Erytra Eflexis is a fully automated analyzer designed to automate in vitro immunohematological testing of human blood utilizing DG Gel 8 cards technology, including Blood Grouping, Antigen Typing, Antibody Screening, Antibody Identification, Antibody Titration, Compatibility Tests, and Direct Antiglobulin Tests. As a standalone analyzer or interfaced to the customer's Laboratory Information System (LIS), Erytra Eflexis automates test processing functions and data management requirements using DG Gel 8 cards and digital image processing.
Device Story
Erytra Eflexis is a fully automated, floor-standing immunohematology analyzer for clinical, donation, and transfusion laboratories. It processes human blood samples (plasma, serum, red cells) using DG Gel 8 cards. The system automates pipetting, incubation, and centrifugation. It features an automated serial dilution method for antibody titration (up to 1/2048) supporting single-point and range titration techniques. The device uses digital image processing to interpret gel card results, eliminating manual transcription errors and standardizing objective criteria. Operators load samples and reagents; the system manages the analytical workflow and interfaces with the Laboratory Information System (LIS) for data management. By automating these steps, the device reduces operator exposure to biohazards and improves analytical consistency and traceability.
Clinical Evidence
Bench testing only. Method comparison study conducted using three Erytra Eflexis analyzers compared against manual serial double dilution and existing FDA-cleared automated methods. Evaluated 246 titrations (serial dilution), 76 samples (range titration), and 364 single dilution tests. Results showed 99.2%–100% agreement with comparative methods, meeting the ≥95% acceptance criteria. Reproducibility and repeatability studies (6 samples x 3 analyzers x 5 days x 2 runs x 2 replicates) confirmed consistent performance.
Technological Characteristics
Automated immunohematology analyzer using DG Gel 8 cards. Features 3 independent incubators, 2 independent centrifuges, and a single pipetting unit. Uses rotation movement for reagent red cell suspension. Connectivity via LIS interface. Software performs digital image processing for result interpretation. Complies with ISO 14971 for risk management.
Indications for Use
Indicated for in vitro immunohematological testing of human blood, including blood grouping, antigen typing, antibody screening, identification, and titration, compatibility testing, and direct antiglobulin tests in clinical, donation, and transfusion laboratories.
Regulatory Classification
Identification
An automated blood grouping and antibody test system is a device used to group erythrocytes (red blood cells) and to detect antibodies to blood group antigens.
{0}
Diagnostic Grifols, S.A.
510(k) Premarket Notification
Erytra Eflexis
5 - 1
# **CH2.03 – 510(k) Summary**
# **Contact Details:**
Name Diagnostic Grifols S.A.
Address Passeig Fluvial, 24, Parets del Valles
Barcelona, 08150, Spain
Establishment Registration 3002772505
Number:
Contact Person: Elvira Estapé Egea
Regulatory Affairs Manager
elvira.estape@grifols.com
Phone: (34) 670-922-237
Date of Summary: June 13th, 2025
# **Device Name:**
Trade Name: Erytra Eflexis
Classification Name: Automated Blood Grouping and Antibody Test System
Device Class: II
Product Code: KSZ
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.9175
# **Legally Marketed Predicate Device:**
Trade Name: Erytra Eflexis
Classification Name: Automated Blood Grouping and Antibody Test System
510(k) Number: BK230820
Device Class: II
Product Code: KSZ
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 864.9175
Clearance Letter June 22, 2023
# **Device Description:**
Erytra Eflexis is designed to automate all necessary operations and procedures to process gel immunohematology tests, allowing laboratories to:
1. Create test profiles and optimize profile implementation in the shortest time and with the most accurate results.
2. Increase process safety and traceability by eliminating possible identification and transcription errors.
{1}
Diagnostic Grifols, S.A.
510(k) Premarket Notification
Erytra Eflexis
5 - 2
3. Increase analytical reliability by standardizing all steps, eliminating possible handling and processing errors, and interpreting the results with objective criteria.
4. Reduce the danger of contamination for operators by reducing operator interaction with the samples and reagents during the analytical process. Operator interaction is limited to the loading and unloading of the analyzer.
In addition, Erytra Eflexis adapts to the needs and differing operational workflows in immunohematology laboratories, donation centers, transfusion centers, and clinical testing laboratories, as well as different work rhythms (routine, emergency) and the flow of samples processed over different shifts.
