HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa is an automated chromogenic assay for in vitro diagnostic use by laboratory professionals in clinical laboratories. The assay provides quantitative results on 3.2% citrated human plasma for the following analytes based on the calibrators used: When used with HemosIL Heparin Calibrators: Quantitative determination of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) activity on the ACL TOP Family, ACL TOP Family 50 Series, and ACL Elite/Elite Pro. When used with HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators: Quantitative determination of apixaban on the ACL TOP Family and ACL TOP Family 50 Series through measurement of Factor Xa activity, which is inversely proportional to the apixaban level. With HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators, the assay is intended to measure apixaban concentrations in patients on apixaban therapy in the following situations where measurement of apixaban levels could be useful to have as additional information: Patients at risk for major bleeding; Patients experiencing a bleeding episode. The assay is not a stand-alone test and the results should be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings. For use in adult population. For prescription use only.
Device Story
Automated chromogenic assay; measures apixaban/heparin levels in 3.2% citrated human plasma. Principle: Factor Xa inactivation; residual Factor Xa reacts with synthetic chromogenic substrate; releases paranitroaniline (pNA) monitored kinetically at 405 nm. pNA concentration inversely proportional to drug level. Used in clinical laboratories by professionals on ACL TOP instrument families. Output: quantitative drug concentration (ng/mL). Clinical utility: provides supplemental data for patients at risk of or experiencing bleeding; aids in assessing suitability for invasive procedures/surgeries. Not for routine monitoring or dose adjustment. Benefits: assists clinical decision-making regarding anticoagulant regimen; helps assess perioperative risk. Risks: inaccurate results potentially leading to inappropriate treatment changes or surgical delays.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document. Device classification based on requirement for analytical and clinical performance testing as part of special controls.
Technological Characteristics
One-stage chromogenic assay. Reagents: purified bovine Factor Xa, Tris-Buffer, EDTA, dextran sulfate, NaCl, BSA, and synthetic chromogenic substrate S-2732. Detection: kinetic spectrophotometry at 405 nm. Platform: ACL TOP family automated analyzers. Traceability: Calibrators/controls traceable to LC-MS/MS or WHO standards. Software: Embedded firmware on ACL TOP systems.
Indications for Use
Indicated for adult patients on heparin (UFH/LMWH) or apixaban therapy. Used to quantify drug activity/concentration in 3.2% citrated human plasma to aid management in patients at risk for or experiencing bleeding. Not for monitoring therapy.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A heparin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitor drug test system is intended for the detection of heparin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors in human specimens collected from patients taking heparin or direct oral factor Xa inhibitors. This device is intended to aid in the management of therapy in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings.
Special Controls
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Design verification and validation must include the following:
(i) Detailed documentation of analytical device performance studies and results demonstrating acceptable analytical performance with a sufficient number of specimens tested in order to obtain unbiased estimates of analytical performance. This documentation shall include the following as appropriate to the technology, specimen types tested, and intended use of the device:
(A) Studies and results for that demonstrate device precision including repeatability and reproducibility, using quality controls and clinical samples, when appropriate. Precision studies must assess specimens for each indicated drug at concentrations throughout the measuring range of the device including near clinically relevant levels, as appropriate. The study must evaluate different sources of variability including, as appropriate, between-run, between-operator, between-lot, between-instrument, between-day, and between-site;
(B) Studies and results that demonstrate that the device is free from clinically significant interference, from endogenous and exogenous interferents associated with the target population(s), and interferents that are specific for, or related to, the technology or methodology of the device;
(C) Data to demonstrate appropriate specimen stability for the intended sample matrices under the intended conditions for specimen collection, handling, and storage described in the device labeling;
(D) Studies and results that demonstrate the linear range, limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ), as applicable to the technology of the device; and
(E) For any devices intended for use for near patient testing, studies and results that demonstrate the robustness of the device in the hands of the intended user, including the entire testing procedure, pre-analytical specimen processing steps, and results interpretation.
(ii) Detailed documentation of clinical performance testing in which the performance is analyzed relative to a comparator that FDA has determined is appropriate. Specimens must be representative of the intended use population(s) and must cover the full range of the device output and any clinically relevant decision points as appropriate.
