Person: | Mitchell A. Dhority<br>Director, Regulatory & Clinical Affairs |
| Classification Name: | 21 CFR Part 888.3353 - Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-<br>constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis |
| Common/Usual Name: | Acetabular Insert Components |
| Trade/Proprietary Name: | Allofit Acetabular System 32mm Alpha Durasul Inserts |
### PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
This Special 510(k) submission seeks to obtain clearance for addition of the Allofit 32mm Alpha Durasul Inserts to the existing, previously cleared (K003578) Allofit 28mm Alpha Durasul Insert product line. The only difference from the existing product is the internal diameter of the insert (32mm vs. 28mm).
There are also no changes to the other previously cleared components of the system which are used in conjunction with the inserts (e.g, acetabular shells, dome hole covers, screw hole covers, instrumentation).
The Allofit 32mm Alpha Durasul inserts incorporate the same general design features as the existing, previously cleared Allofit 28mm Alpha Durasul insert components and Allofit 32mm Alpha inserts (standard Sulene polyethylene). The inserts are snapped into the respective Allofit titanium shell intraoperatively. A peripheral locking mechanism holds the insert within the shell. A peg shaped eminence at the apex of the insert slips into the dome hole of the shell and provides further stability of the insert within the shell. Upon impaction into the short spikes in the dome of the metallic shell minimally penetrate the polyethylene insert, providing additional resistance to rotation. Both a standard and hooded insert configuration will continue to be offered.
The Allofit 32mm Alpha Durasul inserts will also use the same materials as the previously cleared devices (ISO 5834-1/2). The Durasul material is identical to that which was previously
{1}------------------------------------------------
characterized and cleared for use in the Allofit 28mm Alpha Durasul Inserts.
## SPECIFIC DIAGNOSTIC INDICATIONS
There have been no changes in the diagnostic indications from the previously cleared components as a result of this line addition.
Components of the Allofit Acetabular System are intended for use in total hip arthroplasty for treatment of the following:
- patient conditions of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD); e.g., avascular . necrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g., rheumatoid arthritis.
- those patients with failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists. .
- revision of a previously failed hip arthroplasty. .
#### SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE
Substantial equivalence is based on comparison to the previously cleared Allofit 28mm Alpha Durasul Inserts. The fundamental scientific technologies incorporated in this previously cleared design have not changed in this product line addition. The only difference in the existing Allofit Alpha Durasul Insert components and this line addition is the internal diameter (32mm vs. 28mm).
Based on conformance with the design control requirements as specified in 21 CFR 820.30 and similarities in design, materials, sterilization, packaging, instrumentation, intended use and indications for use, we believe that the Allofit 32mm Alpha Durasul Inserts are substantially equivalent to the previously cleared Allofit 28mm Alpha Durasul Inserts.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/2 description: The image shows the address of the Food and Drug Administration. The address is 9200 Corporate Boulevard, Rockville MD 20850. The text is black and the background is white.
DEC 1 3 2001
Mr. Mitchell A. Dhority Director, Regulatory & Clinical Affairs Sulzer Orthopedics Incorporated 9900 Spectrum Drive Austin. Texas 78717
Re: K013935
Trade Name: Allofit Acetabular System/32mm Alpha Inserts Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3353 Regulation Name: Hip joint metal/ceramic/polymer semi-constrained cemented or nonporous uncemented prosthesis Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LZO Dated: November 27, 2001 Received: November 28, 2001
Dear Mr. Dhority:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration
{3}------------------------------------------------
## Page 2 - Mr. Dhority
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your Section 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and additionally 21 CFR Part 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4659. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html.
Sincerely yours.
Mal. N. Millan
Celia M. Witten, Ph.D., M.D. Director Division of General, Restorative and Neurological Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{4}------------------------------------------------
. .
#### K013935 510(k) Number (if known):
Device Name: Allofit Acetabular System - Alpha 32mm Durasul Inserts
# Indications for Use:
Components of the Allofit Acetabular System are intended for use in total hip arthroplasty for treatment of the following:
- patient conditions of noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD); e.g., avascular . necrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory joint disease (IJD), e.g., theumatoid arthritis.
- those patients with failed previous surgery where pain, deformity, or dysfunction persists. .
- revision of a previously failed hip arthroplasty. .
# (PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
પ્ર Prescription Use _
OR
Over-The-Counter Use
Mark n-Mllever
(Optional Format 1-2-96)
1 Pestorative vices
510(k) Number__
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.