The PhiCal™ test is a quantitative ELISA for measuring, in human stool, concentrations of fecal calprotectin, a neutrophilic protein that is a marker of mucosal inflammation. The PhiCal™ test can be used as an in vitro diagnostic to aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD): Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and to differentiate IBD from irritable bowel syndrome; when used in conjunction with other diagnostic testing and the total clinical picture.
Device Story
PhiCal™ is a quantitative ELISA test for measuring fecal calprotectin, a marker of mucosal inflammation. Input: random stool samples (approx. 0.1g) collected without preservatives. Process: stool extraction in buffer; centrifugation; supernatant dilution (1:2500); incubation in microtiter plate coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-calprotectin antibodies; addition of enzyme-conjugated antibodies and alkaline phosphatase substrate. Output: color intensity proportional to calprotectin concentration, measured via ELISA reader (405 nm). Interpretation: concentration derived from 5-point standard curve. Used in clinical laboratories by trained personnel. Results aid physicians in differentiating IBD (Crohn's, ulcerative colitis) from IBS, potentially reducing need for invasive diagnostic procedures.
Clinical Evidence
Clinical study of 908 subjects (255 IBD, 410 IBS, 82 other bowel diseases, 161 normal). Excluding 132 borderline cases, clinical sensitivity was 86% (254/296) and clinical specificity was 94% (451/480). ROC analysis indicated 95% specificity and 70% sensitivity at a 120 µg/g cut-off.
Technological Characteristics
Quantitative ELISA. Components: microtiter plate with polyclonal rabbit anti-calprotectin antibodies, alkaline phosphatase-labeled rabbit IgG, substrate, wash/dilution/extraction buffers. Requires ELISA reader (405 nm), digital scale, vortex mixer, shaker, micro-centrifuge. Standardized against Fagerhol 'Gold Standard' preparation. Proclin 300 used as preservative.
Indications for Use
Indicated for patients suspected of having inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) to aid in diagnosis and differentiation. Used as an in vitro diagnostic for measuring fecal calprotectin concentrations in human stool.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
A fecal calprotectin immunological test system is an in vitro diagnostic device that consists of reagents used to quantitatively measure, by immunochemical techniques, fecal calprotectin in human stool specimens. The device is intended for in vitro diagnostic use as an aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), specifically Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and as an aid in differentiation of IBD from irritable bowel syndrome.
Special Controls
The device is classified as Class II under regulation 21 CFR 866.5180 with special controls. The special control guidance document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Fecal Calprotectin Immunological Test Systems" will be available shortly.
*Classification.* Class II (special controls). The special control for these devices is FDA's guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Fecal Calprotectin Immunological Test Systems.” For the availability of this guidance document, see § 866.1(e).
Submission Summary (Full Text)
{0}------------------------------------------------
# 510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY
- A. 510(k) Number: k050007
- B. Purpose for Submission: New device.
- C. Measurand: Fecal calprotectin
- D. Type of Test: Quantitative, ELISA
- E. Applicant: Genova Diagnostics
- F. Proprietary and Established Names: PhiCal™ Test
# G. Regulatory Information:
- 1. Regulation section: None
- 2. Classification: De novo
- 3. Product Code: NXO, Calprotectin, fecal
- 4. Panel: Immunology (82)
# H. Intended Use:
- 1. Intended use(s):
- The PhiCal™ test is a quantitative ELISA for measuring, in human stool, concentrations of fecal calprotectin, a neutrophilic protein that is a marker of mucosal inflammation. The PhiCal™ test can be used as an in vitro diagnostic to aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD): Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and to differentiate IBD from irritable bowel syndrome.
- 2. Indication(s) for use:
The PhiCal™ test is a quantitative ELISA for measuring, in human stool, concentrations of fecal calprotectin, a neutrophilic protein that is a marker of mucosal inflammation. The PhiCal™ test can be used as an in vitro diagnostic to aid in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD): Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and to differentiate IBD from irritable bowel syndrome; when used in conjunction with other diagnostic testing and the total clinical picture.
- 3. Special condition for use statement(s): The device is for prescription use only.
- 4. Special instrument requirements: ELISA reader (405 nm filter), digital scale (40-150 mg), vortex mixer, shaker, micro-centrifuge
- I. Device Description:
{1}------------------------------------------------
The PhiCal test assay consists of: microtiter plate coated with polyclonal rabbit antibodies for calprotectin (12 strips, 8 wells per strip); alkaline phosphatase labeled rabbit anti-calprotectin IgG in buffer with Proclin 300; substrate in buffer; 20X washing solution; 10X dilution solution with Proclin 300; 5X extraction solution with Proclin 300; 5 vials of calprotectin solution at concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 ng/mL; a low and a high control.
