The BioGenex Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Estrogen Receptor Antibody (Clone ER88) is an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay and is intended for laboratory use to qualitatively identify by light microscopy human estrogen receptor in normal and/or pathological paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues. The ER88 antibody specifically binds to antigens located in the nucleus of cell populations that express estrogen receptor in normal and abnormal tissues. This antibody is indicated as an aid in assessing patient response to hormonal therapy and as an aid in the prognosis and management of breast cancer patients. The clinical interpretation of any staining or its absence should be complemented by morphological studies using proper controls and should be evaluated within the context of the patient's clinical history and other diagnostic tests by a qualified pathologist. BioGenex ER88 antibodies have been optimally manufactured for use with BioGenex Super Sensitive MultiLink Detection Systems with or without BioGenex Automated Staining Systems.
Device Story
BioGenex ER88 is a mouse monoclonal antibody targeting estrogen receptor antigens in cell nuclei. Used in clinical laboratories by pathologists to process formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Input: tissue samples; Process: immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using BioGenex Super Sensitive MultiLink Detection Systems (manual or automated); Output: visual staining patterns observed via light microscopy. Pathologists interpret nuclear staining intensity and distribution to assess estrogen receptor status. Results assist in determining patient eligibility for hormonal therapy and managing breast cancer prognosis. Benefits include localized receptor detection within tumor cells, offering higher specificity than homogenized biochemical assays.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance established via comparison of 122 specimens against the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) biochemical assay. Study utilized formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Concordance between ER88 IHC and DCC was 75% (95% CI: 68%-83%, p<0.0001). Discordance attributed to IHC's ability to localize receptors specifically to tumor cells versus DCC's whole-tissue homogenization. Reproducibility studies (intra-run, inter-run, and manual vs. automated) showed no significant variation.
Technological Characteristics
Mouse monoclonal antibody (Clone ER88) in phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.6) with bovine serum albumin and 0.09% sodium azide. Formulated as concentrate or ready-to-use. Sensing principle: immunohistochemical binding to nuclear estrogen receptor antigens. Compatible with BioGenex Super Sensitive MultiLink Detection Systems and automated staining platforms. Storage: 2-8°C. Stability: 24 months.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use as an aid in assessing patient response to hormonal therapy and in the prognosis and management of breast cancer patients. Used for qualitative identification of estrogen receptors in normal and pathological paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
Immunohistochemistry test systems (IHC's) are in vitro diagnostic devices consisting of polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies labeled with directions for use and performance claims, which may be packaged with ancillary reagents in kits. Their intended use is to identify, by immunological techniques, antigens in tissues or cytologic specimens. Similar devices intended for use with flow cytometry devices are not considered IHC's.
Special Controls
(2) Class II (special control, guidance document: “FDA Guidance for Submission of Immunohistochemistry Applications to the FDA,” Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, 1998). These IHC's are intended for the detection and/or measurement of certain target analytes in order to provide prognostic or predictive data that are not directly confirmed by routine histopathologic internal and external control specimens. These IHC's provide the pathologist with information that is ordinarily reported as independent diagnostic information to the ordering clinician, and the claims associated with these data are widely accepted and supported by valid scientific evidence. Examples of class II IHC's are those intended for semiquantitative measurement of an analyte, such as hormone receptors in breast cancer.
{0}------------------------------------------------
K013148
·
# FEB 2 8 2002
#### SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS INFORMATION
This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with the requirements of SMDA 1990 and 21 CFR § 807.92.
#### GENERAL INFORMATION:
| Submitter: | BioGenex Laboratories, Inc.<br>4600 Norris Canyon Road<br>San Ramon, CA 94583<br>925-275-0550 (Tel)<br>925-275-0580 (Fax) |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Contact Persons: | Gurvinder S. Nanda, Ph.D.<br>Manager, Regulatory Affairs<br>925-543-1336 (Tel)<br>925-866-2525 (Fax) |
| | Jintao Chen, Ph.D.<br>Director, Operations<br>925-866-2568 (Tel)<br>925-866-2525 (Fax) |
| Date of Preparation: | January 30, 2002 |
| Device Generic Name: | Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Estrogen Receptor Antibody |
| Device Trade Name: | BioGenex Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Estrogen Receptor<br>Antibody (Clone ER88) |
| Device Classification Name: | Immunohistochemistry Reagents and Kits |
| Assigned 510(k) Number: | K013148 |
#### PREDICATE DEVICE:
The device is substantially equivalent to certain well-established, widely accepted reference laboratory methodology dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) technique which were common in use prior to May 28, 1976. The device is substantially equivalent in methodology to similar kit for estrogen receptor (Dako, K993957).
