Retrospective analysis of 445 serum samples from pregnant women collected during routine laboratory activities to determine expected values for the assay.
Expected values; Routine clinical laboratory samples; Pregnant women
Clinical Evidence
Study Design
Population
Comparator
Key Endpoints
Retrospective analysis of routine clinical samples
Pregnant women; Sample Size: 445
Not applicable for this study
Distribution of serum / cut-off ratio values
Indications for Use
The Platelia Toxo IgM TMB kit is an in-vitro diagnostic test kit for the qualitative and quantitative detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM in human serum or plasma (EDTA, Heparin, Citrate). Note: - Patient testing with the Platelia® Toxo IgM assay must be performed in conjunction with an anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody assay. - The Platelia® Toxo IgM assay is presumptive for the detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM antibodies and presumptive for the diagnosis of acute, recent or reactivated Toxoplasma gondii infection. - The performance of the Platelia® Toxo IgM assay has not been established for neonate testing. - The Platelia® Toxo IgM assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening.
Device Story
Platelia Toxo IgM TMB is an in vitro diagnostic enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM antibodies in human serum or plasma. The device uses a double sandwich method in 96-well breakaway microplates. Samples are incubated in wells coated with anti-human IgM antibodies; captured IgM binds to T. gondii antigen-conjugate (monoclonal antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase). After washing, a TMB substrate/chromogen solution is added, causing color development proportional to the amount of bound conjugate. The reaction is stopped with acid, and optical density is measured via spectrophotometer at 450 nm. Results are determined by comparing sample optical density to a cut-off control. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Output aids clinicians in diagnosing acute, recent, or reactivated toxoplasmosis when used alongside IgG testing.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Performance evaluated using 348 patient samples and 97 specimens from 40 seroconversion panels. Combined results showed 99.53% agreement with a commercial EIA. Excluding equivocal samples, negative agreement was 100% (271/271) and positive agreement was 98.72% (154/156). CDC panel testing (32 positive, 65 negative) showed 100% agreement with both positive and negative specimens. Precision studies (intra-assay and inter-assay) conducted across three sites and with various plasma anticoagulants (EDTA, Heparin, Citrate) demonstrated acceptable reproducibility.
Technological Characteristics
96-well breakaway microplate EIA. Sensing principle: immunocnzymatic double sandwich. Energy source: spectrophotometer (450 nm). Materials: microplate wells coated with anti-human IgM; T. gondii antigen; monoclonal antibody-HRP conjugate; TMB chromogen solution; synthetic control matrix (Tris-NaCl, BSA, glycerol, colorant).
Indications for Use
Indicated for qualitative and quantitative detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM in human serum or plasma (EDTA, Heparin, Citrate) to aid in diagnosis of acute, recent, or reactivated infection. Must be used with anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG assay. Not for neonate testing or blood/plasma donor screening.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Toxoplasma gondii serological reagents are devices that consist of antigens and antisera used in serological tests to identify antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in serum. Additionally, some of these reagents consist of antisera conjugated with a fluorescent dye (immunofluorescent reagents) used to identify Toxoplasma gondii from clinical specimens. The identification aids in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis caused by the parasitic protozoan Toxoplasma gondii and provides epidemiological information on this disease. Congenital toxoplasmosis is characterized by lesions of the central nervous system, which if undetected and untreated may lead to brain defects, blindness, and death of an unborn fetus. The disease is characterized in children by inflammation of the brain and spinal cord.
Predicate Devices
Kallestad Diagnostics Platelia® Toxo IgM (K89498)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows a logo with the text "O+RAD" in bold, white letters against a black background. The logo has a rounded rectangular shape. The plus sign in "O+RAD" is slightly smaller than the other letters.
SEP 3 0 2002
#### ATTACHMENT I 510(k) SUMMARY
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR 807.92.