## J. Substantial Equivalence Information:
- 1. Predicate device name(s): Not applicable
- 2. Predicate K number(s): Not applicable
- 3. Comparison with predicate:
| Similarities | | |
|--------------|--------|-----------|
| Item | Device | Predicate |
| | | |
| Differences | | | | | | | | |
|-------------|--------|-----------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| Item | Device | Predicate | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
# K. Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
### None referenced
### L. Test Principle:
The test is performed on random stool samples, collected without preservatives. The samples should be tested within 7 days, or frozen at -20° C until tested. An extract is prepared by combining approximately 0.1 gm of stool with 5 mL of extraction buffer and mixing for 30 minutes. Following centrifugation, 20uL of the supernatant is diluted 1:50 with dilution buffer (final dilution 1:2500).
The assay uses a polyclonal rabbit antibody against calprotectin as the capture antibody in an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay system. Calprotectin present in the diluted sample is bound by the antibody adsorbed onto the surface of the microtiter plate. The enzyme conjugated antibodies (rabbit IgG antibodies against calprotectin) bind to the captured antigen. A substrate (alkaline phosphatase) is added and subsequently the enzyme catalyses the conversion of the substrate to a colored product. The intensity of the color is proportional to the amount of conjugate bound, and thus to the amount of captured calprotectin. The concentration of calprotectin in the samples is interpreted from a standard curve using 5 calibrators.
## M. Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
- 1. Analytical performance:
- i. Precision/Reproducibility:
Intra-Assay precision was determined by extracting one low and one high matrix sample, and assaying each extract twenty times within a single assay run. Precision is calculated as the % CV obtained for each level. Respective CV's were 4.07% and 6.17%. Additionally 12 samples were
{2}------------------------------------------------
| assayed in 6 replicates within a singly assay run. Range of %CV was |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.9% to 14.3%. The resultant %CVs demonstrates that the PhiCal Test is |
| precise in the reportable range. |
| Calprotectin Intra-Assay Precision ( g/g) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|-------|------|-------|------|------|-------|------|------|------|-------|------|------|
| | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Analysis | Mean | 177.5 | 55.3 | 229.4 | 31.1 | 96.9 | 106.8 | 17.5 | 18.7 | 20.8 | 182.8 | 55.6 | 60.2 |
| | Std<br>Dev | 5.7 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 2.3 | 11.5 | 9.4 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 10.8 | 3.9 | 2.5 |
| | %CV | 3.2 | 12.0 | 2.9 | 7.4 | 11.9 | 8.8 | 4.7 | 14.3 | 9.2 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 4.1 |
Inter-assay precision was assessed by evaluating results for six different pools of stool. Points are from 20 separate extraction and assay runs. The %CV range was 8.9% to 18.1%. Ten different samples (5 positive, 5 negative) were each extracted 5 separate times from individual stool aliquots. Each extract was then assayed in 4 replicates on 5 separate EIA runs performed on 5 different days. The %CV range was 5.8% to 20.1%. These results demonstrate the assav is reproducible within acceptable limits along the reportable range of the assay.
| Calprotectin Inter-Assay Precision ( g/g) | | | | | | | | | | | |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------|------|------|------|------|------|-------|-------|------|-------|------|
| Analysis | Replicate | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 |
| | Mean | 36.9 | 12.9 | 16.6 | 20.2 | 26.9 | 131.7 | 188.2 | 89.8 | 101.1 | 63.3 |
| | Std Dev | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 10.2 | 36.9 | 10.4 | 13.3 | 12.7 |
| | %CV | 5.8 | 16.7 | 14.9 | 4.4 | 7.6 | 7.7 | 19.6 | 11.6 | 13.2 | 20.1 |
Extraction Repeat Reproducibility: Two samples that represent the low and high ends of the reportable range were tested. Each was extracted 24 times, and each extract was tested. Precision was evaluated according to the %CV obtained for each level. Respective CV's of 12.60% and 12.13% for the low and high levels demonstrate that results are reproducible along the reportable range.
