The Ruthless Spine RJB device is intended to measure the angle of surgical instruments in two planes relative to a vertical plumb line in line with gravity. It is indicated for use during lumbosacral pedicle screw implantation in conjunction with applicable spinal instrumentation and as an adjunct to fluoroscopy or intraoperative x-ray. The RJB device is not intended to replace a surgeon's judgment and has not undergone clinical evaluation. No clinical benefit has been demonstrated or is claimed.
Device Story
Ruthless Spine RJB is an intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool; attaches to surgical instruments to measure instrument angle relative to vertical plumb line (gravity). Device does not use anatomic landmarks or patient registration. Used in OR by surgeons during lumbosacral pedicle screw implantation; provides real-time angular data as adjunct to fluoroscopy/x-ray. Output assists surgeon in instrument positioning; does not replace clinical judgment. Device requires software for measurement processing; subject to special controls including biocompatibility, electrical safety, and wireless coexistence testing.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Device has not undergone clinical evaluation. Performance supported by non-clinical bench testing, including system-level accuracy, simulated use validation, software verification/validation, and electrical/EMC testing.
Technological Characteristics
PCB with MEMS accelerometer, BLE module, coin-cell battery, polyolefin heat-shrink housing. Compatible with stainless steel (ASTM F899) and aluminum (ASTM B211/B221) instruments. Connectivity: BLE to dedicated tablet. Sterilization: EO (device), Steam (instruments). Software: Firmware (v3.0) and App (v1.0.9).
Indications for Use
Indicated for use during lumbosacral pedicle screw implantation in patients requiring spinal instrumentation; used as an adjunct to fluoroscopy or intraoperative x-ray.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
The Ruthless Spine RJB is an intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool that attaches to surgical instruments to measure the angle of the instrument relative to a vertical plumb line in line with gravity. It measures axial and sagittal angles in two planes. It is indicated for use during lumbosacral pedicle screw implantation in conjunction with applicable spinal instrumentation and as an adjunct to fluoroscopy or intraoperative x-ray. The device does not utilize anatomic landmarks or registration to patient anatomy and is not intended to replace a surgeon's clinical judgment.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act. an intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool is subject to the following special controls:
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# DE NOVO CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FOR RUTHLESS SPINE RJB
#### REGULATORY INFORMATION
FDA identifies this type of device as:
Intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool. An intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool attaches to surgical instruments to measure the angle of the instrument relative to a vertical plumb line in line with gravity. The tool does not utilize anatomic landmarks or registration to patient anatomy.
NEW REGULATION NUMBER: 21 CFR 888.4560
CLASSIFICATION: Class II
PRODUCT CODE: OWL
#### BACKGROUND
DEVICE NAME: Ruthless Spine RJB
SUBMISSION NUMBER: DEN230012
DATE OF DE NOVO: February 16, 2023
Ruthless, LLC dba Ruthless Spine CONTACT: 1438 Arrow Highway, Suite F/G Irwindale, CA 91706 USA
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Ruthless Spine RJB device is intended to measure the angle of surgical instruments in two planes relative to a vertical plumb line in line with gravity. It is indicated for use during lumbosacral pedicle screw implantation in conjunction with applicable spinal instrumentation and as an adjunct to fluoroscopy or intraoperative x-ray. The RJB device is not intended to replace a surgeon's judgment and has not undergone clinical evaluation. No clinical benefit has been demonstrated or is claimed.
#### LIMITATIONS
No clinical studies, Real World Data (RWD), Real World Evidence (RWE), or other information are available to evaluate the effect of patient demographics, such as race and ethnicity, on RJB device performance.
{1}------------------------------------------------
The sale, distribution, and use of the RJB device is restricted to prescription use in accordance with 21 CFR 801.109.
