The Claria System is indicated for contained cutting, coring, and extraction of tissue during laparoscopic hysterectomy. The Claria Container is introduced transvaginally to isolate and contain tissue considered benign during powered bulk tissue reduction with the Claria Bulk Tissue Reducer. When used in women with fibroids, the Claria System is for women who are pre-menopausal and under age 50.
Device Story
Claria System comprises integrated power morcellator and transvaginal containment system; used during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Device isolates/contains benign tissue during powered bulk tissue reduction. System components include Claria Container and Claria Bulk Tissue Reducer. Operated by physicians in clinical/surgical settings. System enables tissue morcellation and extraction while maintaining containment integrity to prevent intraperitoneal dissemination of tissue fragments. Output is reduced tissue mass; healthcare provider uses visual feedback to monitor instruments and tissue relative to external viscera. Benefits include minimally invasive tissue removal; reduced risk of occult cancer dissemination via containment. Requires specialized training for deployment and operation.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance testing required to demonstrate device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Testing must verify trained users can deploy, morcellate, and remove tissue while maintaining containment integrity. Must evaluate all adverse events. No specific clinical trial results provided in the summary document.
Technological Characteristics
Integrated power morcellator and containment system. Includes transvaginal containment component and powered bulk tissue reducer. Features include tissue/fluid impermeability, instrument visualization, and mechanical integrity during morcellation. Requires biocompatibility, sterility, and electromagnetic/electrical/thermal/mechanical safety testing. Software-controlled operation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for contained cutting, coring, and extraction of tissue during laparoscopic hysterectomy in women. For fibroid cases, limited to pre-menopausal women under age 50. Contraindicated if tissue is known or suspected to contain malignancy; contraindicated for post-menopausal women or those over 50 with suspected fibroids unless clinical data supports otherwise.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The Claria System is a prescription device indicated for contained cutting, coring, and extraction of tissue during laparoscopic hysterectomy. It consists of an integrated power morcellator and a containment method intended to contain, reduce, and remove gynecologic tissue that is not suspected to contain malignancy. The Claria Container is introduced transvaginally to isolate and contain tissue considered benign during powered bulk tissue reduction with the Claria Bulk Tissue Reducer. When used in women with fibroids, the system is indicated for pre-menopausal women under age 50.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
**FDA** U.S. FOOD & DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
July 2, 2026
Claria Medical, Inc.
Brian Fisher
VP, Regulatory, Clinical & Quality
2586 Wyandotte St.
Mountain View, California 94043
Re: DEN250034
Trade/Device Name: Claria System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 884.4075
Regulation Name: Gynecologic power morcellator and containment system
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: SIM
Dated: July 24, 2025
Received: August 7, 2025
Dear Brian Fisher:
The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Claria System, a prescription device under 21 CFR Part 801.109 with the following indications for use:
The Claria System is indicated for contained cutting, coring, and extraction of tissue during laparoscopic hysterectomy. The Claria Container is introduced transvaginally to isolate and contain tissue considered benign during powered bulk tissue reduction with the Claria Bulk Tissue Reducer. When used in women with fibroids, the Claria System is for women who are pre-menopausal and under age 50.
FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. This order, therefore, classifies the Claria System, and substantially equivalent devices of this generic type, into Class II under the generic name gynecologic power morcellator and containment system.
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
**Gynecologic power morcellator and containment system.** A gynecologic power morcellator and containment system is a prescription device consisting of an integrated power morcellator and a containment method that are intended to contain, reduce and remove gynecologic tissue that is not suspected to contain malignancy during minimally invasive surgery.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
DEN250034 - Brian Fisher
Page 2
Section 513(f)(2) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) was amended by section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on July 9, 2012. This law provides two options for De Novo classification. First, any person who receives a 'not substantially equivalent' (NSE) determination in response to a 510(k) for a device that has not been previously classified under the Act may request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act. On December 13, 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act removed a requirement that a De Novo request be submitted within 30 days of receiving an NSE determination. Alternatively, any person who determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence may request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act without first submitting a 510(k). FDA shall, within 120 days of receiving such a request, classify the device. This classification shall be the initial classification of the device. Within 30 days after the issuance of an order classifying the device, FDA must publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the classification.