### Split Sample Comparison Study:
Forty stool samples that spanned the reportable range of the test were assayed both by GENOVA and by the Fagerhol laboratory in Norway. The forty samples were assayed in small batches over 5 days to introduce day-to-day variability and to minimize any systematic error that might occur in a single run. The comparison plot showed y = 0.9603x + 9.7691, r- = 0.9618.
#### ii. Linearity/assay reportable range:
To confirm the reportable range of the PhiCal™ assay, standard curves were generated for both aqueous and matrix linearity. The results with serially diluted aqueous calprotectin in triplicate showed acceptable
{3}------------------------------------------------
linearity from 6.25 - 100 ng/ml. The following equation was obtained: Standard curve Aqueous, y = 0.8771x + 2.8302, R2=0.9962.
Image /page/3/Figure/2 description: The image is a graph titled "Calprotectin Aqueous Linearity 2-26-03". The graph plots "Observed ng/ml" on the y-axis versus "Theoretical ng/ml" on the x-axis. A black line is plotted through the data points, and the equation of the line is "y = 0.8771x + 2.8302" with an R-squared value of 0.9962.
The results with serially diluted fecal calprotectin in triplicate showed acceptable linearity and accuracy from 7.73 - 114.90 ng/ml. The following equation was obtained: Standard curve Matrix, y = 1.0569x -0.1658, R2=0.9866.
Image /page/3/Figure/4 description: The image is a scatter plot titled "Matrix Linearity Calprotectin". The x-axis is labeled "Theoretical Value ng/ml", and the y-axis is labeled "Observed Value ng/ml". The plot shows a linear relationship between the theoretical and observed values, with the equation of the line being y = 1.0569x - 0.1658 and R^2 = 0.9866.
### Accuracy/ Recovery
Extracts from five different stool samples were each spiked with calprotectin. The calprotectin used for the spike was obtained from established serum pools. The baseline extract for each sample was "spiked" with assay buffer to compensate for volume adjustments made to
{4}------------------------------------------------
| Calprotectin Recovery Data | | | | | | | | | | | |
|--------------------------------------|-------|-------|-------|---------|-------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| # 1a<br># 2a<br># 3a<br># 4a<br># 5a | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Baseline (ug/g) | 49.1 | 73.4 | 66.4 | 6.4 | 73.6 | | | | | | |
| Spike Value (ug/g) | 58.5 | 57.6 | 55.2 | રરું રે | 59.0 | | | | | | |
| Theoretical (Base + Spike) (ug/g) | 107.6 | 131.0 | 121.7 | 61.7 | 132.7 | | | | | | |
| Observed (Base + Spike) (ug/g) | 106.7 | 129.9 | 144.3 | 66.1 | 140.0 | | | | | | |
| % Recovery | 99.2 | 99.1 | 118.6 | 107.2 | 105.5 | | | | | | |
the calprotectin-spiked extracts. Each of the spiked extracts was then assayed per kit protocol. Data is shown in table below.
### iii. Traceability, Stability, Expected values (controls, calibrators, or methods):
Calibrators:
The primary internal reference is calibrated by comparison to the "Gold Standard" preparation provided by Dr. Magne Fagerhol, Norway.
# Analyte Stability:
Studies were conducted to determine the stability of calprotectin in neat stool and in stool extracts. To determine stability in neat stool, several temperature conditions were evaluated: stool collected fresh and subsequently stored at 2-8°C: stool collected fresh and then stored at -20°C; and stool collected fresh and subjected to variable temperatures. Stability in stool extract was evaluated by extracting fresh samples and then storing aliquots of the extract at -20°Cm where a different aliquot was thawed for each analysis over 11 days.
For the variable temperature stability study the collected samples were stored at 2-8°C for 24 hours, after which they were stored in an incubator at 37°C for approximately 21 hours. Once removed from the incubator they were left at room temperature for approximately 5½ hours then stored at 2-8°C for the remainder of the study. This study concluded that calprotectin levels stay relatively consistent (no trends observed) for up to 11 days after collection, under conditions that may be experienced during specimen transport. The studies support the specimen collection, transport and storage recommendations in the package insert.
- iv. Detection limit (functional sensitivity):
# Minimum Detection Limit:
The minimum detection limit (MDT) was determined by running 20 replicates of the assay buffer (treated as patient) on one assay plate. Two standard deviations were added to the mean OD reading, and this value was plugged into the calibration curve to arrive at the MDT. The result was below the functional sensitivity of the assay.
