DEN200041 · Medical Precision BV · QRN · Dec 10, 2021 · Radiology
Device Facts
Record ID
DEN200041
Device Name
Comfort Marker 2.0.
Applicant
Medical Precision BV
Product Code
QRN · Radiology
Decision Date
Dec 10, 2021
Decision
DENG
Submission Type
Direct
Regulation
21 CFR 892.5785
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
The device is indicated for use for applying ink to the skin to identify the margins for radiation therapy. The device is intended to be used in clinical settings by Radiotherapy professionals.
Device Story
Powered device; transdermally delivers colorant to skin; creates marks for radiation therapy guidance. Used in clinical settings by radiotherapy professionals. Includes electrical components; requires sterilization of patient-contacting parts (e.g., safety needle). Mitigates risks of adverse tissue reaction, infection, needle stick, cross-contamination, and electrical/thermal injury via biocompatibility, sterilization, and EMC testing.
Clinical Evidence
Prospective study on healthy volunteers (n=6) evaluated mark durability, visibility, and migration over 12 weeks. Marks placed at 0.25, 0.45, and 0.75 mm depths using Accu-Tatt ink. Results: marks were well-defined, showed no migration, and remained visible throughout the radiotherapy treatment period. Fading observed at 0.25 mm depth after 8 weeks, with no impact on clinical management.
Technological Characteristics
Powered device; transdermal colorant delivery mechanism. Includes electrical components requiring EMC and electrical safety testing. Patient-contacting components (e.g., safety needle) must be sterile. Requires fluid ingress protection and reprocessing validation for reusable components.
Indications for Use
Indicated for use by radiotherapy professionals in clinical settings to apply ink to skin for identifying radiation therapy margins.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A radiation therapy marking device is a powered device that transdermally delivers a permanent or temporary colorant to the skin for the purpose of placing marks to guide radiation therapy. The Comfort Marker 2.0 is an application system for placing reference marks on or in patient's skin to facilitate set-up for radiation therapy treatment, consisting of a battery-powered control unit with pen, a main-powered docking station, and a sterile, single-use safety needle.
Special Controls
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the radiation therapy marking device is subject to the following special controls:
- (1) Design verification and validation must include:
- Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate: (i)
- (A) The indicated colorant is compatible with the device and its method of delivery:
- (B) The device can reproducibly deliver the indicated colorant with the specifications described; and
- (C) The length of time that compatible colorants remain visible on the skin following device application.
- (ii) Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate:
- Accuracy and reproducibility of needle penetration depth; (A)
- Device protection from cross-contamination, including fluid ingress (B) protection:
- Adequacy of the cleaning and disinfection instructions to ensure that the (C) reusable components of the device can be cleaned and disinfected; and
- (D) The sterility of all patient-contacting components (e.g., safety needle).
- Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate electrical (iii) safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of all electrical components of the device.
- Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate continued (iv) sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the intended shelf life.
- (v) Documentation of software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
- The labeling required under 21 CFR 801.109(c) must include: (2)
- An explanation of the device and the mechanism of operation; (i)
- Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing of any reusable components; (ii)
- (iii) Disposal instructions: and
- A shelf life for all sterile components. (iv)
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
## DE NOVO CLASSIFICATION REQUEST FOR COMFORT MARKER 2.0.
#### REGULATORY INFORMATION
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
Radiation therapy marking device. A radiation therapy marking device is a powered device that transdermally delivers a permanent or temporary colorant to the skin for the purpose of placing marks to guide radiation therapy. This classification does not include devices with reusable or reprocessed needles or devices intended for diagnostic, therapeutic, or aesthetic use or to deliver other products for these uses.
NEW REGULATION NUMBER: 21 CFR 892.5785
CLASSIFICATION: Class II
PRODUCT CODE: QRN
#### BACKGROUND
DEVICE NAME: Comfort Marker 2.0.
SUBMISSION NUMBER: DEN200041
DATE DE NOVO RECEIVED: June 22, 2020
#### SPONSOR INFORMATION:
Medical Precision B.V. Telfordstraat 9 - 30 NL 8013 RL. Zwolle Netherlands
#### INDICATIONS FOR USE
The Comfort Marker 2.0. is indicated as follows:
The device is indicated for use for applying ink to the skin to identify the margins for radiation therapy. The device is intended to be used in clinical settings by Radiotherapy professionals.
