DEN160033 · Ark Diagnostics, Inc. · PUJ · May 5, 2017 · Clinical Toxicology
Device Facts
Record ID
DEN160033
Device Name
ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System
Applicant
Ark Diagnostics, Inc.
Product Code
PUJ · Clinical Toxicology
Decision Date
May 5, 2017
Decision
DENG
Submission Type
Direct
Regulation
21 CFR 862.3970
Device Class
Class 2
Indications for Use
ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System includes separately provided test kits for the ARK Voriconazole II Assay, ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator, and ARK Voriconazole II Control. The ARK Voriconazole II Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay intended for the quantitative determination of voriconazole in human serum on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. The measurements obtained are used in monitoring levels of voriconazole to help ensure appropriate therapy. The assay should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures. ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator is intended for use in calibration of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay. ARK Voriconazole II Control is an assayed quality control material intended for use in quality control of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay.
Device Story
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for quantitative voriconazole measurement in human serum; utilizes automated clinical chemistry analyzers (e.g., Roche cobas c 501). Principle: competitive binding between specimen drug and voriconazole-conjugated G6PDH for antibody sites; enzyme activity proportional to drug concentration; spectrophotometric measurement of NADH rate of change. Used in clinical laboratories by technicians/pathologists. Output: quantitative voriconazole concentration (µg/mL). Assists clinicians in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to manage narrow therapeutic index, non-linear pharmacokinetics, and inter-individual metabolic variability. Results serve as adjunct to clinical evaluation/diagnostic procedures to optimize dosing, avoid toxicity, and prevent therapeutic failure.
Clinical Evidence
No clinical data provided in the document. FDA required special controls including precision studies, method comparison data at three laboratory sites, interference studies, and cross-reactivity evaluation for the major metabolite (N-oxide voriconazole) to support safety and effectiveness.
Technological Characteristics
Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay; quantitative measurement; designed for use on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. Requires calibration and quality control materials. Subject to general controls and special controls regarding precision, accuracy, and interference.
Indications for Use
Indicated for quantitative determination of voriconazole in human serum to monitor drug levels and ensure appropriate therapy in patients receiving voriconazole treatment. For prescription use only.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A voriconazole test system is a device intended to measure voriconazole in human serum. Measurements obtained by this device are used in monitoring levels of voriconazole to ensure appropriate therapy.
Special Controls
A voriconazole test system must comply with the following special controls: 1) Premarket notification submissions must include the following information: A. Data demonstrating the precision of the voriconazole test system. Precision studies must include a minimum of three samples containing different concentrations of voriconazole, including near medical decision points at the high and low end of the expected therapeutic range. Samples with concentrations near medical decision points must be clinical specimens collected from patients taking voriconazole. B. Method comparison data demonstrating accuracy of the voriconazole test system. Method comparison data must be collected at three laboratory sites. The comparator method must not be subject to bias due to non-specific detection of voriconazole. C. Data from interference studies performed to evaluate potential interference from co-administered medications used for conditions in which voriconazole is indicated. D. Data from studies performed to evaluate cross reactivity of the major metabolite, N-oxide voriconazole. 2) Your 809.10(b)(5)(ii) compliant labeling must include a warning statement as follows: "This assay should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures."
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are:(1) Design verification and validation must include the following information:
(i) Data demonstrating the precision of the voriconazole test system. Precision studies must include a minimum of three samples containing different concentrations of voriconazole, including near medical decision points at the high and low end of the expected therapeutic range. Samples with concentrations near medical decision points must be individual or pooled clinical specimens, collected from patients taking voriconazole.
(ii) Method comparison data demonstrating accuracy of the voriconazole test system. Method comparison data must be collected at three laboratory sites. The comparator method must not be subject to bias due to nonspecific detection of voriconazole.
(iii) Data from interference studies performed to evaluate potential interference from co-administered medications used for conditions in which voriconazole is indicated.
(iv) Data from studies performed to evaluate cross reactivity of the major metabolite, N-oxide voriconazole.
(2) The labeling required under § 809.10(b) of this chapter must include a warning statement as follows: “This assay should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures.”
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
## EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC CLASS III DESIGNATION FOR ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System
### DECISION SUMMARY
#### A. DEN Number:
DEN160033
### B. Purpose for Submission:
De Novo request for evaluation of automatic class III designation of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System
### C. Measurand:
Voriconazole
### D. Type of Test:
Homogenous Enzyme Immunoassay
### E. Applicant:
ARK Diagnostics, Inc.
