The ELEOS™/ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is indicated for resection and replacement of the proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, total femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusion acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia; 2) Inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis; 3) Correction of functional deformity; 4) Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and, 5) Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques. The ELEOS™/ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is also indicated for procedures where resection and replacement of the proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, total femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia is required with the following conditions: 1) Patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the hip and/or knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment; 2) Surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision hip or knee arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications. 3) Metastatic diseases. The ELEOSx™ MDPB coating, where applied, is intended to reduce bacterial contamination prior to implantation resulting from deposition in the operating room on the surface of the device components.
Device Story
Metallic limb and joint salvage implant; includes optional quaternary ammonium compound (MDPB) coating covalently bonded to surface. Device replaces extremity bones/joints in skeletally mature patients. MDPB coating reduces microbial contamination on device surface prior to implantation; does not act within or on body; not for treating existing infections. Used in surgical oncology or orthopedic revision procedures. Surgeon implants device to restore skeletal function. Benefits include structural replacement and reduced risk of perioperative bacterial contamination. No clinical trial data evaluated for clinical impact of coating on infection prevention.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data. Evidence consists of bench testing and animal studies. A 52-week ovine study and 13-week rabbit study evaluated systemic toxicity and local tissue reactivity, showing minimal reactivity similar to uncoated controls. Bench testing included coating integrity (optical microscopy), range of motion (computer simulation), cement interface pull-out strength, and fretting/corrosion fatigue testing. Antimicrobial performance was evaluated via in vitro simulated use testing.
Indicated for skeletally mature patients requiring resection and replacement of proximal femur, intercalary femur, total femur, distal femur, or proximal tibia due to non-inflammatory/inflammatory degenerative joint disease, functional deformity, failed prior treatments, unmanageable fractures, severe arthropathy, severe trauma, revision arthroplasty, oncology indications, or metastatic disease.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating is a metallic implant with or without polymer bearing for bone and joint replacement. Implants are for resection and replacement of an extremity bone (including the entire bone, epiphyseal bone, metaphyseal bone, or diaphyseal bone), or an extremity bone and the surrounding joint(s) in a skeletally mature patient. The device includes a quaternary ammonium compound coating that is covalently bonded to the device, intended to reduce microbial contamination on the surface of the device prior to implantation.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act. the limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating is subject to the following special controls:
- (1) Animal performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Animal testing must include imaging, histology. and histomorphometry to assess bone formation, healing, and tissue response at relevant timepoints over the course of healing.
- (2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following:
- Evaluation of the static and dynamic performance of the implant: (i)
- Evaluation of coated implant initial fixation: (ii)
- Evaluation of coating integrity: (iii)
- Evaluation of range of motion; (iv)
- Evaluation of articulating bearing wear and bearing material; (v)
- Evaluation of implant disassembly: (vi)
- (vii) Evaluation of fretting and corrosion;
- (viii) Evaluation of antimicrobial performance with clinically relevant microbial species; and
- (ix) Coating characterization, including a detailed description of the substrate morphology and coating process and an evaluation of coating physicochemical properties such as density, thickness, chemistry, and uniformity.
- (3) An analysis must be provided that identifies and evaluates any contribution to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance.
- (4) An analysis or information must be provided to support that the antimicrobial does not act within or on the body.
- (5) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
- (6) Performance data must support the sterility and pyrogenicity of the device components intended to be provided sterile.
- Performance data must validate the reprocessing instructions for the reusable (7) instrumentation to be used with the device.
- Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued (8) sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
- (9) Labeling must include the following:
- Identification of device materials; (i)
- A shelf life: and (ii)
- (iii) Instructions for removal/revision procedures.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
### DE NOVO CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FOR ELEOSXTM LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM
#### REGULATORY INFORMATION
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
Limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating. A limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating is a metallic implant with or without polymer bearing for bone and joint replacement. Implants are for resection and replacement of an extremity bone (including the entire bone, epiphyseal bone, metaphyseal bone, or diaphyseal bone), or an extremity bone and the surrounding joint(s) in a skeletally mature patient. The device includes a quatemary ammonium compound coating that is covalently bonded to the device. Where applied, the coating is intended to reduce microbial contamination on the surface of the device prior to implantation. The device does not contain antimicrobial agents that act within or on the body and this device type does not include combination products.
