DEN250009 · Bridge TO Life, Ltd. · SGY · Jan 15, 2026 · Gastroenterology, Urology
Device Facts
Record ID
DEN250009
Device Name
VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System
Applicant
Bridge TO Life, Ltd.
Product Code
SGY · Gastroenterology, Urology
Decision Date
Jan 15, 2026
Decision
DENG
Submission Type
Direct
Regulation
21 CFR 876.5881
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Therapeutic
Indications for Use
The VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) System is intended to be used for hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of donor livers, after a period of static cold storage (SCS), for eventual transplantation into a recipient. The VitaSmart HOPE System is not intended to be used while the organ is in transport. The device is indicated for use with Donation after Brain Death (DBD) donor livers ≤ 65 years old; or Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) donor livers ≤ 55 years old and with ≤ 18 minutes of functional warm ischemic time with macrosteatosis ≤ 10%. The VitaSmart HOPE System is intended for use by qualified healthcare professionals trained in the use of the VitaSmart HOPE System.
Device Story
System performs hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) of donor livers post-static cold storage; maintains organ at sub-physiological temperatures prior to transplantation. Device includes perfusion circuit, oxygenator, and monitoring components. Operated by trained healthcare professionals in clinical settings. System monitors and controls perfusion parameters: temperature, pressure, flow, and oxygenation. Output provides continuous perfusion to support graft viability; assists clinicians in assessing organ function. Benefits include improved graft preservation and potential reduction in post-transplant complications.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance testing required to demonstrate device performance with compatible perfusion solutions. Must evaluate organ graft function, survival, recipient survival, and device-related adverse events (ischemic/vascular complications, perfusion injury).
Technological Characteristics
Hypothermic machine perfusion system; includes perfusion circuit, oxygenator, and accessories. Features controls/monitors for temperature, pressure, flow, and oxygenation. Organ-contacting components must be biocompatible and sterile. Requires shelf-life validation, EMC/electrical safety testing, and human factors validation.
Indications for Use
Indicated for hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of donor livers post-static cold storage for transplantation. Patient population: DBD donor livers ≤ 65 years old; DCD donor livers ≤ 55 years old with ≤ 18 minutes functional warm ischemic time and ≤ 10% macrosteatosis.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) System is a device intended for hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of donor livers, after a period of static cold storage (SCS), for eventual transplantation into a recipient. It is indicated for use with Donation after Brain Death (DBD) donor livers ≤ 65 years old; or Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) donor livers ≤ 55 years old and with ≤ 18 minutes of functional warm ischemic time with macrosteatosis ≤ 10%. The system includes perfusion sets, oxygenators, and other components of the perfusion circuit.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant is subject to the following special controls:
(1) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended when used with a compatible perfusion solution, and must evaluate:.
(i) Organ graft function and survival;
(ii) Recipient survival; and
(iii) Device-related adverse events, including ischemic and vascular complications and perfusion injury.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated:
(i) Mechanical integrity and reliability of the perfusion circuit; and
(ii) Controls and monitors for the perfusion parameters including temperature, pressure, flow, and oxygenation.
(3) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(4) The organ-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(5) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of all organ-contacting components of the device.
(6) Performance data must support the shelf-life by demonstrating package integrity, continued sterility, and functionality of the organ-contacting components of the device.
(7) Performance data must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety of the device in the intended use environment, including environments encountered during organ transport.
(8) Human factors validation testing must demonstrate that the intended user(s) in the intended use environment can correctly and safely use the device based solely on the directions for use and training program.
(9) A training program must be included with sufficient educational elements so that upon completion of the training program, the user can correctly prepare, perfuse, and monitor the organ while mitigating the risk of contamination.
(10) Labeling must include:
(i) The recommended training required for the safe use of the device;
(ii) Information on compatible perfusion solutions;
(iii) Information on the organ donor and recipient population from which the device performance was evaluated.