The assigned 510(k) number is: K013837
| DATE: | September 10, 2002 |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| APPLICANT: | Bio-Rad<br>3, Boulevard Raymond Poincaré<br>92430 Marnes-la-Coquette, France |
| PHONE: | 33-1-47-95-6138 |
| FAX: | 33-1-47-95-6242 |
| OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENT: | Sylvie Confida |
| PRODUCT TRADE NAME: | Bio-Rad Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB |
| COMMON NAME: | Toxoplasma IgM Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) |
| CLASSIFICATION NAME: | 21 CFR 866.3780, Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay,<br>Toxoplasma Gondii |
| PREDICATE DEVICE: | Kallestad Diagnostics Platelia® Toxo IgM (K89498) |
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB assay is a qualitative assay which utilizes an immunocnzymatic double sandwich method. Diluted samples and controls are placed into microplate wells coated with antibodies to human IgM. The IgM antibodies present in the samples are captured by the solid phase. Remaining antibodies (including any of the IgG class) and other serum proteins are removed by washing. A solution containing T. gondii antigen and conjugate (monoclonal antibody to T. gondii labeled with horseradish peroxidase) is placed into each well. T. gondii IgM antibodies in the test sample that are captured on the solid phase bind the T. gondii antigen-complex. Excess T. gondii antigen and conjugate are removed by washing. A peroxidase substrate and chromogen solution is added which reacts with the conjugate to initiate a color development reaction is stopped by the addition of an acid. The optical density readings for the test samples are obtained with a spectrophotometer set at a wavelength of 450 nm. The presence of T. gondii IgM antibodies in an individual sample is determined by comparing the optical density reading for the sample to the optical density reading of the cut-off control serum.
{1}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/1/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Bio-Rad Laboratories, a company that manufactures and distributes products for the life science research and clinical diagnostics markets. The logo is in black and white and features the company name in bold, sans-serif letters. The logo is enclosed in a rounded rectangle.
## INTENDED USE
The Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB kit is an in vitro diagnostic test kit allowing the qualitative detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii in human serum or plasma (EDTA, Heparin, Citrate).
#### Note:
- Patient testing with the Platelia® Toxo IgM assay must be performed in conjunction with an anti-. Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody assay.
- . The Platelia® Toxo IgM assay is presumptive for the detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM antibodies and presumptive for the diagnosis of acute, recent, or reactivated Toxoplasma gondii infection.
- . The performance of the Platelia® Toxo IgM assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening.
### TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB kit is a modified version of the Platelia® Toxo IgM kit and remains similar in form and function. The following comparison table indicates significant similarities and differences between the kits:
| Characteristics | Platelia® Toxo IgM (Predicate) | Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Format and Test Method | 96-well microplate EIA,<br>non-breakaway wells | 96-well microplate EIA,<br>breakaway wells |
| Intended Use | Assay for the qualitative<br>detection of anti- <i>Toxoplasma</i><br><i>gondii</i> IgM in human serum | Assay for the qualitative<br>detection of anti- <i>Toxoplasma</i><br><i>gondii</i> IgM in human serum or<br>plasma |
| Positive and Negative Controls | Pooled human serum, negative<br>for <i>T. gondii</i> , is used to<br>manufacture the negative control<br>and to dilute the positive control. | A synthetic matrix consisting of<br>Tris-NaCl buffer, BSA, glycerol,<br>and colorant is used to<br>manufacture the negative control<br>and to dilute the positive control. |
| Chromogen | <i>o</i> . phenylenediamine-2 HCL<br>(OPD) tablets | Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB)<br>solution |
| Wavelength | Dual wavelength reading at<br>492 nm and 620 nm. | Dual wavelength reading at<br>450 nm and 620 nm. |
#### Comparison Table
{2}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/2/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Bio-Rad. The logo is in white text on a black background. The text is bold and sans-serif.
## PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
## A. Precision Studies
Inter-assay and intra-assay reproducibility were determined by assaying two T. gondir IgM negative samples and four T. gondii IgM positive samples in triplicate, on three different days at three laboratory sites.