{1}------------------------------------------------
### LIMITATIONS
The sale, distribution, and use of the Comfort Marker 2.0 are restricted to prescription use in accordance with 21 CFR 801.109.
Colorant is not distributed with this device.
Do not use the device on damaged skin.
Do not use the device on skin with dermatitis.
The Safety Needle is sterile, single use and cannot be reprocessed.
Only use specified consumables.
Not intended for use in magnetic resonance imaging rooms.
### PLEASE REFER TO THE LABELING FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS.
#### DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The Comfort Marker 2.0 is an application system for placing reference marks on or in patient's skin to facilitate set-up for radiation therapy treatment. The device includes the following components:
- 1. Battery powered control unit with pen
- 2. Main powered docking station with adapter and
- 3. Safety needle (single use, sterile)
Figure 1: Control unit, Pen (with safety needles) and docking station
Image /page/1/Picture/15 description: The image shows a control unit, pen, and docking station. The control unit is white and has a power button, as well as three colored buttons: green, pink, and blue. The pen is blue and is connected to the control unit by a black cord. The docking station is white and has a slot for the pen.
{2}------------------------------------------------
Mode of operation: To achieve the intended use, the device uses a safety needle (shown in figure 2). This actuation is achieved by a longitudinal movement of the driving rod inside the pen. The driving mechanism comprises electromagnetic coils, switched on and off by the controller for generating magnetic fields. Hereby, the distance moved by the driving rod can be controlled precisely by controlling the amount of applied energy. The driving device comprises a guiding mechanism arranged for allowing only movement of the driving rod along the longitudinal direction. The actual distance travel is measured with a measuring coil and used to control the desired depth setting. The system contains a mechanical end stop in the safety needle to ensure that the needle will not protrude more than 1 mm. The docking station is used to recharge the control unit.
Image /page/2/Figure/1 description: The image shows a safety needle assembly. The assembly includes a carrier with needles, a tip, and a spring. The image also includes a section view of the assembled needle, labeled SECTION A-A. The length of the assembly is labeled as (42,60).
Direction of use: Reference points / markers are placed transdermally to facilitate patient set-up for radiation therapy treatment. After disinfection of the skin area, placement of the Safety Needle on the pen, calibration of the system and applying the colorant, the user selects the shallow setting on the Control Unit and places the marker. If the user decides the marker point is not sufficiently visible, the medium setting on the control unit is selected.
# SUMMARY OF NONCLINICAL/BENCH STUDIES
# STERILITY
The safety needle is a sterile, single use component of the device system. The safety needle is sterilized using EO sterilization and sterilant residuals were quantified and under the acceptable limits for EO and ECH. The sterilization method was validated per ANSVAAMI/ISO 11135:2014: Sterilization of health-care products - Ethylene oxide -Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices. The sterility assurance level (SAL) for the needle cartridge is at least 10 %.
{3}------------------------------------------------
The requirements of the packaging system for the safety needle were evaluated in accordance with ISO 11607-1:2019 Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems. The shelf-life of the needle cartridge was evaluated after accelerated aging equivalent to one year. The package integrity was evaluated using the seal strength test and the dye penetration test to demonstrate the performance of the sterile barrier system (SBS) over time. The test article met the acceptance criteria for each test.
# ELECTRICAL SAFETY AND ELECTROMAGNETIC CAPABILITY (EMC)
The following Electrical Safety and EMC testing has been performed:
- ANSI/AAMI ES60601- 1:2005+A2 (R2012) +A1: Medical Electrical Equipment -. Part 1: General Reauirements For Basic Safety And Essential Performance (IEC 60601-1:2005, MOD) (Consolidated Text) (Includes ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1:2005/(R)2012 And A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 And A2:2010/(R)2012)
- IEC 60601-1-2: 2014 (Edition 4): Medical electrical equipment Part 1-2 General . requirements for basic safety and essential performance – Electromagnetic compatibility
- . IEC 60601-1-6: Collateral Standard: Usability
The Comfort Marker 2.0 passed all relevant portions of the testing.
## SOFTWARE
The software is responsible for implementing and testing the required drivers, communication interface and the application software for both the Comfort Marker 2.0 control unit and pen. All of the elements of software information corresponding to moderate level of concern (LOC) devices as outlined in FDA's guidance document "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" (issued May 11, 2005) were provided. Adequate documentation describing the software development program was provided. Verification and validation (V&V) activities were described at the unit, integration, and system level and the results of these activities met the pass/fail criteria. In addition, a hazard analysis from both the patient's and user's standpoint was performed, hazards were addressed; and an appropriate validation process has been carried out.