(iv) Information on the perfusion protocols and configurations from which the device performance was evaluated;
(v) A list of all accessories and components; and
(vi) A shelf life or service period.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}
FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION
January 15, 2026
Bridge to Life Ltd.
% Michael Nilo
President and Principal Consultant
Nilo Medical Consulting Group
3706 Butler St. #313
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15201
Re: DEN250009
Trade/Device Name: VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5881
Regulation Name: Hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant
Regulatory Class: Class II
Product Code: SGY
Dated: March 29, 2025
Received: March 31, 2025
Dear Michael Nilo:
The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System, a prescription device under 21 CFR Part 801.109 with the following indications for use:
The VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) System is intended to be used for hypothermic oxygenated perfusion of donor livers, after a period of static cold storage (SCS), for eventual transplantation into a recipient. The VitaSmart HOPE System is not intended to be used while the organ is in transport.
The device is indicated for use with Donation after Brain Death (DBD) donor livers ≤ 65 years old; or Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) donor livers ≤ 55 years old and with ≤ 18 minutes of functional warm ischemic time with macrosteatosis ≤ 10%.
The VitaSmart HOPE System is intended for use by qualified healthcare professionals trained in the use of the VitaSmart HOPE System.
FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. This order, therefore, classifies the VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System, and substantially equivalent devices of this generic type, into Class II under the generic name hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
{1}
DEN250009 - Michael Nilo
Page 2
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
**Hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant.** A hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant is a device that performs oxygenated perfusion of liver grafts at sub-physiological temperatures until it is transplanted into a recipient patient. This generic type of device may also include perfusion sets, oxygenators, and other components of the perfusion circuit.
Section 513(f)(2) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) was amended by section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on July 9, 2012. This law provides two options for De Novo classification. First, any person who receives a "not substantially equivalent" (NSE) determination in response to a 510(k) for a device that has not been previously classified under the Act may request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act. On December 13, 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act removed a requirement that a De Novo request be submitted within 30 days of receiving an NSE determination. Alternatively, any person who determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence may request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act without first submitting a 510(k). FDA shall, within 120 days of receiving such a request, classify the device. This classification shall be the initial classification of the device. Within 30 days after the issuance of an order classifying the device, FDA must publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the classification.
On March 31, 2025, FDA received your De Novo requesting classification of the VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System. The request was submitted under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. In order to classify the VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System into class I or II, it is necessary that the proposed class have sufficient regulatory controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the information submitted in the De Novo request, FDA has determined that, for the previously stated indications for use, the VitaSmart Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion System can be classified in class II with the establishment of special controls for class II. FDA believes that class II (special) controls provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type. The identified risks and mitigation measures associated with the device type are summarized in the following table:
| Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
| --- | --- |
| Graft failure or organ damage due to:
• Improper organ perfusion pressure or temperature,
• Insufficient priming of the perfusion circuit or
• Improper preparation of the perfusion circuit with liver graft
• Compromised perfusion or perfusion monitoring during handling | Clinical performance testing
Non-clinical performance testing
Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis
Human factors testing
Labeling |
{2}
DEN250009 - Michael Nilo
Page 3
| Infection | Sterilization validation
Reprocessing validation
Training
Shelf life testing
Labeling |
| --- | --- |
| Adverse tissue reaction | Biocompatibility evaluation |
| Delayed procedure or graft damage due to interference with other devices or electrical hazards | Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing
Electrical safety testing |
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant is subject to the following special controls:
(1) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended when used with a compatible perfusion solution, and must evaluate:.
(i) Organ graft function and survival;
(ii) Recipient survival; and
(iii) Device-related adverse events, including ischemic and vascular complications and perfusion injury.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be evaluated:
(i) Mechanical integrity and reliability of the perfusion circuit; and
(ii) Controls and monitors for the perfusion parameters including temperature, pressure, flow, and oxygenation.
(3) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed.
(4) The organ-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(5) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of all organ-contacting components of the device.