NEW REGULATION NUMBER: 21 CFR 888.3900
CLASSIFICATION: Class II
PRODUCT CODE: QZZ
#### BACKGROUND
DEVICE NAME: ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System
SUBMISSION NUMBER: DEN210058
DATE DE NOVO RECEIVED: January 4, 2022
#### SPONSOR INFORMATION:
Onkos Surgical 77 East Halsey Rd Parsippany, NJ 07054
## INDICATIONS FOR USE
The ELEOSTM/ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is indicated for resection and replacement of the proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, total femur, distal femur. and proximal tibia in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusion acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia; 2) Inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis; 3) Correction of functional deformity
{1}------------------------------------------------
4) Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed: and.
- 5) Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
The ELEOS™/ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is also indicated for procedures where resection and replacement of the proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, total femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia is required with the following conditions: 1) Patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the hip and/or knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment;
2) Surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision hip or knee arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications.
- 3) Metastatic diseases
The ELEOSx™ MDPB coating, where applied, is intended to reduce bacterial contamination prior to implantation resulting from deposition in the operating room on the surface of the device components. The clinical impact associated with the MDPB coating, including prevention of infection or reduction of infection risk in patients, has not been evaluated in human clinical trials. The MDPB coating is not intended to treat existing infections and does not act within or on the body.
### LIMITATIONS
The sale, distribution, and use of the ELEOSx ™ Limb Salvage System are restricted to prescription use in accordance with 21 CFR 801.109.
PLEASE REFER TO THE LABELING FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS.
## DEVICE DESCRIPTION
#### Implant Description
The Onkos Surgical ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System consists of components that are used in the reconstruction of the lower limb. The systems include components manufactured from cobalt-chrome alloy (CoCr), titanium alloy (TAV), and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Non-articulating CoCr component surfaces are coated with 12-Methacryloyloxydodecyl Pyridinium Bromide (MDPB), which is intended to reduce bacterial contamination on the surface of the device components prior to implantation resulting from deposition in the operating room. Based on in vitro testing, this coating may result in immobilization and/or lysis of some challenge organisms. The MDPB coated CoCr stems are for cemented use in the reconstruction/replacement of the lower limb. The reconstruction applications are proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, distal femur, total femur, proximal tibia, and hinged knee. The ELEOS™ Limb Salvage components are femoral head, proximal femur, female stem, mid-section, stem, distal femur, tibial hinge component, axial pin. tibial poly spacer, tibial baseplate, malemale mid-section, resurfacing femur, proximal tibia, tapered screws, patella, stem
{2}------------------------------------------------
extension, tibial wedges, and augments.
| Proximal Femur | Intercalary | Distal<br>Femur | Total Femur | Proximal Tibia | Hinged Knee |
|-----------------------|--------------------|---------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|--------------------|
| Image: Proximal Femur | Image: Intercalary | Image: Distal Femur | Image: Total Femur | Image: Proximal Tibia | Image: Hinged Knee |
| | | Reconstruction Applications and Assemblies | | | | | |
|----------------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|-------------|-----------------|----------------|-------------------|----------------|
| Components | Material | Proximal<br>Femur | Intercalary | Distal<br>Femur | Total<br>Femur | Proximal<br>Tibia | Hinged<br>Knee |
| Femoral head | CoCr | X | | | X | | |
| Proximal Femur | TAV | X | | | X | | |
| Female Stem | CoCr | | X | | | | |
| Mid-Section2 | CoCr | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Segmental Stem2 | CoCr or TAV | X | X | X | | X | |
| Modular Collar | TAV | X | | X | | X | |
| Distal Femur | CoCr | | | X | X | | |
| Tibial Hinge<br>Component | CoCr and<br>UHWMPE | | | X | X | X | X |
| Axial Pin | CoCr and<br>UHWMPE | | | X | X | X | X |
| Tibial Poly Spacer | UHWMPE | | | X | X | X | X |
| Tibial Baseplate | TAV | | | X | X | | X |
| Male-Male Mid-<br>Section2 | CoCr or TAV | | | | X | | |
| Resurfacing<br>Femur | CoCr | | | | | X | X |
| Proximal Tibia | TAV | | | | | X | |
| Tapered Screw1 | TAV | | | X | X | X | X |
| Patella1 | UHWMPE | | | X | X | X | X |
| Wedges and<br>Augments1 | TAV | | | X | X | | X |
| Stem Extensions1 | TAV | | | X | X | X | X |
- 1 These implants are optional for each procedure. The surgeon shall use his/her medical judgement to determine if these implants are necessary based on factor such as patient bone quality, joint stability, and pathology.