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICE:
BioGenex ER88 is a monoclonal antibody, which specifically binds to estrogen receptor antigen located in the nuclear region of a variety of normal and abnormal tissues. It is a mouse monoclonal anti-estrogen receptor antibody from mouse ascites fluid diluted in phosphate buffered saline pH 7.6 containing bovine serum albumin as carrier protein and 0.09% sodium azide as preservative. The antibody is available in concentrated (MU368-UC) as well as ready to use form (AM368-5M and AM368-10M). Refer to package insert for details.
#### INTENDED USE:
The BioGenex Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Estrogen Receptor Antibody (Clone ER88) is an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay and is intended for laboratory use to qualitatively identify by light microscopy human estrogen receptor in normal and/or pathological paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed tissues. The ER88 antibody specifically binds to antigens located in the nucleus of cell populations that express estrogen receptor in normal and abnormal tissues. This antibody is indicated as an aid in assessing patient response to hormonal therapy and as an aid in the prognosis and management of breast cancer patients. The clinical interpretation of any staining or its absence should be complemented by morphological studies using proper controls and should be evaluated within the context of the patient's clinical history and other diagnostic tests by a qualified pathologist.
BioGenex ER88 antibodies have been optimally manufactured for use with BioGenex Super Sensitive MultiLink Detection Systems with or without BioGenex Automated Staining Systems.
# STATEMENT OF HOW TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS COMPARED TO SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENT DEVICE:
A table is provided below comparing the similarities and differences between the BioGenex device and the predicate Dako Device (K993957) to detect estrogen receptors in normal and or pathological tissues.
| | BioGenex<br>(New device-K013148) | Dako<br>(Predicate device K993957) |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clone | ER88 | 1D5 |
| Antibody | Mouse monoclonal | Mouse monoclonal |
| Immunoglobulin Class | Mouse IgG1, Kappa | Mouse IgG1, Kappa |
| Intended Use | Is intended for laboratory use<br>to qualitatively identify by<br>light microscopy human<br>estrogen receptor in normal | May be used in semi<br>quantitative detection of<br>human estrogen receptor in<br>tissue sections of human |
{2}------------------------------------------------
| | and/or pathological paraffin-<br>embedded, formalin-fixed<br>tissues. | breast cancer by<br>immunohistochemistry. |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Indication | This antibody is indicated as<br>an aid in assessing patient<br>response to hormonal therapy<br>and as an aid in the prognosis<br>and management of breast<br>cancer patients. | This antibody is indicated as<br>an aid in assessing the likely<br>hood of response to therapy<br>as well as in prognosis and<br>management of breast cancer<br>patients. |
| Specificity | Human estrogen receptor in<br>formalin-fixed paraffin<br>embedded tissues. | Human estrogen receptor in<br>formalin-fixed paraffin<br>embedded tissues. |
| Total protein<br>concentration: | 10 mg/ml | 10 mg/ml |
| Storage | 2-8°C | 2-8°C |
| Application | For manual and automated<br>use | For manual and automated<br>use |
#### PERFORMANCE DATA:
#### 1. Specificity of Primary Antibody
A total of 88 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues covering a wide range of normal human tissue types were tested with the BioGenex ER88 antibody using BioGenex Super Sensitive HRP Detection System. In normal human tissues ER88 antibody demonstrated negative immunoreactivity with most tissues. However, positive immunoreactivity was observed with some normal tissues like the nuclei of acini and duct cells of mammary gland and myometrium and endometrium of uterus.
## 2. Reproducibility
- (a) Intra run (within-run) assay: The reproducibility of staining was determined by staining 10 slides of the same tissues within a single run. All slides were stained by the same individual using the same set of reagents for each of the tissues tested. Evaluation of the results indicates no significant variation among the slides of the same tissue stained in the same run.