#### F. Proprietary and Established Names:
ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System includes the following: ARK Voriconazole II Assay ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator ARK Voriconazole II Control
### G. Regulatory Information:
- 1. Regulation:
21 CFR 862.3970
- 2. Classification:
Class II (Special Controls)
{1}------------------------------------------------
### 3. Product code:
PUJ
## 4. Panel:
91 - Toxicology
### H. Indications for use:
- 1. Indication(s) for use:
ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System includes separately provided test kits for the ARK Voriconazole II Assay, ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator, and ARK Voriconazole II Control.
The ARK Voriconazole II Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay intended for the quantitative determination of voriconazole in human serum on automated clinical chemistry analyzers. The measurements obtained are used in monitoring levels of voriconazole to help ensure appropriate therapy. The assay should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures.
ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator is intended for use in calibration of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay.
ARK Voriconazole II Control is an assayed quality control material intended for use in quality control of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay.
- 2. Special conditions for use statement(s):
For prescription use only.
The assay should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures.
### 3. Special instrument requirements:
The assay was validated on the Roche cobas c 501 analyzer
### I. Device Description:
The ARK Voriconazole II Assay Test System consists of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay, the ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator, and the ARK Voriconazole II Control.
{2}------------------------------------------------
The ARK Voriconazole II Assay consists of:
- . Reagent R1: rabbit polyclonal antibodies to voriconazole, glucose-6-phosphate, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, bovine serum albumin, sodium azide, and stabilizers.
- . Reagent R2: voriconazole labeled with bacterial G6PDH buffer, bovine serum albumin, sodium azide, and stabilizers.
The ARK Voriconazole II Calibrator has six levels and consists of voriconazole, buffer, bovine serum albumin, and sodium azide.
The ARK Voriconazole II Control has three levels and consists of voriconazole, buffer, bovine serum albumin, and sodium azide.
## J. Standards/Guidance Documents Referenced:
- CLSI document EP5-A3, Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement . Procedures
- CLSI Guideline EP6-A: Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement ● Procedures: A Statistical Approach
- CLSI Protocol EP7-A2: Interference Testing in Clinical Chemistry
- CLSI Guideline EP9-A3: Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation . Using Patient Samples
- CLSI Protocol EP17-A2: Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory . Measurement Procedures
# K. Test Principle:
ARK Voriconazole II Assay is a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay based on competition between drug in the specimen and voriconazole-conjugated glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (voriconazole-G6PDH) for binding to the antibody reagent. As voriconazole-G6PDH binds antibody, voriconazole-G6PDH enzyme activity decreases. In the presence of drug from the specimen, enzyme activity increases and is directly proportional to the drug concentration. Active voriconazole-G6PDH enzyme converts the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) to NADH that is measured spectrophotometrically as a rate of change in absorbance. Endogenous plasma G6PDH does not interfere with the results because the coenzyme NAD functions only with the bacterial enzyme used in the assay.
# L. Performance Characteristics:
The following performance characteristics were obtained on the Roche cobas c 501 analyzer.