# PLEASE REFER TO THE LABELING FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS.
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Ruthless Spine RJB device ("RJB device") is an intraoperative surgical angle measurement guide that attaches to surgical instruments to measure the instrument relative to a vertical plumb line in line with gravity. The device can measure the axial and sagittal angles relative to gravity. The RJB system only provides measurements for angles in two planes relative to the vertical gravitational plumb line. As such. the RJB device does not provide surgical assistance, guidance, or navigation against patient anatomy. The RJB device is not intended to replace a surgeon's clinical judgement and has not undergone clinical evaluation. No clinical benefit has been demonstrated or is claimed.
The RJB device is provided sterile for single use and utilizes Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) to connect to a tablet computer and display the angle measurements via the RJB Application (App). A set of handles and instruments compatible with the RJB are provided with the device for use in lumbosacral pedicle screw placement. The following components are part of the RJB system:
- . RJB Device
- . Quick Connect Axial Ratcheting Handle (2)
- . Straight Probe (1)
- Duckbill Probe (1) .
- . RJB App
Note, a Tablet Computer is required to operate the device. The Tablet used for running the RJB App is supplied by the user and must be dedicated to RJB App use and not be used for any other purpose. The following are the minimum tablet specifications required for the RJB App:
Apple iPad Pro 11" (4th Generation) and above Storage: 128GB iOS: 14 and above Camera: Camera access is desirable but not required (device barcode may be input manually) Bluetooth: 4.0 and above Wi-Fi: Is required to download the app but is not necessary for App usage Cellular connectivity: Not required
Android Storage: 32GB Android OS: 10 and above
{2}------------------------------------------------
Processor Specifications: 2.0 GHz Memory: 2GB RAM Camera: Camera access is desirable but not required (device barcode may be input manually). If camera function is utilized, minimum camera resolution is an 8MP main camera with auto-focus. Bluetooth: 4.0 and above Wi-Fi: Is required to download the app but is not necessary for App usage Cellular connectivity: Not required
# RJB Device
The RJB device is comprised of a printed circuit board (PCB) containing an accelerometer, BLE module, and an integrated chip with programmed firmware, powered by an on-board coin-cell battery. The entire RJB PCB is surrounded by polyolefin heat-shrink tubing. A polyimide pulltab (orange strip in Figure 1) is inserted underneath the battery such that when it is removed from the end of the device, the RJB device is turned on and is able to be paired with a tablet for use. The device has a minimum 8-hour battery life once activated. The RJB device is identified with a serial number and scannable barcode that are used to pair the device in the RJB App.
Image /page/2/Picture/3 description: The image shows three different views of a medical device. The first view shows the front of the device, which has a blue plastic casing with the words "UP" and "DOWN" printed on it with arrows. The second view shows the side of the device, which has a barcode and the words "Ruthless Spine" printed on it. The third view shows the device attached to a screwdriver.
Figure 1: RJB device (left and middle) and RJB device inserted into example device handle (right).
Once activated and paired with the App, the RJB device can be inserted into the slotted handle of a pedicle screw instrument which fits the dimensions of the RJB device. A set of compatible handles and instruments are provided with the RJB system; each instrument is manufactured with a slot feature at the end of the handle, allowing for the RJB device to be inserted and held in place via friction fit. The RJB device is marked with orientation arrows to ensure proper insertion into a compatible handle.
{3}------------------------------------------------
The RJB operates by sensing the axial and sagittal angles that the device is oriented in with respect to gravity and outputting those angles to the tablet display for the user to view. Angles are displayed to either whole or half-degree precision. The measurements are made with respect to gravity and do not have any anatomical reference.
# RJB Application
The RJB Application (App) is the user interface of the system. The user will connect the RJB device to the RJB App upon start-up of the application via a welcome screen that contains a text box for device serial number input or barcode scanning. Following pairing, the RJB device can then be inserted into the compatible slotted handle of a pedicle screw instrument.
Through the App, the user can rename or remove the paired device depending on need. Up to four RJB devices can be paired at once. During the pairing process, the user will be required to choose a preset name for the device or can choose to manually type in a custom name not on the list. After pairing, the user can choose which device to have selected when the selected device's data is communicated to the application. The RJB App will display the axial and sagittal angles on the touchscreen display. While using connected devices, users also have the option to hold desired angles on screen or offset the displayed angle by a desired amount through the App.
