DEN230024 · Technoclone Herstellung Von Diagnostika Und Arzneimitteln GM · SAC · Feb 28, 2024 · Hematology
Device Facts
Record ID
DEN230024
Device Name
Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity
Applicant
Technoclone Herstellung Von Diagnostika Und Arzneimitteln GM
Product Code
SAC · Hematology
Decision Date
Feb 28, 2024
Decision
DENG
Submission Type
Direct
Regulation
21 CFR 864.7297
Device Class
Class 2
Attributes
Pediatric
Indications for Use
The Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) intended for the qualitative determination of ADAMTS13 activity in platelet poor human citrated plasma. The assay is intended to be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in adult and pediatric patients being evaluated for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA).
Device Story
Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity is an ELISA-based in vitro diagnostic assay; utilizes platelet-poor human citrated plasma samples; measures ADAMTS13 activity levels. Performed in clinical laboratory settings by trained personnel. Results provided to clinicians to assist in TTP diagnosis; must be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. Does not guide treatment or monitoring; results above diagnostic cutoff do not exclude TTP diagnosis in high-suspicion patients. Benefits include aiding timely diagnosis of TTP in patients presenting with thrombotic microangiopathy.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical performance study conducted at two sites (US and non-US) with 137 residual plasma samples from patients with suspected TMA. Samples were tested in duplicate. Sensitivity was 84.8% (95% CI: 69.1%–93.3%) and specificity was 97.1% (95% CI: 91.9%–99%). PPV was 90.2% and NPV was 95.3%. Study design was double-blinded, comparing assay results against clinical diagnosis of TTP.
Technological Characteristics
Manual ELISA. Components: anti-GST coated microplate, GST-VWF73 substrate, HRP-conjugated anti-neoepitope antibody, TMB substrate, sulfuric acid stop solution. Measures absorbance at 450 nm. Requires microplate reader. Traceable to NIBSC WHO 1st International Standard ADAMTS13 Plasma 12/252. Shelf-life 24 months at 2-8°C.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult and pediatric patients being evaluated for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) to aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP).
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) intended for the qualitative determination of ADAMTS13 activity in platelet-poor human citrated plasma. It is used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in adult and pediatric patients being evaluated for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA).
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/0/Picture/0 description: The image shows the logo of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The logo consists of two parts: a symbol on the left and the text "FDA U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION" on the right. The symbol is a stylized representation of a caduceus, a traditional symbol of medicine. The text is in a combination of blue and black, with "FDA" in blue and the rest of the text in black.
# EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC CLASS III DESIGNATION FOR Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity DECISION SUMMARY
#### Background Information: I
### A De Novo Number
DEN230024
# B Applicant
Technoclone Herstellung von Diagnostika und Arzneimitteln GmbH
# C Proprietary and Established Names
Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity
### D Regulatory Information
| Product<br>Code(s) | Classification | Regulation<br>Section | Panel |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------|------------|
| SAC | Class II with<br>special controls | 21 CFR 864.7297 | Hematology |
#### Submission/Device Overview: II
### A Purpose for Submission:
De Novo request for evaluation of automatic class III designation for Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity
### B Measurand:
ADAMTS13 Activity
### C Type of Test:
Manual enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 www.fda.gov
{1}------------------------------------------------
#### III Indications for Use:
### A Intended Use(s):
See Indications for Use below
# B Indication(s) for Use:
The Technozvm ADAMTS13 Activity assay is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) intended for the qualitative determination of ADAMTS13 activity in platelet poor human citrated plasma. The assay is intended to be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings as an aid in the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in adult and pediatric patients being evaluated for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA).
# C Special Conditions for Use Statement(s):
For Prescription Use Only For In Vitro Diagnostic Use Only
# D Special Instrument Requirements:
Microplate reader
#### IV Device/System Characteristics:
# A Device Description:
The Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay is an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used for detection of ADAMTS13 activity in citrated human plasma.
The assay contains:
- ADAMTS13 Activity anti-GST coated test plate microplate coated with anti-GST antibody .