# PERFORMANCE TESTING - BENCH
Bench testing was conducted to demonstrate that the Comfort Marker 2.0 performs as expected under the anticipated conditions of use. This testing included evaluation of key device parameters such as needle penetration depth, puncture rate, and the ability of the safety features of the device to mitigate the risk of cross-contamination. The following bench testing was conducted to demonstrate the device performance characteristics:
- . Puncture Rate: The purpose of this test was to demonstrate that the device operates at the intended puncture rate at each depth setting when used on a skin substitute.
{4}------------------------------------------------
- Needle Puncture Depth: The purpose of this test was to evaluate the depth of needle . penetration into a skin substitute at each depth setting.
- Needle Sharpness: The purpose of this test is to test the sharpness of the needle based ● on required force for piercing standardized film.
- Needle Arrangement: The objective of this test is to demonstrate that the needles are ● properly arranged in a circular pattern after assembly.
- . Needle Protrusion: The purpose of this test was to ensure that the needle does not protrude more than 1 mm from the tip housing.
- Needle Dimension: The purpose of this test was to ensure that the needle diameter . and straightness are within specifications
- Tip-to-Tip Alignment: The purpose of this test was to evaluate the alignment of each . needle tip within the needle assembly.
- Glue Strength: The purpose of this test was to evaluate the strength of the bond ● between the needles and the needle carrier.
- Squeeze Test: The purpose of this test was to demonstrate that the needle carrier stays within the protective housing when squeezed by hand during assembly.
- Drop Test: The purpose of this test was to demonstrate that the needle housing adequately shields the needle tips when dropped.
- . Colorant Migration: The purpose of this test was to demonstrate adequate protection against fluid ingress into the handpiece.
# SUMMARY OF CLINICAL INFORMATION
A limited study to validate the durability of reference points placed with the Comfort Marker 2.0 for a duration of twelve weeks was conducted on healthy volunteers. The study focused on the following elements: technique to place the mark, colorant to be used with the Comfort Marker 2.0, whether the mark is visible to the radiation therapy professional, whether the colorant migrates impacting the matter that would affect clinical management and duration that the mark remains visible.
- (b) (4)healthy human volunteers participated in the study, between the age group of "10 (4) men and " women). They did not have any underlying skin conditions. All volunteers were informed about the test procedure and provided with details of the test center. Before participating, all the volunteers signed the consent form.
The procedure was performed in a radiotherapy preparation room by a radiotherapy technician. The procedure used Accu-tatt® - ink in the United States of America and the Comfort Marker 2.0 device. The colorant was applied to the arms of two volunteers and to the thoracic area of four volunteers. Endpoints defined were visibility, migration, and clearance.
The reference points were marked according to the Comfort Marker 2.0 instructions for use. Each volunteer received reference points using Accu-Tatt® at all the depth settings (0.25, 0.45 and 0.75 mm). Documentation of the reference points were taken immediately and followed for 12 weeks. Each reference point was made only once.
{5}------------------------------------------------
Results
- a) The healthy volunteer study showed that Comfort Marker 2.0 can place well defined reference points using Accu-Tatt® at all three depth settings.
- b) The reference points did not show any migration on the skin. All reference points from Accu-Tatt® were clearly visible during week" until " a period in which radiotherapy treatment is provided.
- c) Generally, Accu-Tatt® when used at the lowest depth settings (0.25 mm) faded away at week 12 in most of the participants, however no impact on clinical treatment was observed.
## Pediatric Extrapolation
In this De Novo request, existing clinical data were not leveraged to support the use of the device in a pediatric patient population.
# LABELING
Labeling has been included which consists of a user manual, instructions for use, box labeling, and patient labeling. The user manual and instructions for use include a description of the device technical parameters, contraindications, warnings and precautions. These documents summarize the main steps for using the device as well as the necessary measures to properly dispose of any single use items and clean the reusable components of the device.
The instructions for use contain the following:
- 1. Only use specified consumables with the Comfort marker 2.0
- a. Safety Needle: Safety needle, Medical Precision B.V.
- b. Accu-tatt® ink
- 2. Warnings:
- a. Inadequate disinfection may lead to cross-contamination when used on multiple patients.
- b. During operation the needle is continuously exposed out of the Safety Needle. Be careful not to induce a needle stick incident.
- 3. Contraindications:
- a. Do not use on damaged skin.