Image /page/3/Picture/4 description: The image shows a screen display with the title "RJB DISPLAY" at the top. Below the title, the text "GEARSHIFT, RJB6 240F.BC53" is displayed. The screen shows the axial angle as 24.5 and the sagittal angle as -16.0.
Figure 2: RJB Application example screen
{4}------------------------------------------------
# SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL TESTING
#### BIOCOMPATIBILITY / MATERIALS
The RJB is intended to be used with lumbosacral pedicle screw instrumentation, inserted into the handle end of an instrument which does not contact the patient during the surgical procedure. The device is thus considered a non-contact device per Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within risk management process", having no direct or indirect contact with the body.
The outer material of the RJB is | (0)[4) polvolefin heat shrink tubing printed with This commercial-grade heat shrink material is (b)(c) ======================================================================================================================================================================= RoHS-compliant and is lead- and halogen-free. Although not required for non-contact devices, cytotoxicity testing per ISO 10993-5 was performed on samples of the heat shrink tubing material that had undergone the same handling, cleaning, and sterilization processes as production devices.
All patient-contacting instrumentation provided with the RJB system is manufactured from medical grade stainless steel per ASTM F899 and 6061-T6/T651 aluminum per ASTM B211 or B221 with a type and duration of patient contact of direct tissue/bone contact, limited (≤24 hours) duration. Biocompatibility evaluation has been completed per Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, "Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part I: Evaluation and testing within risk management process".
## ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY AND ELECTRICAL SAFETY
The following electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety testing was performed for the RJB:
- · Electromagnetic compatibility testing per:
- IEC 60601-1-2:2014
- · FCC CFR 47, Part 15, subpart B:2017, Class A (radiated emissions)
- · AIM 7351731 Rev. 2.00 (2017-02-23) (electromagnetic immunity)
- · IEEE/ANSI C63.27.2017 (coexistence/crosstalk)
- · Electrical safety testing per:
- IEC 60601-1:2005, AMD1:2012
As part of the compliance to IEC 60601-1, the RJB risk management documentation was assessed in conformance with ISO 14971:2007 Medical devices - Application of risk management to medical devices. Also, as part of IEC 60601-1 testing, the RJB firmware documentation was assessed in conformance with IEC 62304:2006 Medical device software - Software life cycle processes. Upon completion of the electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety testing, all relevant portions met the acceptance criteria and the labeling mitigations have been implemented.
For additional information regarding electromagnetic compatibility and electrical safety, please see the Surgical Technique.
{5}------------------------------------------------
#### SOFTWARE / CYBERSECURITY
The RJB software documentation and verification testing is based on a Level of Concern of Moderate per FDA's Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices. Prior to mitigation of hazards, a failure of the software device could result in minor injury to the patient. The device and labeling passed all relevant portions of the testing.
#### Software Description
The programmable software that comprises the RJB takes two forms. 1) programmed firmware loaded onto the integrated chip on the RJB device itself, and 2) the software of the RJB App run on a tablet.
The programmed firmware allows the RJB hardware to measure angular displacement from vertical by using a Micro Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) accelerometer to measure the gravitational field in all three axes. The three gravitational measurements are converted into angles by basic trigonometry. The displacement angles are then communicated to a display device (RJB App run on a tablet) by a BLE wireless link. An integrated microprocessor and RF radio module are used to control the accelerometer, compute the angles, and send the results to the display device.
The App connects to an RJB device via cither manual serial number entry or automated barcode scanning. Once paired, the App displays the axial and sagittal angles communicated by the RJB onto the tablet screen.
## Verification Testing
Software verification testing was performed for the RJB system to verify that the system functions as designed. The following methods were applied to verification testing of the system:
- 1. Identify software requirement specifications.
- 2. Create a verification test procedure and acceptance criteria for each specification.
- 3. Perform each verification test and record the results.