- 1. Analytical performance:
{3}------------------------------------------------
### a. Reproducibility/Precision
### Internal Precision Study:
An internal 20-day precision study was performed by testing tri-level controls and three samples from pooled human serum. Each level was tested over 20 days, with 2 runs per day and 4 replicates per run. The following results were obtained:
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(µg/mL) | Within Run | | Between Run | | Between Day | | Total | |
|-----------------------------|-----|-----------------|------------|--------|-------------|--------|-------------|--------|-------|--------|
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| ARK Voriconazole II Control | | | | | | | | | | |
| LOW | 160 | 1.03 | 0.047 | 4.6 | 0.030 | 2.9 | 0.022 | 2.1 | 0.051 | 4.9 |
| MID | 160 | 4.91 | 0.194 | 3.9 | 0.124 | 2.5 | 0.101 | 2.1 | 0.209 | 4.3 |
| HIGH | 160 | 9.39 | 0.394 | 4.2 | 0.242 | 2.6 | 0.207 | 2.2 | 0.426 | 4.5 |
| Human Serum | | | | | | | | | | |
| LOW | 160 | 1.02 | 0.043 | 4.2 | 0.029 | 2.8 | 0.024 | 2.4 | 0.047 | 4.6 |
| MID | 160 | 5.03 | 0.182 | 3.6 | 0.149 | 3.0 | 0.111 | 2.2 | 0.217 | 4.3 |
| HIGH | 160 | 9.80 | 0.334 | 3.4 | 0.286 | 2.9 | 0.221 | 2.3 | 0.407 | 4.2 |
Another internal precision study was performed by testing three voriconazole patient sample pools using three lots of the ARK Voriconazole II Assay reagents. Each level was tested over 5 days, with 2 runs per day and 4 replicates per run. The following results were obtained:
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(µg/mL) | Within Run | | Between<br>Run | | Between<br>Day | | Between Lot | | Total | |
|--------|-----|-----------------|------------|-----------|----------------|-----------|----------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------|-----------|
| | | | SD | CV<br>(%) | SD | CV<br>(%) | SD | CV<br>(%) | SD | CV<br>(%) | SD | CV<br>(%) |
| LOW | 120 | 1.00 | 0.042 | 4.2 | 0.023 | 2.3 | 0.021 | 2.1 | 0.034 | 3.4 | 0.059 | 5.9 |
| MID | 120 | 4.83 | 0.234 | 4.8 | 0.069 | 1.4 | 0.048 | 1.0 | 0.102 | 2.1 | 0.248 | 5.1 |
| HIGH | 120 | 10.59 | 0.621 | 5.9 | 0.293 | 2.8 | 0.266 | 2.5 | 0.096 | 0.9 | 0.667 | 6.3 |
#### Multi-Site Precision Study
Precision was also evaluated at three sites (ARK and two external sites) over 5 nonconsecutive days. ARK tri-level voriconazole controls and three samples from pooled human serum were tested over 5 days, with 2 runs per day and 4 replicates per run. The overall (across sites) precision study results are shown below:
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Sample | N | Mean<br>(µg/mL) | Repeatability | | Between-Run | | Between-Day | | Reproducibility | |
|-----------------------------|-----|-----------------|---------------|--------|-------------|--------|-------------|--------|-----------------|--------|
| | | | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) | SD | CV (%) |
| ARK Voriconazole II Control | | | | | | | | | | |
| LOW | 120 | 1.08 | 0.054 | 5.0 | 0.044 | 4.1 | 0.036 | 3.4 | 0.064 | 6.0 |
| MID | 120 | 5.04 | 0.247 | 4.9 | 0.171 | 3.4 | 0.144 | 2.9 | 0.275 | 5.5 |
| HIGH | 120 | 9.93 | 0.466 | 4.7 | 0.480 | 4.8 | 0.320 | 3.2 | 0.645 | 6.5 |
| Human Serum | | | | | | | | | | |
| LOW | 120 | 1.06 | 0.047 | 4.4 | 0.040 | 3.8 | 0.032 | 3.0 | 0.057 | 5.4 |
| MID | 120 | 5.12 | 0.251 | 4.9 | 0.148 | 2.9 | 0.120 | 2.3 | 0.265 | 5.2 |
| HIGH | 120 | 10.13 | 0.510 | 5.0 | 0.338 | 3.3 | 0.292 | 2.9 | 0.561 | 5.5 |
- b. Linearity/assay reportable range:
#### Linearity
Pure voriconazole (USP, 99.7% purity) was added to pooled human serum to obtain a concentration of 20.0 ug/mL. Dilutions of this 20.0 ug/mL high concentration sample were made proportionally using human serum negative for voriconazole. Eleven levels of samples were tested in two runs with three replicates per run. Regression analysis was performed between the measured mean voriconazole and calculated values for each dilution. The linear regression results are shown below.
Y = 1.0209 X - 0.0416 R2: 0.9995
These results support the claimed measuring range of 0.5 to 14.0 ug/mL.