- b. Do not use the Comfort Maker 2.0 on skin with dermatitis. Radiation therapy can cause radiation dermatitis. Due to superficial placement of the pigment, radiation dermatitis may alter the appearance or duration of the marker placed by the Medical Precision device. Radiation dermatitis may accelerate immune system dispersion or clearing of the tattoo pigment, resulting in loss of usable marker before the radiation mark is no longer needed.
- 4. Precautions
- The reference points made with a shallow depths 0.25 mm may not be visible a. immediately after placing the reference point in certain situations. In such cases, use medium depth setting 0.45 mm on the same location.
{6}------------------------------------------------
- The shallow depth setting 0.25 mm may tend to fade after week 8. Assess the b. reference points at each patient visit. If signs of fading or clearing are noted, it is recommended to repeat the placement of reference points on intact skin as per established standard of care.
## RISKS TO HEALTH
The table below identifies the risks to health that may be associated with use of a radiation therapy marking device and the measures necessary to mitigate these risks.
| Identified Risks to Health | Mitigation Measures |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Adverse tissue reaction | Biocompatibility evaluation |
| Cross contamination and infection | Reprocessing validation |
| | Sterilization validation |
| | Non-clinical performance testing |
| | Shelf-life testing |
| | Labeling |
| Needle stick injury to provider | Non-clinical performance testing |
| | Labeling |
| Device and/or software failure leading to | Clinical performance testing |
| ineffective marking | Non-clinical performance testing |
| | Software validation, verification, and |
| | hazard analysis |
| | Labeling |
| Electrical shock or electromagnetic | Electromagnetic compatibility testing |
| interference with other devices | Electrical safety testing |
| | Labeling |
## Table 1. Identified Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
### SPECIAL CONTROLS
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the radiation therapy marking device is subject to the following special controls:
- (1) Design verification and validation must include:
- Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate: (i)
- (A) The indicated colorant is compatible with the device and its method of delivery:
- (B) The device can reproducibly deliver the indicated colorant with the specifications described; and
- (C) The length of time that compatible colorants remain visible on the skin following device application.
- (ii) Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate:
- Accuracy and reproducibility of needle penetration depth; (A)
{7}------------------------------------------------
- Device protection from cross-contamination, including fluid ingress (B) protection:
- Adequacy of the cleaning and disinfection instructions to ensure that the (C) reusable components of the device can be cleaned and disinfected; and
- (D) The sterility of all patient-contacting components (e.g., safety needle).
- Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate electrical (iii) safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of all electrical components of the device.
- Documentation of performance data from studies that demonstrate continued (iv) sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the intended shelf life.
- (v) Documentation of software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
- The labeling required under 21 CFR 801.109(c) must include: (2)
- An explanation of the device and the mechanism of operation; (i)
- Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing of any reusable components; (ii)
- (iii) Disposal instructions: and
- A shelf life for all sterile components. (iv)
## BENEFIT-RISK DETERMINATION
The probable benefits of the Comfort Marker 2.0 outweigh the probable risks of the device in light of the special controls proposed for this device in addition to the applicable general controls. The device may be used to apply marks using Accu-tatt® to the skin to assist with patient set-up for radiation therapy. In the data provided, the marks were visible and durable for a minimum period of 8 weeks. Risks associated with adverse tissue reaction are addressed with biocompatibility evaluation. Risks related to infection and cross-contamination are mitigated by reprocessing validation, sterilization, and labeling. Labeling and other special controls related to needle performance and colorant delivery will also help address risks associated with ineffective marking. Risks associated with interference with other devices are mitigated by special controls concerning electromagnetic compatibility and software validation, verification, and hazard analysis. The performance data provided, including those data required by the special controls, when combined with the device labeling suggest that the device will be safe and effective for its proposed indications for use.
### Patient Perspectives
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
### BENEFIT/RISK CONCLUSION
In conclusion, given the available information above, for the following indication statement:
The device is indicated for use for applying ink to the skin to identify the margins for radiation therapy. The device is intended to be used in clinical settings by Radiotherapy professionals.
{8}------------------------------------------------
The probable benefits outweigh the probable risks for the Comfort Marker 2.0. The device provides benefits, and the risks can be mitigated by the use of general controls and the identified special controls.
### CONCLUSION
The De Novo request for the Comfort Marker 2.0 is granted and the device is classified as follows:
Product Code: QRN Device Type: Radiation therapy marking device Regulation Number: 21 CFR 892.5785 Class: II
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.