- 4. Testing is considered complete once all test procedures have successfully passed, which indicates that all functions of the RJB system are properly implemented.
Following completion of the verification testing, all software features have passed the testing acceptance criteria.
## Revision Level History
The current revision of the RJB firmware is version 3.0, and the current revision of the RJB App is v1.0.9. These versions of the firmware and software were used to conduct system level verification/validation.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# Cybersecurity
Adequate risk analyses and information per FDA guidance Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices were provided. The cybersecurity risks associated with the RJB were evaluated through the following:
- Identification of assets, threats, and vulnerabilities; .
- Assessment of the impact of threats and vulnerabilities on device functionality . and end user/patients:
- . Assessment of the likelihood of a threat and of a vulnerability being exploited;
- Determination of risk levels and suitable mitigation strategies; .
- Assessment of residual risk and risk acceptance criteria. .
The cybersecurity risk analysis performed, the controls identified, the comparison with the National Vulnerability Database, and the labeling information detailed within the Cybersecurity Assessment demonstrated that all risks associated with network capable interfaces of the device have been mitigated to the lowest possible level.
# PACKAGING, STERILIZATION, AND SHELF LIFE
## RJB Device
The RJB device is provided sterile for single use. The sterilization method of the device has been validated in accordance with ISO 11135:2014 to ensure a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6 before the device is marketed.
Each Ruthless Spine RJB device has a shelf life of 1 year, which has been validated through real-time and accelerated aging techniques per ASTM F1980-16. The shelf life of the ethylene oxide (EO)-sterilized packages was verified by demonstrating package integrity through gross leak detection and peel strength testing.
## RJB Instruments
RJB instruments and handles are provided visually clean and non-sterile and must be sterilized prior to use. None of the provided instruments or handles are reusable. Steam sterilization method per ANSI/AAMI/ISO 17665-1 was validated to ensure a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6.
## PERFORMANCE TESTING-BENCH
The RJB underwent a series of non-clinical performance tests described below to verify safety and effectiveness during use, as well as to validate the overall device design.
#### Angle Measurement Accuracy
In order to verify the system-level angle measurement accuracy of the RJB device, the angular outputs of the device were compared with a NIST-traceable calibrated digital
{7}------------------------------------------------
protractor mounted at the same axial or sagittal angle in space as the RJB device. All test results met the acceptance criteria.
| | Axial Orientation | Sagittal Orientation |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|
| Average Difference Between RJB and<br>Protractor Measurement ± standard<br>deviation | $0.36 \pm 0.32^\circ$ | $0.74 \pm 0.47^\circ$ |
Table 1: System-Level Angle Measurement Accuracy Testing Results
# Battery Life Testing
Battery life testing was performed following distribution and accelerated aging validation to confirm that these activities do not adversely affect the RJB's 8-hour usage life. All devices demonstrated a battery life of 8 hours, meeting the acceptance criterion.
## Procedural Accuracy Testing
Procedural accuracy testing of the RJB device was performed in order to validate the accuracy of the device under simulated use conditions. The test method involved the user positioning the RJB instrument against a cadaver pedicle to simulate pedicle screw placement. The instrument was positioned in a composite angle using a pre-planned axial angle from MRI imaging and sagittal angle from fluoroscopv imaging. When the instrument was positioned at the desired composite angle, both a fluoroscopic and a pair of photographic images were taken of the instrument to allow for angle calculation following the test. The images taken were used to calculate composite angle error as compared to the ground-truth measurement (gravity).
The results for angular composite error for all 240 trials (3 measurements at each of 5 levels for 16 surgeon users) is shown below are presented in Figure 3 below.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Image /page/8/Figure/0 description: The image is a histogram that shows the distribution of composite errors in degrees. The x-axis represents the composite error in degrees, ranging from 0.0 to 3.0. The y-axis represents the number of tests, ranging from 0 to 25. The histogram shows that the composite errors are mostly concentrated between 0.2 and 1.4 degrees, with a peak around 0.8 degrees.