#### Analytical Recovery
Analytical recovery throughout the measurement range was assessed. Serum samples were prepared by gravimetric addition of pure voriconazole (USP, 99.7% purity) to methanol and volumetric addition of this stock solution to human serum negative for voriconazole. The percentage recovery ranged from 90.0% to 104.9%, as shown below:
| Calculated Concentration | Measured Concentration | Percent Recovery |
|--------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ug/mL) | (ug/mL) | |
| 0.50 | 0.45 | 90.0 |
| 1.20 | 1.19 | 99.2 |
| 3.00 | 3.05 | 101.7 |
| 6.00 | ર : 86 | 97.7 |
| 9.00 | 8.74 | 97.1 |
| 12.00 | 11.44 | તે જેવી તેમ જ દૂધની ડેવી જેવી સવલતો પ્રાપ્ય થયેલી છે. આ ગામનાં લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી, ખેતમજૂરી તેમ જ પશુપાલન છે. આ ગામમાં પ્રાથમિક શાળા, પંચાયતઘર, આંગણવાડી તેમ જ દૂધની ડ |
| 15.00 | 15.75 | 104.9 |
{5}------------------------------------------------
- c. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
#### Traceability
The ARK Voriconazole II Calibrators are traceable to a certified USP Reference Standard.
#### Value Assignment
Concentrations of the ARK Voriconazole II Calibrators and Controls are assiened through internal procedures that were reviewed and found to be acceptable.
#### Stability:
Accelerated stability studies were performed to support a shelf-life stability claim of up to 12 months for the ARK Voriconazole II Reagents, Calibrators and Controls when stored unopened at 2-8°C. Real time stability studies to support shelf-life stability claims are ongoing. Real-time testing for on-board stability of ARK Voriconazole II Reagents was performed and supports an in-use stability claim of 60 days for reagents. Specimen stability was also evaluated and was shown to be stable for up to a week at 2-8°C and up to four weeks at -20 °C.
- d. Detection limit
The Limit of Blank, Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation were determined in accordance with CLSI EP17-A2.
The Limit of Blank (LoB) was evaluated by testing 20 blank patient specimens over 3 days using 3 lots of ARK Voriconazole II reagents, and was determined to be 0.003 ug/mL.
The Limit of Detection (LoD) was calculated based on the LoB and the standard deviation of a low concentration pooled serum sample tested over 3 days using 3 lots of ARK Voriconazole II reagents, and was determined to be 0.05 ug/mL.
The Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) was defined as the lowest Voriconazole concentration that shows bias ≤15% and within-laboratory precision of ≤ 10%, and was determined to be 0.5 ng/mL.
#### e. Analytical specificity:
Interference studies were conducted using CLSI Protocol EP7-A2 as a guideline. Clinically high concentrations of potentially interfering substances were spiked into serum samples with known levels of voriconazole (approximately 1 and 5 ug/mL). Each sample was then tested in two runs with three replicates per run using the ARK Voriconazole II Assay, along with a serum control of voriconazole. The percentage recovery relative to the measurement of voriconazole in the serum control was calculated. The sponsor states that interference is considered to be significant if the
{6}------------------------------------------------
analytical recovery is outside of ± 10% of the initial value.
#### Endogenous Substances
Interference studies were conducted for endogenous substances with serum samples at 1.0 and 5.0 µg/mL of voriconazole. The concentration tested for each endogenous substance and percent recovery results are shown below.
| Interfering Substance | Interferent<br>concentration<br>tested | Percentage Recovery<br>1.0 µg/mL<br>Voriconazole | Percentage Recovery<br>5.0 µg/mL<br>Voriconazole |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Human Albumin | 12 g/dL | 103.8 | 98.7 |
| Bilirubin (Conjugated) | 70 mg/dL | 99.0 | 99.6 |
| Bilirubin (Unconjugated) | 70 mg/dL | 102.9 | 95.7 |
| Cholesterol | 617 mg/dL | 95.8 | 98.3 |
| Hemoglobin | 1000 mg/dL | 102.9 | 93.5 |
| Rheumatoid Factor | 1000 IU/mL | 103.8 | 100.2 |
| Human IgG | 12 g/dL | 105.8 | 97.8 |
| Triglycerides | 1000 mg/dL | 107.5 | 99.2 |
| Uric Acid | 30 mg/dL | 105.8 | 96.2 |
### Cross-reactivity of N-oxide Voriconazole
A cross-reactivity study was conducted for the major metabolite of voriconazole, Noxide-voriconazole at 5.0 ug/mL and 10.0 µg/mL levels. The results demonstrated non-significant (≤ 3.0%) cross reactivity from N-oxide-voriconazole when tested in the absence or presence of voriconazole in human serum.