(2) The labeling required under § 809.10(b) of this chapter must include:
(i) Identification of any known interferents, including all endogenous, exogenous, technology-specific, and patient population-specific interferents, specific to the test outputs. The information must include the concentration(s) or level(s) of the interferent at which clinically significant interference was found to occur, and the concentration range or levels at which interference was not found to occur;
(ii) A prominent statement that the device is not intended for use in monitoring patients taking heparin or direct oral factor Xa inhibitors; and
(iii) Limiting statements indicating, as applicable:
(A) That the device should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures; and
(B) That the device is not specific to the direct oral factor Xa inhibitor that has been evaluated and may detect the presence of other direct factor Xa inhibitors that have not been evaluated.
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC CLASS III DESIGNATION FOR
## HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa
# DECISION MEMORANDUM
#### A. De Novo Number:
DEN190032
## B. Purpose for Submission:
De Novo classification request for the evaluation of automatic class III designation of the HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa
### C. Measurands:
Apixaban, Heparin
#### D. Type of Test:
Anti-Xa chromogenic assay
#### E. Applicant:
Instrumentation Laboratory Co.
#### F. Proprietary and Established Names:
HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators HemosIL Heparin Calibrators HemosIL UF Heparin Controls HemosIL LMW Heparin Controls
#### G. Regulatory Information:
- 1. Regulation section:
864.7295
- 2. Classification:
Class II (Special Controls)
{1}------------------------------------------------
# 3. Product codes:
OLU
# 4. Panel:
81 - Hematology
## H. Indications For Use:
- 1. Indication(s) for Use:
HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa is an automated chromogenic assay for in vitro diagnostic use by laboratory professionals in clinical laboratories. The assay provides quantitative results on 3.2% citrated human plasma for the following analytes based on the calibrators used:
#### . When used with HemosIL Heparin Calibrators:
Quantitative determination of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) activity on the ACL TOP Family, ACL TOP Family 50 Series, and ACL Elite/Elite Pro.
## · When used with HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators:
Quantitative determination of apixaban on the ACL TOP Family and ACL TOP Family 50 Series through measurement of Factor Xa activity, which is inversely proportional to the apixaban level. With HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators, the assay is intended to measure apixaban concentrations in patients on apixaban therapy in the following situations where measurement of apixaban levels could be useful to have as additional information:
- Patients at risk for major bleeding
- Patients experiencing a bleeding episode
The assay is not a stand-alone test and the results should be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings.
For use in adult population. For prescription use only.
## 2. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only For use in adult population only For in vitro diagnostic use only
- 3. Special instrument requirements:
ACL TOP family: ACL TOP 300 CTS; ACL TOP 500 CTS; ACL TOP 700; ACL TOP
{2}------------------------------------------------
# 700 CTS: ACL TOP 700 LAS
ACL TOP 50 series family: ACL TOP 350 CTS; ACL TOP 550 CTS; ACL TOP 750; ACL TOP 750 CTS; ACL TOP 750 LAS
# I. Device Description:
HemosIL Liquid Heparin and HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa are one stage chromogenic assays based on a synthetic chromogenic substrate and on Factor Xa inactivation. The assay provides quantitative apixaban results on 3.2% citrated human plasma when used with HemosIL Heparin Calibrators and/or HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators.
The assay contains:
- Factor Xa reagent purified bovine Factor Xa, Tris-Buffer, EDTA, dextran sulfate, . sodium chloride, and bovine serum albumin
- Chromogenic substrate liquid chromogenic substrate S-2732 and bulking agent .
The assay requires the following components which are not included in the assay kit:
- HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators two levels ( and ( ( ng/mL) of lyophilized calibrators . prepared from human citrated plasma containing apixaban, buffers, and stabilizers.
- HemosIL Apixaban Controls two levels (1) and (1) of lyophilized controls . prepared from human citrated plasma containing apixaban, buffers, and stabilizers,
- HemosIL Heparin Calibrator three levels (0, 0.8 and 2.0 IU/mL) of lyophilized . calibrators prepared from human citrated plasma containing heparin, buffer and stablizers.