Erytra Eflexis automates the following gel immunohematology tests:
- ABO Red Cell and Serum Grouping.
- Rh(D) Typing.
- Antigen Typing.
- Antibody detection.
- Antibody identification.
- Antibody titration.
- Direct Antiglobulin test.
- Compatibility Tests (Crossmatching).
### Indications for Use:
Erytra Eflexis is a fully automated analyzer designed to automate in vitro immunohematological testing of human blood utilizing DG Gel 8 cards technology, including Blood Grouping, Antigen Typing, Antibody Screening, Antibody Identification, Antibody Titration, Compatibility Tests, and Direct Antiglobulin Tests.
As a standalone analyzer or interfaced to the customer's Laboratory Information System (LIS), Erytra Eflexis automates test processing functions and data management requirements using DG Gel 8 cards and digital image processing.
{2}
Diagnostic Grifols, S.A.
510(k) Premarket Notification
Erytra Eflexis
5 - 3
# **Comparison to Predicate Device:**
| Parameter | Predicate Device Diagnostic Grifols S.A. Erytra Eflexis (BK230820) | Subject Device Diagnostic Grifols S.A. Erytra Eflexis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **General** | | |
| **Indications for Use Statement** | Erytra Eflexis is a fully automated analyzer designed to automate in vitro immunohematological testing of human blood utilizing DG Gel 8 cards technology, including Blood Grouping, Antigen Typing, Antibody Screening, Antibody Identification, Antibody Titration, Compatibility Tests, and Direct Antiglobulin Tests. As a standalone analyzer or interfaced to the customer’s Laboratory Information System (LIS), Erytra Eflexis automates test processing functions and data management requirements using DG Gel 8 cards and digital image processing. | Erytra Eflexis is a fully automated analyzer designed to automate in vitro immunohematological testing of human blood utilizing DG Gel 8 cards technology, including Blood Grouping, Antigen Typing, Antibody Screening, Antibody Identification, Antibody Titration, Compatibility Tests, and Direct Antiglobulin Tests. As a standalone analyzer or interfaced to the customer’s Laboratory Information System (LIS), Erytra Eflexis automates test processing functions and data management requirements using DG Gel 8 cards and digital image processing. |
| **Classification** | II | II |
| **Product Code** | KSZ | KSZ |
| **Regulation number** | 21 CFR 864.9175 | 21 CFR 864.9175 |
| **Common name** | Automated Blood Grouping and Antibody Test System | Automated Blood Grouping and Antibody Test System |
| **Test performed** | - ABO Red Cell and Serum Grouping - Rh(D) Typing - Antigen Typing - Antibody detection - Antibody identification - Antibody titration - Direct Antiglobulin test - Compatibility Tests (Crossmatching) | - ABO Red Cell and Serum Grouping - Rh(D) Typing - Antigen Typing - Antibody detection - Antibody identification - Antibody titration (including Single Point and Range Titration techniques) - Direct Antiglobulin test - Compatibility Tests (Crossmatching) |
| **Primary components** | Analyzer Computer Software Optional hand-held bar code scanner Optional printer | Analyzer Computer Software Optional hand-held bar code scanner Optional printer |
| **Specimen Types** | Plasma, Serum and Red Blood Cells. | Plasma, Serum and Red Blood Cells. |
| **Reagents** | Erytra Eflexis is used with Diagnostic Grifols DG Gel 8 cards, Medion Grifols Diagnostics Reagent Red Blood Cells and Validated Antisera Reagents. | Erytra Eflexis is used with Diagnostic Grifols DG Gel 8 cards, Medion Grifols Diagnostics Reagent Red Blood Cells and Validated Antisera Reagents. |
{3}
Diagnostic Grifols, S.A.