| N-oxide-<br>Voriconazole<br>(µg/mL) | Measured Voriconazole in Absence/Presence of<br>Metabolite (µg/mL) | | |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| | Voriconazole<br>Absent<br>(0.0 µg/mL) | Voriconazole<br>Present<br>(1.0 µg/mL) | Voriconazole<br>Present<br>(5.0 µg/mL) |
| 0.0 | 0.00 | 1.06 | 4.99 |
| 5.0 | 0.04 | 1.17 | 4.96 |
| 10.0 | 0.10 | 1.23 | 5.29 |
#### Potentially Co-Administered Medications
Interference studies were conducted for structurally related compounds, medications routinely co-administered with voriconazole, and other potentially co-administered drugs, at serum concentrations of 1.0 and 5.0 µg/mL of voriconazole. The concentration tested for each potentially interfering compound and percent recovery results are shown below. No significant interference was observed.
{7}------------------------------------------------
| # | Compound | Concentration tested (µg/mL) | Percentage Recovery | |
|----|-------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------|
| | | | 1.0 µg/mL Voriconazole | 5.0 µg/mL Voriconazole |
| 1 | Abacavir | 30 | 100 | 96.6 |
| 2 | Acetaminophen | 200 | 100 | 90.9 |
| 3 | Alprazolam | 5 | 100 | 97.4 |
| 4 | Amikacin | 100 | 99 | 100.4 |
| 5 | Amphotericin | 100 | 92.5 | 96.7 |
| 6 | Amprenavir | 30 | 99 | 96.4 |
| 7 | Atazanavir | 30 | 102.1 | 95.4 |
| 8 | Atovaquone | 100 | 94.8 | 93 |
| 9 | Bendamustine | 30 | 98 | 96.4 |
| 10 | Bosutinib | 100 | 104.1 | 94.6 |
| 11 | Cefepime | 500 | 96.9 | 92.8 |
| 12 | Ceftazidime | 500 | 99 | 93.8 |
| 13 | Ciprofloxacin | 100 | 96.1 | 96 |
| 14 | Citalopram | 10 | 100 | 95.4 |
| 15 | Clonazepam | 10 | 99 | 99.2 |
| 16 | Codeine | 10 | 99 | 102 |
| 17 | Colistimethate Na | 100 | 99 | 98.4 |
| 18 | Cyclosporine A | 40 | 99 | 99.2 |
| 19 | Darunavir | 30 | 100 | 94.3 |
| 20 | Dasatinib | 100 | 99 | 100.8 |
| 21 | Efavirenz | 30 | 95.1 | 93.9 |
| 22 | Emtricitabine | 30 | 99 | 92.6 |
| 23 | Erythromycin | 200 | 99 | 91.5 |
| 24 | Fluconazole | 30 | 101.8 | 97.2 |
| 25 | Fosamprenavir | 30 | 97 | 100.4 |
| 26 | Gabapentin | 100 | 98.2 | 95.3 |
| 27 | Gentamicin | 100 | 98.1 | 100 |
| 28 | Itraconazole | 20 | 97.2 | 93.4 |
| 29 | Lamivudine | 30 | 96.3 | 99.2 |
| 30 | Lopinavir | 30 | 94.4 | 99.2 |
| 31 | Lorazapam | 10 | 98.1 | 101 |
| 32 | Maraviroc | 10 | 99.1 | 100.8 |
| 33 | Meropenem | 500 | 92.5 | 96.4 |
| 34 | Methotrexate | 100 | 95.3 | 94.4 |
| 35 | Metronidazole | 200 | 93.4 | 95.8 |
| 36 | Micafungin | 300 | 98.1 | 101.2 |
| 37 | Morphine | 10 | 96.3 | 91.7 |
| 38 | Mycophenolic acid | 40 | 97 | 91.1 |
| 39 | Nelfinavir | 30 | 93.4 | 94.7 |
| 40 | Nevirapine | 30 | 94.4 | 94.3 |
| # | Compound | Concentration<br>tested (µg/mL) | Percentage Recovery | |
| | | | 1.0 µg/mL<br>Voriconazole | 5.0 µg/mL<br>Voriconazole |
| 41 | Olanzapine | 10 | 98 | 91.1 |
| 42 | Penicillin V | 100 | 98.1 | 102.4 |
| 43 | Piperacillin | 500 | 93.1 | 92.2 |
| 44 | Posaconazole | 20 | 99.1 | 93 |
| 45 | Prednisolone | 200 | 102.9 | 91.3 |
| 46 | Ritonavir | 30 | 100 | 99.2 |
| 47 | Sirolimus | 10 | 104.7 | 101.6 |
| 48 | Stavudine | 30 | 96.3 | 101.5 |
| 49 | Tazobactam | 100 | 99 | 90.2 |
| 50 | Tacrolimus | 10 | 98 | 94.6 |
| 51 | Tenofovir | 30 | 98 | 96.7 |
| 52 | Tipranavir | 30 | 96.3 | 102.4 |
| 53 | Tobramycin | 100 | 100 | 96.3 |
| 54 | Trimethoprim | 50 | 93.9 | 91.8 |
| 55 | Sulfamethoxazole | 400 | 97 | 91.8 |
| 56 | Vancomycin | 250 | 98.2 | 101.2 |
| 57 | Vincristine | 100 | 93.1 | 92 |
| 58 | Zolpidem | 30 | 102.8 | 91.2 |
{8}------------------------------------------------
### 2. Comparison studies:
### a. Method comparison study:
Method comparison studies were performed following CLSI Protocol EP9-A3 at 3 study sites. Results from 165 serum specimens tested with the ARK Voriconazole II Assay on Roche cobas c 501 analyzers at 3 sites were compared to those from a validated LC-MS/MS method. The samples represented a diverse population of inhospital patients with voriconazole concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 13.9 µg/mL by the LC-MS/MS method. The Passing Bablok regression analysis results are presented below.