- ADAMTS13 Activity GST-VWF73 reagent that contains GST tagged peptide of 73 amino . acids from the A2 domain of VWF with specific cleavage site for ADAMTS13 and serves as the in vitro substrate for ADAMTS13
- ADAMTS13 Activity Calibrators-consists of six vials containing lyophilized plasma, each . with a different level of ADAMTS13 activity
- ADAMTS13 Activity Controls consists of two vials of lyophilized plasma, each with high . or low levels of ADAMTS13 activity
- . ADAMTS13 Activity Conjugate - reagent that contains horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated monoclonal antibody directed against the neoepitope exposed due to cleavage of GST-VWF73 by ADAMTS13 present in plasma
- ADAMTS13 TMB substrate reagent contains tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate for . HRP
- ADAMTS13 Activity Stop Solution reagent contains 2.5% sulfuric acid for stopping the . conversion of TMB substrate
{2}------------------------------------------------
# B Test Principle
ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif 13, is an enzyme (VWF-cleaving protease) that specifically cleaves yon Willebrand factor (VWF) under high shear stress conditions. The Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay is an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of ADAMTS13 activity in human citrated plasma. GST-VWF73, a substrate that can be specifically cleaved by ADAMTS13 in vitro, is immobilized on to wells of a microplate that is pre-coated with an antibody specific to glutathione S-transferase (GST). After washing away unbound GST-VWF73, samples (i.e., clinical specimens, controls, and calibrators) are pipetted into wells and incubated with immobilized GST-VWF73. ADAMTS13 present in the samples cleaves the VWF73 peptide of immobilized GST-VWF73 at specific sites, exposing the neoepitope on VWF73. After washing away the excess sample, a second mouse monoclonal antibody specific to the neoepitope on GST-VWF73 that has been conjugated to the enzyme horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is added to the well. After washing away unbound HRP-conjugated antibody, the chromogenic substrate is added to the well. The HRP enzyme catalyzes a specific reaction with the chromogenic substrate, which produces a colored product that is detected as absorbance measurement (optical density, OD) at 450 nm with a microplate reader. The amount of absorbance (OD) generated is proportional to ADAMTS13 activity in the well. The results for the wells containing calibrators are used to create a reference curve to quantify the ADAMTS13 activity in the sample.
In line with the recommendation of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2020), the assay results should be interpreted at the ADAMTS13 Activity assay cut-off of 0.1 IU/mL for thrombotic thrombocvtopenic purpura (TTP). Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay results > 0.1 IU/mL will be TTP negative and results ≤ 0.1 IU/mL will be TTP positive. The ADAMTS13 Activity assay results should be interpreted in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings.
#### V Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
CLSI EP05-A3: Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Approved Guideline - Third Edition
CLSI EP06-A2: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP07-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures: Approved Guideline - Second Edition
CLSI EP25-A: Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved Guideline
{3}------------------------------------------------
#### Performance Characteristics: VI
### Analytical Performance:
# 1. Precision/Reproducibility:
Precision studies were conducted according to recommendations in CLSI EP05-A3 using quality controls and nine human plasma sample pools, which were prepared by mixing human plasma from normal donors with clinical samples from patients diagnosed with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and deficient in ADAMTS13 activity or heat inactivated plasma.
### Within-laboratory precision
To evaluate the within-laboratory precision, each sample was tested for five days with two runs per day and two replicates per run at a single site, using three reagent lots for a total of 30 replicate measurements per sample. The samples tested included levels below, around and above the assay cut-off of 0.1 IU/mL. The quantitative results are summarized in the tables below.