- HemosIL LMW Heparin Controls two levels (low and high) of lyophilized controls . prepared from human citrated plasma containing low molecular weight (LMW) heparin, buffers and stabilizers. Each lot of LMW Heparin Controls is traceable to the 3rd International WHO Standadrd 11/176 for LMW heparin.
- Hemos IL UF Heparin Controls two levels (low and high) of lyophilized controls . prepared from human citrated plasma containing unfractionated (UF) heparin, buffers and stabilizers. Each lot of UF Heparin Controls is traceable to the 6th International WHO standard 07/328 for UF heparin.
- Cleaning solution .
- Cleaning agent .
- Factor diluent .
# J. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
- CLSI C62, Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Methods; Approved Guideline, . First Edition. October 2014.
- . CLSI EP05-A3, Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: Approved Guideline, Third Edition, October 2014.
{3}------------------------------------------------
- . CLSI EP06, Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline, April 2003.
- CLSI EP07-A2. Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry Third Edition .
- . CLSI EP17-A2. Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline, Second Edition, June 2012.
- CLSI EP25, Evaluation of Stability of In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents; Approved . Guideline. September 2009.
- . CLSI EP37, Supplemental Tables for Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry; First Edition.
# K. Test Principle:
The HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa is an anti-factor Xa one-stage chromogenic assay. When an excess amount of factor Xa is added to a sample containing apixaban, factor Xa is partially neutralized by apixaban. Residual factor Xa is quantified when the synthetic chromogenic substrate is added to the patient sample. The released paranitroaniline (pNA) is released and monitored kinetically at 405 nm. The measured pNA is inversely proportional to apixaban levels. Thus, maximum absorption occurs with low levels of drug, and minimum absorption. occurs with high levels of drug. The same detection principle is employed when lowmolecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin levels are measured. Heparin is analyzed as a complex with antithrombin present in patient plasma forms an [AT·heparin] complex. The concentration of this complex is dependent on the availability of the patient's endogenous antithrombin. When the synthetic chromogenic substrate is added to the patient sample. the [AT heparin] complex inhibits FXa and residual FXa reacts with the chromogenic substrate resulting in cleavage of pNA. The released pNA is monitored kinetically at 405 nm. The measured pNA is inversely proportional to the low-molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin levels.
## L. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
## 1. Analytical performance:
Analytical performance studies for low-molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin were previously reported in K090209.
- a. Precision/Reproducibility:
Five precision studies were performed following the recommendations in the CLSI EP05-A3 guideline.
Study 1: This study was conducted over 20 days, with two runs per day and two replicates per run for a total of 240 determinations (i.e. 80 determinations per reagent lot). The study design included three representative instrument models, three reagent
{4}------------------------------------------------
lots (i.e. one lot per instrument), as well as manspiked samples and with plasma pool. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components: within-run, between-run, between-day and between-instrument. The results for within-run and total imprecision are provided in the summary table below.
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(ng/mL) | Within-Run | | Total | |
|-------------|---|-----------------|------------|--------|-------|-----|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Spiked 1 | | | | (b)(4) | | |
| Spiked 2 | | | | | | |
| Plasma pool | | | | | | |
Study 2: This study was conducted over 20 days, with two runs per day and two replicates per run for a total of determinations (i.e. [0] determinations for the ACL TOP family and (19) determinations for the ACL TOP 50 family). The study design included on instrument models from @14 instrument families, multiple reagent lots depending on the instrument family (i.e. base reagent lots were assessed on the ACL TOP family whereas or reagent lots were assessed on the ACL TOP 50 family), quality controls, [b](spiked samples, and [ 1+ plasma pool. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components: within-run, between-run, between-day, between-lot and between-instrument. The results for within-run and total imprecision are provided in the summary table below.