### Functional sensitivity:
The functional sensitivity was estimated by determining a precision profile at the low concentration range and then selecting the concentration at
{5}------------------------------------------------
which a 20% CV is obtained. To establish the functional sensitivity for the assay, 3 concentrations of kit standards, 12.5 ng/mL, 6.25 ng/mL and 3.125 ng/mL (6.25 ng/mL standard diluted 1:2 with dilution buffer), were assayed in either triplicate or quadruplicate over 6 days. %CV for all three concentrations were <20%. For purposes of result reporting, the low end of the reportable range will be limited to the lowest calibrator, 6.25ng/mL. This corresponds to 15.6 mg calprotectin/kg stool after conversion at the typical sample dilution of 1:2500.
- Analytical specificity: V.
Microorganisms: The following bacteria, which occur frequently in the stool, or are common to infectious diarrhea were evaluated as potential interfering factors – Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia. The presence of these bacteria in stool samples does not interfere with the PhiCal Test.
Oral Pharmaceuticals: The following oral pharmaceuticals and nutritional supplements were tested for potential interference: Prednisone; Sulfamethoxazole, Pentasa; Prevacid; Vancomycin; Asacol; Azathioprine; Ciprofloxacin HCL; Ferrous Sulfate; Multiple vitamin; Vitamin E; Zelnorm. The concentration of the drug in the suspension was sufficient to approximate the concentration to be expected in a patient's stool based on the appropriate dosages and average stool volume per twenty four hours. No interference was noted.
Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Bleeding of as much as 100 mL per day would increase the fecal calprotectin concentration by no more than 6 mg/L (15 ug/g).23
- vi. Assay cut-off: See clinical cut-off.
- 2. Comparison studies:
- Method comparison with predicate device: i. Not applicable.
- ii. Matrix comparison: Not applicable.
- 3. Clinical studies:
- Clinical sensitivity and specificity: a.
Fecal calprotectin results from the complete cohort of 908 subjects were used to calculate the overall clinical sensitivity and specificity of the PhiCal test. The 908 subjects included IBD n=255, IBS n=410, other bowel diseases n=82, IBD, and normal subjects n=161. The results and calculations are shown below:
| N = 908 | IBD/ Inflamed<br>"Organic" | IBS/ Normal<br>"Non-Organic" | Totals |
|---------------|----------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
| >120 mcg/gm | 254 | 29 | 283 |
| 50-120 mcg/gm | 43 | 89 | 132 |
{6}------------------------------------------------
| <50 mcg/gm | 42 | 451 | 483 |
|------------|--------|--------|-----------------|
| Totals | 296+43 | 480+89 | $776+132 = 908$ |
When borderline cases (n=132) are excluded from the calculations: Clinical sensitivity: 86% (254/296) Clinical specificity: 94% (451/480)
- b. Other clinical supportive data (when a. and b. are not applicable): Not applicable.
- 4. Clinical cut-off:
Establishing the cut-off for the assay was done by testing 124 normal sera. The mean value was 40μg/g, and with a standard deviation of 40μg/g, the upper cut point was 120μg/g. In addition, ROC analysis using results from the total 908 patients showed that 120 µg/g yielded 95% specificity and 70% sensitivity.
Image /page/6/Figure/6 description: The image is a Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) for Calprotectin. The y-axis represents sensitivity, ranging from 0 to 100, while the x-axis represents 100-Specificity, also ranging from 0 to 100. The ROC curve starts near the top of the y-axis and gradually approaches the top right corner, indicating the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity for the Calprotectin test. A dashed diagonal line represents the line of no discrimination.
| Calprotectin Concentration | Interpretation | Follow-Up |
|----------------------------|----------------|--------------------------------|
| <15.625 – 50 µg/g | Normal | None |
| 50 – 120 µg/g | Borderline | Re-evaluate @ 4-6 weeks |
| >120 µg/g | Abnormal | Repeat as clinically indicated |
{7}------------------------------------------------
- 5. Expected values/Reference range:
The expected value in the normal population is <50 µg/g. The highest levels are found in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis with levels as high as five to several thousand times the upper limit for healthy individuals. Calprotectin is generally not elevated in healthy subjects or in irritable bowel syndrome but levels can overlap with those of organic disease.
# N. Proposed Labeling:
The labeling is sufficient and it satisfies the requirements of 21 CFR Part 809.10.
# O. Conclusion:
The petition for Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation for this device is accepted. The device is classified as Class II under regulation 21 CFR 866.5180 with special controls. The special control guidance document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Fecal Calprotectin Immunological Test Systems" will be available shortly.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.