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(IU/mL) | Repeatability | | Between-run | | Between-day | | Between-lot | | Within-<br>laboratory | |
|--------|----|-----------------|---------------|------|-------------|------|-------------|------|-------------|------|-----------------------|------|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| S1 | 30 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 4.46 | 0.03 | 5.10 | 0.02 | 3.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 7.66 |
| S2 | 30 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 2.26 | 0.04 | 8.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3.00 | 0.04 | 9.26 |
| S3 | 29 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 3.25 | 0.01 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 0.01 | 4.52 |
| S4 | 29 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 0.01 | 4.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.10 | 0.01 | 4.97 |
| S5 | 30 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 0.01 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 5.17 |
| S6 | 30 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 0.01 | 8.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 7.87 |
| S7 | 30 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 4.88 | 0.03 | 3.80 | 0.02 | 2.90 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.05 | 6.90 |
| S8 | 30 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 3.04 | 0.01 | 5.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 6.24 |
| S9 | 30 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 0.01 | 4.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 4.91 |
| Sample | Mean<br>(IU/mL) | Total<br>results | Qualitative agreement | |
|----------------|-----------------|------------------|------------------------------|----------------|
| | | | Number of correct<br>results | % Correct call |
| S1<br>negative | 0.65 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S2<br>negative | 0.45 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S3<br>negative | 0.24 | 29 | 29/29 | 100 |
| S4<br>negative | 0.19 | 29 | 29/29 | 100 |
| S5<br>negative | 0.14 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Sample | Mean<br>(IU/mL) | Total<br>results | Qualitative agreement | |
|----------------|-----------------|------------------|------------------------------|----------------|
| | | | Number of correct<br>results | % Correct call |
| S6<br>positive | 0.08 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S7<br>negative | 0.65 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S8<br>negative | 0.23 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S9<br>negative | 0.12 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
# Operator-to-operator
The study was conducted over five days using one reagent lot with two runs per day and two replicates per run by three operators for a total of 30 mean results per sample level. The study design included six samples prepared by mixing plasma from normal human donors with native deficient plasma (TTP patient plasma) in different ratios. In addition, three sample levels were prepared by mixing plasma from normal human donors with heat inactivated plasma. The samples tested included levels below, around and above the assay cut-off of 0.1 IU/mL.
| Sample | N | Mean (IU/mL) | Repeatability | | Between-run | | Between-day | | Between-operator | | Within-laboratory | |
|--------|----|--------------|---------------|------|-------------|------|-------------|------|------------------|------|-------------------|-------|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| S1 | 30 | 0.67 | 0.03 | 4.17 | 0.03 | 5.10 | 0.03 | 4.80 | 0.01 | 1.90 | 0.06 | 8.27 |
| S2 | 30 | 0.45 | 0.01 | 2.26 | 0.04 | 9.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.30 | 0.05 | 10.08 |
| S3 | 29 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 2.90 | 0.01 | 4.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.30 | 0.01 | 5.59 |
| S4 | 29 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 2.19 | 0.01 | 5.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 0.01 | 6.10 |
| S5 | 30 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1.77 | 0.01 | 3.60 | 0.01 | 3.40 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 0.01 | 5.99 |
| S6 | 30 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.10 | 0.01 | 8.12 |
| S7 | 30 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 4.81 | 0.03 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 1.80 | 0.05 | 7.11 |
| S8 | 30 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 2.26 | 0.01 | 4.90 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.60 | 0.01 | 5.84 |
| S9 | 30 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 0.01 | 5.20 | 0.00 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 0.01 | 6.18 |
| Sample | Mean<br>(IU/mL) | Total<br>results | Qualitative agreement | |
|----------------|-----------------|------------------|------------------------------|----------------|
| | | | Number of correct<br>results | % Correct call |
| S1<br>negative | 0.67 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S2<br>negative | 0.45 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S3<br>negative | 0.24 | 29 | 29/29 | 100 |
| S4<br>negative | 0.19 | 29 | 29/29 | 100 |
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Sample | Mean<br>(IU/mL) | Total<br>results | Qualitative agreement | |
|----------------|-----------------|------------------|------------------------------|----------------|
| | | | Number of correct<br>results | % Correct call |
| S5<br>negative | 0.13 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S6<br>positive | 0.07 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S7<br>negative | 0.65 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S8<br>negative | 0.23 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S9<br>negative | 0.12 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
# Site-to-site reproducibility
The study was performed at three study sites. At each site, the samples were assayed on each of five days, with two runs per day and two replicates per run, using one lot of reagents, resulting in a total of 30 mean results per sample level. The study design included six sample levels prepared by mixing plasma from normal human donors with native deficient plasma (TTP patient plasma) in different ratios. In addition, three sample levels were prepared by mixing plasma from normal human donors with heat inactivated plasma. To prepare heat inactivated plasma with no residual ADAMTS13 activity, citrated plasma samples from normal donors were heat-inactivated for 1 hour at 56℃. The samples tested included levels below, around and above the cut-off of 0.1 IU/mL.