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(ng/mL) | Within-Run | | Total | |
|-------------|---|-----------------|------------|--------|-------|-----|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control 1 | | | | (b)(4) | | |
| Control 2 | | | | | | |
| Spiked 1 | | | | | | |
| Spiked 2 | | | | | | |
| Spiked 3 | | | | | | |
| Plasma pool | | | | | | |
Study 3: This study was conducted over 20 days, with two runs per day and two replicates per run for a total of prodeterminations. The study design included libro instrument models from (1)(4) instrument families | | reagent lots, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | plasma pool and contrived plasma pool. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components; within-run, between-run, between-day, between-lot and between-instrument. The results for within-run and total imprecision are provided in the summary table below.
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(ng/mL) | Within-Run | | Total | |
|----------------|---|-----------------|------------|--------|-------|-----|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Diluted native | | | | (b)(4) | | |
| Contrived pool | | | | | | |
Study 4: This study was conducted at three sites over five days, with two runs per day
{5}------------------------------------------------
and three replicates per run for a total of 270 determinations. The study design included representative instrument model ( ) quality controls, on 4 spiked samples and native sample. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components: within-run, between-run, between-day, betweenlaboratory and between-lot. The results for within-run, between-laboratory and total imprecision are provided in the summary table below.
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(ng/mL) | Within-run | | Between-<br>Laboratory | | Total | |
|-----------|-----|-----------------|------------|------|------------------------|------|-------|------|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Control 1 | 270 | 71.00 | 2.43 | 3.40 | 1.22 | 1.70 | 3.37 | 4.70 |
| Control 2 | 270 | 290.00 | 4.73 | 1.60 | 3.55 | 1.20 | 6.96 | 2.40 |
| Spiked 1 | 270 | 53.90 | 2.36 | 4.40 | 2.32 | 4.30 | 4.04 | 7.50 |
| Spiked 2 | 270 | 721.60 | 23.50 | 3.30 | 35.71 | 4.90 | 43.7 | 6.10 |
| Spiked 3 | 270 | 954.50 | 32.10 | 3.40 | 33.14 | 3.50 | 46.8 | 4.90 |
| Native | 270 | 199.90 | 6.07 | 3.00 | 9.16 | 4.60 | 11.9 | 5.90 |
Study 5: This study was conducted at three sites over five days, with one reagent lot per site, two runs per day and three replicates per run for a total of 270 determinations. The study design included one representative instrument model. [[0](4) diluted sample and native samples. Precision estimates were calculated for each of the following variance components: within-run, between-run, between-day, withinlaboratory, between-laboratory and between-lot. The results for within-run, betweenlaboratory and total imprecision are provided in the summary table below.
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(ng/mL) | Within-run | | Between-<br>laboratory | | Total | |
|-------------------|-----|-----------------|------------|------|------------------------|------|-------|------|
| | | | SD | %CV | SD | %CV | SD | %CV |
| Diluted<br>native | 270 | 59.70 | 2.52 | 4.20 | 1.00 | 1.70 | 3.11 | 5.20 |
| Native 1 | 270 | 106.10 | 3.33 | 3.10 | 1.39 | 1.30 | 3.88 | 3.70 |
| Native 2 | 270 | 246.90 | 6.59 | 2.70 | 5.34 | 2.20 | 8.72 | 3.50 |
## b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
Linearity studies were performed following the CLSI EP06-A guideline using three reagent lots and one representative instrument model from two instrument families. Normal pooled plasma (NPP) spiked with known concentrations of apixaban was tested in four replicates. Two separate linear regressions were performed. For the first, samples with Mifferent concentrations were evaluated to establish the analytical measuring interval; and for the second, samples with | | different concentrations were evaluated to establish the extended measuring interval.
Based on the results of the linearity studies, the claimed assay reportable range is 20-1000 ng/mL.
{6}------------------------------------------------
- c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
## Traceability
Two levels of lyophilized HemosIL Apixaban Calibrators are prepared from human citrated plasma by means of a dedicated process at two different concentrations of apixaban. Calibrator 1 contains no apixaban. A house standard lot of calibrators is used to value assign each new lot of Apixaban Calibrator 2. Calibrator value assignments are traceable to apixaban supplied by the manufacturer and quantitated in plasma assayed by Liquid Chroatography - tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Expected values: Calibrator 16763 Calibrator 2:
Two levels of lyophilized HemosIL Apixaban controls are prepared from human citrated plasma by means of a dedicated process at two different concentrations of apixaban. A house standard lot of Apixaban Controls is used to value assign each new lot of Apixaban Controls. Calibrator value assignments are traceable to apixaban supplied by the manufacturer and quantitated in plasma assayed by LC-MS/MS.