510(k) Premarket Notification
Erytra Eflexis
5 - 4
| Parameter | Predicate Device Diagnostic Grifols S.A. Erytra Eflexis (BK230820) | Subject Device Diagnostic Grifols S.A. Erytra Eflexis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Positive identification of samples and reagents** | Yes | Yes |
| **Throughput** | 36 samples (ABO/Rh cards) per hour, including forward & reverse group | 36 samples (ABO/Rh cards) per hour, including forward & reverse group |
| **Useful life** | 7 years, considering 8 hours a day of continuous operation at maximum throughput (using ABO/Rh DG Gel 8 cards), 250 days a year. | 7 years, considering 8 hours a day of continuous operation at maximum throughput (using ABO/Rh DG Gel 8 cards), 250 days a year. |
| **Hardware** | | |
| **Reagent Red Cell suspension** | Maintained by Rotation Movement | Maintained by Rotation Movement |
| **Barcode Symbologies** | - Interleaved 2 of 5. - Code 3 of 9. - Codabar. - EAN 8 / EAN 13 / JAN 8 / JAN 13. - Codes 128 A, B & C (ISBT 128). - Others under configuration. | - Interleaved 2 of 5. - Code 3 of 9. - Codabar. - EAN 8 / EAN 13 / JAN 8 / JAN 13. - Codes 128 A, B & C (ISBT 128). - Others under configuration. |
| **Sample loading capacity** | 72 tubes simultaneously | 72 tubes simultaneously |
| **Reagent loading capacity** | 2 removable, independent, and random-access racks. | 2 removable, independent, and random-access racks. |
| **Sample/Reagent Dispensing (pipetting) Unit** | 1 | 1 |
| **Card loading capacity** | 200 cards | 200 cards |
| **Incubator** | 3 independent incubators | 3 independent incubators |
| **Centrifuge** | 2 independent centrifuges | 2 independent centrifuges |
| **System solution and waste containers** | 1 container for Grifols Wash Solution A 1 container for Grifols Wash Solution B 2 containers for waste solutions that can be configured to become Wash Solution containers if external drain is used. 1 disposable container for processed DG Gel 8 cards | 1 container for Grifols Wash Solution A 1 container for Grifols Wash Solution B 2 containers for waste solutions that can be configured to become Wash Solution containers if external drain is used. 1 disposable container for processed DG Gel 8 cards |
{4}
Diagnostic Grifols, S.A.
510(k) Premarket Notification
Erytra Eflexis
5 - 5
The differences between the Erytra Eflexis and its predicate device, the Erytra Eflexis (BK230820), are related to the Antibody Titration technique. The Erytra Eflexis uses an automated serial dilution method that allows for the preparation of dilutions up to 1/2048. Additionally, the Erytra Eflexis supports both single point and range titration techniques within antibody titration tests, when required by the user, in comparison to the predicate device. These differences do not raise new concerns of safety and effectiveness.
**Performance:**
All new risks and hazard analysis related to the automated serial dilution method, and single dilution and range titration techniques, have been performed and documented per ISO 14971 guidelines.
An in-house method comparison study was conducted with three Erytra Eflexis, and with DG Gel 8 Anti-IgG (Rabbit) and DG Gel 8 Neutral cards, and 0.8% Reagent Red Blood Cells. The following methods were used as comparative methods:
- Serial dilution titration technique: the current FDA approved automated single direct dilution method was used as comparative for titers up to 64, and the manual serial double dilution method was used as comparative for titers higher than 64.
- Single dilution and range titration techniques: the manual serial double dilution method was used as comparative for high range titrations.
A total of 246 titrations were compared for serial dilution titration techniques and out of 76 samples were used for range titration techniques comparison. Additionally, a total of 364 single dilution tests were compared with the manual method.
The percent agreements and the lower limits of 95% one-side confidence interval (CI) for Erytra Eflexis and antibody titration technique are indicated in the following table:
| Antibody Titration | N° of samples | Percent Agreement (Lower 95% CI) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Concordances Obtained for Anti-Human Globulin** | | |
| Serial Dilution Technique | 116 | 100% (97.5%) |
| Ranges Technique | 76 | 100% (96.1%) |
| Single Point | 205 | 100% (98.5%) |
| **Concordances Obtained for the Neutral Gel** | | |
| Serial Dilution Technique | 130 | 99.2% (96.4%) |
| Ranges Technique | 76 | 100% (96.1%) |
| Single Point | 159 | 100% (98.1%) |
{5}
Diagnostic Grifols, S.A.
510(k) Premarket Notification
Erytra Eflexis
5 - 6
The percent agreement (estimated with a 95% CI) between the three antibody titration techniques performed by Erytra Eflexis and with the respective comparative methods met all the acceptance criteria previously established as $\geq 95\%$ for DG Gel 8 Anti-IgG (Rabbit) and for DG Gel 8 Neutral cards.