| Sample | N | Mean (IU/mL) | Repeatability | | Between-run | | Between-day | | Between-site | | Reproducibility | |
|--------|----|--------------|---------------|------|-------------|------|-------------|------|--------------|------|-----------------|-------|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| S1 | 30 | 0.67 | 0.03 | 4.81 | 0.04 | 6.20 | 0.05 | 6.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 10.24 |
| S2 | 30 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 4.67 | 0.04 | 8.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.20 | 0.05 | 9.86 |
| S3 | 29 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 3.75 | 0.02 | 6.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 4.80 | 0.02 | 8.99 |
| S4 | 29 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 4.46 | 0.02 | 7.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 8.64 |
| S5 | 30 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 4.17 | 0.01 | 9.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 9.88 |
| S6 | 30 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 4.53 | 0.01 | 6.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 7.00 | 0.01 | 10.45 |
| S7 | 30 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 4.46 | 0.04 | 5.70 | 0.01 | 2.00 | 0.03 | 3.90 | 0.06 | 8.49 |
| S8 | 30 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 4.31 | 0.01 | 5.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 6.85 |
| S9 | 30 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 2.97 | 0.01 | 6.40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.60 | 0.01 | 8.01 |
| Sample | Mean (IU/mL) | Total results | Qualitative agreement | |
|-------------|--------------|---------------|---------------------------|----------------|
| | | | Number of correct results | % Correct call |
| S1 negative | 0.67 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S2 negative | 0.46 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| | Mean | Total | Qualitative agreement | |
|----------------|---------|---------|------------------------------|----------------|
| Sample | (IU/mL) | results | Number of correct<br>results | % Correct call |
| S3<br>negative | 0.25 | 29 | 29/29 | 100 |
| S4<br>negative | 0.19 | 29 | 29/29 | 100 |
| S5<br>negative | 0.14 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S6<br>positive | 0.07 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S7<br>negative | 0.66 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S8<br>negative | 0.23 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
| S9<br>negative | 0.12 | 30 | 30/30 | 100 |
### 2. Analytical Specificity/Interference:
Interference studies were conducted based on the CLSI EP07 3rd Edition guideline. Three base pools mimicking high (1.0 IU/mL), medium (0.5 IU/mL) and low (0.1 IU/mL) levels of ADAMTS13 activity were prepared by mixing human citrated plasma (non-icteric, nonturbid and non-hemolyzed) with plasma rendered ADAMTS13 deficient by heat inactivation. Interference testing was conducted by paired-difference testing using one lot of reagents for both common endogenous and extrinsic interferents. Each sample was tested in five replicates. Samples with and without the interferent were measured, and the measurand concentration difference was determined.
None of the substances in the following table were found to lead to clinically significant interference.
| Potential interfering<br>substance | No interference up to the<br>following evaluated clinically<br>significant concentration: |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Exogenous | |
| Acetaminophen | 15.6 mg/dL |
| Acetylcysteine | 15.0 mg/dL |
| Ampicillin Na | 7.5 mg/dL |
| ASA | 3.0 mg/dL |
| Biotin | 0.351 mg/dL |
| Caplacizumab | 0.15 mg/dL |
| Cefoxitin Na | 660.0 mg/dL |
| Cyclosporine | 0.18 mg/dL |
| Doxycycline | 1.8 mg/dL |
| Heparin | 330 units/dL |
| Ibuprofen | 21.9 mg/dL |
| Levodopa | 0.75 mg/dL |
| Methyldopa | 2.25 mg/dL |
{7}------------------------------------------------
| Potential interfering<br>substance | No interference up to the<br>following evaluated clinically<br>significant concentration: |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Exogenous | |
| Metronidazole | 12.3 mg/dL |
| Phenylbutazone | 32.0 mg/dL |
| Prednisolone | 0.12 mg/dL |
| Rifampicin | 4.8 mg/dL |
| Rituximab | 50.0 mg/dL |
| Theophylline | 6.0 mg/dL |
| Endogenous | |
| Intralipid | 500 mg/dL |
| Hemoglobin | 220 mg/dL |
| Unconjugated Bilirubin | 66.0 mg/dL |
| Conjugated Bilirubin | 66.0 mg/dL |
| GST | 0.02 mg/dL |
| VWF | 2.0 IU/mL |
| Human anti mouse antibody | titer >12 |
| Rheumatoid factor | 156 IU/mL |
### 3. Assay Reportable Range:
Not applicable
- 4. Traceability, Stability, Expected Values (Controls, Calibrators, or Methods):
### Traceability
Target values for calibrators and controls are traceable to the first International Standard for ADAMTS13 Activity and Antigen in Plasma (NIBSC WHO 1st international Standard ADAMTS13 Plasma 12/252).