Expected values: Low Control: (b)(4) High Control: (b)(4)
#### Freeze-thaw cycle
Three lots of Liquid Anti-Xa reagents were tested before frozen (baseline) and after each of the three freeze-thaw cycles. The study was performed with three reagent lots and two vials per reagent lot for each sample at each time point. For each freeze-thaw cycle, the reagents were frozen at | @14) for (0)(4) hours and thawed at 2-8°C for bx(0) hours. The Liquid Anti-Xa demonstrated stability of up to two freeze-thaw cycles, with no more than 24 hours between each cycle at | 10/4)
#### Sample stability
Sample stability studies were performed to support the recommended storage and handling instructions found in the device labeling. Citrated plasma samples were tested after storage in the following temperature ranges. 15-25°C and 2-8°C. The study was performed using one reagent lot with at least four replicate measurements at each time point for each sample. The study data demonstrate that citrated plasma samples are stable for 24 hours when stored at 15-25°C and 7 days when stored at 2-8°C.
- d. Detection limit:
The limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), and limit of quantitation (LoQ) for the test system was determined following the CLSI EP17-A2 guideline. Each study
{7}------------------------------------------------
design included (0) reagent lots and (0) representative instrument model from each instrument family.
The limit of blank (LoB) was determined using the four citrated plasma pools containing no apixaban. Three replicate measurements were tested for each of the four plasma pools on five different days on two different instrument models for n=60 determinations per reagent lot per instrument model. The sponsor determined the LoB to be (0)(1)
The limit of detection (LoD) was determined using four citrated plasma pools containing low levels of apixaban around 10 ng/mL. Each of the four plasma pools were tested in triplicate on five different days on two instrument models for n=60 determinations per reagent lot per instrument model. The sponsor determined the LoD to be | prev
The limit of quantitation (LoQ) was determined using four citrated plasma pools spiked apixaban at four targeted concentrations: [0] [10] and 10/4) ]. Each of the four plasma pools were tested in eight replicates per day on five different days, for n=40 determinations per reagent lot per instrument model. The sponsor determined the LoQ to be (D) 43
e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were conducted based on the CLSI EP07-A2 guideline. The study design included one representative instrument model and three different reagent lots. Potentially interfering endogenous substances were spiked into the test samples (spiked with apixaban at [ (4) or ) and the control samples. Potentially interfering exogenous substances were spiked into the test samples (i.e. native pooled plasma with apixaban at Mand | | | | | pooled plasma spiked with apixaban at @14) and the control sample was tested in a minimum of four replicates.
None of the substances in the following table (endogenous or exogenous substances) were found to lead to clinicially significant interference.
#### Endogenous Substances
| Interfering Substance | Concentration Tested |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Hemoglobin | 300 mg/dL |
| Bilirubin | 25 mg/dL |
| Triglycerides | 1150 mg/dL |
| Lupus anticoagulant | 2.11 (dRVVT screen/confirm ratio) |
{8}------------------------------------------------
## Exogenous Substances
| Interfering Substance | Concentration Tested |
|-----------------------|----------------------|
| Acetylsalicylic acid | 3 mg/dL |
| Atorvastatin | 0.075 mg/dL |
| Isosorbide dinitrate | 0.6 mg/dL |
| Ticagrelor | 0.188 mg/dL |
| Warfarin | 7.5 mg/dL |
- Assav cut-off: f.
Not applicable
- 2. Clinical performance:
Method comparison performance studies using clinical samples for low-molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin were previously reported in K090209.