- (b) Inter run (run-to-run) assay: The reproducibility between runs was determined by staining slides containing the same tissues over 10 different runs. Evaluation of the results indicates no significant variation among the slides of the same tissue stained in different runs.
- (c) Instrumental runs vs. manual runs: Ten slides each were stained with the antibody manually and using BioGenex Automated Stainer for each of the tissues tested. Tissue blocks were selected to demonstrate reproducibility over a wide
{3}------------------------------------------------
range of reactivity scale. The prediluted form of ER88 antibody was used for this study along with BioGenex Super Sensitive MultiLink Detection System with DAB as the substrate. Evaluation of the results indicates no significant variation among the slides of the same tissue stained manually and in the automated process.
## 3. Sensitivity
Comparison between ER88 IHC and reference DCC assays. The study was designed to use independent clinical specimens to establish the performance characteristics of ER88 antibody staining and its concordance with the reference methodology, dextrancharcoal coated (DCC) assay. The DCC assay is a biochemical assay and has been considered the gold standard for ER assay. More recently, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become a popular method for such testing (Kell, D et al. 1993, Goussard, 1998; Ferrero-Pous, M et al. 2001).
A total of 122 specimens were used in this study. All the specimens were selected according to the following criteria: 1) fomalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections were available; 2) each tissue was initially assayed for ER by DCC. No other selection criteria were employed. The study was conducted using two different batches of clinical specimens to include approximately 50% positive and negative cases.
The first batch of 29 specimens was assayed for DCC in the laboratory of the late Dr. William McGuire at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas. The DCC results were scored as positive using a cut-off value of ≥10 femtomoles/mg of protein. IHC staining of these slides was done in the laboratory of Dr. Louis P. Pertschuk in the Department of Pathology, King's County Hospital. State University of New York, Health Science Center, Brooklyn, New York using detection reagents provided by BioGenex.
The second batch of 93 specimens was assaved for DCC in the laboratory of Dr. William Fricke (Genesee Hospital, Rochester, NY). The DCC results were scored as positive or negative using a cut-off value of ≥10 femtomoles/mg of protein. The tissue blocks were provided to BioGenex laboratories for slide preparation and IHC staining using BioGenex detection reagents.
For both the studies, each resulting slide was read independently by two pathologists, who have no knowledge of any other laboratory or clinical data of the specimens. The scoring was based on percentage of cells with positive nuclear staining (Fitzgibbons PL, et al, 2000). Any trace of nuclear staining was counted as positive result (NIH Consensus Statement, 2000). The intensity of staining was not factored into the scoring system. A cut-off value of >10% of positive tumor cells was used to score a slide as positive or negative.
{4}------------------------------------------------
The overall binary concordance of ER88 IHC staining to ER DCC assay was 75% (92/122), with a 2-side 95% confidence interval of 68% - 83% (p<0.0001). This level of concordance indicated that ER88 IHC results and ER DCC results were similar. However, 25% of the results were discordant between these two methods. Reasons for discordance between hormone receptor IHC staining and hormone receptor DCC assays are well known (Kell, et al. 1993; Goussard, 1998; Ferrero-Poüs, et al. 2001), Since DCC requires specimen homogenization, the cellular localization of any detected receptor can not be determined. The receptor might be from either benign epithelium or tumor cells or both sources within the same tissue. With IHC, positive signals from only the tumor areas of the tissue are read by trained pathologists and signals from apparent normal areas from the same tissue are ignored. This would suggest that the IHC method is more specific than the DCC method.
## 4. Stability:
The objective of this study was to determine the expiration date of the device. The BioGenex ER88 Antibody was stored at 2-8°C continuous. Three lots of the device were tested after 24 months of storage following the standard in-house quality control testing procedures. Results of this study indicated that this device was stable for at least 24 months at 2-8°C.
Shipping stress studies were carried out on three lots of the device by continuous exposure to extreme temperature condition 45℃ for 48 hours. Results of this study indicated that this device was stable after continuous 48 hour exposure at 45°C.
## CONCLUSION:
The results indicate that BioGenex Monoclonal Anti-Estrogen Receptor (Clone ER88) is substantially equivalent to dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) technique and Dako estrogen receptor antibody (K993957).
# BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Ferrero-Poüs M, Trassard, M, Le Doussal V, Hacène K, Tubiana-Hulin M, Spyratos, F. Comparison of enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical measurements of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer patients. Appl Immunohistochem & Mol Mor 2001:9:267-275.
Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, Thor AD, Allred DC, Clark GM, Ruby SG, O'Malley F, Simpson JF, Connolly JL, Hayes DF, Edge SB, Lichter A, Schnitt SJ, Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000 Jul:124(7):966-78.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Kell D, Kamel O, Rouse R, Immunohistochemical analysis of breast carcinoma estrogen reen D, realler o, receptors in paraffin embedded tissue. Appl Immunohistochem 1993;1(4):275-281.
Goussard J. Paraffin section immunocytochemistry and cytosol-based ligand-binding assays for ER and PR detection in breast cancer: the time has come for more objectivity. Cancer Lett 1998 Oct 23;132(1-2):61-66.
NIH Consensus Statement. Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, Volume 17, Number 4, November 1–3, 2000 National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, pg. 8.
{6}------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Image /page/6/Picture/1 description: The image is a black and white logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo features a stylized caduceus symbol, which is a staff with two snakes coiled around it. The words "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES - USA" are arranged in a circular pattern around the caduceus symbol.
.
Food and Drug Administration 2098 Gaither Road Rockville MD 20850
FEB 2 8 2002
Gurvinder S. Nanda, Ph.D. Manager, Regulatory Affairs BioGenex Laboratories, Inc. 4600 Norris Canyon Road San Ramon, CA 94583
Re: k013148
Trade/Device Name: BioGenex Mouse Anti-Estrogen Receptor Antibody (Clone ER88) Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.1860 Regulation Name: Immunohistological Reagents and Kits Regulatory Class: Class II Product Code: MXZ Dated: December 20, 2001 Received: December 21, 2001
Dear Dr. Nanda:
We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.
If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to such additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.
Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.
{7}------------------------------------------------
#### Page 2 -
This letter will allow you to begin marketing your device as described in your 510(k) premarket notification. The FDA finding of substantial equivalence of your device to a legally marketed nothleation. The I Driving of succion for your device and thus, permits your device to proceed to the market.
If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (2) CFR Part 801 and 1 IT you desire spoonne active in yagostic devices), please contact the Office of Compliance at additionally 607.10 for in an ally, for questions on the promotion and advertising of your device, (301) 594-4566. Fraundomary, For quice at (301) 594-4639. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR 807.97). Other general information on your responsibilities under the Act may be obtained from the Division of Small mioritiation on your responsive as assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or Manufacturers International and Oblass "http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dsmamain.html".
Sincerely yours,
Steven Sutman
Steven I. Gutman, M.D., M.B.A. Director Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Enclosure
{8}------------------------------------------------
# INDICATIONS FOR USE STATEMENT
510(k) Number (if known): K013148
BioGenex Mouse Anti-Estrogen Receptor Antibody Device Name: (Clone ER88)
- The BioGenex Mouse Monoclonal Anti-Estrogen Receptor Indications for Use: Antibody (Clone ER88) is an immunohistochemical (IHC) assay and is intended for laboratory use to qualitatively identify by light microscopy human estrogen receptor in normal and/or pathological paraffin-embedded, formalinfixed tissues. The ER88 antibody specifically binds to antigens located in the nucleus of cell populations that express estrogen receptor in normal and abnormal tissues. This antibody is indicated as an aid in assessing patient response to hormonal therapy and as an aid in the prognosis and management of breast cancer patients. The clinical interpretation of any staining or its absence should be complemented by morphological studies using proper controls and should be evaluated within the context of the patient's clinical history and other diagnostic tests by a qualified pathologist.
optimally been have antibodies ER88 BioGenex manufactured for use with BioGenex Super Sensitive MultiLink Detection Systems with or without BioGenex Automated Staining Systems.
(Please do not write below this line-continue on another page if needed)
Concurrence of CDRH, Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)
Prescription Use
(Per 21 CFR 801.109) OR Over – The – Counter Use
(Optional format 1-2-96)
Sousan S.Altaie
(Division Sign-Off)
Division of Clinical Laboratory Devices
510(k) Number K013148
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.