### Stability of calibrators and controls
Stability of calibrators and controls were evaluated in accordance with CLSI EP25A. Three lots of calibrators and controls were used in the study and stored in their final packaging at 2-8°C. At time points 0, 12, 24 and 30 months, sets of calibrators and controls were placed into stable storage (-70°C). At the end of the study (t=30 months), all calibrators and controls were tested in triplicate in one single run on one instrument using one lot of reagents. The data supported a real-time stability of 24 months.
- 5. Assay Cut-Off:
Not applicable
{8}------------------------------------------------
# B Comparison Studies:
# 1. Clinical Performance Study:
The clinical performance study was conducted at two external sites, one located in U.S. and the other located outside of the U.S. Testing was performed double blinded. The clinician making the diagnosis decisions and selecting the samples was blinded to the Technozym ADAMTS 13 activity results and the laboratory technician conducting the Technozym assay was blinded to the diagnosis. Samples were tested in duplicate using the Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay. One kit lot was used per study site. At each study site, tests were performed by one laboratory professional. The study samples used in testing were residual samples selected from a local repository of frozen human citrated plasma from patients diagnosed with thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) (i.e., clinical suspicion of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)) by board-certified clinician according to the local testing algorithm for TMAs. All patient samples were from donors > 6 months of age and patient population is representative of intended use population.
Combined agreement analysis for both sites with a total of 137 samples included in the clinical performance study.
| | | Clinical diagnosis of TTP | | |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|
| | | Positive | Negative | Total |
| Technozym<br>ADAMTS13<br>Activity | Positive | 28 | 3 | 31 |
| | Negative | 5 | 101 | 106 |
| Total | | 33 | 104 | 137 |
| | Sensitivity = 84.8% (28/33); 95% CI: (69.1% to 93.3%)<br>Specificity = 97.1% (101/104); 95% CI: (91.9% to 99%) | | Positive Predictive Value (PPV) = 90.2% (28/31); 95% CI: (75.2% to 96.6%)<br>Negative Predictive Value (NPV) = 95.3% (101/106); 95% CI: (90.0% to 97.8%) | |
### C Clinical Studies:
- 1. Clinical Sensitivity:
Refer to Clinical Performance Study
# 2. Clinical Specificity:
Refer to Clinical Performance Study
- 3. Other Clinical Supportive Data (When 1. and 2. Are Not Applicable):
Not applicable
{9}------------------------------------------------
# D Clinical Cut-Off:
The clinical cut-off for TTP diagnosis is 10% or 0.1 IU/mL ADAMTS13 activity.
# E Other Supportive Performance Characteristics Data:
### 1. Prozone Effect (Hook Effect)
Information was provided to support that no significant hook effect was observed up to activity levels of 8 IU/mL.
### 2. Cross-contamination Studies
A study was performed to evaluate if cross-contamination and/or carryover occurs between samples in the plate wells during the assay procedure. Low samples with a target concentration of 0.1 IU/mL and high samples with a target concentration of 1.0 IU/mL were used to perform the studies. In the first stage, the signal of only low samples was evaluated throughout the microplate. In the second stage, two test plates were run with an alternating pattern over all available patient sample locations. The pattern consisted of two wells containing only the low samples followed by two wells containing the high sample. The study was performed by three operators performing testing with three microplate readers and plate washer combinations with one lot of reagents. No cross-contamination was observed.
# 3. Reagent Stability Studies:
### Real-time Shelf-life Stability Studies
The real-time stability study was conducted in accordance with CLSI guideline EP25-A. The study was conducted with three lots of Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay kits. Eight samples were prepared by mixing citrated human plasma in human ADAMTS13 activity deficient plasma (HIP) in different ratios. These samples were aliquoted and frozen at -20℃ and a fresh aliquot was used for every test time point. Reagent kits were stored in their final packaging at 2-8°C. Time points used in the real time stability study included: 0, 6. 12, 24 and 30 months. Reagent kits were retrieved and tested with different ADAMTS13 activity sample levels at the end of each designated time point in the study. The testing was done in duplicates for each ADAMTS13 activity level. Based on the real-time stability results, the data supports a shelf-life of the Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay kit for up to 24 months at 2-8°C.