- 2 These implants are available with the ELEOSx™ antibacterial coating (MDPB).
## Instrument Description
Instruments included in the Onkos ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System are used in implantation and removal of the system components.
# SUMMARY OF NONCLINICAL/BENCH STUDIES
## BIOCOMPATIBILITY/MATERIALS
The non-articulating CoCr alloy components of the Onkos ELEOSxTM Limb Salvage System include a MDPB surface coating.
Biocompatibility evaluation of the subject implant device has been completed according
{3}------------------------------------------------
to FDA's Guidance, "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1, 'Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process."" Biocompatibility testing for the permanent implant included cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5). intracutaneous reactivity (ISO 10993-10), sensitization (ISO 10993-10), materialmediated pvrogenicity (ISO 10993-11), acute systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11). genotoxicity (ISO 10993-3; bacterial reverse mutation assay, mouse lymphoma assay). All test methods and results were found acceptable.
A 52-week ovine study was conducted to evaluate systemic toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017 and local implantation per ISO 10993-6:2016. An additional 13-week rabbit study was conducted (intramuscular and epicondylar) to supplement the ovine study and address local implantation per ISO 10993-6:2016. The totality of the implantation data supports that the test articles did not produce systemic toxicological effects and resulted in minimal local tissue reactivity, similar to the control article (uncoated metal).
Chemical characterization with exhaustive extraction in polar (neutral pH of 7 and acidic . pH of 4), mid-polar. non-polar conditions was performed per ISO 10993-18 with toxicological risk assessment per ISO 10993-17 to evaluate the reported extractables.
The Ti6Al4V (TAV) and UHMWPE components (without MDPB coating) were adequately evaluated for biocompatibility in prior marketing submissions.
The instruments included in the Onkos ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System are made from various materials with limited (≤ 24h) contact to tissue/bone. The instruments were adequately evaluated for biocompatibility in prior marketing submissions.
# STERILIZATION/PACKAGING AND SHELF-LIFE/PYROGENICITY
## Sterilization
The ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is a single-use device provided clean and sterile to the end user. Gamma sterilization of the device has been validated to provide a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 106 based on the VDMax25 method as recommended by FDA Recognized Consensus Standard series ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137-1 ("Sterilization of health care products - Radiation - Part 1: Requirements for development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices")/-2 ("Sterilization of health care products - Radiation - Part 2: Establishing the sterilization dose").
#### Packaging and Shelf-life
Implants are packaged within a 10 mil urethane sleeve, followed by an inner nylon/10)(4)(4) pouch, an outer nylon bouch, a retention insert, and a shrink-wrapped shelf box. Non-clinical performance testing established a shelf-life of 3 months. Antibacterial performance testing supported device performance over the proposed shelf-life. Packaging was validated using ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 ("Packaging for terminally
{4}------------------------------------------------
sterilized medical devices - Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems").
# Pyrogenicity
Bacterial endotoxins testing (BET) was performed to determine whether the total endotoxin value for the device met pyrogen limit specifications. All tested devices passed with a reported value of less than or equal to 20 EU/device, meeting the recommended endotoxin limits per ANSI/AAMI ST72:2019 ("Bacterial endotoxins - Test methods, routine monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing").