The results obtained in the Method comparison study supported the conclusion that the Erytra Eflexis including the new automated serial dilution method, and single dilution and range titration techniques, yielded equivalent results to the comparative methods using FDA licenses reagents and instruments.
In addition, an internal reproducibility and repeatability study was conducted. The study was done using three Erytra Eflexis in accordance to the following profile: 6 Samples x 3 Erytra Eflexis x 5 days x 2 runs (am/pm) x 2 replicates.
The study demonstrated that the Erytra Eflexis consistently obtained the expected results and the reproducibility and repeatability of the results for these techniques was deemed demonstrated.
In summary, the results of the in-house evaluation supported the conclusion that the Erytra Eflexis including the new automated serial dilution method, and single dilution and range titration techniques, can perform antibody titrations with its DG Gel 8 cards and Medion Grifols Diagnostics Reagent Red Blood Cells, safely and effectively. In addition, it is concluded that the Erytra Eflexis is substantially equivalent when compared to the results obtained using the same DG Gel 8 cards and Medion Grifols Diagnostics Reagent Red Blood Cells tested by the comparative methods.
### **Conclusions:**
Diagnostic Grifols S.A. concludes, based on all the information submitted and discussed in this submission and in this summary that Erytra Eflexis, when used for the defined indications for use, performs as well as or better than the legally marketed predicate device Erytra Eflexis (BK230820). In addition, all the requirements for a product to be marketed in the United States have been demonstrated.
Predicate graph will load when search results are available.
Embedding visualization will load when search results are available.
PDF viewer will load when search results are available.
Loading panels...
Select an item from Submissions
Click any panel, subpart, regulation, product code, or device to see details here.
Section Matches
Results will appear here.
Product Code Matches
Results will appear here.
Special Control Matches
Results will appear here.
Loading collections...
Loading
My Alerts
You will receive email notifications based on the filters and frequency you set for each alert.
Sort by:
Create Alert
Search Filters
Agent Token
Create a read-only bearer token for Claude, ChatGPT, or other agents that can call HTTP APIs.
Copy this now. It will not be shown again.
Connected apps
Apps you authorized through browser sign-in. Disconnecting revokes their access immediately.
Learn the FDA Browser
Two short videos show you everything — or skip straight to the written tutorial if you'd rather read. You can reopen this any time from the Tutorial button in the top bar.
Part 1 — Search, results, and everyday workflows 16 min
Part 2 — Embeddings: the galaxy map 3 min
1. Search: exact and fuzzy
Type a phrase like "coronary artery calcification" into the search box. You get two kinds of results. Exact results match the literal phrase — prefix searches work ("coronary artery calcificati") but suffix searches do not. Fuzzy results match on the meaning and intent of your phrase rather than the exact words, and are sorted by relevance score. Hover over the Exact or Fuzzy badge on any row to see exactly why it matched.
Use the checkboxes above the results to narrow: SaMD keeps only software-only devices, AI / ML keeps only devices with AI.
Exact vs. fuzzy search: what's the difference?
Exact matches on the literal phrase (prefix search works, suffix does not). Fuzzy matches on the meaning and intent of the phrase rather than the exact words. Hover over the badge on any row to see why it matched.
You search "coronary artery calcification" and want only software devices with AI. What two filters do you apply?
Narrow by SaMD (software-only devices), then narrow by AI/ML (devices with AI).
2. The results table
Scroll right in the results table. The intended use is extracted for you — no need to open the PDF. The device story gives a high-level snapshot of what the device does and how it's used. The AI Performance sub-table shows each output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, and development/test dataset descriptions — the same format Innolitics uses for regulatory strategy outputs, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. It is AI-generated but has been very reliable in practice.
Where do you find a device's intended use without opening the PDF?
Scroll right in the search results table. The intended use column is extracted for you; no need to dig into the 510(k) summary PDF.
What does the AI Performance sub-table show, and why is it useful?
Output name, acceptance criteria, observed values, development dataset description, and test dataset description. It's the same format we use for regulatory strategy output and Fast 510(k) input, and the fastest high-level fingerprint of an AI device. AI-generated but reliable in practice.