### 4. Sample Stability Studies
### Frozen sample stability
Eight samples were prepared by mixing citrated human plasma with heat treated citrated human plasma in different ratios, and aliquots was stored frozen at < - 20°C. At each test time point, a randomly selected set of aliquots was thawed at 37°C using a water bath and testing was performed. Samples were tested in duplicates in the Technozym ADAMTS13 Activity assay within one run. Testing was performed at the time points 0 (stored at -20°C for minimum of 5 days before testing), 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. One reagent lot was used
{10}------------------------------------------------
throughout the study and testing was performed on one instrument. The study supports frozen sample stability of 12 months.
# Fresh Sample stability
Six samples were prepared by mixing freshly drawn citrated human plasma with native TTP plasma (no ADAMTS13 activity) and aliquoted for testing at room temperature (18-25°C) and under refrigerated conditions (2-8°C). For samples stored at room temperature, testing was performed at time points 0, 4, 8, 9, 24 and 25 hours. For samples stored under refrigerated conditions, testing was performed at time points 0, 24, 25, 48 and 49 hours. All samples were tested in duplicates using three different reagent lots. The study supports a sample stability for up to 8 hours at room temperature (18-25°C) and up to 24 hours under refrigerated conditions.
#### Proposed Labeling: VII
The labeling supports the decision to grant the De Novo request for this device.
#### VIII Identified Risks and Mitigations:
| Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Clinical action based on false positive results<br>may lead to inappropriate patient management,<br>or unnecessary treatments. | Certain design verification and validation<br>activities and documentation, including<br>certain studies.<br><br>Certain labeling information, including<br>certain limiting statements and performance<br>characteristics. |
| Clinical action based on false negative results<br>may lead to delayed diagnosis, misdiagnosis, or<br>discontinuation of treatment. | Certain design verification and validation<br>activities and documentation, including<br>certain studies.<br><br>Certain labeling information, including<br>certain limiting statements and performance<br>characteristics. |
#### IX Benefit/Risk Assessment:
### A Summary of the Assessment of Benefit:
There is currently no FDA market-authorized device for determining ADAMTS13 activity. Patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) typically present with thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (e.g., low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, low haptoglobin, elevated LDH, presence of schistocytes in peripheral blood smear) and various degrees of organ damage. These changes, however, are non-specific for TTP and can also occur in many of the differential diagnoses. TTP is caused by ADAMTS13 deficiency. The availability of the test may aid in the differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) from other thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) as described in the Journal of Thrombosis and
{11}------------------------------------------------
Haemostasis (2020) "ISTH guidelines for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura" (e.g., "although diagnosis of TTP relies on a high index of suspicion, based on clinical presentation and laboratory results, the panel recognized that the importance of having an ADAMTS13 activity test in the diagnosis and initial management process").
### B Summary of the Assessment of Risk:
When used as intended, the risks of the device are mainly related to false positive or false negative test results. For a false positive test result, the risk could include unnecessary further testing or inappropriate patient management, including cessation of investigation for other diseases, resulting in missed opportunities to properly treat the patient. Additionally, a false positive test may lead to unnecessary treatments with side effects such as bleeding, fatigue, pyrexia, headache, paresthesia, urticaria, fatal infusion reactions, tumor lysis syndrome, severe mucocutaneous reaction and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Risks of a false negative test include a missed or delayed diagnosis, improper patient management including continuation of investigating the etiology of a patient's symptoms, which usually consists of further history, physical examination, and testing. The additional risk associated with a false negative test is related to the inappropriate discontinuation of treatment which can lead to missed opportunities for the timely treatment of TTP positive patients. Such treatment has been associated with faster normalization of platelet count, lower incidence of TTP-related death, lower rate of recurrence of TTP and lower incidence of thromboembolic event than placebo in clinical trials.
### C Patient Perspectives:
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
### D Summary of the Assessment of Benefit-Risk:
Device design verification and validation, including precision, method comparison, and interference studies will help ensure that the device functions as intended and mitigate the risk of false positive or false negative test results. A limitation statement conveying that results from the assay alone should not be used in making treatment decisions will be included in the labeling, as an additional mitigation against the risk of false positive and false negative results. Overall, while general controls are insufficient to mitigate the risks of the device, in light of the special controls, the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks of incorrect test results for the proposed indications for use.
#### Conclusion: X
The De Novo request is granted, and the device is classified under the following and subject to the special controls identified in the letter granting the De Novo request:
Product Code(s): SAC Device Type: ADAMTS13 activity test system Class: II Regulation: 21 CFR 864.7297
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.