## PERFORMANCE TESTING - BENCH
Some previous device information and performance data for the uncoated implant configurations are considered to demonstrate acceptable device-specific performance due to insignificant effect of the MDPB coating on those construct mechanical tests. A summary of those special control performance data, including evaluation of static and dynamic strength, range of motion, articulating bearing wear and bearing material, and implant disassembly as well as validation information for the reprocessing instructions for the reusable instrumentation of the device is identified in Onkos's cleared marketing applications (K211677, K203815, K203588, K203090, K180130, K161520). Additional non-clinical performance testing is provided to address the device performance due to the addition of the MDPB coating and a summary of these additional non-clinical mechanical performance evaluations is provided in Table 1:
| Test | Purpose | Method | Performance<br>Criteria | Results |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Evaluation of MDPB<br>Coating Integrity | To demonstrate that<br>MDPB coating does<br>not shear off or<br>delaminate from the<br>subject device<br>through handling and<br>implantation. | Follow the surgical<br>technique protocol for<br>proximal femoral<br>replacement, and<br>verify pre-assembly<br>and post-assembly,<br>using optical<br>microscopy, that the<br>MDPB coating<br>remains intact on the<br>device. | N/A – this is a<br>characterization of the<br>effect of surgical<br>assembly on the<br>MDPB-coated device. | No evidence of<br>damage or removal of<br>the MDPB coating<br>from the device<br>observed. |
| Range of Motion<br>(ROM) | To assess the risk of<br>MDPB coating<br>contact with any of<br>the ELEOSx system<br>articulating surfaces. | Computer simulated<br>hip and knee joint<br>movement performed<br>throughout entire<br>ROM until<br>impingement contact. | No impingement<br>contact of MDPB-<br>coated components. | No contact with<br>MDPB-coated<br>components under<br>maximum ROM;<br>ROM equivalent to the<br>currently available<br>non-MDPB coated<br>limb salvage device. |
Table 1: Summary of Non-clinical Mechanical Performance Evaluations
{5}------------------------------------------------
| Cement interface<br>Pull-out | To evaluate the pull-<br>out strength of the<br>stem/cement interface | Stems were inserted<br>into cylinders<br>surrounded by bone<br>cement. Once cured,<br>stems were pulled<br>axially until failure. | MDPB-coated group to MDPB-coated group<br>have equivalent or had higher pull-out<br>higher pull-out strength strength compared to<br>compared to un-coated un-coated group.<br>group. | |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Fretting and<br>Corrosion | To demonstrate that<br>the addition of the<br>MDPB coating does<br>not compromise the<br>mechanical integrity<br>of the limb salvage<br>assembly. | Proximal femurs (with<br>maximum mid-section<br>modularity) were<br>distally potted and<br>proximally loaded.<br>The device was<br>fatigue tested in saline<br>at (b)(4) N for (b)(4)<br>cycles at a frequency<br>of Hz. Components<br>were optically<br>inspected for fretting<br>and corrosion damage<br>after testing. | The MDPB-coated<br>proximal femurs to<br>have comparable<br>performance to the<br>control device (un-<br>coated proximal<br>femurs). | Similar fretting<br>corrosion was<br>observed in the<br>MDPB-coated<br>proximal femurs and<br>the controls. |
## Antimicrobial Performance
The subject device's MDPB coating was evaluated for its antimicrobial performance based on a simulated use in vitro test method that demonstrated antibacterial activity. The subject device's MDPB coating was also evaluated for its antimicrobial resistance risk profile.
Information was provided establishing reasonable evidence to support the understanding that the antimicrobial action of the MDPB coating is neutralized in the body and would. not be expected to have meaningful antimicrobial activity within or on the body following implantation.
## MDPB Coating Physicochemical Characterization
The subject device's MDPB coating was characterized and evaluated for assessment of coating physicochemical properties such as coating chemistry, thickness, density, and uniformity. Information to establish these characteristics included a detailed description of the substrate morphology and coating process, a validated fluorescein method to determine the MDPB coating density on the surface of the subject device, micro-imaging and spectroscopy techniques to determine the coating thickness and elemental compositions, appropriate visual inspections to demonstrate sufficient uniformity of the MDPB coating on the surface of the subject device, and a final product release strategy containing appropriately established product specification and sampling plan. The sponsor demonstrated that the biocompatibility and antibacterial performance testing are representative of worst-case performance of the subject device based on the coating characterization.
{6}------------------------------------------------
# LABELING
The labeling consists of the following: device description, indications for use, instructions for use including surgical steps (e.g., device selection and placement), principles of device operation. identification of device materials, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and a list of potential adverse effects. Furthermore, the sterile packaging includes a shelf-life for the device. The labeling meets the requirements of 21 CFR 801.109 for prescription devices.
### RISKS TO HEALTH
The table below identifies the risks to health that may be associated with use of a limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating and the measures necessary to mitigate these risks.
| Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Antimicrobial resistance | Antimicrobial resistance analysis |
| Loss of implant integrity and<br>function leading to revision | Non-clinical performance testing<br>Shelf life testing<br>Labeling |
| Adverse tissue reaction | Animal performance testing<br>Biocompatibility evaluation<br>Non-clinical performance testing<br>Pyrogenicity testing |
| Infection | Non-clinical performance testing<br>Sterilization validation<br>Shelf life testing<br>Reprocessing validation<br>Labeling |
## SPECIAL CONTROLS
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act. the limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating is subject to the following special controls:
- (1) Animal performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. Animal testing must include imaging, histology. and histomorphometry to assess bone formation, healing, and tissue response at relevant timepoints over the course of healing.