On August 7, 2025, FDA received your De Novo requesting classification of the Claria System. The request was submitted under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. In order to classify the Claria System into class I or II, it is necessary that the proposed class have sufficient regulatory controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the information submitted in the De Novo request, FDA has determined that, for the previously stated indications for use, the Claria System can be classified in class II with the establishment of special controls for class II. FDA believes that class II (special) controls provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type. The identified risks and mitigation measures associated with the device type are summarized in the following table:
| Identified Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
| --- | --- |
| Adverse tissue reaction | Biocompatibility evaluation |
| Infection from lack of sterility | Sterilization validation Shelf life validation Labeling |
| Intraperitoneal tissue dissemination (benign or malignant) from containment breach leading to: • Spread of occult (unknown) cancer or fibroid fragments • Pain and distension | Clinical performance testing Non-clinical performance testing Software verification, validation and hazard analysis Electrical safety, thermal safety and mechanical safety testing Electromagnetic compatibility testing Labeling Training |
| Vaginal wound issues (bleeding, clot formation, pain, poor healing), organ injury, or infectious processes from: • Contact with the system components • Electrical shock • Excessive heat generation from the system components • Use error | Clinical performance testing Non-clinical performance testing Software verification, validation and hazard analysis Electrical safety, thermal safety and mechanical safety testing Electromagnetic compatibility testing Labeling Training |
{2}
DEN250034 - Brian Fisher
Page 3
| Identified Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
| --- | --- |
| Conversion to mini-laparotomy or open surgery with prolonged anesthesia due to: • Inadequate tissue morcellation • Use error | Clinical performance testing Non-clinical performance testing Labeling Training |
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the gynecologic power morcellator and containment system is subject to the following special controls:
1. (1) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Testing must demonstrate that trained users can deploy the device, morcellate and remove gynecologic tissue, and remove the device while maintaining containment integrity. Testing must evaluate all adverse events.
2. (2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use to verify and validate the design of the system. The following system performance characteristics must be tested:
1. (i) Demonstration of device impermeability to tissue, cells and fluids following morcellation;
2. (ii) Demonstration that the device allows for visualization of the instruments used with the system and tissue relative to external viscera during tissue reduction;
3. (iii) Demonstration that instruments used with the system do not compromise the integrity of the containment system; and
4. (iv) Demonstration of tissue morcellation and extraction under worst-case conditions.
3. (3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
4. (4) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be sterile.
5. (5) Performance data must support shelf life by demonstrating continued sterility of sterile components, package integrity, and device functionality over the labeled shelf life.
6. (6) Performance testing must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility, electrical safety, thermal safety, and mechanical safety of the device.
7. (7) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
8. (8) A training program must be validated and included with sufficient educational elements so that upon completion of the training program, users can deploy the device, morcellate and remove gynecologic tissue, and remove the device while maintaining containment integrity.
9. (9) Labeling must include:
1. (i) A contraindication for use in gynecologic surgery in which the tissue to be morcellated is known or suspected to contain malignancy;
{3}
DEN250034 - Brian Fisher
Page 4
- (ii) Unless clinical performance data demonstrates that it can be removed or modified, a contraindication for removal of uterine tissue containing suspected fibroids in patients who are: post-menopausal; or over 50 years of age; or candidates for en bloc tissue removal though the vagina or via a mini-laparotomy incision;
- (iii) A boxed warning identifying the risk of unsuspected cancer, potential for dissemination and that the use of this device has not been clinically demonstrated to reduce this risk;
- (iv) A statement limiting use of the device to physicians who have completed the training program; and
- (v) An expiration date or shelf life of the sterile components.
In addition, this is a prescription device and must comply with 21 CFR 801.109.
Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some granted products may instead be combination products. If you have questions on whether your product is a combination product, contact CDRHProductJurisdiction@fda.hhs.gov.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class II device from the premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act, if FDA determines that premarket notification is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type. FDA has determined premarket notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type and, therefore, the device is not exempt from the premarket notification requirements of the FD&C Act. Thus, persons who intend to market this device type must submit a premarket notification containing information on the gynecologic power morcellator and containment system they intend to market prior to marketing the device.
Please be advised that FDA's decision to grant this De Novo request does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the FD&C Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the FD&C Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the FD&C Act; 21 CFR 1000-1050).
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System Rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
{4}
DEN250034 - Brian Fisher
Page 5
A notice announcing this classification order will be published in the Federal Register. A copy of this order and supporting documentation are on file in the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852 and are available for inspection between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
As a result of this order, you may immediately market your device as described in the De Novo request, subject to the general control provisions of the FD&C Act and the special controls identified in this order.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
If you have any questions concerning the contents of the letter, please contact Veronica A. Cronin at 301-796-6538.
Sincerely,
SHARON M.
ANDREWS -S FDA
Sharon M. Andrews
Director
DHT3B: Division of Reproductive,
Gynecology, and Urology Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.