#### Composite Error Distribution Among All Surgeon Testers
Figure 3: Angular composite error for all trials
Repeatability of the fluoroscopic angles was computed from the difference between the largest and smallest fluoroscopic sagittal angle at each level. The results are summarized in Figure 4.
Image /page/8/Figure/4 description: This image is a bar graph titled "Repeatability". The x-axis is labeled "Error in Degrees" and ranges from 0 to 3, with increments of 0.2. The y-axis is labeled "Number of Tests" and ranges from 0 to 8. The bar graph shows the number of tests for each error in degrees, with the highest number of tests occurring at 0.6 and 1.4 degrees.
Figure 4: Fluoroscopic angle repeatability results
All sixteen (16) surgeons participating in the tests met the acceptance criteria. None of the composite errors exceeded 2.6 degrees (±3º acceptance criteria) and the largest fluoroscopic image repeatability deviation was 2.7 degrees (±3º acceptance criteria).
{9}------------------------------------------------
# USABILITY TESTING
Usability testing in the form of a surgeon evaluation of the RJB device was performed to validate the design of the RJB device and application. The test was also intended to determine the effectiveness of device labeling in instructing the users on proper device setup and operation. Surgeon feedback was captured with a Usability Test Questionnaire following the test. Each question was asked with response options given either as a scale of 1-5 (strongly disagree to strongly agree), a yes/no chosen response, or a written response as prompted. See Table 2 below for a summary of the questionnaire results.
| Item | Question | Avg Score/Summary |
|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| 1 | The RJB device fit securely into the instrument handle. | 5 |
| 2 | The battery pull tab was easy to remove. | 5 |
| 3 | Which pairing method was used? | Barcode: 14 Manual: 1 |
| 4 | It was easy to pair the RJB device. | 5 |
| 5 | Four (4) RJB devices were able to pair. | Yes: 13 No: 1 |
| 6 | The RJB for the instrument in use was always displayed on the screen. | Yes: 15 No: 0 |
| 7 | The Hold feature held the angle on-screen and did not remove the held angle until 'Clear Hold' was pressed. | Yes: 14 No: 1 |
| 8 | The Offset feature offset the angle on-screen and did not remove the offset until 'Clear Offset' was pressed. | Yes: 14 No: 1 |
| 9 | The RJB device remained on for the entire test. | Yes: 14 No: 1 |
| 10 | The angles updated in real-time throughout the test. | Yes: 14 No: 1 |
| 11 | The angles displayed were in the proper plane. | Yes: 14 No: 1 |
| 12 | The device labeling was clear and helpful. | 5 |
| 13 | The measurement accuracy of the RJB is ±3.5 degrees in both the axial and sagittal directions. | 4.9 |
| 14 | Overall, I found the various features of the RJB device and application to be well-integrated. | 4.9 |
| 15 | I would imagine that most people would learn to use the RJB device very quickly. | 4.7 |
Table 2: Usability Test Questionnaire Results
Overall, surgeons representing potential clinical users provided valuable input on the usability of the RJB device. No feedback warranted device design or labeling changes. The testing validated that the user needs are met with the current device design and labeling.
## LABELING
The RJB system labeling consists of the following: device description, device characteristics, wireless technology information, indications for use, contraindications, warnings and precautions, cleaning and sterilization information, storage and handling information, tablet and app installation instructions, device operating instructions, product complaint information, and
{10}------------------------------------------------
label symbols definitions. The labeling meets the requirements of 21 CFR 801.109 for prescription devices and specifically indicates that the device is not intended to replace a surgeon's clinical judgement nor intended to influence clinical decision-making. The sterile packaging section includes information on the shelf life of the device.