Site 1
| | | Neg 1 | | Neg 2 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | | Pos 3 | | Pos 4 | |
|-------------------|--|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| | | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO |
| N= | | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Mean= | | 0.027 | 0.052 | 0.022 | 0.042 | 0.742 | 1.438 | 0.660 | 1.278 | 0.825 | 1.599 | 1.477 | 2.862 |
| Within Run | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (intra-assay) sd= | | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.021 | 0.011 | 0.022 | 0.016 | 0.031 | 0.017 | 0.034 |
| %CV= | | 5.2% | 5.1% | 7.5% | 7.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (inter-assay) sd= | | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.020 | 0.041 | 0.013 | 0.038 | 0.013 | 0.048 | 0.032 | 0.050 |
| %CV= | | 8.1% | 9.7% | 6.7% | 6.3% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 1.6% | 3.0% | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Site 2
| | | Neg 1 | | Neg 2 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | | Pos 3 | | Pos 4 | |
|---------------------------------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|--|
| | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | |
| N= | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| Mean= | 0.031 | 0.050 | 0.029 | 0.048 | 0.746 | 1.206 | 0.669 | 1.083 | 0.776 | 1.255 | 1.511 | 2.444 | |
| Within Run<br>(intra-assay) sd= | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 0.040 | 0.015 | 0.024 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.051 | 0.082 | |
| %CV= | 22.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | 23.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | 2.3% | 2.3% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 3.4% | 3.4% | |
| Total<br>(inter-assay) sd= | 0.009 | 0.016 | 0.007 | 0.012 | 0.024 | 0.061 | 0.015 | 0.066 | 0.012 | 0.063 | 0.046 | 0.151 | |
| %CV= | 29.9% | 32.8% | 22.3% | 24.4% | 3.2% | 5.0% | 2.2% | 6.1% | 1.5% | 5.0% | 3.0% | 6.2% | |
Site 3
| | | Neg 1 | | Neg 2 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | | Pos 3 | | Pos 4 | |
|-------------------|--|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| | | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO |
| N= | | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Mean= | | 0.032 | 0.057 | 0.024 | 0.042 | 0.769 | 1.393 | 0.705 | 1.278 | 0.684 | 1.227 | 1.346 | 2.426 |
| Within Run | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (intra-assay) sd= | | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.055 | 0.104 | 0.023 | 0.044 | 0.011 | 0.020 | 0.061 | 0.107 |
| %CV= | | 11.6% | 12.1% | 24.0% | 25.3% | 7.1% | 7.5% | 3.3% | 3.5% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 4.5% | 4.4% |
| Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (inter-assay) sd= | | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.010 | 0.016 | 0.073 | 0.203 | 0.077 | 0.212 | 0.119 | 0.150 | 0.098 | 0.150 |
| %CV= | | 43.7% | 38.7% | 41.2% | 36.8% | 9.5% | 14.6% | 11.0% | 16.6% | 17.4% | 12.2% | 7.3% | 6.2% |
{3}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/3/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Bio-Rad Laboratories, a company that manufactures and distributes products for the life science research and clinical diagnostics markets. The logo is in white text on a black background. The text is bold and sans-serif.
In addition, inter-assay and intra-assay reproducibility with plasma samples were determined by assaying three additional samples (one T. gondii IgM negative sample and two T. gondii IgM positive samples) in triplicate, on three different days, at one laboratory site.
| Serum | Neg 1 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | |
|----------------------------------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO |
| N = | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Mean = | 0.022 | 0.04 | 0.710 | 1.26 | 1.083 | 1.92 |
| Within-Run<br>(intra-assay) sd = | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.019 | 0.034 | 0.029 | 0.052 |
| %CV = | 8.7% | 8.8% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Total<br>(inter-assay) sd = | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.035 | 0.077 | 0.051 | 0.074 |
| %CV = | 14.5% | 14.9% | 4.9% | 6.1% | 4.8% | 3.9% |
| EDTA | Neg 1 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | |
| | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO |
| N = | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Mean = | 0.024 | 0.04 | 0.761 | 1.35 | 1.063 | 1.88 |
| Within-Run<br>(intra-assay) sd = | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.019 | 0.034 | 0.019 | 0.033 |
| %CV = | 8.3% | 8.3% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Total<br>(inter-assay) sd = | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.036 | 0.030 | 0.056 | 0.076 |
| %CV = | 8.5% | 9.4% | 4.7% | 2.2% | 5.2% | 4.0% |
| Citrate | Neg 1 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | |
| | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO |
| N = | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Mean = | 0.022 | 0.04 | 0.674 | 1.19 | 1.075 | 1.91 |
| Within-Run<br>(intra-assay) sd = | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.017 | 0.029 | 0.020 | 0.036 |
| %CV = | 5.0% | 5.0% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Total<br>(inter-assay) sd = | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.031 | 0.038 | 0.043 | 0.091 |
| %CV = | 9.9% | 10.6% | 4.5% | 3.2% | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Heparin | Neg 1 | | Pos 1 | | Pos 2 | |
| | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO | OD | S/CO |
| N = | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Mean = | 0.022 | 0.04 | 0.719 | 1.27 | 1.034 | 1.83 |
| Within-Run<br>(intra-assay) sd = | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.012 | 0.020 | 0.022 | 0.039 |
| %CV = | 4.4% | 4.4% | 1.6% | 1.6% | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Total<br>(inter-assay) sd = | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.024 | 0.031 | 0.059 | 0.115 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/4/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for BIO-RAD. The logo is white text on a black rounded rectangle. The text is in all caps and bolded.