(6) Performance data must support the shelf-life by demonstrating package integrity, continued sterility, and functionality of the organ-contacting components of the device.
(7) Performance data must demonstrate the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety of the device in the intended use environment, including environments encountered during organ transport.
(8) Human factors validation testing must demonstrate that the intended user(s) in the intended use environment can correctly and safely use the device based solely on the directions for use and training program.
(9) A training program must be included with sufficient educational elements so that upon completion of the training program, the user can correctly prepare, perfuse, and monitor the organ while mitigating the risk of contamination.
(10) Labeling must include:
(i) The recommended training required for the safe use of the device;
(ii) Information on compatible perfusion solutions;
(iii) Information on the organ donor and recipient population from which the device performance was evaluated.
(iv) Information on the perfusion protocols and configurations from which the device performance was evaluated;
{3}
DEN250009 - Michael Nilo
Page 4
(v) A list of all accessories and components; and
(vi) A shelf life or service period.
In addition, this is a prescription device and must comply with 21 CFR 801.109.
Although this letter refers to your product as a device, please be aware that some granted products may instead be combination products. If you have questions on whether your product is a combination product, contact CDRHProductJurisdiction@fda.hhs.gov.
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class II device from the premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act, if FDA determines that premarket notification is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type. FDA has determined premarket notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type and, therefore, the device is not exempt from the premarket notification requirements of the FD&C Act. Thus, persons who intend to market this device type must submit a premarket notification containing information on the hypothermic machine perfusion system and accessories for orthotopic liver transplant they intend to market prior to marketing the device.
Please be advised that FDA's decision to grant this De Novo request does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the FD&C Act or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the FD&C Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803) for devices or postmarketing safety reporting (21 CFR 4, Subpart B) for combination products (see https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/guidance-regulatory-information/postmarketing-safety-reporting-combination-products); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820) for devices or current good manufacturing practices (21 CFR 4, Subpart A) for combination products; and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the FD&C Act; 21 CFR 1000-1050).
All medical devices, including Class I and unclassified devices and combination product device constituent parts are required to be in compliance with the final Unique Device Identification System Rule ("UDI Rule"). The UDI Rule requires, among other things, that a device bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label and package (21 CFR 801.20(a)) unless an exception or alternative applies (21 CFR 801.20(b)) and that the dates on the device label be formatted in accordance with 21 CFR 801.18. The UDI Rule (21 CFR 830.300(a) and 830.320(b)) also requires that certain information be submitted to the Global Unique Device Identification Database (GUDID) (21 CFR Part 830 Subpart E). For additional information on these requirements, please see the UDI System webpage at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/unique-device-identification-system-udi-system.
A notice announcing this classification order will be published in the Federal Register. A copy of this order and supporting documentation are on file in the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852 and are available for inspection between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
{4}
DEN250009 - Michael Nilo
Page 5
As a result of this order, you may immediately market your device as described in the De Novo request, subject to the general control provisions of the FD&C Act and the special controls identified in this order.
For comprehensive regulatory information about medical devices and radiation-emitting products, please see Device Advice (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance) and CDRH Learn (https://www.fda.gov/training-and-continuing-education/cdrh-learn). Additionally, you may contact the Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE) to ask a question about a specific regulatory topic. See the DICE website (https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/contact-us-division-industry-and-consumer-education-dice) for more information or contact DICE by email (DICE@fda.hhs.gov) or phone (1-800-638-2041 or 301-796-7100).
If you have any questions concerning the contents of the letter, please contact Virag Patel at 301-796-0452 or virag.patel@fda.hhs.gov.
Sincerely,
GLENN B. BELL -S
Glenn B. Bell, Ph.D.
Director
DHT3A: Division of Renal, Gastrointestinal,
Obesity, and Transplant Devices
OHT3: Office of Gastrorenal, ObGyn,
General Hospital, and Urology Devices
Office of Product Evaluation and Quality
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.