3. Judging fuzzy relevance
Fuzzy results trail off in relevance as you scroll. Use three signals to decide how far down to go: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether your target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, you're past the relevant zone. A top hit with a low score (~0.4) and a stretched explanation is a hint the closest predicates are far away — the project may be headed for De Novo. Note the fuzzy search is a pattern match: it doesn't handle negation ("not") well, and hardware devices can appear — filter by SaMD/AI ML to cut them.
How do you judge how far down fuzzy search results to go?
Use the relevancy signals: the fuzzy badge explanations, the intended use column, and whether the target output (e.g., Cobb angle) still appears in the AI Performance sub-table. Once it stops appearing, results are trailing off in relevancy.
4. Device detail page: chat and citations
Click a device name to open its detail page: device facts on the left, a chat window on the right. Ask something like "Describe the training data". The answer carries little citation bubbles — click one to jump to the highlighted passage in the source PDF, so you can verify every AI answer against the document. There's also a Download PDF button for sharing.
How do you verify an AI chat answer on the device detail page?
Click the citation bubbles to jump to the relevant highlight in the source document.
Reading rule for every project: how many summaries do you read in full?
At least the three most relevant 510(k) or De Novo summaries, in full. After that, use targeted chat questions to confirm your memory quickly. The tool supports this professional habit — it doesn't replace it.
5. Side-by-side comparison
Select multiple rows in the results table (aim for under ~10), then open the PDF Viewer tab. Ask one question — it goes to all selected devices in parallel, each with citations. This is the fastest way to compare and contrast devices: training data, PCCP scope, how they handled adding new scanners, and so on.
What does the side-by-side PDF viewer mode do?
Select multiple devices, open the PDF viewer tab, and ask one question (e.g., "Describe the training data"). It queries all selected devices simultaneously with citations, so you can compare and contrast quickly.
6. Collections
With rows selected, go to the Collections tab and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). Reload that selection any time — before a client call, pull up the collection and ask questions across all of its devices at once.
How do you save a set of selected devices for later use?
Select the rows, go to the Collections tab, and create a labeled collection (e.g., "Cobb Angle Project"). You can reload the selection anytime and carry it into the PDF viewer and other tabs that support selections.
7. Product codes and the regulations tree
Click a product code in the results to jump to it in the regulations tree — identification text, sibling product codes, and devices you can open in a PDF viewer on the right. Click a regulation number to see its identification, special controls, and related product codes. You can also search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree. Always read the special controls if any exist for your device — it broadens your search and sharpens pre-kickoff research.
What can you do from the regulations tree view?
Browse product codes and regulation numbers, read the identification text and special controls, browse sibling product codes, open device PDFs on the right, and search by product code or regulation number at the top of the tree.
8. Chart view
Click Show Chart and segment by regulation number (or product code) to see which regulations dominate your result set. Clicking a regulation takes you into the regulations tree. Great for spotting that most matches are, say, hardware laparoscopic devices — a cue to go back and filter.
How do you see which regulations dominate a search result set?
Click "Show Chart" and segment by Regulation Number. Clicking a regulation takes you to the regulations tree.
9. The predicate graph
Open the Predicates tab for a family-tree view of predicate relationships. Click a node to trace its parents and children; selections from search carry over pre-selected. Commonly predicated devices are worth reading — a lot of people predicated them for a reason. The visual lineage is also handy on client calls, e.g. to show how a predicate family evolved and justify why your predicate still holds.
In the predicate graph, why are commonly predicated devices worth reading?
A lot of people predicated them for a reason. Clicking a node traces parents and children, and selections from search carry over pre-selected.
10. Embeddings: the galaxy map
The Embeddings tab plots every matching document in a 2-D "galaxy map" where semantically similar devices cluster together. Hover or click clusters to explore, and let AI label the clusters for you. Embeddings beat product codes for grouping: two devices can carry different product codes (LLZ vs. QIH) yet do the same thing — the embedding captures the meaning of the intended use and device story. This is also exactly how retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) works under the hood, and it makes a great visual on client calls.
Try it yourself
Head to the search page and work through a few of these AI/ML fuzzy searches to build intuition: perivascular fat on CT · aortic valve calcification opportunistic screening on noncontrast CT · breast cancer prediction on digital pathology slides · autism detection · gestational age prediction · a hearing aid that can also detect a pulse · foundation model based analysis of ECG · large language models · penetration test. Watch how the relevance scores, intended use, and AI Performance tables tell you when results stop being meaningful.