- (2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use and include the following:
- Evaluation of the static and dynamic performance of the implant: (i)
- Evaluation of coated implant initial fixation: (ii)
- Evaluation of coating integrity: (iii)
- Evaluation of range of motion; (iv)
- Evaluation of articulating bearing wear and bearing material; (v)
{7}------------------------------------------------
- Evaluation of implant disassembly: (vi)
- (vii) Evaluation of fretting and corrosion;
- (viii) Evaluation of antimicrobial performance with clinically relevant microbial species; and
- (ix) Coating characterization, including a detailed description of the substrate morphology and coating process and an evaluation of coating physicochemical properties such as density, thickness, chemistry, and uniformity.
- (3) An analysis must be provided that identifies and evaluates any contribution to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance.
- (4) An analysis or information must be provided to support that the antimicrobial does not act within or on the body.
- (5) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
- (6) Performance data must support the sterility and pyrogenicity of the device components intended to be provided sterile.
- Performance data must validate the reprocessing instructions for the reusable (7) instrumentation to be used with the device.
- Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued (8) sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the identified shelf life.
- (9) Labeling must include the following:
- Identification of device materials; (i)
- A shelf life: and (ii)
- (iii) Instructions for removal/revision procedures.
## BENEFIT-RISK DETERMINATION
The target populations for the ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System are high-risk patients due to associated medical co-morbidities, the magnitude of the types of surgical procedures, and the high risk of device-related and procedure-related adverse events including infection.
The sponsor has collected adequate data to assess the safety profile of the subject device and has identified that there are benefits from the use of the device. Mechanical evaluations demonstrated restoration of function, while the antimicrobial performance testing demonstrated a reduction of in vitro bacterial contamination. The risks to health, which include antimicrobial resistance, loss of implant integrity and function leading to revision, adverse tissue reaction, and infection have been mitigated by an animal safety study and other non-clinical studies as described above. A list of warnings and potential adverse effects is provided in the labeling. In conclusion, the benefits of using the subject device for its intended use/indications for use outweigh the risks to health.
{8}------------------------------------------------
Benefits: The probable benefits of the subject device with the MDPB coating, as demonstrated by the non-clinical evaluations described above, include limb salvage and restoration of function, and reduced bacterial contamination on the surface of the device prior to implantation in a highrisk patient group.
Risks: The risks of the subject device, as listed in the Risks to Health section above, are antimicrobial resistance, loss of implant integrity and function leading to revision, adverse tissue reaction, and infection. These risks have been mitigated by the listed Mitigation Measures above, which include non-clinical performance testing, biocompatibility evaluation, pyrogenicity testing, sterilization validation, shelf-life validation, reprocessing validation, and labeling.
To address potential safety concerns related to the MDPB coating stability and effect in humans, a 522 Order for a Postmarket Surveillance Study will be issued for this device.
## Patient Perspectives
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
#### Benefit/Risk Conclusion
In conclusion, given the available information above, for the following indication statement:
The ELEOSTM/ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is indicated for resection and replacement of the proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, total femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia in skeletally mature patients with the following conditions: 1) Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, ankylosis, protrusion acetabuli, and painful hip dysplasia; 2) Inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as rheumatoid arthritis:
- 3) Correction of functional deformity
- 4) Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed; and,
- 5) Treatment of fractures that are unmanageable using other techniques.
The ELEOS™/ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is also indicated for procedures where resection and replacement of the proximal femur, intercalary portion of the femur, total femur, distal femur, and proximal tibia is required with the following conditions: 1) Patients suffering from severe arthropathy of the hip and/or knee that does not respond to any conservative therapy or better alternative surgical treatment: 2) Surgical intervention for severe trauma, revision hip or knee arthroplasties, and/or Oncology indications. 3) Metastatic diseases
The ELEOSx™ MDPB coating, where applied, is intended to reduce bacterial contamination prior to implantation resulting from deposition in the operating room on the surface of the device components. The clinical impact associated with the MDPB coating, including prevention of infection or reduction of infection risk in patients, has
{9}------------------------------------------------
not been evaluated in human clinical trials. The MDPB coating is not intended to treat existing infections and does not act within or on the body.
The probable benefits outweigh the probable risks for the ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System. The device provides benefits, and the risks can be mitigated by the use of general controls and the identified special controls.
## CONCLUSION
The De Novo request for the Onkos Surgical ELEOSx™ Limb Salvage System is granted and the device is classified as follows:
Product Code: QZZ Device Type: Limb and joint salvage device with quaternary ammonium compound coating Regulation Number: 21 CFR 888.3900 Class: II
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.