# RISKS TO HEALTH AND IDENTIFIED MITIGATION MEASURES
Table 3 identifies the risks to health that may be associated with the use of an intraoperative surgical angle measurement guide and the measures necessary to mitigate these risks.
| Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Implant malpositioning, prolonged<br>operative time, or loss of function /<br>measurement integrity resulting<br>from user error, measurement<br>inaccuracy, and/or hardware failure | Non-clinical performance testing<br>Labeling |
| Adverse tissue reaction | Biocompatibility evaluation |
| Infection | Sterilization/reprocessing validation<br>Shelf life testing<br>Labeling |
| Implant malpositioning, prolonged<br>operative time, or loss of function /<br>measurement integrity resulting<br>from software error | Software verification, validation, and hazard<br>analysis<br>Usability testing<br>Labeling |
| Electrical shock | Electrical safety testing<br>Labeling |
| Device failure due to interference<br>from other devices, or interference<br>leading to failure of other devices<br>in the operating environment | Electromagnetic compatibility/interference<br>testing<br>Wireless coexistence testing<br>Electrical safety testing<br>Labeling |
Table 3 - Identified Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
## SPECIAL CONTROLS
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act. an intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool is subject to the following special controls:
- Non-clinical performance testing data must demonstrate that the device performs as (1) intended under anticipated conditions of use, including an evaluation of system-level accuracy and validation of procedural accuracy in simulated use.
- (2) Usability testing must demonstrate that the intended user(s) can correctly use the device based on the instructions for use.
{11}------------------------------------------------
- (3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
- (4) Performance testing must support the sterility and shelf life of the device.
- Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed. (5)
- Performance data must demonstrate the electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, (6) and wireless coexistence of the device.
- (7) Labeling must include:
- A detailed summary of the device technical parameters: (i)
- (ii) Information regarding limitations of the clinical significance of the device output:
- A detailed summary of the accuracy and precision of the device; (iii)
- Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing of any reusable components; (iv) and
- The shelf life of the device. (v)
#### BENEFIT/RISK DETERMINATION
The sponsor has collected adequate data to assess the safety profile of the subject device and identified that there are benefits (e.g., providing intraoperative measurements on the orientation of pedicle screw instrumentation relative to gravity). System-level accuracy verification and simulated-use procedural accuracy validation demonstrated that the accuracy of the angle measurements provided by the device are acceptable for the intended use of the RJB in lumbosacral pedicle screw procedures.
Although no clinical benefit has been demonstrated or is claimed, the sponsor's system, procedural, and usability testing indicate that adequately trained surgeons can use the RJB device to accurately measure the isolated or composite sagittal and axial angles of surgical instruments designed for lumbosacral pedicle screw implantation (± 1º system / ± 3º procedural).
Accordingly, the submitted test results demonstrate that an informed and adequately trained surgeon can accurately and reproducibly use the Ruthless Spine RJB to determine the axial and sagittal trajectory angles of the instruments relative to a vertical plumb line in line with gravity. These measurements may be of value during the intra-operative implantation of lumbosacral pedicle screws when used in adjunct to traditional radiographic, visual, and tactile methods.
The risks of the device are based on the risk analysis performed and include loss of function or measurement integrity resulting from user error, measurement inaccuracy, and/or hardware or software failure, adverse tissue reaction, infection, or electromagnetic interference. Types of harmful risks include patient harm due to incorrect instrument trajectory, such as implant malpositioning. Associated device risks (e.g., patient harm due to incorrect instrument trajectory, prolonged operative time, surgeon distraction, and/or electrical shock) can be effectively mitigated by training and the use of general and special controls.
#### Patient Perspectives
{12}------------------------------------------------
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
## Benefit/Risk Conclusion
In conclusion, based on the available data, when used as an intraoperative tool for measuring the angle of pedicle screw instruments in two planes relative to the vertical gravity plumb line, the probable benefit of the Ruthless Spine RJB outweighs the probable risk when the device is used as intended. Overall, the device provides benefits, and the identified risks can be mitigated by the use of general controls and identified special controls.
## CONCLUSION
The De Novo request for the Ruthless Spine RJB is granted and the device is classified under the following:
Product Code: QWL Device Type: Intraoperative surgical angle measurement tool Class: II Regulation: 21 CFR 888.4560
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.