| Site | N | Slope<br>(95% CI) | Intercept<br>(95% CI) | R2<br>(95% CI) | Sample Range<br>Tested<br>(concentration<br>on LC-MS/MS) |
|------|-----|------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | 165 | 0.99<br>(0.96 to 1.03) | 0.08<br>(0.04 to 0.16) | 0.96<br>(0.94 to 0.96) | 0.5 to 13.9 µg/mL |
| 2 | | 0.99<br>(0.96 to 1.02) | 0.05<br>(-0.03 to 0.15) | 0.95<br>(0.93 to 0.96) | |
| 3 | | 0.98<br>(0.95 to 1.01) | 0.06<br>(-0.01 to 0.11) | 0.97<br>(0.95 to 0.97) | |
{9}------------------------------------------------
- b. Matrix comparison:
Not applicable
- 3. Clinical studies:
Not applicable
- 4. Expected Values
Not applicable.
# M. Labeling
The labeling is sufficient and satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Parts 801 and 809, and the special controls for this type of device.
# N. Identified Risks to Health and Identified Mitigations
| Identified Risks to Health | Identified Mitigations |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Clinical action (e.g., dose adjustments) based on<br>falsely elevated inaccurate voriconazole results may<br>lead to decreased clinical efficacy of the drug and<br>consequently poorer clinical outcomes. | General controls and special controls (1),<br>and (2) |
| Clinical action (e.g. dose adjustments) based on<br>falsely low inaccurate voriconazole results may lead<br>to an increased risk of toxicity. | General controls and special controls (1),<br>and (2) |
{10}------------------------------------------------
# O. Benefit/Risk Analysis
| | Summary |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Summary<br>of the<br>Benefit(s) | Voriconazole is characterized by a narrow therapeutic spectrum, non-linear<br>pharmacokinetics, and frequent inter-individual and intra-individual variability<br>in voriconazole serum concentrations. It is metabolized in the liver by several<br>cytochrome P450 isoenzymes; however, voriconazole is primarily metabolized<br>by CYP2C19. The CYP2C19 gene is known to have several different genetic<br>polymorphisms which are known to differentially affect voriconazole<br>metabolism. For these above-mentioned reasons, voriconazole therapeutic drug<br>monitoring (TDM) can assist clinicians in determining adequate dose exposure<br>levels when evaluating patients' overall clinical response. Clinical decision<br>making should not be based solely on review of voriconazole TDM when<br>assessing patients' risk of drug toxicity or therapeutic benefit. Voriconazole<br>TDM should be used only as an adjunct to clinical care and not as a sole means<br>of determining clinical response. |
| Summary<br>of the<br>Risk(s) | Although, there is generally no accepted voriconazole TDM target range, several<br>studies propose voriconazole TDM cut-off ranges anywhere from 1-5.5 µg/mL<br>or 2-6 µg/mL, where a trough of 2 µg/mL is generally acceptable among<br>patients with more severe illness. Studies have linked voriconazole levels of<br><1.0 µg/mL with therapeutic failure (Chen J, et al., Therapeutic drug monitoring<br>of voriconazole in children, Ther Drug Monit 2012; 34:77-84).<br><br>Therefore, the risk of a falsely elevated voriconazole value is decreased clinical<br>efficacy of the drug and consequently poorer clinical outcomes, as the physician<br>may erroneously believe that voriconazole is within an effective range based on the inaccurate voriconazole TDM value. This is of particular concern for individuals with life-threatening fungal infections, among whom the proportion of patients with potentially sub-therapeutic levels may be high (Trifilio S, et al.,<br>Monitoring plasma voriconazole levels may be necessary to avoid subtherapeutic levels in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, Cancer<br>2007; 109:1532-1535). A falsely elevated TDM value could result in a physician prematurely discontinuing voriconazole therapy out of concern that at elevated levels the patient may be subject to increased toxicity (Potoski B,<br>Brown J, The safety of voriconazole, Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 1273-1275;<br>Lutsar I, et al., Voriconazole treatment for less-common, emerging, or refractory fungal infections, Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1122-1131).