#### B. Comparison Studies
Performance of the Platelia Toxo IgM TMB assay was evaluated against another commercially available enzyme immunoassay (EIA) by testing 348 patient samples and 97 specimens from 40 seroconversion panels. The combined results of the patient and seroconversion panel testing demonstrate an agreement of 99.53%.
| | 1<br>= 445 | TMB | | |
|-----|------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|
| | | Neg | Equivocal<br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Pos |
| lgM | Neg | 27 | | |
| EIA | Equivocal | | | |
| | Pos | | | ાર્ય |
Platelia Toxo IgM TMB vs IgM EIA Correlation Table (combined results)
Excluding equivocal samples / specimens, the combined results of comparative prospective and retrospective testing demonstrated the following:
Negative agreement : 100.00% (271/271). The 95% confidence intervaled is 99.82 - 100.00%. Positive agreement : 98.72% (154/156). The 95% confidence intervale is 96.61 - 100.00%. Overall agreement : 99.53% (425/427). The 95% confidence interval-6 is 98.76% - 100.00%.
#### C. Expected Values
A total of 445 fresh and frozen serum samples obtained from pregnant women during routine laboratory activities in the area of Paris, France were tested with the Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB assay. The distribution of serum / cut-off ratio values is shown in the following chart.
Image /page/4/Figure/9 description: The image is a bar chart titled "Platelia Toxo IgM TMB Expected Values". The x-axis is labeled "Ratio Serum / Cut-Off", and the y-axis is labeled "Frequency". The bar chart shows the frequency of different ratio serum/cut-off values. The bar chart shows that the most frequent ratio serum/cut-off value is less than 0.1, with a frequency of 214, and greater than or equal to 1.0, with a frequency of 154.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/5/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo for Bio-Rad. The logo is white text on a black rounded rectangle. The text reads "BIO-RAD" with a plus sign between "BIO" and "RAD".
### D. CDC Test Panel
The following information is from a serum panel obtained from the CDC and tested by Bio-Rad Laboratories. The results are presented as a means to convey further information on the performance of this assay with a masked, characterized serum panel. This does not imply an endorsement of the assay by the CDC.
The panel consists of 32 positive and 65 negative samples. The Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB assay demonstrated 100% agreement with the positive specimens and 100% agreement with the negative specimens.
Please Note: There should be no other statistical calculation or inferences drawn from the panel results.
{6}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the Department of Health & Human Services USA. The logo features a stylized image of three human profiles facing right, stacked on top of each other. The profiles are drawn with thick, curved lines. The logo also includes the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged in a circular fashion around the image.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
SEP 3 0 2002
Mr. David Bhend Regulatory Affairs Associate Bio-Rad Laboratories Diagnostics Group 6565 18511 Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052
Re: k013837
> Trade/Device Name: Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3780 Regulation Name: Toxoplasma gondii serological reagents Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: LGD Dated: July 19, 2002 Received: July 23, 2002
Dear Mr. Bhend:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{7}------------------------------------------------
Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed predicate device results in a classification for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801 and : additionally 809.10 for in vitro diagnostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4588. Additionally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, please contact the Office of Compliance at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small Manufacturers International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 443-6597 or at its internet address "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours.
Steven Butman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
#### ATTACHMENT G INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
## 510(k) Number (if known): K013837
Device Name: Platelia® Toxo IgM TMB
## Indications for Use:
The Platelia Toxo IgM TMB kit is an in-vitro diagnostic test kit for the qualitative and quantitative detection of anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM in human serum or plasma (EDTA, Heparin, Citrate).
Note:
- . Patient testing with the Platelia® Toxo IgM assay must be performed in conjunction with an anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgG antibody assay.
- The Platelia® Toxo IgM assay is presumptive for the detection of anti-● Toxoplasma gondii IgM antibodies and presumptive for the diagnosis of acute, recent or reactivated Toxoplasma gondii infection.
- The performance of the Platelia® Toxo IgM assay has not been established for ● neonate testing.
- . The Platelia® Toxo IgM assay has not been cleared/approved by the FDA for blood/plasma donor screening.
Woody Deubler
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K013837
(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE - CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE IF NEEDED)
# Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Professional Use: ___________
OR
Prescription Use: (Per 21 CFR 801.109
Over-The-Counter Use: (Optional Format 1-2-96)
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.