- a. Accuracy
The method comparison study was conducted using the HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa assay on the Instrumentation Laboratory ACL TOP 300 CTS, ACL TOP 500 CTS, and ACL TOP 700 CTS by testing n=367 clinical samples collected from patients receiving apixaban at three different U.S. clinical sites. Results from the HemosIL. Liquid Anti-Xa were compared to results from a validated apixaban LC-MS/MS method. Linear regression analyses were performed for the dataset collected for each site. The following table summarizes the line equation from the linear regression analysis performed for the combined dataset.
| N | r | Slope (95% CI) | Intercept (95% CI) |
|-----|-------|------------------------|-------------------------|
| 367 | 0.995 | 1.101 ((b)(4), (b)(4)) | -2.458 ((b)(4), (b)(4)) |
A summary of device performance at different medically important concentrations througout the reportable range for the combined dataset is shown below.
| | Relative Predicted Bias (95% CI) | |
|-----------|----------------------------------|--|
| 30 ng/mL | (b)(4) | |
| 50 ng/mL | | |
| 100 ng/mL | | |
| 350 ng/mL | | |
- b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
- 3. Clinical studies:
{9}------------------------------------------------
- a. Clinical Sensitivity:
Not applicable
- b. Clinical specificity:
Not applicable
- c. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable):
Not applicable
- 4. Clinical cut-off:
Not applicable
- 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa assay is not intended to monitor patients on apixaban therapy. Currently, apixaban does not require therapeutic monitoring: thus, there is no standard therapeutic range as the on-therapy range may be different for each individual patient.
# N. Proposed Labeling
The labeling supports the decision to grant the De Novo request for this device.
## O. Identified Risks to Health and Mitigation Measures
| Identified Risk | Mitigation Measures |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| False positive/false negative/failed<br>to provide a result for diagnostics | Certain analytical studies and clinical studies in design<br>verification and validation.<br>Certain labeling information. |
# P. Benefit/Risk Determination
## Patient perspectives
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
# Summary of the Assessment of Benefit
The HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa assay is intended for the measurement of apixaban levels in patients at risk of major bleeding or experiencing a bleeding episode. The performance characteristics of the test are evaluated in analytical and clinical validation studies and the data demonstrate acceptable analytical and clinical performance for this intended use. The
{10}------------------------------------------------
benefit of the test is to provide clinicians with an additional assessment tool that is used in conjunction with clinical and other laboratory findings in the management of patients receiving apixaban. Drug levels that are within expected ranges/on-therapy ranges may provide clinicians with reassurance and resulting in continuation of treatment. Detection of drug levels below or above expected ranges/on-therapy range may lead to a change in the anticoagulant regimen. In the preoperative settings, a drug concentration of (D)(4) is currently accepted as the safe-for-treatment threshold for invasive procedures and surgeries. In patients with drug concentrations (019) the procedures/sugeries may be postponed until the drug concentrations are below this threshold. Several factors contribute to the uncertainty for the benefits. The on-therapy range shows (and variability between patients. There is limited information on the relationship between drug concentrations and clinical outcomes. The threshold has not been fully evaluated for its impact on patient outcomes. In addition, apixaban does not require routine monitoring and the drug levels are not used as the basis of dose-adjustment and reversal. Therefore, the extent of uncertainty for the benefits is medium.
#### Summary of the Assessment of Risk
The risk of the device is associated with inaccurate test results. For apixaban levels around the "on-therapy range", falsely high and falsely low results may lead to inappropriate switching of anticoagulant regimen or continuation of apixaban. At drug levels close to the cutoff for surgeries and invasive procedures () falsely high results may cause delay of life saving surgeries or invasive procedures, whereas falsely low results may increased the risk for perioperative bleeding.
## Summary of the Assessment of Benefit-Risk
Considerations of risk mitigation include special controls for performance characteristics addressing analytical and clinical validation, and labeling device performance and limitations (e.g. not intended for the monitoring and dosage adjustment of apixaban). Additionally, the device is labeled "prescription only", "not a stand-alone test" and "should be used in conjunction with other clinical and laboratory findings." Given the combination of the device's indications for use, labeling, and the required general controls and special controls established for this device, the probable benefits would outweigh the probable risks.
## Q. Conclusion
The De Novo request is granted and the device is classified under the following and subject to the special controls identified in the letter granting the De Novo request:
Product Code: OLU Device Type: Heparin and direct oral factor Xa inhibitor drug test system Class: II Regulation: 21 CFR 864.7295
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.