<br><br>The risk of a falsely low voriconazole value is increased risk of toxicity if voriconazole is continued at the same dose, or a potential increase in the dose based on a falsely low level. The population of patients taking voriconazole generally has significant co-morbidities (e.g., hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients at increased risk for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or patients may be receiving concomitant medications which are also metabolized through the same metabolic pathways as voriconazole). Therefore, physicians may opt to routinely follow clinically relevant biochemical parameters, such as liver enzyme studies, to ensure that there is no worsening of these parameters.<br><br>Therapeutic dose levels should be monitored alongside patients' overall clinical progress, as false readings in any direction may adversely affect patients'<br>clinical outcomes. Voriconazole levels should be used as an adjunct to clinical judgment and clinical monitoring and not as a sole means of assessing the adequacy of voriconazole dosing, or voriconazole toxicity, or as a surrogate for patient outcomes. |
| Summary<br>of Other<br>Factors | As specified in the label, a voriconazole level may be used as an adjunct to clinical judgment and clinical monitoring and should not be used as a sole means of assessing the adequacy of voriconazole dosing, or toxicity. Additionally, analytical risks are mitigated by in vitro diagnostic (IVD) labelling compliant with 21 CFR 809.10. |
{11}------------------------------------------------
{12}------------------------------------------------
#### Conclusions
Do the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks?
Yes, the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks of this device in light of the special controls assigned, along with general controls, including design controls.
#### Patient Perspectives:
This submission did not include specific information on patient perspectives for this device.
### P. Conclusion:
| Product Code: | PUJ |
|---------------|--------------------------|
| Device Type: | Voriconazole test system |
| Class: | II (special controls) |
| Regulation: | 21 CFR 862.3970 |
- a) Identification. A voriconazole test system is a device intended to measure voriconazole in human serum. Measurements obtained by this device are used in monitoring levels of voriconazole to ensure appropriate therapy.
- b) Classification. Class II (special controls). A voriconazole test system must comply with the following special controls:
- 1) Premarket notification submissions must include the following information:
- A. Data demonstrating the precision of the voriconazole test system. Precision studies must include a minimum of three samples containing different concentrations of voriconazole, including near medical decision points at the high and low end of the expected therapeutic range. Samples with concentrations near medical decision points must be clinical specimens collected from patients taking voriconazole.
- B. Method comparison data demonstrating accuracy of the voriconazole test system. Method comparison data must be collected at three laboratory sites. The comparator method must not be subject to bias due to non-specific detection of voriconazole.
- C. Data from interference studies performed to evaluate potential interference from co-administered medications used for conditions in which voriconazole is indicated.
- D. Data from studies performed to evaluate cross reactivity of the major metabolite, N-oxide voriconazole.
- 2) Your 809.10(b)(5)(ii) compliant labeling must include a warning statement as follows: "This assay should only be used in conjunction with information available from clinical evaluations and other diagnostic procedures."
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.